Substance P (free acid) adopts different conformation than native peptide in DMSO, water and DPPC bilayers

Structural analysis of substance P using molecular dynamics and NMR spectroscopy

The present work is a combined structural study, using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Molecular Dynamics(MD), of the amidated and the free acid forms of substance P in water and methanol. The results obtained using both approaches were compared in order to characterize the structural features of both peptides in solution. From the NMR experiments it was derived that the free acid form adopts an extended conformation at the N-terminus and a helical conformation at the C-terminal segment of the peptide in both water and methanol; these structural features are in qualitative agreement with the results of the MD simulations. No significant differences in behavior were observed between the amidated and the free acid forms of the peptide in the simulations and in the experiments carried out in water, suggesting that the different activities of these analogs are due to their different mode of interaction with the receptor rather than to their structural preferences. Finally, we propose that the structure of substance P can be partially inferred from its sequence due to the presence of a Pro-X-Pro motif on the N-terminus and a Gly-Leu sequence on the C-terminus.

Replacement of Phe6, Phe7, and Phe11 of D-Trp8-somatostatin-14 with L-pyrazinylalanine. Predicted and observed effects on binding affinities at hSST2 and hSST4. An unexpected effect of the chirality of Trp8 on NMR spectra in methanol

An alanine scan performed in the 1970s suggested that Phe(6) and Phe(11) are required for the binding of somatostatin (SRIF-14). Molecular modeling studies and replacement of Phe(6) and Phe(11) with a cystine bridge affording ligands with the retention of high biological activity, however, led to the alternate conclusion that Phe(6) and Phe(11) stabilize the bioactive conformation of SRIF-14. Subsequent studies revealed that Phe(11) shields Phe(6) in a "herringbone" arrangement. More recently, a report from this laboratory demonstrated that Spartan 3-21G MO calculations can be invaluable in explaining SARs in medicinal chemistry. For example, the ability of benzene and indole rings to bind the Trp(8) binding pocket for SRIF-14 and the inability of pyrazine to do so was explained through differences in electrostatic potentials. To investigate the role of Phe(6) and Phe(11) more fully, we report here the synthesis of two analogues of D-Trp(8)-SRIF in which Phe(6) and Phe(11) were replaced by the pryazinylalanine congeners, respectively. The NMR spectra in D(2)O and the K(i)s fully support the proposition that Phe(11) stabilizes the bioactive conformation through pi-bonding or aromatic edge-to-face interaction and that pyrazinylalanine(6) can be shielded by Phe(11). The data also show unexpectedly that Phe(6), via the pi-bond, interacts with the receptor, consistent with the original interpretation of the alanine scan. Heretofore it had only been known that Lys(9) interacts with an aspartate anion of the receptor. These conclusions are supported by recent studies of Lewis et al. on the effects on K(i)s of Ala(6)-SRIF-14-amide at the five receptor subtargets. We also found that pyrazinylalanine(7)-D-Trp(8)-SRIF-14 does not bind, suggesting a repulsive interaction with the receptor. Taken together, our results not only validate predictions based on Spartan 3-21G MO analysis but also provide valuable information about the nature of the receptor interaction at the molecular level. Finally, the chirality of Trp(8) was unexpectedly found to have a striking effect on NMR spectra in methanol, especially at lower temperatures.