1
|
Robertson EG, Hetherington K, Daly R, Donoghoe MW, Handelsman N, Ziegler DS, Wakefield CE. The feasibility and acceptability of collecting psychosocial outcome measures embedded within a precision medicine trial for childhood cancer. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7339. [PMID: 38898768 PMCID: PMC11187165 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are increasingly being collected within cancer clinical trials, yet limited literature on the feasibility and acceptability of doing so. METHODS We collected parent-proxy and adolescent (≥12 years old) PROMs through a longitudinal, psychosocial sub-study ('PRISM-Impact') embedded in a precision medicine trial for children with poor prognosis cancer ('PRISM'). We report on feasibility (response, participation, and attrition rates; follow-up and responding to elevated distress) and acceptability (parents' perceived benefit/burden of participation; and impact on decision to participate in PRISM) of PRISM-Impact. RESULTS Over the reporting period, 462 families were eligible for PRISM-Impact. Family and adolescent response rates were 53% and 45%, respectively. Parents whose child had relapsed were more likely to participate in PRISM-Impact than parents whose child had not (p < 0.001). Parent and adolescent attrition rates were 30% and 56% respectively. We conducted 478 calls for intake and to follow-up on missing questionnaires, and 122 calls to respond to elevated distress. Parents reported wanting to participate in PRISM-Impact for altruistic reasons and because they valued psychosocial research. Parents reported little-to-no burden and some benefit from participating in PRISM-Impact, with little change in ratings overtime. Most parents felt that participating in PRISM-Impact did not impact their desire to participate in PRISM (72%), with some feeling more eager to participate (19%). CONCLUSIONS PRISM-Impact response rates were comparable to other psycho-oncology studies, despite the poor prognosis population. Integration of PROMs within a paediatric oncology trial is acceptable to parents, and may provide a more comprehensive assessment of the impact of trial participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eden G. Robertson
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & HealthUNSW SydneyKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kate Hetherington
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & HealthUNSW SydneyKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Rebecca Daly
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & HealthUNSW SydneyKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Mark W. Donoghoe
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & HealthUNSW SydneyKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Stats Central, Mark Wainwright Analytical CentreUNSW SydneyKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Nicholas Handelsman
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & HealthUNSW SydneyKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - David S. Ziegler
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & HealthUNSW SydneyKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia
- Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Children's Cancer InstituteUNSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & HealthUNSW SydneyKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wakefield CE, Hetherington K, Robertson EG, Donoghoe MW, Hunter JD, Vetsch J, Marron JM, Tucker KM, Marshall GM, Broom A, Haber M, Tyrrell V, Malkin D, Lau L, Mateos MK, O'Brien TA, Ziegler DS. Hopes, concerns, satisfaction and regret in a precision medicine trial for childhood cancer: a mixed-methods study of parent and patient perspectives. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:1634-1644. [PMID: 37726477 PMCID: PMC10645918 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02429-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paediatric precision oncology aims to match therapeutic agents to driver gene targets. We investigated whether parents and patients regret participation in precision medicine trials, particularly when their hopes are unfulfilled. METHODS Parents and adolescent patients completed questionnaires at trial enrolment (T0) and after receiving results (T1). Parents opted-in to an interview at T1. Bereaved parents completed a questionnaire 6-months post-bereavement (T1B). We analysed quantitative data with R and qualitative data thematically with NVivo, before integrating all data for interpretation. RESULTS 182 parents and 23 patients completed T0; 108/182 parents and 8/23 patients completed T1; 27/98 bereaved parents completed T1B; and 45/108 parents were interviewed. At enrolment, participants held concurrent hopes that precision medicine would benefit future children and their child. Participants expressed concern regarding wait-times for receipt of results. Most participants found the trial beneficial and not burdensome, including bereaved parents. Participants reported high trial satisfaction (median scores: parents: 93/100; patients: 80/100). Participants expressed few regrets (parent median scores: parents: 10/100; bereaved parents: 15/100; patient regret: 2/8 expressed minimal regret). CONCLUSIONS Even when trial outcomes did not match their hopes, parents and patients rarely regretted participating in a childhood cancer precision medicine trial. These data are critical for integrating participants' views into future precision medicine delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire E Wakefield
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Kate Hetherington
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Eden G Robertson
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark W Donoghoe
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Stats Central, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Clinical Research Unit, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jacqueline D Hunter
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Janine Vetsch
- Department of Health, Institute of Applied Nursing Science, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan M Marron
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katherine M Tucker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, 2052, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Glenn M Marshall
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Children's Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander Broom
- Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies, School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michelle Haber
- Children's Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Vanessa Tyrrell
- Children's Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David Malkin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Loretta Lau
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Children's Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marion K Mateos
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Children's Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tracey A O'Brien
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Children's Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David S Ziegler
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Children's Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vemuri S, O'Neill J, Hynson J, Gillam L. Informing Simulation Design: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study of the Experiences of Bereaved Parents and Actors. Simul Healthc 2023; 18:75-81. [PMID: 35081089 DOI: 10.1097/sih.0000000000000634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Simulations, which represent reality, are effective in pediatric healthcare communication skills education and training. Parents are increasingly engaged in simulation development, particularly for authentic character development, to help achieve greater psychological fidelity. For simulated encounters related to a child's end-of-life, involvement of bereaved parents would make sense. However, this is challenging because there is limited research to guide their inclusion and significant responsibility for any approach to be thoughtful and psychologically safe for participating parents. This study explores the impact and experiences of bereaved parents and actors who participated in simulation design. METHODS This qualitative phenomenological study involved five bereaved parents and two actors who participated in a full-day workshop to design and develop characters for use in a simulation. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted up to four weeks after the workshop. Data collected from these telephone interviews were analyzed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS Bereaved parents found the workshop emotionally challenging but positive, worthwhile, and beneficial. Similarly, actors found the workshop helpful in character development and, although it was an intense experience for them, it validated the importance of their work. Key elements of our research findings could inform future such activities. CONCLUSIONS Involving bereaved parents in simulation design can be psychologically safe and beneficial for both parents and actors. Ongoing involvement of bereaved parents may lead to higher-quality simulated experiences, allowing clinicians to practice skills to enhance care provided at a child's end-of-life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidharth Vemuri
- From the Department of Paediatrics (S.V.), The University of Melbourne, Victorian Paediatric Palliative Care Program, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Department of Nursing Research (J.O.), The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne; Victorian Paediatric Palliative Care Program (J.H.), The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne; Department of Paediatrics The University of Melbourne; and Department of Paediatrics (L.G.), The University of Melbourne, Children's Bioethics Centre, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barber V, Evans R, Ramnarayan P, Wray J. What Happens When you Ask for Feedback? Anticipating and Addressing Challenges Can Be Effective for Eliciting Parents' Views About Their Critically Ill Child's Retrieval to Paediatric Intensive Care. J Patient Exp 2023; 10:23743735221143949. [PMID: 36741824 PMCID: PMC9893356 DOI: 10.1177/23743735221143949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
User feedback is an important element of health-service evaluation and can be used to improve services but can be difficult to obtain, particularly in acute care situations. As part of a national study, we explored stakeholders' perspectives on paediatric critical care retrieval processes through questionnaires and interviews. Obtaining feedback in a highly charged, stressful and busy paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) environment is fraught with difficulties so we aimed to optimise each stage of data collection by being both proactive and reactive. Patient and public involvement occurred throughout and engagement with sites and supporting local research staff to approach and recruit families were prioritised. High-quality study materials were developed to reduce local staff burden and promote and maintain study awareness. We describe strategies used and what worked/did not work. We suggest approaches for optimising elicitation of parents' experiences in difficult circumstances, highlighting the importance of engagement and commitment of PICU staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Barber
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health,
Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS
Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ruth Evans
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health,
Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS
Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Padmanabhan Ramnarayan
- Children's Acute Transport Service (CATS),
Great Ormond
Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation
Trust, London, UK,Paediatric Critical Care, Imperial College,
London, UK
| | - Jo Wray
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Robertson EG, Kelada L, Best S, Goranitis I, Grainger N, Le Marne F, Pierce K, Nevin SM, Macintosh R, Beavis E, Sachdev R, Bye A, Palmer EE. Acceptability and feasibility of an online information linker service for caregivers who have a child with genetic epilepsy: a mixed-method pilot study protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e063249. [PMID: 36288836 PMCID: PMC9615979 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are rare epilepsy conditions that collectively impact 1 in 2000 children. They are highly genetically heterogeneous, resulting in significant barriers to accurate and adequate information for caregivers. This can lead to increased distress and dissatisfaction with the healthcare system. To address this gap, we developed 'GenE Compass' to provide caregivers with the highest-quality possible, understandable and relevant information in response to specific questions about their child's DEE. Using a mixed-method design, we will now pilot GenE Compass to evaluate the acceptability to caregivers and clinicians, feasibility and impact to caregivers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will recruit 88 caregivers (estimated final sample of 50 at follow-up) who have a child under 18 years of age with a suspected or confirmed DEE diagnosis. Following consent and a baseline questionnaire (questionnaire 1 (Q1)), participants will be able to submit questions to GenE Compass over a 3-month period. After 3 months, participants will complete a follow-up questionnaire (Q2) and an optional telephone interview to answer the research questions. Primary outcomes are acceptability of GenE Compass and feasibility of delivering the intervention (eg, cost of the intervention, number of questions submitted and time taken to respond to questions). Secondary outcomes include the impact of GenE Compass on caregivers' quality of life, information searching behaviours, perceptions of their child's illness and activation. ETHICS AND DISCUSSION The study protocol (V.2, dated 16 September 2021) has been approved by the Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Human Research Ethics Committee (ETH11277). The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences. A lay summary will be disseminated to all participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12621001544864.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eden G Robertson
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lauren Kelada
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - I Goranitis
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natalie Grainger
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Fleur Le Marne
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Randwick, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristine Pierce
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Epilepsy Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Suzanne M Nevin
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Macintosh
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Randwick, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Erin Beavis
- Department of Neurology, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Randwick, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rani Sachdev
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Randwick, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Annie Bye
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Randwick, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth E Palmer
- Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Randwick, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vig PS, Lim JY, Lee RWL, Huang H, Tan XH, Lim WQ, Lim MBXY, Lee ASI, Chiam M, Lim C, Baral VR, Krishna LKR. Parental bereavement - impact of death of neonates and children under 12 years on personhood of parents: a systematic scoping review. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:136. [PMID: 34481491 PMCID: PMC8418708 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00831-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Losing a child tragically impacts the well-being and functioning of parents. With these effects extending beyond emotional, physical morbidity and compromising self-perceptions, appropriate, longitudinal, timely and personalised support is key to effective care of bereaved parents. However, in the absence of a comprehensive understanding of parental bereavement, effective support of bereaved parents remains suboptimal. To address this gap, we scrutinise prevailing data on the effects of a child's death, aged 0-12 years, through the lens of the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP). METHODS To study prevailing accounts of bereaved parents following the death of a child, we adopt Krishna's Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SEBA) to structure our Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA). RESULTS Three thousand seventy-four abstracts were reviewed, 160 full text articles were evaluated, and 111 articles were included and analysed using thematic and content analysis. Four themes/categories were identified relating to the four rings of the RToP. Findings reveal that static concepts of protective and risk factors for grief are misplaced and that the support of healthcare professionals is key to assisting bereaved parents. CONCLUSION In the absence of consistent support of bereaved parents, this study highlights the need for effective training of healthcare professionals, beginning with an appreciation that every aspect of an individual parent's personhood is impacted by the loss of their child. Acknowledging grief as a complex, evolving and personalised process subjected to parental characteristics, settings, context and available support, this SSR in SEBA calls attention to effective nurturing of the relationship between parents and healthcare professionals, and suggests use of the RToP to assess and direct personalised, timely, specific support of parents in evolving conditions. We believe the findings of this review also call for further studies to support healthcare professionals as they journey with bereaved parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prachi Simran Vig
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Palliative and Supportive Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Jia Yin Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Palliative and Supportive Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Randal Wei Liang Lee
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Palliative and Supportive Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Huixin Huang
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Palliative and Supportive Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Xiu Hui Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Palliative and Supportive Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Wei Qiang Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Palliative and Supportive Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Marie Bernadette Xin Yi Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Palliative and Supportive Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Alexia Sze Inn Lee
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
| | - Crystal Lim
- Medical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Block 3 Level 1, Singapore, 169608 Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857 Singapore
| | - Vijayendra Ranjan Baral
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857 Singapore
- Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Block 5 Level 4, Singapore, 169608 Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
- Division of Palliative and Supportive Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610 Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857 Singapore
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Blk MD11, 10 Medical Drive, #02-03, Singapore, 117597 Singapore
- PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436 Singapore
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Deming RS, Wolfe J, DeCourcey DD. Weighing Distress and Benefit: Understanding the Research Participation Experiences of Bereaved Parents of Children With Complex Chronic Conditions. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62:39-47.e1. [PMID: 33279601 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Improving end-of-life care for children with complex chronic conditions (CCCs) requires parental perspectives. The vulnerability of bereaved parents has historically been a research barrier and studies describing their research participation experience are lacking. OBJECTIVES To examine the research participation experience of bereaved parents of children with CCCs and to identify factors associated with distress or benefit. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, parents of deceased children who received care at Boston Children's Hospital between 2006 and 2015 completed survey questions describing their research participation experience after completing the Survey About Caring for Children with CCCs. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with perceived distress or benefit with participation. Free responses were analyzed using qualitative techniques. RESULTS One hundred fourteen (54%) of 211 eligible parents completed the survey a median of 3.9 years (interquartile range, 2.1-6.5) after their child's death. Most parents felt comfortable (78%) and reported benefit (88%) from survey participation. Only 6% of parents reported "a great deal" of distress with participation, and of those, 67% still found it beneficial. Being at least moderately spiritual was associated with benefit (adjusted odds ratio 7.12 [95% CI: 1.58-32.1]), while parental decisional regret was associated with distress (adjusted odds ratio 3.41 [95% CI: 1.33-8.72]). Benefit was the most common domain identified, with parents expressing appreciation for the opportunity to help others and share their story. CONCLUSION A majority of parents responded to questions about their child's end-of-life care without significant distress. When present, distress was often accompanied by a perception that participation was beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel S Deming
- Division of Pediatric Palliative Care, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Joanne Wolfe
- Division of Pediatric Palliative Care, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Danielle D DeCourcey
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Medical Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reggio C, Mowbray C, Waldron MK, Rood AL, Sibilia G, Mooney-Doyle K, Hinds PS. "It Can Be Hard But It's Not Bad": Three Questions to Solicit Caregiver Perceptions of Benefits and Burdens to Participating in Pediatric Palliative Care Research. J Palliat Med 2021; 24:1641-1649. [PMID: 33902327 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: To allay uneasiness among clinicians and institutional review board members about pediatric palliative care research and to yield new knowledge relevant to study methods, documenting burdens and benefits of this research on children and their families is essential. Design: In a grounded theory study with three data points (T1, T2, and T3), we evaluated benefits and burdens of family caregiver participation at T3. English-speaking caregivers participating in palliative or end-of-life decisions for their child with incurable cancer or their seriously ill child in the intensive care unit participated. Thirty-seven caregivers (n = 22 from oncology; n = 15 from intensive care) of 33 children completed T3 interviews; most were mothers (n = 25, 67.6%), African American (n = 18, 48.6%), and married (n = 28, 75.7%). Measurement: Benefits and burdens were assessed by three open-ended questions asked by an interviewer during a scheduled telephone contact. Responses were analyzed using descriptive semantic content analysis techniques and themes were extracted. Results: All 37 T3 participants completed the 3 questions, resulting in no missing data. The most frequently reported themes were of positive personal impact: "Hoping to help others," "Speaking about what is hard is important," and "Being in the study was sometimes hard but not bad." Conclusions: No caregiver described the study as burdensome. Some acknowledged that answering the questions could evoke sad memories, but highlighted benefits for self and others. Attrition somewhat tempers the emphasis on benefits. Documenting perceived benefits and burdens in a standardized manner may accurately convey impact of study participation and yield new knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Reggio
- Division of Nursing, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Catriona Mowbray
- Division of Oncology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mia K Waldron
- Division of Nursing, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Adelaide L Rood
- Department of Nursing, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Gabriella Sibilia
- The Conway School of Nursing, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kim Mooney-Doyle
- University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Pamela S Hinds
- Division of Nursing, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Robertson EG, Wakefield CE, Tsoli M, Kellie SJ, Alvaro F, Gifford AJ, Weber MA, Rodriguez M, Kirby M, Ziegler DS. Parents' experiences of postmortem tumor donation for high-grade gliomas: benefits and suggested improvements. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:vdab087. [PMID: 34458732 PMCID: PMC8386242 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric high-grade glioma is a devastating diagnosis. There has been no improvement in outcomes for several decades, with few children surviving 2 years postdiagnosis. Research progress has been hampered by a lack of tumor samples, which can be used to develop and test novel therapies. Postmortem tumor donations are therefore a valuable opportunity to collect tissue. In this study, we explored Australian parents' experiences of donating their child's tumor for research after their child had died. METHODS We collected qualitative data from 11 bereaved parents who consented to donate samples of their child's high-grade glioma for research postmortem. We asked parents about their perceived benefits/burdens of the autopsy, recommendations for improving consent discussions, and decision regret. RESULTS Parents hoped that their donation would help to find a cure for future children with high-grade glioma. They described feeling comforted knowing that their child's suffering may help others. Some parents also felt that the donation would help them better understand their child's tumor. Although some parents described discomfort about procedures leading up to the autopsy, parents reported minimal regret regarding their decision to donate their child's tumor. Parents provided recommendations to improve consent discussions, such as providing more information about the autopsy logistics and why the donation was needed. CONCLUSION Parents consented to autopsy for altruistic reasons, although donation may also assist parents in their grieving. There is a strong need to improve access to tumor donations for any family who wishes to donate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eden G Robertson
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Claire E Wakefield
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Maria Tsoli
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Children’s Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stewart J Kellie
- Children’s Cancer Centre, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Frank Alvaro
- Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders, John Hunter Children’s Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew J Gifford
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Children’s Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Anatomical Pathology, NSW Health Pathology East (Prince of Wales Hospital), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin A Weber
- Anatomical Pathology, NSW Health Pathology East (Prince of Wales Hospital), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Rodriguez
- Anatomical Pathology, NSW Health Pathology East (Prince of Wales Hospital), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Maria Kirby
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - David S Ziegler
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Children’s Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Heathcote LC, Loecher N, Spunt SL, Simon P, Tutelman PR, Wakefield CE, Ach E, Schapira L. Do qualitative interviews cause distress in adolescents and young adults asked to discuss fears of cancer recurrence? Psychooncology 2020; 30:123-126. [PMID: 32909342 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren C Heathcote
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Nele Loecher
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sheri L Spunt
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Pamela Simon
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Perri R Tutelman
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Claire E Wakefield
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily Ach
- Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Lidia Schapira
- Department of Medical Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Raharjo CV, Hetherington K, Donovan L, Fardell JE, Russell V, Cohn RJ, Morgan NL, Siddiqui J, Wakefield CE. An Evaluation of By My Side: Peer Support in Written Form is Acceptable and Useful for Parents Bereaved by Childhood Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 59:1278-1286. [PMID: 32006611 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Cancer is the leading cause of nonaccidental death in childhood, with the death of a child representing a devastating loss for families. Peer support offers a valuable way to support parents' adjustment in bereavement. The By My Side book provides written peer support by sharing bereaved parents' stories to normalize grief experiences and reduce parents' isolation. It is available free of charge. OBJECTIVES This project evaluated the acceptability, relevance, emotional impact, and usefulness of By My Side. DESIGN Bereaved parents and health care professionals (HCPs) provided feedback via a questionnaire. We used descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis of open-ended responses to analyze the data. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS We mailed a study invitation and evaluation questionnaire to parents and HCPs who ordered a copy of By My Side. RESULTS About 24 bereaved parents and seven HCPs provided feedback. Parents thought the book's length (91.7%) and amount of information (83.3%) was just right. About 75% of parents reported that the book made them feel that their reactions to their child's death were normal and/or appropriate. Parents reported positive and negative emotional reactions to the book (e.g., 87.5% felt comforted, 87.5% felt sadness). All parents and HCPs reported that the book provided useful information about grief. About 83.4% of parents and 85.7% of HCPs would recommend it to others. CONCLUSION By My Side was acceptable and useful to bereaved parents and HCPs. Results suggest that peer support in written form may help normalize aspects of grief and comfort parents bereaved by childhood cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callista V Raharjo
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia; Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate Hetherington
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia; Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Leigh Donovan
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia; Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; Paediatric Palliative Care Service, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Joanna E Fardell
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia; Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vera Russell
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard J Cohn
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia; Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | - Claire E Wakefield
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia; Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Donovan LA, Wakefield CE, Russell V, Fardell J, Mallitt KA, Hetherington K, Cohn R. Variables associated with grief and personal growth following the death of a child from cancer: A mixed method analysis. DEATH STUDIES 2019; 45:702-713. [PMID: 31656129 DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2019.1682087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
This mixed method study explored parent and child characteristics that impact grief and personal growth in parents (n = 119) after a child dies from cancer in Australia. Medical components of a child's cancer care including radiation treatment, referral to palliative care, and location of death had a significant impact on levels of grief. Parents' gender, religious affiliation, and education level had a significant impact on levels of personal growth. This study further enhances our understanding of the impact of specific parent and child characteristics throughout a child's cancer treatment and end of life that may influence their families' experience of bereavement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leigh A Donovan
- Department of Social Work, Welfare and Indigenous Health Liaison, Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Randwick, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Claire E Wakefield
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Randwick, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Vera Russell
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Randwick, Australia
| | - Joanna Fardell
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Randwick, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kylie-Ann Mallitt
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kate Hetherington
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Randwick, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard Cohn
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Randwick, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|