Diagnostic accuracy of the cancer ratio for the prediction of malignant pleural effusion: evidence from a validation study and meta-analysis

The Use of "Cancer Ratio" in Differentiating Malignant and Tuberculous Pleural Effusions: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Differentiating between tuberculosis and malignancy as the cause of an exudative lymphocyte predominant pleural effusion is difficult due to similarities in the cellular and biochemical characteristics of the pleural fluid in both conditions. Microbiological tests in tubercular pleural effusions have a poor diagnostic yield, and the long turnaround time for results prevents an early diagnosis. The diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is hampered by a variable yield of pleural fluid cytology and closed pleural biopsy and the fact that thoracoscopy may not be readily available or feasible in each patient. A key gap in the existing knowledge is the performance of the serum lactate dehydrogenase to pleural adenosine deaminase ratio (ie, "cancer ratio"; CR) in differentiating between tuberculous and MPE in a high tuberculosis prevalence country like India, although its use has been well established in Western literature. The CR may find a practical application in the community health care settings in low-income countries without ready access to biopsy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the CR as a test to differentiate tubercular and malignant etiology in patients with an exudative lymphocyte predominant pleural effusion. Secondary objectives to be assessed include a comparison of CR to pleural fluid carcinoembryonic antigen in MPE and the association of histologic type of lung carcinoma to the CR positivity.

METHODS

This hospital-based, prospective, observational study will include patients admitted with pleural effusion whose pleural fluid reports indicate a lymphocyte-predominant exudate. The ability of the CR to discriminate between tuberculous and MPE will be evaluated as a primary objective of this study. The performance of CR and pleural fluid carcinoembryonic antigen in the diagnosis of MPE will be compared using the receiver operating characteristics and area under the curve for both tests as a secondary objective. The association between a positive CR and histologic type of lung cancer will be analyzed as well.

RESULTS

Data collection began in June 2022. As of March 24, 2024, we have recruited 22 patients. Outcomes of the study are expected at the end of 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study will provide an objective basis for the use of CR in differentiating between tuberculosis and malignancy as the cause of an exudative lymphocyte predominant pleural effusion.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/56592.

LDH/ADA ratio in pleural fluid for the diagnosis of infectious pleurisy

Pleural effusion (PE) is a common medical concern, often requiring thoracentesis for a definitive diagnosis. An elevated pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) may indicate tuberculosis, but this is not always the case. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of biomarkers determined in pleural fluid and propose a new diagnostic strategy for PE in patients with high levels of ADA in pleural fluid. This retrospective analysis studied patients with PE who received thoracentesis for the first time with an ADA level of > 33 U/L in the pleural fluid analysis at two tertiary hospitals from March 2019 to March 2023. Demographic and clinical data, as well as pleural fluid biomarkers and their ratios, were studied and compared between different PE groups, and a decision tree was developed. During the study period, 259 patients were enrolled, with four different types of PE: parapneumonic (PPE) 155, tuberculosis (TPE) 41, malignant (MPE) 50, and miscellaneous 13. Biomarkers and their ratios performed well in the differential diagnosis of PE, with the LDH/ADA ratio distinguishing between PPE and non-PPE with sensitivity and specificity of 98.06% and 98.08%, respectively. The combination of LDH/ADA ratio, ADA, and mononuclear cell percentage was identified as important factors for creating a decision tree with an overall accuracy of 89.96%. The pleural fluid LDH/ADA ratio was a useful diagnostic for distinguishing PPE from non-PPE, and a decision tree with an accuracy of 89.96% was created to differentiate the four forms of PE in clinical situations.

Risk factors for symptomatic malignant pleural effusion recurrence in patients with actionable mutations in advanced lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) comes generally with high mortality and poor prognosis. Recurrence of symptomatic MPE is always accompanied by poor survival quality. In lung adenocarcinoma, researchers speculate whether patients with actionable mutation or without are applicable to different management models for MPE. Under the background of the high mutation probability and the encouraging therapeutic response in Asians, researches on the risk factors of MPE are in need.

Methods

This retrospective review included 343 metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients with MPE. Recurrence was defined as recurrent symptomatic MPE requiring the second thoracentesis to relieve symptoms within 300 days after the first thoracentesis. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis were utilized to investigate independent risk factors for MPE recurrence.

Results

Of the 343 patients involved, 139 experienced MPE recurrence within 300 days; 34.3% in 201 patients with actionable mutations and 51.2% in 129 patients without actionable mutations are in the recurrence. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the group without mutations was 161 days. The median RFS of the other group with mutations was 300 days. Patients with actionable mutations showed a significantly lower hazard of MPE recurrence on univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis indicated that receiving targeted therapy after the first thoracentesis within 30 days, lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) level, lower serum lactate dehydrogenase (s-LDH) level, and lower serum carcinoembryonic antigen (s-CEA) level were independent protective factors. In subgroup analysis, risk factors differed. Receiving targeted therapy after the first thoracentesis within 30 days remained an independent factor in the mutated patients.

Conclusions

The findings herein indicated the characteristics of specific patients at high risk for MPE recurrence in lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with actionable mutations benefit more in MPE recurrence and could benefit from targeted therapy and active intrapleural management.

Age affects the diagnostic accuracy of the cancer ratio for malignant pleural effusion

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cancer ratio (CR), which is defined as serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) ratio, has been reported to be a useful diagnostic marker for malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Whether its diagnostic accuracy is affected by age remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effects of age on the diagnostic accuracy of CR.

METHODS

The participants in this study were from a prospective cohort (SIMPLE cohort, n = 199) and a retrospective cohort (BUFF cohort, n = 158). All participants were patients with undiagnosed pleural effusion (PE). We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CR. The effect of age on the diagnostic accuracy of CR was investigated by adjusting the upper limit of age for participant enrolment.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight MPE patients were verified in the SIMPLE cohort, and thirty-five MPE patients were verified in the BUFF cohort. The AUCs of CR in the SIMPLE and BUFF cohorts were 0.60 (95% CI: 0.52-0.68) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.54-0.71), respectively. In both cohorts, the AUCs of CR decreased with the advancement of age.

CONCLUSION

Age can affect the diagnostic accuracy of CR for MPE. CR has limited diagnostic value in older patients.

KEY MESSAGE

Cancer ratio is a promising diagnostic marker for malignant pleural effusion. This study revealed that its diagnostic accuracy decreased in older patients. Its diagnostic accuracy is overestimated by previous studies using tuberculosis and pneumonia patients as controls.

Diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion with combinations of multiple tumor markers: A comparison study of five machine learning models

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the diagnostic value of combinations of tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 125, CA153, and CA19-9 in identifying malignant pleural effusion (MPE) from non-malignant pleural effusion (non-MPE) using machine learning, and compare the performance of popular machine learning methods.

METHODS

A total of 319 samples were collected from patients with pleural effusion in Beijing and Wuhan, China, from January 2018 to June 2020. Five machine learning methods including Logistic regression, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Bayesian additive regression tree, random forest, and support vector machine were applied to evaluate the diagnostic performance. Sensitivity, specificity, Youden's index, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of different diagnostic models.

RESULTS

For diagnostic models with a single tumor marker, the model using CEA, constructed by XGBoost, performed best (AUC = 0.895, sensitivity = 0.80), and the model with CA153, also by XGBoost, showed the largest specificity 0.98. Among all combinations of tumor markers, the combination of CEA and CA153 achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.921, sensitivity = 0.85) in identifying MPE under the diagnostic model constructed by XGBoost.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic models for MPE with a combination of multiple tumor markers outperformed the models with a single tumor marker, particularly in sensitivity. Using machine learning methods, especially XGBoost, could comprehensively improve the diagnostic accuracy of MPE.

Adenosine deaminase-based measurement in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion: a multicenter retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

The differential diagnosis of pleural effusion is difficult, and studies have reported on the potential role of adenosine deaminase (ADA) in the differential diagnosis of undiagnosed pleural effusion. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the diagnostic role of ADA in pleural effusion.

METHODS

266 patients with pleural effusion from three centers were enrolled. The concentrations of ADA and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were measured in pleural fluids and serum samples of the patients. The diagnostic performance of ADA-based measurement for tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), malignant pleural effusion (MPE), and parapneumonic effusion (PPE) was examined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

An area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.909 was obtained using the pleural ADA values as the indicator for TPE identification (sensitivity: 87.50%, specificity: 87.82%). The ratio of serum LDH to pleural ADA (cancer ratio) provided the predictive capacity with an AUC of 0.879 for MPE diagnosis (sensitivity: 95.04%, specificity: 67.06%). At a cut-off value of 14.29, the pleural ADA/LDH ratio showed a sensitivity and specificity of 81.13% and 83.67%, respectively, and a high AUC value of 0.888 for the differential diagnosis of PPE from TPE.

CONCLUSION

ADA-based measurement is helpful for the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion. Further studies should be performed to validate these results.

Pleural fluid biochemical analysis: the past, present and future

Identifying the cause of pleural effusion is challenging for pulmonologists. Imaging, biopsy, microbiology and biochemical analyses are routinely used for diagnosing pleural effusion. Among these diagnostic tools, biochemical analyses are promising because they have the advantages of low cost, minimal invasiveness, observer independence and short turn-around time. Here, we reviewed the past, present and future of pleural fluid biochemical analysis. We reviewed the history of Light’s criteria and its modifications and the current status of biomarkers for heart failure, malignant pleural effusion, tuberculosis pleural effusion and parapneumonic pleural effusion. In addition, we anticipate the future of pleural fluid biochemical analysis, including the utility of machine learning, molecular diagnosis and high-throughput technologies. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) should address the topic of pleural fluid biochemical analysis in the future to promote specific knowledge in the laboratory professional community.

A Case of Pneumonia Masking Pleural Malignancy

The invasion of the pleural membrane by a malignant pleural tumor can lead to the production of malignant pleural effusion (MPE), resulting in the symptoms of dyspnea, and some patients have cough, sputum and other symptoms, which are easily confused with pneumonia. In this case, the initial diagnosis of the patient is pneumonia, and the final diagnosis is pneumonia combined with pleural malignancy. Therefore, if the patient has unexplained symptoms of bloody pleural effusion, it is necessary to examine for malignant tumors and should actively perform thoracentesis and drainage, look for malignant cells in the pleural effusion cell precipitation, evaluate the nature of pleural effusion, conduct pleural biopsy tissue examination, and determine the type and source of lung malignancy by the combined application of cell block technology and immunohistochemistry. Take the cytological examination results in pleural effusion seriously, and finally, surgical or immunotherapy can be performed.

Diagnostic value of periostin in lung cancer-related malignant pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

Periostin (POSTN) is an extracellular matrix protein that is overexpressed in lung cancer and is considered an effective diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of POSTN and to further evaluate the diagnostic value of POSTN combined with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer ratio [CR: serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)/pleural effusion adenosine deaminase (PE ADA)] in lung cancer-related malignant PE (MPE).

METHODS

A total of 108 patients with PE, including 54 with lung cancer and 54 with benign lung disease, were enrolled in this study. The POSTN levels of PE and serum were detected using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Information on the expression of PE and serum CEA, serum LDH, and PE ADA was collected from medical records.

RESULTS

The levels of PE POSTN in MPE of patients with lung cancer were significantly higher than those in patients with benign PE (p < 0.0001). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of PE POSTN for lung cancer-related MPE were respectively 77.78% and 68.52% when the cutoff value was determined to be 53.45 ng/ml. The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that PE POSTN has a high diagnostic value in MPE associated with lung cancer [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.764], and the combination of PE POSTN, PE CEA, and CR can improve the diagnostic accuracy of lung cancer-related MPE (AUC = 0.948).

CONCLUSION

POSTN can be used as a potential marker for lung cancer-related MPE diagnosis.