1
|
Panwar R, Tarvade S, Lanyon N, Saxena M, Bush D, Hardie M, Attia J, Bellomo R, Van Haren F. Relative Hypotension and Adverse Kidney-related Outcomes among Critically Ill Patients with Shock. A Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 202:1407-1418. [PMID: 32614244 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201912-2316oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale: There are no prospective observational studies exploring the relationship between relative hypotension and adverse kidney-related outcomes among critically ill patients with shock.Objectives: To investigate the magnitude of relative hypotension during vasopressor support among critically ill patients with shock and to determine whether such relative hypotension is associated with new significant acute kidney injury (AKI) or major adverse kidney events (MAKE) within 14 days of vasopressor initiation.Methods: At seven multidisciplinary ICUs, 302 patients, aged ≥40 years and requiring ≥4 hours of vasopressor support for nonhemorrhagic shock, were prospectively enrolled. We assessed the time-weighted average of the mean perfusion pressure (MPP) deficit (i.e., the percentage difference between patients' preillness basal MPP and achieved MPP) during vasopressor support and the percentage of time points with an MPP deficit > 20% as key exposure variables. New significant AKI was defined as an AKI-stage increase of two or more (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome creatinine-based criteria).Measurements and Main Results: The median MPP deficit was 19% (interquartile range, 13-25), and 54% (interquartile range, 19-82) of time points were spent with an MPP deficit > 20%. Seventy-three (24%) patients developed new significant AKI; 86 (29%) patients developed MAKE. For every percentage increase in the time-weighted average MPP deficit, multivariable-adjusted odds of developing new significant AKI and MAKE increased by 5.6% (95% confidence interval, 2.2-9.1; P = 0.001) and 5.9% (95% confidence interval, 2.2-9.8; P = 0.002), respectively. Likewise, for every one-unit increase in the percentage of time points with an MPP deficit > 20%, multivariable-adjusted odds of developing new significant AKI and MAKE increased by 1.2% (0.3-2.2; P = 0.008) and 1.4% (0.4-2.4; P = 0.004), respectively.Conclusions: Vasopressor-treated patients with shock are often exposed to a significant degree and duration of relative hypotension, which is associated with new-onset, adverse kidney-related outcomes.Study registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN 12613001368729).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakshit Panwar
- ICU, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sanjay Tarvade
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas Lanyon
- Department of Anaesthesia, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Manoj Saxena
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dustin Bush
- ICU, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Miranda Hardie
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Attia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rinaldo Bellomo
- Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Frank Van Haren
- Intensive Care Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia.,Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia; and.,Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Untreated Relative Hypotension Measured as Perfusion Pressure Deficit During Management of Shock and New-Onset Acute Kidney Injury-A Literature Review. Shock 2019; 49:497-507. [PMID: 29040214 DOI: 10.1097/shk.0000000000001033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Maintaining an optimal blood pressure (BP) during shock is a fundamental tenet of critical care. Optimal BP targets may be different for different patients. In current practice, too often, uniform BP targets are pursued which may result in inadvertently accepting a degree of untreated relative hypotension, i.e., the deficit between patients' usual premorbid basal BP and the achieved BP, during vasopressor support. Relative hypotension is a common but an under-recognized and an under-treated sign among patients with potential shock state. From a physiological perspective, any relative reduction in the net perfusion pressure across an organ (e.g., renal) vasculature has a potential to overwhelm autoregulatory mechanisms, which are already under stress during shock. Such perfusion pressure deficit may consequently impact organs' ability to function or recover from an injured state. This review discusses such pathophysiologic mechanisms in detail with a particular focus on the risk of new-onset acute kidney injury (AKI). To review current literature, databases of Medline, Embase, and Google scholar were searched to retrieve articles that either adjusted BP targets based on patients' premorbid BP levels or considered relative hypotension as an exposure endpoint and assessed its association with clinical outcomes among acutely ill patients. There were no randomized controlled trials. Only seven studies could be identified and these were reviewed in detail. These studies indicated a significant association between the degree of relative hypotension that was inadvertently accepted in real-world practice and new-onset organ dysfunction or subsequent AKI. However, this is not a high-quality evidence. Therefore, well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate whether adoption of individualized BP targets, which are initially guided by patient's premorbid basal BP and then tailored according to clinical response, is superior to conventional BP targets for vasopressor therapy, particularly among patients with vasodilatory shock states.
Collapse
|