Association between personality traits and Escitalopram treatment efficacy in panic disorder

Serum BDNF levels are involved in the diagnosis and treatment response in patients with PD

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to explore whether brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) could be predictive for the diagnosis of panic disorder (PD) and to explore the association between serum BDNF levels and the treatment response to escitalopram in PD patients.

METHODS

Ninety PD patients and 99 healthy controls (HCs) were finally recruited. PD patients were treated only by escitalopram for 8 weeks. All patients were administered the Short-Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14), and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) to assess life quality, anxiety symptoms and trait, respectively. Neuropsychological tests were assessed at baseline in all participants. Besides, peripheral venous blood was drawn from all participants for BDNF serum levels detection both at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

In PD patients, the baseline serum BDNF levels were lower than HCs. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of baseline serum BDNF levels predicting PD from HCs was 0.947 (94.9 % for sensitivity, 77.8 % for specificity). The baseline serum BDNF levels (beta = 0.276, p = 0.007), the current duration (beta = -0.301, p = 0.004), and trait anxiety (TAI) (beta = 0.201, p = 0.045) were predictors for reduction rates of HAMA-14 after 8 weeks' escitalopram treatment.

LIMITATIONS

A long-term observation and high homogeneity of sample may make the results more convincing.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary finding highlighted the value of serum BDNF levels for the diagnosis of PD. In addition, the higher baseline serum BDNF levels may predict the better escitalopram treatment response in PD patients.

Thirteen-year follow-up of long-term treated psychotic disorder: personality aspects

OBJECTIVE

Personality is an aspect that can affect the symptoms and social function in individuals with psychotic disorders. Several studies have investigated personality in schizophrenia and other long-term psychotic disorders. No study has examined the stability of personality traits exceeding five years in patients with schizophrenia and related disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate the stability of personality traits over a 13-year period among patients with schizophrenia and related disorders and healthy individuals and to evaluate case-control differences.

METHODS

At three occasions during a 13-year period patients with schizophrenia and related disorders (n = 28) and healthy individuals (n = 57) completed Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP). Mean-level change and case-control differences were investigated for all the individuals using within- and between-subject analyses, respectively. Analyses were performed on three occasions for all 13 subscales and the three overall factors of SSP. Also, correlations, means, and SDs were calculated.

RESULTS

Tests of within-subject correlations showed differences in two subscales: Lack of Assertiveness, which were influenced by age, and Physical Trait Aggression, where patients' ratings were stable, whereas controls rated themselves less aggressive at a higher age. Between-subjects correlations showed differences regarding diagnosis, time, age, gender, or age × gender in nine of the 13 subscales as well as in factor Neuroticism.

CONCLUSION

Long-term follow-up showed generally high stability of personality traits measured with SSP. Between-subject analyses over the 13 years showed that patients differed compared to controls for the SSP factor Neuroticism as well as the subscale Detachment, which is in accordance with previous studies within this population.

Stability in Personality After Physical Trauma

Personality trait stability may be influenced by several factors, there among different life events such as psychological trauma. However, little is known regarding trait stability after physical trauma. Therefore, our primary aim was to assess the extent of stability in personality in burn patients during the first year after injury. Eighty-four burn patients, admitted to a national burn center, were assessed with the Swedish universities Scales of Personality during acute care and 12 months postburn. Personality domain scores remained stable between acute care and 12 months postburn. On the trait level, the only change was seen in personality trait Stress Susceptibility, where burn patients' scores were lower compared with norm scores during acute care but then increased, and normalized, at 12 months postburn. To conclude, personality scores remained relatively stable during the first year after burn trauma.

Association Between Personality Traits and Onabotulinumtoxin A Response in Patients With Chronic Migraine

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the potential association between personality traits and onabotulinumtoxin A (onabotA) response in patients with chronic migraine (CM).

BACKGROUND

Previous studies from a categorial perspective show that patients with CM have anxious or obsessive personality according to the Salamanca screening test. However, the influence of personality traits in onabotA response in patients with CM has not yet been studied. We hypothesize that cluster C personality traits may be associated with non-response to onabotA.

METHODS

This case-control observational study includes patients with CM who received at least 2 treatment cycles of onabotA in 2 headache units between January and May 2018. onabotA response was defined as a reduction of at least 50% in the number of monthly migraine days. Personality traits were evaluated using the Salamanca questionnaire, a validated categorial inventory assessing 11 personality traits.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve patients, 100/112 (89.6%) females, mean age (standard deviation): 43 (11) years, were recruited. 96/112 (85.7%) achieved response to onabotA. Dependent trait was significantly associated with non-response to onabotA (P = .008; OR: 0.223 [95%CI: 0.074 to 0.675]). Significant association with other personality traits or confounders was not found.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study showing personality traits may predict onabotA response in patients with CM. The presence of dependent personality trait in patients with CM is associated with non-response to onabotA.

Predicting treatment outcome for anxiety disorders with or without comorbid depression using clinical, imaging and (epi)genetic data

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review complements previous reviews on prediction research in anxiety disorders with a focus on clinical, imaging and genetic as well as epigenetic factors and aims to provide recommendations for the design of future integrative studies in adults as well as children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical factors predicting worse outcome such as a diagnosis of social anxiety disorder, comorbid depression and certain cognitive, behavioral and personality traits as well as low socioeconomic status were confirmed in large clinical studies. Imaging factors focusing on the fear and anxiety network were repeatedly described as predicting therapy response in small exploratory studies. The plethora of candidate gene studies has now been complemented by large genome-wide association studies and small epigenetic investigations with the need for replication in larger samples.

SUMMARY

The present status of research on predictors for therapy response in anxiety disorders, in particular on imaging and genetic factors, is still fragmentary. Some clinical factors for poorer outcome, though, have been consistently replicated and should be considered in the revision of therapy guidelines. There is a definite need for large integrative studies at the national and international level integrating multiple levels of biomarkers at different stages of development.

Empirical evidence of the effect of personality pathology on the outcome of panic disorder

BACKGROUND

Treatment resistant disorders are a significant clinical problem. Impediments to good outcome need to be identified and addressed. Personality pathology has been hypothesized to be one such factor in panic disorder. There is no consensus as to the effects of personality pathology on the outcome of panic disorder. This study examined empirical evidence. The hypothesis was that personality pathology would cause poorer outcome of panic disorder.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted that winnowed 2627 articles down to 27 based on 1) longitudinal design; 2) validated measures of personality; 3) validated outcome measures; and 4) the presence of effect size or data to calculate effect size. All effect sizes were translated into odds ratios (ORs) for ease of comparison.

RESULTS

An overall median OR of 2.7 was found, indicating personality pathology negatively affected outcome. This finding persisted even when adjusted for baseline severity of illness. The effects were found for both clinical outcomes (OR = 2.7) and for social adjustment (OR = 2.9). There was a tendency for more dropouts in the personality pathology group. More highly structured drug therapy regimens and highly structured psychotherapy seemed to partially mitigate this outcome.

CONCLUSION

The negative effect of personality pathology was confirmed in well-designed longitudinal studies. This was not related to initial clinical severity. Clinical implications are that patients with personality pathology require the therapist to stick more closely to treatment protocols and to mitigate the tendency of these patients to drop out of treatment.

Personality traits and escitalopram treatment outcome in major depression

BACKGROUND

Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRI) have proven to be effective in treatment of depression. Still, treatment efficacy varies significantly from patient to patient and about 40% of patients do not respond to initial treatment. Personality traits have been considered one source of variability in treatment outcome.

AIM

Current study aimed at identifying specific personality traits that could be predictive of treatment response and/or the dynamics of symptom change in depressive patients.

METHOD

In a sample of 132 outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) treated with an SSRI-group antidepressant escitalopram, the Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP) were used in order to find predictive personality traits. For the assessment of the severity of depressive symptoms and the improvement rates, the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were used.

RESULTS

Escitalopram-treated MDD patients with higher social desirability achieved more rapid decrease in symptom severity. None of the studied traits predicted the end result of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that specific personality traits may predict the trajectory of symptom change rather than the overall improvement rate.

Patients' characteristics and their influence on course of fear during agoraphobic symptom provocation: may SS(N)RI treatment compensate unfavorable individual preconditions?

BACKGROUND

Patients' characteristics and antidepressants are discussed to be relevant in the context of phobic exposure.

AIMS

To identify patients characteristics associated with a differential course of fear during disorder-specific symptom provocation as well as to elucidate the effect of selective serotonin-(noradrenalin-) reuptake inhibitors [SS(N)RI] on development of fear in the context of re-exposure to the phobic stimuli.

METHODS

Twenty-eight clinically well-characterized patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia (PD/AG) were classified into subjects who show a reduction of fear ('Fear-') during a symptom provocation via a picture-based paradigm (T1) and those who did not ('Fear+'). Subsequently, SS(N)RI treatment was administered to all patients and subjects were re-exposed to the feared stimuli after 8 weeks of treatment (T2). Moreover, brain activity within the 'fear network' was measured via functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at T1 and T2.

RESULTS

Fear - were significantly younger and demonstrated increased exposure-related fear as well as stronger activity in several fear-related brain areas than Fear+. We found significant improvements in all clinical parameters after pharmacological intervention for the whole sample (T1-T2; all measures p < .02). However, reduction of fear as well as activation in (para)limbic structures during symptom provocation were now attenuated in Fear - but increased in Fear+.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age may predict a therapeutically unfavorable course of fear during agoraphobic symptom provocation. Since we found no negative impact of medication on fear development at all, there was some evidence that SS(N)RI treatment might improve the individual ability to get involved with the agoraphobic stimuli while conducting disorder-specific exposure.

Stability of personality traits over a five-year period in Swedish patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder and non-psychotic individuals: a study using the Swedish universities scales of personality

BACKGROUND

Personality is considered as an important aspect in persons with psychotic disorders. Several studies have investigated personality in schizophrenia. However, no study has investigated stability of personality traits exceeding three years in patients with schizophrenia. This study aims to investigate the stability of personality traits over a five-year period among patients with schizophrenia and non-psychotic individuals and to evaluate case-control differences.

METHODS

Patients with psychotic disorders (n = 36) and non-psychotic individuals (n = 76) completed Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP) at two occasions five years apart. SSP scores were analysed for effect of time and case-control differences by multiple analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) and within-subjects correlation.

RESULTS

MANCOVA within-subjects analysis did not show any effect of time. Thus, SSP mean scale scores did not significantly vary during the five-year interval. Within subject correlations (Spearman) ranged 0.30-0.68 and 0.54-0.75 for the different SSP scales in patients and controls, respectively. Patients scored higher than controls in SSP scales Somatic Trait Anxiety, Psychic Trait Anxiety, Stress Susceptibility, Lack of Assertiveness, Detachment, Embitterment, and Mistrust.

CONCLUSION

The stability of the SSP personality trait was reasonably high among patients with psychotic disorder, although lower than among non-psychotic individuals, which is in accordance with previous research.