Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies by solid phase immunoassays: advantages and technical concerns

Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Kidney Allograft Dysfunction: Current and Future Applications in the Era of Precision Medicine

Kidney transplantation stands as the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease, significantly improving both the quality and longevity of life compared to dialysis. In recent years, the survival rates for patients and grafts have markedly increased thanks to innovative strategies in desensitization protocols for incompatible transplants and advancements in immunosuppressive therapies. For kidney transplant recipients, preventing allograft rejection is of paramount importance, necessitating the use of immunosuppressive medications. Regular follow-up appointments are essential, as monitoring the function of the kidney allograft is critical. Currently, established biomarkers such as serum creatinine, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), proteinuria, and albuminuria are commonly employed to assess allograft function. However, these biomarkers have limitations, as elevated levels often indicate significant allograft damage only after it has occurred, thereby constraining treatment options and the potential for restoring graft function. Additionally, kidney biopsies, while considered the gold standard for diagnosing rejection, are invasive and carry associated risks. Consequently, the identification and development of new, sensitive, and specific biomarkers like dd-cfDNA, microRNAs (e.g., miR-21, miR-155), and sCD30 for allograft rejection are crucial. To tackle this challenge, intensive ongoing research employing cutting-edge technologies, including "omics" approaches, like genomic techniques, proteomics, or metabolomics, is uncovering a variety of promising new biomarkers.

Novel insights in the clinical management of hyperimmune patients before and after transplantation

Despite improvements in anti-Human Leucocyte Antigens antibody detection, identification, and characterization offer a better in peri-operative management techniques, antibodies remain a serious cause of morbidity and mortality for patients both before and after organ transplantation. Hyperimmune patients are disadvantaged by having to wait longer to receive an organ from a suitably matched donor. They could benefit from desensitization protocols in both pre- and post-transplantation period. Clinical studies are underway to highlight which best desensitization strategies could be assure the best outcome in both heart and kidney transplantation. Although most clinical evidence about desensitization strategies by using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, proteasome inhibitors, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, interleukin-6 blockade, cysteine protease and complement inhibitors, comes from kidney transplantation studies, many of the debated novel concepts can be easily applied to desensitization also in heart transplantation. Here, we discuss the candidates and recipients' management by using most common standard of care and novel therapeutics, desensitization endpoints, and strategies for future studies.

Human leukocyte antigen antibody sensitization, lung transplantation, and health equity

Women with advanced lung disease, particularly Black and Hispanic women, are more likely than other patients to have anti-human leukocyte (HLA) antibodies against potential donors. Sensitized patients, especially those who are highly sensitized, are less likely to be listed for lung transplant or to be considered candidates for mechanical circulatory support. They are also at higher risk for waitlist death. Institutional variability in approach to HLA antibody screening and pre-transplant management creates barriers to transplant that disproportionately impact Black and Hispanic women. At the same time, our understanding of the clinical significance of pre-transplant antibodies lags behind the sophistication of our screening assays. The lack of national data on pre- and post-transplant HLA antibody characteristics hinders research into strategies to mitigate concerns about these antibodies and to improve access to lung transplant among sensitized patients. Ongoing work should be done to identify clinically higher risk antibodies, to develop better strategies for safely crossing antibodies at the time of transplant, and to model changes in lung allocation to give priority to sensitized patients for a HLA antibody-antigen compatible donors. These priorities mandate a commitment to collaborative, multicenter research and to real time translation of results to clinical practice and allocation policy.

Detecting mismatched donor HLA types from allograft biopsies - An easily applicable tool for improved individualized risk assessment

Short-term allograft survival has improved among solid organ transplant (SOT) patients. An increasing number of SOT patients are prepared for re-transplantation because of chronic allograft failure. Lack of HLA typing or incomplete HLA typing of previous donors complicates pretransplant risk assessment, as repeated HLA mismatches may be missed. In addition, a complete HLA type of the donor is essential in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection. We aimed to determine donor HLA types from allograft biopsies from kidney, heart and liver grafts. Graft biopsies were obtained from 13 kidney, heart and liver transplanted patients. HLA typing was performed using q-PCR. Alleles of both donor and recipient origin were detected, and donor HLA type was concluded by deducting known HLA types of the recipient. For all 13 patients, we were able to determine mismatched donor HLA alleles from graft material. These results are promising, because they enable better individualized risk assessment.