Internal evaluation of risk stratification tool using serial procalcitonin and clinical risk factors in pediatric febrile neutropenia: The non-interventional, single institution experience prior to clinical implementation

Severe outcomes and risk factors of non-neutropenic fever episodes in hospitalized children with cancer in Kenya

Introduction

Compared to febrile neutropenia (FN), non-neutropenic fever (NNF) episodes in children with cancer have not been associated with severe outcomes. Risk factors for severe outcomes in FN and NNF episodes in children with cancer from low-middle-income countries (LMIC) are incompletely described.

Methods

A prospective, observational cohort study was conducted at a tertiary public referral hospital in western Kenya. Inclusion criteria were age ≤14 years, cancer diagnosis, hospitalized, fever >38.5°C or persistently >38°C. Neutropenia was an absolute count (ANC) <500 K/µL. Severe outcomes were BSI or death. Statistical analysis detected significance between groups and a univariate analysis was conducted.

Results

Of the 99 fevers, 54.5% were NNF episodes. Over 66% of NNF episodes were in patients with solid tumors. More severe outcomes were observed in NNF episodes compared to FN [BSI: 7.4% (4/54) vs. 4.4% (2/45); death: 7.4% (4/54) vs. 4.4% (2/45)], yet no deaths occurred in episodes with BSI. Acute leukemia not in remission (OR= 8.67, 95% CI [CI: 2.3-32.62]; p= 0.002) and concern for disease relapse (OR= 14.17, 95% CI [2.08-96.3]; p= 0.012) were significantly associated severe outcomes. Time to antibiotic administration (9 hours) did not differ by ANC. Under half (45.5%) of fever episodes had a blood culture ordered, with 93.9% obtained after administration of antibiotics.

Discussion

Non-neutropenic fever episodes had more severe outcomes. Prompt fever management is recommended in all children with cancer treated in an LMIC setting. Pediatric oncology treatment centers in LMICs should rigorously evaluate their fever management clinical practice. Clinical risk factors were identified, but a risk-stratified approach in an LMIC setting is not recommended. Urgent attention is needed to identify areas of clinical improvement.

Successful Management of Pediatric Patients with Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenia Using a Clinical Care Pathway in Egypt

BACKGROUND

Criteria for home management of low-risk febrile neutropenia remain challenging in supportive care. Careful selection of low-risk febrile neutropenic pediatric patients can improve outcomes and decrease complications. In the current study, we implemented a clinical pathway for pediatric patients presenting to the emergency room department with low-risk febrile neutropenia by using strict inclusion criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective study from December 2021 to September 2022; all patients presented to the emergency room department were screened for pathway evaluation, and risk stratification was performed using a strict checklist. Patients were included if they met the low-risk criteria. Thorough clinical and laboratory assessments were performed on these patients. All patients started oral antibiotics and were instructed about alarming signs. Patients were followed up at the outpatient clinic on days 3 and 7.

RESULTS

Two hundred and three patients with 200 episodes of low-risk febrile neutropenia were enrolled; one hundred and ten were males, and 90 were females; underlying hematological malignancies accounted for 54.0%. On day three, 181 patients out of 200 were afebrile for 24 hours (90.0%), and 47.5% were still neutropenic. At day seven, all study patients were afebrile, had recovering counts, and stopped antibiotics regardless of the count. Absolute neutrophil count recovery on day seven was achieved in 95.5% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Our inclusion criteria for patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia proved to be safe without deaths or intensive care unit admission and successful with the lowest admission rate, so it can be used for a stewardship program to avoid unnecessary patient admissions and help healthcare givers to optimize patient allocation and follow-up safely.

"Better at home": Mixed methods report of intricacies in pediatric febrile neutropenia management

INTRODUCTION

Many febrile neutropenia (FN) episodes are low risk (LR) for severe outcomes and can safely receive less aggressive management and early hospital discharge. Validated risk tools are recommended by the Children's Oncology Group to identify LR FN episodes. However, the complex dynamics of early hospital discharge and burdens faced by caregivers associated with the FN episode have been inadequately described.

METHODS

An adapted quality-of-life (QoL) survey instrument was administered by a convergent mixed methods design; qualitative and quantitative data from two sources, the medical record and the mixed methods survey instrument, were independently analyzed prior to linkage and integration. Code book was informed by conceptual framework; open coding was used. Mixed methods analysis used joint display of results to determine meta-inferences.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patient-caregiver dyads participated with a response rate of 87%. Of the 27 FN episodes, 51.8% (14/27) were LR and 40.7% (11/27) had an early hospital discharge. The LR and early hospital discharge groups had higher mean QoL scores comparatively. Meta-inferences are reciprocal influencers and expand the complex situation; FN negatively affects the entire family, and the benefits of hospital management were outweighed by risks and worsened symptoms, so an individualized approach to management and care at home was preferred.

CONCLUSION

Early discharge of LR FN episodes positively impacts QoL, yet risk-stratified management for FN is intricately complex. Optimal FN management should prioritize the patient's overall health; shared decision-making is recommended and can improve care delivery. These results should be confirmed in a larger, more heterogeneous population.

Joint Display of Integrated Data Collection for Mixed Methods Research: An Illustration From a Pediatric Oncology Quality Improvement Study

PURPOSE

Researchers often struggle to integrate quantitative and qualitative data. Joint displays of data collected using mixed methods provide a framework for supporting integration, yet the literature lacks methodologic articles illustrating in detail the iterative nature of constructing such displays. We demonstrate the process for creating a joint display for integrating the collection of data obtained by qualitative and quantitative methods.

METHODS

Within a convergent mixed methods cohort study, the Early Discharge of Febrile Neutropenic Children with Cancer Study, we constructed a joint display to inform integrated collection of 2 forms of data (quantitative and qualitative) from 2 sources (a patient-caregiver mixed methods survey and a manual abstraction of medical records).

RESULTS

In a first step, we used a data sources table to align related quantitative and qualitative data. The resulting table consisted of 2 side-by-side columns based on the mixed survey data. After several additional iterative steps, we constructed a final 6-column joint display. This final display delineated the separate data sources, linked constructs to the quantitative and qualitative variables within each source, and integrated the constructs across the separate data sources.

CONCLUSIONS

Challenges of integration, though not unique to prospective mixed methods cohort studies, stem from the sheer volume of qualitative and quantitative information and the need to logically organize the data in preparation for integrated data analysis. Tailoring joint displays to specific studies is challenging, but mixed methods researchers who embrace the methodologic malleability can produce effective joint displays to illustrate the mixed data collection linkages and create a preliminary structure ultimately for organizing mixed data findings.