Alcohol screening scores and the risk of intensive care unit admission and hospital readmission

Prevalence of Alcohol Use Characterized by Phosphatidylethanol in Patients With Respiratory Failure Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

Alcohol misuse is overlooked frequently in hospitalized patients, but is common among patients with pneumonia and acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Investigations in hospitalized patients rely heavily on self-report surveys or chart abstraction, which lack sensitivity. Therefore, our understanding of the prevalence of alcohol misuse before and during the COVID-19 pandemic is limited.

RESEARCH QUESTION

In critically ill patients with respiratory failure, did the proportion of patients with alcohol misuse, defined by the direct biomarker phosphatidylethanol, vary over a period including the COVID-19 pandemic?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure receiving mechanical ventilation were enrolled prospectively from 2015 through 2019 (before the pandemic) and from 2020 through 2022 (during the pandemic). Alcohol use data, including Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)-C scores, were collected from electronic health records, and phosphatidylethanol presence was assessed at ICU admission. The relationship between clinical variables and phosphatidylethanol values was examined using multivariable ordinal regression. Dichotomized phosphatidylethanol values (≥ 25 ng/mL) defining alcohol misuse were compared with AUDIT-C scores signifying misuse before and during the pandemic, and correlations between log-transformed phosphatidylethanol levels and AUDIT-C scores were evaluated and compared by era. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to handle missing phosphatidylethanol data.

RESULTS

Compared with patients enrolled before the pandemic (n = 144), patients in the pandemic cohort (n = 92) included a substantially higher proportion with phosphatidylethanol-defined alcohol misuse (38% vs 90%; P < .001). In adjusted models, absence of diabetes, positive results for COVID-19, and enrollment during the pandemic each were associated with higher phosphatidylethanol values. The correlation between health care worker-recorded AUDIT-C score and phosphatidylethanol level was significantly lower during the pandemic.

INTERPRETATION

The higher prevalence of phosphatidylethanol-defined alcohol misuse during the pandemic suggests that alcohol consumption increased during this period, identifying alcohol misuse as a potential risk factor for severe COVID-19-associated respiratory failure. Results also suggest that AUDIT-C score may be less useful in characterizing alcohol consumption during high clinical capacity.

Association between clinical measures of unhealthy alcohol use and subsequent year hospital admissions in a primary care population

BACKGROUND

Screening for unhealthy alcohol use in primary care may help identify patients at risk for negative health outcomes.

AIMS

This study examined the associations between 1) screening with the AUDIT-C (alcohol consumption) and 2) an Alcohol Symptom Checklist (symptoms of alcohol use disorder) and subsequent-year hospitalizations.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 29 primary care clinics in Washington State. Patients were screened in routine care (10/1/2016-2/1/2019) with the AUDIT-C (0-12) and administered the Alcohol Symptom Checklist (0-11) if they had AUDIT-C score ≥ 7. All-cause hospitalizations were measured within 1 year of the AUDIT-C and Alcohol Symptom Checklist. AUDIT-C and Alcohol Symptom Checklist scores were categorized based on previously used cut-points.

FINDINGS

Of 305,376 patients with AUDIT-Cs, 5.3% of patients were hospitalized in the following year. AUDIT-C scores had a J-shaped relationship with hospitalizations, with risk for all-cause hospitalizations higher for patients with the AUDIT-C scores 9-12 (12.1%; 95% CI: 10.6-13.7%, relative to a comparison group of those with AUDIT-C scores 1-2 (female)/1-3 (male) (3.7%; 95% CI: 3.6-3.8%), adjusted for socio-demographics. Patients with AUDIT-C ≥ 7 and Alcohol Symptom Checklist scores reflecting severe AUD were at increased risk of hospitalization (14.6%, 95% CI: 11.9-17.9%) relative to those with lower scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher AUDIT-C scores were associated with higher incidence of hospitalizations except among people with low-level drinking. Among patients with AUDIT-C ≥ 7, the Alcohol Symptom Checklist identified patients at increased risk of hospitalization. This study helps demonstrate the potential clinical utility of the AUDIT-C and Alcohol Symptom Checklist.

Rates, Reasons, and Independent Predictors of Readmissions in Portal Venous Thrombosis Hospitalizations in the USA

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT), generally considered rare, is becoming increasingly recognized with advanced imaging. Limited data exist regarding readmissions in PVT and its burden on the overall healthcare cost. This study aimed to outline the burden of PVT readmissions and identify the modifiable predictors of readmissions.

METHODS

The National Readmission Database (NRD) was used to identify PVT admissions from 2016 to 2019. Using the patient demographic and hospital-specific variables within the NRD, we grouped patient encounters into two cohorts, 30- and 90-day readmission cohorts. We assessed comorbidities using the validated Elixhauser comorbidity index. We obtained inpatient mortality rates, mean length of hospital stay (LOS), total hospital cost (THC), and causes of readmissions in both 30- and 90-day readmission cohorts. Using a multivariate Cox regression analysis, we identified the independent predictors of 30-day readmissions.

RESULTS

We identified 17,971 unique index hospitalizations, of which 2,971 (16.5%) were readmitted within 30 days. The top five causes of readmissions in both 30-day and 90-day readmission cohorts were PVT, sepsis, hepatocellular cancer, liver failure, and alcoholic liver cirrhosis. The following independent predictors of 30-day readmission were identified: discharge against medical advice (AMA) (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.86; P = 0.002); renal failure (aHR 1.44, P = 0.014), metastatic cancer (aHR 1.31, P = 0.016), fluid and electrolyte disorders (aHR 1.20, P = 0.004), diabetes mellitus (aHR 1.31, P = 0.001) and alcohol abuse (aHR 1.31, P ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The readmission rate identified in this study was higher than the national average and targeted interventions addressing these factors may help reduce the overall health care costs.

Interventions to Reduce Hospital and Emergency Department Utilization Among People With Alcohol and Substance Use Disorders: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Substance use disorders (SUDs), prevalent worldwide, are associated with significant morbidity and health care utilization.

OBJECTIVES

To identify interventions addressing hospital and emergency department utilization among people with substance use, to summarize findings for those seeking to implement such interventions, and to articulate gaps that can be addressed by future research.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A scoping review of the literature. We searched PubMed, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar for any articles published from January 2010 to June 2020. The main search terms included the target population of adults with substance use or SUDs, the outcomes of hospital and emergency department utilization, and interventions aimed at improving these outcomes in the target population.

SUBJECTS

Adults with substance use or SUDs, including alcohol use.

MEASURES

Hospital and emergency department utilization.

RESULTS

Our initial search identified 1807 titles, from which 44 articles were included in the review. Most interventions were implemented in the United States (n=35). Half focused on people using any substance (n=22) and a quarter on opioids (n=12). The tested approaches varied and included postdischarge services, medications, legislation, and counseling, among others. The majority of study designs were retrospective cohort studies (n=31).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we found few studies assessing interventions to reduce health care utilization among people with SUDs. The studies that we did identify differed across multiple domains and included few randomized trials. Study heterogeneity limits our ability to compare interventions or to recommend one specific approach to reducing health care utilization among this high-risk population.

Medications and Patient Factors Associated With Increased Readmission for Alcohol-Related Diagnoses

Objective

To investigate medication factors and patient characteristics associated with readmissions following alcohol-related hospitalizations.

Patients and Methods

Adult patients admitted from September 1, 2016, through August 31, 2019, who had an alcohol-related hospitalization were identified through electronic health records. Patient characteristics and medications of interest administered during hospitalization or prescribed at discharge were identified. Medications of interest included US Food and Drug Administration–approved medications for alcohol use disorder, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, gabapentin, opioids, and muscle relaxants. The primary outcome was to identify medications and patient factors associated with 30-day alcohol-related readmission. Secondary outcomes included medications and patient characteristics associated with multiple alcohol-related readmissions within a year from the index admission (ie, two or more readmissions) and factors associated with 30-day all-cause readmission.

Results

Characteristics of the 932 patients included in this study associated with a 30-day alcohol-related readmission included younger age, severity of alcohol withdrawal, history of psychiatric disorder, marital status, and the number of prior alcohol-related admission in the previous year. Benzodiazepine or barbiturate use during hospitalization or upon discharge was associated with 30-day alcohol-related readmission (P=.006). Gabapentin administration during hospitalization or upon discharge was not associated with 30-day alcohol-related readmission (P=.079).

Conclusion

The findings reinforce current literature identifying patient-specific factors associated with 30-day readmissions. Gabapentin use was not associated with readmissions; however, there was an association with benzodiazepine/barbiturate use.

Rethinking Unhealthy Alcohol Use in the United States: A Structured Review

Greater than moderate alcohol use spans a continuum that includes high levels of total alcohol consumed per period (heavy drinking) as well as episodes of intense drinking (binges) and can give rise to alcohol use disorder (AUD) when associated with an inability to control alcohol use despite negative consequences. Although moderate drinking and AUD have standard, operable definitions in the United States (US), a significant “gray area” remains in which an individual may exceed recommended drinking guidelines but does not meet the criteria for AUD (hereafter referred to as unhealthy alcohol use). To address this need, we conducted a structured literature search to evaluate how this gray area is defined and assess its burden within the US. For purposes of this review, we will refer to this gray area as “unhealthy alcohol use.” Although numerous terms are used to describe various unsafe drinking practices, our review did not find any studies in which the specific prevalence and/or burden of unhealthy alcohol use was evaluated. That is, we found no studies that focus exclusively on individuals who exceed moderate drinking guidelines but do not meet AUD criteria. Furthermore, we did not discover an established framework for identifying individuals with unhealthy alcohol use. The lack of a consistent framework for identifying unhealthy alcohol users has significant implications for patient management and disease burden assessment. Therefore, we propose the following framework in which unhealthy alcohol use comprises 2 distinct subpopulations: those at risk of experiencing alcohol-related consequences and those who have subthreshold problems associated with use. The former, termed “risky drinkers,” are defined by exceeding recommended guidelines for moderate drinking (⩽1 or 2 drinks per day for women and men, respectively). People with subthreshold problems associated with use, defined as exhibiting exactly 1 AUD symptom, would be classified as “problematic drinkers” within this proposed framework. These definitions would help bring the core elements of unhealthy alcohol use into focus, which in turn would help identify and provide management strategies sooner to those affected and reduce the overall burden of unhealthy alcohol use.

The association of alcohol use with all-cause and cardiovascular disease-related hospitalizations or death in older, high-risk Veterans

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of alcohol misuse among older adults has grown dramatically in the past decade, yet little is known about the association of alcohol misuse with hospitalization and death in this patient population.

METHODS

We examined the association between alcohol use (measured by a screening instrument in primary care) and rates of all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related 6-month hospitalization or death via electronic health records (EHRs) in a nationally representative sample of older, high-risk Veterans. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including frailty and comorbid conditions.

RESULTS

The all-cause hospitalization or death rate at 6 months was 14.9%, and the CVD-related hospitalization or death rate was 1.8%. In adjusted analyses, all-cause hospitalization or death was higher in older Veterans who were nondrinkers or harmful use drinkers compared to moderate use drinkers, but CVD-related hospitalization or death was similar in all categories of drinking.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the complex association between alcohol and all-cause acute healthcare utilization found in the broader population is similar in older, high-risk Veteran patients. These findings do not support an association between alcohol consumption and CVD-specific hospitalizations.

Clinical impact of chronic substance abuse in a Norwegian ICU-population

BACKGROUND

The clinical impact of chronic substance abuse of alcohol and drugs-referred to as substance use disorders (SUD)-is often overlooked in the intensive care (ICU) setting. The aims of the present study were to identify patients with SUD-regardless of cause of admission-in a mixed Norwegian ICU-population, and to compare patients with and without SUD with regard to clinical characteristics and mortality.

METHODS

Cross-sectional prospective study of a mixed medical and surgical ICU-population aged ≥18 years in Oslo, Norway. Data were collected consecutively, using a questionnaire including the AUDIT-C test, medical records and toxicology results. Patients classified with SUD were divided into the subgroups alcohol use disorders (AUD) and drug use disorders (DUD).

RESULTS

Overall, 222 (26%) of the 861 patients included were classified with SUD; 137 (16%) with AUD and 85 (10%) with DUD. 130/222 (59%) of the SUD-patients had substance abuse-related cause of ICU-admission. Compared to non-SUD patients, DUD-patients were younger (median age 42 vs 65 years) and had lower SAPS II scores (41 vs 46), while AUD-patients had higher SOFA scores (8.0 vs 7.3). Overall, age-adjusted logistic regression analysis showed similar hospital mortality for SUD-patients and non-SUD patients, but AUD was associated with increased mortality among medical patients and in patients with sepsis (OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.0-2.8), and OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.1-6.2)).

CONCLUSION

One in four ICU-patients had SUD regardless of cause of admission. Alcohol use disorder was associated with increased mortality in medical patients and in patients with sepsis.

Risk factors and costs associated with 30-day readmissions following alcohol-related hospitalizations in the United States from 2010 to 2015

Patients with alcohol-related diagnoses at initial hospitalization are at high risk of 30-day readmission. Understanding risk factors for 30-day readmission among these patients may help to identify those who would benefit from efforts to reduce risk of readmission. The Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to estimate 30-day all-cause readmissions among United States patients with an alcohol-related index hospitalization and to evaluate risk factors and costs associated with these readmissions. Included patients were 18 years of age or older at initial hospitalization, had an alcohol-related primary diagnosis (based on ICD-9-CM codes), and were discharged between 2010 and 2015. They were followed for 30 days after initial hospitalization within the calendar year to identify all-cause readmissions. A logistic regression analysis assessed the association between risk factors and 30-day readmission. Average costs of initial admissions and readmissions were estimated. Among 113,931,723 adult index hospitalizations, 1,124,228 had alcohol-related diagnoses. Patients had a mean age of 49 years, 73% were male, and 45% had public insurance coverage. The annual rate of 30-day readmissions among patients with index alcohol-related hospitalizations increased from 119 readmissions per 1000 admissions in 2010 to 140 per 1000 in 2015, while the rate of readmissions among patients with all-cause hospitalizations declined from 103 to 98 per 1000. The regression analysis suggested that age, male sex, comorbid conditions, discharge against medical advice, admission to large and teaching hospitals, and Medicaid vs. non-Medicaid payment were all risk factors for 30-day readmission. Mean costs of initial alcohol-related hospitalizations were greater among those with a 30-day readmission than without a 30-day readmission, and the mean cost of 30-day readmission was even greater. Mitigating the upward trend in rates of readmission following alcohol-related initial hospitalizations may be addressed through better identification of high-risk patients who are admitted with an alcohol-related diagnosis and greater use of existing evidence-based psychosocial and pharmacotherapy treatment methods.

Pilot Randomized Trial of a Recovery Navigator Program for Survivors of Critical Illness With Problematic Alcohol Use

Many survivors of critical illness have problematic alcohol use, associated with risk of death and hospital readmission. We tested the feasibility, acceptability, treatment fidelity, and potential efficacy of a customized alcohol intervention for patients in ICUs. The intervention was delivered by a Recovery Navigator using principles of motivational interviewing and shared decision-making.

DESIGN

Pilot randomized trial.

SETTING

Two urban ICUs in Denver, CO.

PATIENTS

Patients with problematic alcohol use were enrolled prior to hospital discharge.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to usual care, single-session motivational interviewing and shared decision-making, or multisession motivational interviewing and shared decision-making.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We assessed feasibility via enrollment and attrition, acceptability via patient satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8), fidelity via observation and questionnaires, and potential efficacy via group means and CIs on measures of alcohol use, psychiatric symptoms, cognition, and other alcohol-related problems. Over 18 months, we offered the study to 111 patients, enrolled 47, and randomized 36; refusals were mainly due to stigma or patients' desire to handle problems on their own. Groups were similar at baseline, and 67% of patients met criteria for alcohol use disorder. Average patient satisfaction was high (mean = 28/32) regardless of group assignment. Sessions were delivered with 98% adherence to motivational interviewing principles and excellent motivational interviewing spirit; patients perceived the intervention to be more autonomy supportive than usual care. Group means after 6 months suggested that patients receiving the intervention might improve on measures such as alcohol use, psychiatric symptoms, legal problems, and days of paid work; however, they did not receive more substance use treatment. All results were nonsignificant due to small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

A Recovery Navigator intervention was feasible and acceptable for delivering high-fidelity brief interventions to ICU patients. Changes in alcohol-related problems with motivational interviewing and shared decision-making were nonsignificant but clinically meaningful in size. A full-scale randomized trial of motivational interviewing and shared decision-making is warranted.

Alcohol misuse and outpatient follow-up after hospital discharge: a retrospective cohort study

Purpose

Patients with alcohol misuse are less likely to receive preventive health services but more likely to utilize emergency health services. However, the association between alcohol misuse and outpatient follow-up after hospitalization is unknown and may depend on whether a patient experiences a critical illness. We sought to determine whether alcohol misuse was associated with lower rates of outpatient follow-up after hospital discharge and whether the magnitude of this association differed in patients who experienced a critical illness.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective cohort study using administrative data from an urban safety net hospital. Patients were included if they were admitted between 2011 and 2015, were between the ages of 18 and 89, resided within the safety net county, were discharged home, and were at moderate to high risk for hospital readmission within the subsequent 30 days. Alcohol misuse was identified using a combination of ICD-9 codes and response to a single screening question. The primary outcome was a combined measure of follow-up with a primary care physician or specialist provider in the 30 days following hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for factors known to be associated with healthcare utilization.

Results

Overall, 17,575 patients were included in the analysis; 4984 (28%) had alcohol misuse. In the 30 days following hospital discharge, 46% of patients saw any outpatient provider. In an unadjusted analysis, the association between alcohol misuse and attending any outpatient follow-up was dependent on whether patients had a critical illness (p value < 0.0001) with the highest rates of follow-up in survivors of critical illness without alcohol misuse (53%, 95% CI 51%, 55%) followed by patients without alcohol misuse or critical illness (49%; 95% CI 48%, 50%), patients with alcohol misuse without critical illness (38%; 95% CI 36%, 39%), and patients with alcohol misuse and a critical illness (37%; 95% CI 35%, 40%). Adjusting for factors associated with healthcare utilization, these findings were modestly attenuated but unchanged.

Conclusions

Patients with alcohol misuse who are at moderate to high risk for hospital readmission may benefit from targeted interventions to increase rates of outpatient follow-up after hospital discharge.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13722-018-0125-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Experience of Patients with Alcohol Misuse after Surviving a Critical Illness. A Qualitative Study

RATIONALE

Alcohol misuse is common in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), but there is currently no evidence-based approach to address drinking in ICU survivors.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to describe the experience of ICU survivors with alcohol misuse during their hospitalization and the 3 months after hospital discharge to inform an alcohol-specific intervention for this unique population.

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive qualitative study of ICU survivors from medical ICUs in three separate hospitals with a positive screening result on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Semistructured interviews were conducted 3 months after hospital discharge of patients. Patients were also allowed to nominate up to two friends or family members for enrollment to provide additional perspective on the patient's experience.

RESULTS

We enrolled 50 patients and 22 of their friends and/or family members. The average APACHE II score was 23, 80% of patients were male, and the average age was 50 years; 70% of patients and 77% of friends/family members completed the semistructured interview 3 months after hospital discharge. We identified three domains that could inform an alcohol-specific intervention, each with multiple themes: motivation with complications (anxiety and depression, critical illness as a catalyst, delirium and cognitive impairment); therapeutic alliance (autonomy, failure and opportunities to build a therapeutic alliance); and the return to the home milieu (lack of screening for depression and anxiety, social network support for drinking, social isolation, social network support for abstinence, lack of available and affordable treatment, and negative experiences with Alcoholics Anonymous).

CONCLUSIONS

An alcohol intervention for ICU survivors would account for the context in which patients are making a decision about their drinking and optimize the patient-provider interaction. Contrary to current paradigms that focus on addressing alcohol consumption only during a hospitalization, an intervention for ICU survivors should continue as patients transition from the hospital to home.

Epidemiology and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in the Era of Combination Antiretroviral Therapy

Purpose. The impact of critical illness on survival of HIV-infected patients in the era of antiretroviral therapy remains uncertain. We describe the epidemiology of critical illness in this population and identify predictors of mortality. Materials and Methods. Retrospective cohort of HIV-infected patients was admitted to intensive care from 2002 to 2014. Patient sociodemographics, comorbidities, case-mix, illness severity, and 30-day mortality were captured. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of mortality. Results. Of 282 patients, mean age was 44 years (SD 10) and 169 (59%) were male. Median (IQR) CD4 count and plasma viral load (PVL) were 125 cells/mm³ (30–300) and 28,000 copies/mL (110–270,000). Fifty-five (20%) patients died within 30 days. Factors independently associated with mortality included APACHE II score (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.12; 95% CI 1.08–1.16; p < 0.001), cirrhosis (aHR 2.30; 95% CI 1.12–4.73; p = 0.024), coronary artery disease (aHR 6.98; 95% CI 2.20–22.13; p = 0.001), and duration of HIV infection (aHR 1.07 per year; 95% CI 1.02–1.13; p = 0.01). CD4 count and PVL were not associated with mortality. Conclusions. Mortality from an episode of critical illness in HIV-infected patients remains high but appears to be driven by acute illness severity and HIV-unrelated comorbid disease rather than degree of immune suppression.