A new oligonucleotide-based ELISA for the detection of anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies

Improved diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus with human-derived double-stranded DNA antigen

Anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA) serve as a crucial serological indicator for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) is mainly used in clinical diagnosis of SLE, but suffers from low specificity, partially because the use of dsDNA antigens of varied sources in current CIA kits that sometimes led to controversial results. On the basis that anti-dsDNA in healthy individuals tend to selectively bind with dsDNA originating from pathogens, whereas pathogenic anti-dsDNA in SLE patients bind all forms of dsDNA, here we proposed the use of dsDNA fragment derived from human genome as antigen (synthesized via PCR using the human genomic DNA as the template). A magnetic bead-based immunofluorescence assay (IFA) was thus developed for SLE diagnosis, which exhibited improved sensitivity and specificity over CIA using the WHO reference reagent (15/174) as standard. For clinical serum sample analysis (n = 590), IFA exhibited an accuracy of 71.9% that was higher than CIA (65.3%). Crucially, the IFA results exhibited stronger correlations with the activity of SLE, renal involvement, and its prognosis. Besides the improved clinical diagnosis, the proposed IFA also holds great promise in assay standardization due to the high homogeneity of the synthetic dsDNA.

Anti-dsDNA Testing Specificity for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Autoantibody specificity in autoimmune diseases is variable due to each patient's individual spectrum of autoantibodies and the inherent differences between detection methods and tests. Since false-positive results have downstream consequences, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) specificity from published studies of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

A systematic review (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects) identified cross-sectional or case-control studies published January 2004 to August 2019, reporting anti-dsDNA test accuracy data in SLE. Study quality was assessed using Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, version 2. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate specificity by test method or named test where feasible.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included covering 43 different tests. The Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence test (CLIFT) and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay methods are likely to be ≥ 90% specific (Euroimmun 97.8% (95% CI 96.2%-98.7%) 4 studies; EliA 94.7% (95% CI 91.7%-96.7%), 6 studies; CLIFT 98.7% (95% CI 96.7%-99.5%), 8 studies/7 tests]. For other test methods, specificity was not fully demonstrated to be ≥ 90% and/or the control group included healthy patients possibly overestimating specificity. More studies are required for NOVA Lite [96.0% (95% CI 87.2%-98.9%), 5 studies], chemiluminescence immunoassays [92.3% (95% CI 83.6%-96.6%), 6 studies/4 tests], multiplex immunoassays [89.3% (95% CI 86.1%-91.8%), 4 studies/2 tests], and Farr fluorescent immunoassays (no estimate, 2 studies). Specificity data reported for Farr radioimmunoassays [93.8% (95% CI 85.4-97.5%), 11 studies, 9 tests] and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays [93.4% (95% CI 89.9%-95.7%), 15 studies/16 tests] lacked consistency.

CONCLUSION

Anti-dsDNA testing shows considerable variation in test specificity, with potential impact on the management of SLE patients. This review may help laboratory specialists and clinicians choose and interpret the appropriate anti-dsDNA test for their setting.

Complement deficiency in pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND:

Pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) accounts for about 10%–20% of all patients with SLE. Deficiencies in early complement components of the classical pathway are the strong genetic risk factor for the development of SLE. In this study, clinical and laboratory manifestations of both complement-deficient and normal complement pSLE patients were compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

To investigate clinical and immunological manifestations of pSLE in Iran, 36 consecutive pSLE patients (onset before 18 years) who were followed up over a period of 2 years, were studied. Complement C1q and C2 levels were measured using radial immunodifusion assay and complement C3 and C4 levels were measured using nephelometry. Medical records were retrospectively evaluated from patient database of Children Medical Center Hospital. Data were assessed through descriptive analysis (confidence interval = 95%), paired t-test, and Pearson correlation test.

RESULTS:

Twenty-one patients (58%) had at least one component of complement deficiency. Ten patients (27%) had low C1q level, 11 patients (30.5%) had low C2, nine patients (25%) had low C3, and four patients (11%) had low C4 level. Serum level of complement in pSLE was significantly lower than the control group, except C4 (P = 0.005). The low C1q patients had an earlier age of onset of disease (P < 0.0001). The cutaneous manifestations were more frequent and much more severe in pSLE with low complement (100% vs. 73%). The frequency of renal and musculoskeletal symptoms was equal, but renal morbidity was more common in pSLE with low complement. Positivity for anti-ds-DNA was less common in pSLE with low complement (71% vs. 86%).

CONCLUSION:

In pSLE patients with early disease onset and more aggressive SLE manifestations and negative anti-ds-DNA test, complement deficiency should be considered.

Detection of autoimmune antibodies in localized scleroderma by synthetic oligonucleotide antigens

In this study, we developed a series of synthetic oligonucleotides that allowed us to investigate the details on the antigen recognition by autoimmune antibodies in localized scleroderma subjects. Besides dramatically improved analytical specificity of the assay, our data suggests a potential linking for antibodies to DNA to the biological status of disease state in localized scleroderma. Moreover, introducing chemical modifications into short synthetic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecules completely changed the binding titers of corresponding antibodies and their clinical relevance. The strongest observed effect was registered for the localized scleroderma skin damage index (LoSDI) on the IgG antibodies to TC dinucleotide-rich double-stranded antigen (p < 0.001). In addition to providing valuable tools for diagnosis of clinically relevant biomarkers, we believe that this work opens up new opportunities for research on antibodies to nucleic acids in localized scleroderma and other autoimmune diseases.

Chemiluminescent immunoassay technology: what does it change in autoantibody detection?

Diagnostic technology is rapidly evolving, and over the last decade, substantial progress has been made even for the identification of antibodies, increasingly approaching this type of diagnostic to that of automated clinical chemistry laboratory. In this review, we describe the analytical and diagnostic characteristics of chemiluminescence technology in its strength and in its applicability for a more rapid and accurate diagnosis of autoimmune diseases. The wide dynamic range, greater than that of immunoenzymatic methods, the high sensitivity and specificity of the results expressed in quantitative form, the high degree of automation and the clinical implications related to the reduction in the turnaround time, and the ability to run a large number of antibody tests (even of different isotypes), directed towards large antigenic panels in random access mode, make this technology the most advanced in the clinical laboratory, with enormous repercussions on the workflow and on the autoimmunology laboratory organisation. Further improvements are expected in the coming years with the development of new analytical platforms such as the flow-injection chemiluminescent immunoassay, the two-dimensional resolution for chemiluminescence multiplex immunoassay and the magnetic nanoparticles chemiluminescence immunoassay, which will likely result in additional increases in the clinical efficacy of antibody tests.

Application of fluorescent protein-tagged trans factors and immobilized cis elements to monitoring of toxic metals based on in vitro protein-DNA interactions

Environmental toxic metals cause serious global public health problems. On-site monitoring protects people from exposure to such harmful elements. In this study, the bacterial transcriptional switches were applied to monitoring of toxic metals. ArsR and CadC, trans factors of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, were fused to GFP. The fusion proteins, ArsR-GFP and CadC-GFP, associated with cis elements, P(ars)-O(ars) and P(cad)-O(cad), respectively and dissociated from those upon recognition of As(III) or Pb/Cd. Cell lysates containing ArsR-GFP were pre-incubated with As(III) standard solutions for 15 min and loaded into P(ars)-O(ars)-immobilized microplate wells. Cell lysates containing CadC-GFP were pre-incubated with Pb or Cd solutions and loaded into P(cad)-O(cad)-immobilized wells. The cell lysates were incubated for 15 min and removed from the wells. Fluorescence intensity in the wells dose-dependently decreased in response to As(III) up to 200 μg/l or Pb/Cd up to 100 μg/l. Detection limits were 10 μg/l for As(III) 10 μg/l for Cd, and 20 μg/l for Pb with a microplate fluororeader, whereas 5.0 μg/l for As(III), 1.0 μg/l for Cd, and 10 μg/l for Pb with a handheld fluorometer. This method was available to detect Pb/Cd or As(III) in water containing soil extracts. This is the first demonstration of a simple and rapid fluorometry to detect analytes based on in vitro interaction between a cis element and a trans factor.

Anti-Scl-70 (topo-I) antibodies in SLE: Myth or reality?

Autoantibodies to topoisomerase I (topo-I, also referred to as Scl-70, ATA) have historically been considered a specific marker for systemic sclerosis (SSc). Although found in approximately 20% of SSc sera, other evidence indicated that ATA also occur in up to 25% of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Given that SLE is approximately 100 times more prevalent than SSc, the number of ATA positive SLE patients is at least 2-3 orders of magnitude greater than the prevalence of ATA in SSc. These observations have raised questions about the disease specificity and clinical value of ATA. Therefore, our objective was to analyse the prevalence of ATA in different disease conditions with a special focus on SLE employing a systematic literature review (meta-analysis) in combination with our experimental investigations.

Diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus: new-generation immunoassays for measurement of anti-dsDNA antibodies are an effective alternative to the Farr technique and the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of four new enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for anti-double-stranded-DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies, in comparison with the Farr assay and the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT). To this purpose, sera from four patient groups were collected: 52 sera from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); 28 from patients with other connective tissue diseases (CTD); 36 from patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection; and 24 from those with acute viral infection. All sera were tested for anti-dsDNA antibodies by four EIA methods using a different antigenic DNA source [synthetic oligonucleotide (Method A), circular plasmid (Method B), recombinant (Method C), and purified extracted (Method D)], and by CLIFT and Farr assays. The diagnostic sensitivity of the assays was as follows: 84.6% (Method A), 73% (B), 82.7% (C), 84.6% (D), 55.8% (CLIFT), and 78.8% (Farr). Specificity was 82.9% (A), 97.7% (B), 96.5% (C), 94.3% (D), 96.5% (CLIFT), and 90.9% (Farr). From these data, we can conclude that the new-generation EIA methods evaluated in this study have higher sensitivity than the CLIFT and Farr assays and, with the exception of Method A, have specificity similar to the CLIFT and slightly higher than the Farr assay. These findings suggest that EIA tests may replace CLIFT as a screening test and the Farr assay as a specific test, for anti-dsDNA antibody detection.