The Prognostic Value of External vs Internal Pancreatic Duct Stents in CR-POPF after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The impact of pancreatic duct stent placement on the clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate for high-risk anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the impact of pancreatic duct stent outcomes on the prognosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with high-risk anastomoses.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were identified through comprehensive searches in Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed databases. Cochrane Collaboration's tool RoB2 was used to evaluate study quality. The presence of non-dilated main pancreatic duct and soft gland texture were used to identify high risk anastomoses. The primary outcome measured was clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate. The heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Six studies (n = 476) were included. The pooled data showed no significant difference in the clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate between stented and nonstented groups for at least one high-risk factor out of two factors selected (p = 0.234). Patients with non-dilated main pancreatic duct who received stent placement had a lower clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (RR = 0.582, 95%CI = 0.383-0.883, p = 0.011). In contrast, patients with soft pancreatic texture showed no significant difference between two groups (p = 0.879). After removing the study identified by sensitivity analysis as the origin of heterogeneity from general cohorts, the stented group had a lower clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (RR = 0.608, 95%CI = 0.413-0.895, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of robust evidence to support pancreatic duct stent placement for high-risk anastomoses. Nevertheless, stent implantation may be beneficial for patients with non-dilated pancreatic duct or external stent drainage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered in advance with PROSPERO (CRD42023471943).

Comparison of surgical outcomes between single-layer and double-layer pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most severe complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and this study investigates the effects of single-layer and double-layer pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) on POPF.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Four electronic databases were systematically searched until March 2024: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) software. Mean difference (MD) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to indicate continuous or dichotomous variables, respectively. Ten studies were included, comprising 1811 patients.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Compared to the double-layer PJ group, the single-layer PJ group had a similar POPF rate (OR=0.73; P=0.28) and grade C POPF rate (OR=0.55; P=0.12), but a lower grade B POPF rate (OR=0.50; 95% CI: 0.31-0.81; P=0.005). The clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) rate was lower in the single-layer PJ group (OR=0.47; 95% CI: 0.31-0.73; P<0.001), especially in the 2017 International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) criteria subgroup (OR=0.44; 95% CI: 0.27-0.73; P=0.001), the China subgroup (OR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.26-0.64; P<0.001), and the minimally invasive subgroup (OR=0.40; 95% CI: 0.22-0.74; P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with double-layer PJ, single-layer PJ after PD might reduce the incidence of CR-POPF.

Jejunal Perforation Due to Internal Pancreatic Stents Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Case Series and Technical Modification

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex surgical procedure performed to treat various conditions, including pancreatic head cancer and ampullary tumors. Postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs) remain one of the most challenging complications of PD, with potentially severe consequences such as abscess formation, bleeding, and even mortality. To mitigate the risk of POPFs, internal pancreatic stents are often employed to promote healing by diverting pancreatic secretions. Although internal stents offer advantages, including the avoidance of external drainage, complications such as stent migration, cholangitis, and liver abscesses have been commonly documented. A jejunal perforation caused by internal pancreatic stents, however, is an extremely rare complication. In this report, we describe three cases of jejunal perforations caused by internal pancreatic stents following PD and present a modified technique to reduce the risk of this complication. Three cases of jejunal perforation following PD were observed. In Case 1, a 69-year-old female developed intra-abdominal abscesses, and computed tomography (CT) revealed a perforation caused by a pancreatic stent, necessitating reoperation. In Case 2, an 83-year-old male exhibited a perforation and hematoma on CT 36 hours after surgery, requiring reoperation. In Case 3, a 66-year-old male presented with an inflammatory response five days post-surgery. CT revealed stent-related perforation, leading to reoperation. All patients fully recovered following surgical intervention. These cases underscore the importance of careful pancreatic stent placement during PD to minimize complications. The likely cause of the jejunal perforations was the perpendicular angle of the stent placement, leading to erosion of the jejunal wall. To address this issue, a modified technique was introduced, involving advancing the stent 5 cm into the jejunal lumen to reduce any direct pressure on the jejunal wall. This adjustment has prevented further cases of perforation, highlighting the critical need for surgical vigilance and technical modifications to enhance patient outcomes following PD.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy and an external pancreatic stent in risky patients: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing debate about the most appropriate method for reconstructing the pancreas after a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study assessed the impact of pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) with an external pancreatic stent on postoperative outcomes following PD in high-risk patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study involves a propensity score-matched analysis of high-risk patients who underwent PD with PG reconstruction. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula (POPF). Secondary outcomes included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, re-exploration rate, as well as postoperative morbidity and mortality rates.

RESULTS

The study included 78 patients; 26 patients underwent PD with Pancreatogastrostomy (PG) and an external pancreatic stent, while 52 underwent PG without a pancreatic stent. Blood loss and operative time did not significantly differ between the two groups. The overall postoperative morbidity was higher in the group without a stent than in the stented group (34.6% vs. 15.4%, P = 0.06). No patient in the pancreatic stent group developed a clinically relevant POPF; however, in the non-stented group of PG, 17.3% developed POPF. There were no cases of hospital mortality in the stented group. However, in the non-stented group, two hospital mortality happened (one case was due to the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) secondary to POPF grade C, and the other was due to pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSION

PG with an external pancreatic stent results in fewer clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas, a decrease in postoperative morbidities, and a non-existent mortality rate in high-risk patients.

Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of recurrent acute pancreatitis after pancreaticojejunostomy: A case report

BACKGROUND

Drainage through pancreatic duct stenting is a crucial step in preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. There are virtually no reported cases of recurrent acute pancreatitis following pancreaticoduodenectomy, and there is currently no supporting research on the timing for stent replacement or removal.

CASE SUMMARY

We report a patient in whom a pancreatic duct stent placed during pancreaticoduodenectomy failed to detach as expected, resulting in recurrent episodes of acute pancreatitis. The patient underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to remove the obstructing pancreatic duct stent, and no abdominal pain or acute pancreatitis episodes were observed during the one-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the importance of regular follow-up and appropriate management of pancreatic duct stents in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Our findings provide valuable insights for the clinical management of such cases.

Stent A pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: Is it always necessary?

The establishment of a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is considered the most common and, concomitantly, the most serious complication associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The search for either technical modifications of the operative technique or pharmaceutical interventions that could possibly aid in decreasing the incidence of this often-devastating complication appears justified. The stenting of the pancreatic duct, with the use of either internal or external stents, has been evaluated in this direction. In theory, it is an approach that could eliminate many pathophysiological factors responsible for the occurrence of a POPF. The purpose of the present study was to review the current data regarding the role of pancreatic duct stenting on the incidence of POPF, after PD, by using PubMed and Reference Citation Analysis. In general, previous studies seem to highlight the superiority of external stents over their internal counterparts in regard to the incidence of POPF; this is at the cost, however, of increased morbidity associated mainly with the stent removal. Certainly, the use of an internal stent is a less invasive approach with acceptable results and is definitely deprived of the drawbacks arising through the complete diversion of pancreatic juice from the gastrointestinal tract. Bearing in mind the scarcity of high-quality data on the subject, an approach of reserving stent placement for the high-risk for POPF patients and individualizing the selection between the use of an internal or an external stent according to the distinct characteristics of each individual case scenario appears appropriate.

Efficacy of the omental roll-up technique in pancreaticojejunostomy to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Backgrounds/Aims

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is being performed more frequently. A pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) leak is the major determinant of patient outcomes. An omental flap around PJ might improve postoperative outcomes.

Methods

A prospective randomized controlled trial was planned at PGIMER, Chandigarh. Fifty-eight patients meeting the criteria were included in the study. Group A underwent PD with omental roll-up and group B underwent standard PD.

Results

The mean age of patients in group A was 57.1 ± 14.3 years and 51.2 ± 10.7 in group B. Jaundice (p = 0.667), abdominal pain (p = 0.69), and co-morbidities were equal among the groups. The body mass index of patients in group B was higher at 24.3 ± 5.4 kg/m2 (p = 0.03). The common bile duct diameter (12.6 ± 5.3 mm vs. 17.2 ± 10.3 mm, p = 0.13) and the pancreatic duct diameter (4.06 ± 2.01 mm vs. 4.60 ± 2.43 mm, p = 0.91) were comparable. The intraoperative blood loss (mL) was significantly higher in group B (233.33 ± 9.57 vs. 343.33 ± 177.14, p = 0.04). Drain fluid amylase levels on postoperative day (POD) 1 (p = 0.97) and POD3 (p = 0.92) were comparable. The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade A (p ≥ 0.99) and grade B (p = 0.54) were comparable. The mean postoperative length of stay among was similar (p = 0.89).

Conclusions

An omental wrap can be performed without increase in complexity of the procedure. However, its utility in preventing POPFs and morbidity remains unclear.

A modified Blumgart method using a homemade crochet needle facilitates pancreaticojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Among the safest procedures for anastomosis in pancreaticoduodenectomy, Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy is associated with low rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and postoperative complications. However, this technique is difficult to perform during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). This study presents a modified Blumgart method using a homemade crochet needle to facilitate laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy and evaluates its safety and reliability.

METHODS

From February 2019 to October 2022, 96 LPD surgeries with the new technique were performed by the same surgeons in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The operative details (operative time, pancreaticojejunostomy time, POPF rate, postoperative complication rate, mortality rate) were analyzed along with clinical and pathological indicators (pancreatic duct diameter, pancreatic texture, and histopathological findings).

RESULTS

There were 54 men and 42 women with a mean age of 63.38 ± 10.41 years. The intraoperative bleeding volume, operative time and postoperative length of hospital stay were 198.43 ± 132.97 mL, 445.30 ± 87.05 min and 13.68 ± 4.02 days, respectively. The operation time of pancreaticojejunostomy was 66.28 ± 10.17 min. Clinically relevant POPFs (grades B and C) occurred in 14.6% of patients. Only one patient had postoperative abdominal hemorrhage and was cured after reoperation. There were no operative or in-hospital deaths. With our proposed modification, the pancreatic duct and jejunal orifice are aligned correctly during duct-to-mucosa (DTM) after the application of external traction through the homemade crochet needle. The space between the posterior wall of pancreatic remnant and jejunal loop can be exposed by adjusting the tension of the external threads, which can facilitate DTM.

CONCLUSIONS

A modified Blumgart method using a homemade crochet needle could be technically feasible and safe during LPD. A randomized control trial is needed to confirm these findings.

Postoperative pancreatitis and pancreatic fistulae: a review of current evidence

OBJECTIVES

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) represents one of the most severe complications following pancreatic surgery. Despite being a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, its pathophysiology is poorly understood. In recent years, there has been growing evidence to support the role of postoperative or post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) in the development of POPF. This article reviews the contemporary literature on POPF pathophysiology, risk factors, and prevention strategies.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using electronic databases, including Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, to retrieve relevant literature published between 2005 and 2023. A narrative review was planned from the outset.

RESULTS

A total of 104 studies fulfilled criteria for inclusion. Forty-three studies reported on technical factors predisposing to POPF, including resection and reconstruction technique and adjuncts for anastomotic reinforcement. Thirty-four studies reported on POPF pathophysiology. There is compelling evidence to suggest that PPAP plays a critical role in the development of POPF. The acinar component of the remnant pancreas should be regarded as an intrinsic risk factor; meanwhile, operative stress, remnant hypoperfusion, and inflammation represent common mechanisms for acinar cell injury.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence base for PPAP and POPF is evolving. Future POPF prevention strategies should look beyond anastomotic reinforcement and target underlying mechanisms of PPAP development.

Application of split pancreatic duct stent in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a classic surgical method for diseases, such as tumors at the lower end of the common bile duct, pancreatic head, and benign and malignant tumors of the duodenum. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most serious complications of LPD. To reduce the incidence of grade B or C POPF and other complications after LPD, we applied a split pancreatic duct stent combined with the characteristics of internal and external stent drainage. Between September 2020 and September 2022,12 patients underwent placement of the Split pancreatic duct stent during LPD. Data on basic characteristics of patients, surgical related indicators and postoperative POPF incidence were collected and analyzed. The results showed that the average operation time was 294.2 ± 36 minutes, average time for pancreaticojejunostomy was 35.9 ± 4.1 minutes, and average estimated blood loss was 204.2 ± 58.2 mL. Biochemical leakage occurred in 2 patients (16.7%), whereas no grade B or C POPF, 1 case (8.3%) had postoperative bleeding, and no death occurred within 30 days after the operation. Preliminary experience shows that the split pancreatic duct stent can effectively reduce the incidence of complications after LPD, especially grade B or C POPF.

Pancreatic duct stents

Pancreatic duct stenting using endoscopy or surgery is widely used for the management of benign and malignant pancreatic diseases. Endoscopic pancreatic stents are mainly used to relieve pain caused by chronic pancreatitis and pancreas divisum, and to treat pancreatic duct disruption and stenotic pancreaticointestinal anastomosis after surgery. They are also used to prevent postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis and postoperative pancreatic fistula, treat pancreatic cancer, and locate radiolucent stones. Recent advances in endoscopic techniques, such as endoscopic ultrasonography and balloon enteroscopy, and newly designed stents have broadened the indications for pancreatic duct stenting. In this review we outlined the types, insertion procedures, efficacy, and complications of endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placement, and summarized the applications of pancreatic duct stents in surgery.

Impact of internal and external drainage of the pancreatic duct on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Based on the domestic and foreign research on the impact of internal and external drainage of the pancreatic duct on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), we conducted a meta-analysis to provide doctors with evidence on its applications in clinical work.

AIM

To systematically evaluate the effect of internal and external drainage of the pancreatic duct on pancreatic fistula after PD.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang, and VIP were searched for randomized controlled and retrospective studies on internal and external drainage after PD resection from 2016 to 2021. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the literature was selected, the data were extracted, and the literature quality was evaluated. Rev Man 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of four retrospective studies with 1213 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the improvement of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after PD between internal and external drainage [odds ratio (OR) = 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.84-2.40, P = 0.19]. Sensitivity analysis suggested that there was no heterogeneity among the studies (P = 0.33, I² = 8.7%). The difference was statistically significant after pooling the results using the fixed-effects model (OR = 1.83, 95%CI: 1.12-2.99, P = 0.02). External drainage can reduce the incidence of postoperative clinically related pancreatic fistula. Subgroup analysis showed that there was no difference in the improvement of grade B (OR = 0.95, 95%CI: 0.64-1.40, P = 0.78] or grade C pancreatic fistula (OR = 1.58, 95%CI: 0.81- 3.09, P = 0.18).

CONCLUSION

External drainage of the supporting duct can reduce the incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after surgery, but there is no difference in the improvement of grades B and C pancreatic fistula. Further research is required to verify our findings.

The prognostic value of external vs internal pancreatic duct stents after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with FRS ≥ 4: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of external vs internal pancreatic duct stents after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of external and internal stents using the Fistula Risk Score system with regard to the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula.

METHODS

A total of 382 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy were retrospectively enrolled from January 2015 to October 2019. The receiver operating characteristic curve was performed for subgroup analysis of the patients at different levels of risk for pancreatic fistula.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in terms of pancreatic fistula or other postoperative complications. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve threshold of 3.5, 172 patients with a Fistula Risk Score ≥ 4 and 210 patients with a Fistula Risk Score < 4 were divided into separate groups. The number of valid cases was insufficient to support the subsequent research in patients with a Fistula Risk Score < 4. In patients with a Fistula Risk Score ≥ 4, the use of an external pancreatic duct stent was significantly more effective than the use of an internal stent, especially with regard to the risk for pancreatic fistula (Grade C) (P = 0.039), at ameliorating the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (P = 0.019). Additionally, the incidence of lymphatic leakage was significantly higher in the external stent group compared with the internal stent group (P = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with internal stents, the use of an external stent could reduce the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with a Fistula Risk Score ≥ 4. More large-scale prospective clinical trials are warranted to further clarify our results.