The use of adjunct anesthetic medication with regional anesthesia and rates of general anesthesia for 1867 cesarean deliveries from 2014 to 2018 in a community hospital

A comparison of anesthetic outcomes between activation and removal of epidural catheters for patients who underwent unscheduled intrapartum cesarean delivery

Background

We hypothesized that patients who underwent unscheduled intrapartum cesarean delivery and had removal of an indwelling epidural catheter followed by an attempt of a new regional anesthetic would be more likely to have regional anesthesia without conversion to general anesthesia or administration of additional anesthetic medication compared to patients who had activation of an epidural catheter.

Methods

Patients who had an unscheduled intrapartum cesarean delivery from July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2021, who had an indwelling labor epidural catheter were included. Patients were propensity matched based on obstetric indication for cesarean delivery and number of physician-administered rescue analgesia boluses administered during labor. A multivariate proportional odds regression was performed.

Results

After adjusting for parity, depression, last neuraxial labor analgesic technique, physician-administered rescue analgesia boluses, and duration from neuraxial placement to entering the operating room for cesarean delivery, patients who had removal of their epidural catheters were more likely to have regional anesthesia without conversion to general anesthesia or administration of additional anesthetic medication (odds ratio 4.298; 95% confidence interval 2.448, 7.548; P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Removal of epidural catheters was associated with a greater chance of avoiding conversion to general anesthesia or administration of additional anesthetic medication.

Comparing Different Anesthesia Methods on Anesthetic Effect and Postoperative Pain in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive technique to completely peel the pathological mucosa from the submucosa under endoscopy, which has been often utilized to treat early gastric cancer. During the operation, anesthesia is required to reduce the discomfort due to the complexity, high risk, and longtime operation of ESD. In this study, we compared different anesthesia methods on anesthetic effect and postoperative pain in patients (≥65 years old) with early gastric cancer during ESD. For this purpose, 60 patients with early gastric cancer who were more than 65 years old were selected from January 2019 to December 2021, where 30 patients treated with simple intravenous general anesthesia were divided into the simple group and 30 patients treated with intravenous combined inhalation general anesthesia were regarded as the composite group. The hemodynamic index, wake-up time, postoperative pain intensity, operation time, and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. For the hemodynamic index before incision, after incision, and at the end of the operation, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) in the composite group was higher than that in the simple group (P < 0.05) and the heart rate (HR) was lower than that in the simple group (P < 0.05). After the ESD operation, the wake-up time and visual analogue scale (VAS) in the composite group were lower than those in the simple group (P < 0.05). In addition, the ESD operation time and incidence of adverse reactions in the composite group was significantly lower than that in the simple group (P < 0.05). These results showed that intravenous combined inhalation general anesthesia had a good anesthetic effect, stable hemodynamics during ESD operation, and slight postoperative pain.

Intravenous Dexmedetomidine as an Adjunct to Neuraxial Anesthesia in Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Chart Review

Background

Dexmedetomidine is a selective α-2 agonist commonly used for sedation that has been used in obstetric anesthesia for multimodal labor analgesia, postcesarean delivery analgesia, and perioperative shivering. This study evaluated the role of intravenous dexmedetomidine to provide rescue analgesia and/or sedation during cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia.

Methods

We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia between December 1, 2018, and November 30, 2019, who required supplemental analgesia during the procedure. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who received intravenous dexmedetomidine (Dexmed group) and patients who received adjunct medications such as fentanyl, midazolam, ketamine, and nitrous oxide (Standard group). Primary outcome was incidence of conversion to general anesthesia.

Results

During the study period, 107 patients received adjunct medications. There was no difference in conversion to general anesthesia between the Dexmed group and the Standard group (6% (4/62) vs. 9% (4/45); p=0.718). In the Dexmed group, the mean dexmedetomidine dose received was 37 μg (range 10 to 140 μg). While the use of inotropic/vasopressor medications was common and similar in both groups, there was an increase in the incidence of bradycardia (Dexmed 15% vs. Standard 2%; p=0.042) but not hypotension (Dexmed 24% vs. Standard 24%; p=1.00) in the Dexmed group.

Conclusion

In patients who required supplemental analgesia for cesarean delivery, those who received dexmedetomidine versus other medications had a similar rate of conversion to general anesthesia, a statistically significant increase in bradycardia, but no difference in the incidence of hypotension.

Incidence and Effect of Intrathecal Fentanyl Use in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Deliveries in the Community Setting: A Single-Center Observational Retrospective Study

Background: The addition of intrathecal fentanyl to spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery has been shown to be beneficial, but its rate of utilization in the community setting is unknown. The primary aim of our study was to determine the rate of intrathecal fentanyl use for cesarean deliveries with spinal anesthesia in a community hospital, and our secondary aim was to determine its effect on anesthetic outcomes.

Methods: Patients who underwent cesarean delivery from June 1, 2017 to November 30, 2019 with spinal anesthesia as the initial anesthetic technique were included.

Results: Seven hundred sixty-one cesarean deliveries met inclusion criteria, and 161 (21.2%) patients received intrathecal fentanyl in their spinal anesthetic for cesarean delivery. A multivariate model that controlled for patient weight and time from spinal placement to procedure end showed that patients who received intrathecal fentanyl were less likely to have conversion to general anesthesia or administration of systemic anesthetic adjuncts compared to patients who did not receive intrathecal fentanyl (odds ratio 2.889, 95% CI 1.552-5.903; P=0.0017).

Conclusion: Only 1 in 5 patients received intrathecal fentanyl for cesarean deliveries performed under spinal anesthesia in a community hospital despite known benefits. Patients who did not receive intrathecal fentanyl had increased odds of conversion to general anesthesia or administration of systemic anesthetic adjunct administration, a finding consistent with previous studies. The addition of intrathecal fentanyl to spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery should be strongly considered in the community setting.

The Current Role of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

Purpose of the Review

The use of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery has declined in the last decades due to the widespread utilization of neuraxial techniques and the understanding that neuraxial anesthesia can be provided even in urgent circumstances. In fact, the role of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery has been revisited, because despite recent devices facilitating endotracheal intubation and clinical algorithms, guiding anesthesiologists facing challenging scenarios, risks, and complications of general anesthesia at the time of delivery for both mother and neonate(s) remain significant. In this review, we will discuss clinical scenarios and risk factors associated with general anesthesia for cesarean delivery and address reasons why anesthesiologists should apply strategies to minimize its use.

Recent Findings

Unnecessary general anesthesia for cesarean delivery is associated with maternal complications, including serious anesthesia-related complications, surgical site infection, and venous thromboembolic events. Racial and socioeconomic disparities and low-resource settings are major contributing factors in the use of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery, with both maternal and perinatal mortality increasing when general anesthesia is provided. In addition, more significant maternal pain and higher rates of postpartum depression requiring hospitalization are associated with general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Summary

Rates of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery have overall decreased, and while general anesthesia no longer is a contributing factor to anesthesia-related maternal deaths, further opportunities to reduce its use should be emphasized. Raising awareness in identifying situations and patients at risk to help avoid unnecessary general anesthesia remains crucial.