An observational study of adherence to combined oral contraceptive regimens

Variations in sleep associated with different types of hormonal contraceptives

Progesterone and some of its metabolites are neuroactive steroids that affect sleep by increasing melatonin secretion and stimulating GABA-A receptors. The effect of progestogens in hormonal contraceptives on sleep has not been thoroughly investigated. This observational study assessed possible associations in sleep changes induced by estrogen-progestogens in contraceptives in 108 women between the ages of 20 and 50 years. We assessed mean nightly sleep time with a 31-day sleep diary, and subjective sleep quality with the five subjective subscores of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Included women were of childbearing age, healthy, sexually active and had been using a hormonal contraceptive method (pill, intrauterine system (IUS), subcutaneous implant, vaginal ring) for at least six months. Results were compared to a matched control group that did not use hormonal contraceptives. The longest mean nightly sleep time, compared to control (450 min), occurred in women who used progestogen-only oral contraception (510 min), followed by IUS delivery of levonorgestrel 13.5 mg (480 min) and oral ethinylestradiol 0.02/0.03 mg plus gestodene 0.075 mg (475 min). Global subjective sleep quality was influenced most by the administration of etonorgestrel 0.120 mg/ethinylestradiol 0.015 mg via the vaginal route. Our results show that low-doses of progestins affect various aspects of sleep, and that this is influenced by the route of administration.

The 7-day contraceptive hormone-free interval should be consigned to history

AIM

This review summarises the available data on the disadvantages of the 7-day contraceptive-free interval (CFI) of combined oral contraceptives (COCs), in contrast to shorter CFIs or continuous use - including flexible regimens - and provides recommendations for practice.

METHODS

Relevant papers were identified by Medline and PubMed. The final reference list was generated on the basis of relevance to the review, with priority given to systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials.

RESULTS

There is considerable inter- and intra-individual variation in the absorption and metabolism of COCs. Even with perfect use, the loss of endocrine suppression during the standard 7-day CFI allows follicular development with the risk of escape ovulation in a vulnerable minority. This risk increases in typical users whenever the CFI is prolonged: late restarts are a common reason for pill omissions. Shortening or eliminating the CFI improves contraceptive efficacy using the lowest doses available, without evidence to date of compromised safety.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no scientific evidence to support a 7-day CFI and it should be replaced either by a continuous flexible regimen, or extended regimens with a shortened CFI, prescribed first-line. In women preferring a monthly 'bleed', a 4-day CFI similarly provides a greater safety margin when pills are omitted.