1
|
Development of a predictive model for luteal phase oocyte retrieval in poor responders undergoing natural cycle IVF. Sci Rep 2022; 12:7695. [PMID: 35545640 PMCID: PMC9095724 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11602-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study is the development of a prediction model indicating successful application of Oocyte Retrieval performed during the Luteal Phase (LuPOR) in poor responders, as defined by the retrieval of at least one MII oocyte. Recruitment included 1688 poor responders diagnosed as per Bologna Criteria, undergoing natural cycle ICSI between 2012 and 2020. Oocyte collections were performed during the follicular phase and during the luteal phase similarly. Antral Follicle Count (AFC), Estradiol (E2) levels evaluated on both trigger days prior to Follicular Phase Oocyte Retrieval (FoPOR) and LuPOR, and the number of small follicles 8–12 mm that were not aspirated during FoPOR were identified as predictive factors indicative of an efficient LuPOR practice with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.86, 0.86, 0.89 as well as 0.82 respectively. The combination of the above-mentioned characteristics into a prediction model provided an AUC of 0.88, specificity and a sensitivity of 0.73 and 0.94 respectively and an accuracy of 0.89. The model provided a positive predictive value (PPV) of 93.5% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 46.8%. The clinical conclusion of the present study aims to be of added value to the clinician, by providing a prediction model defining the POR population benefiting from LuPOR. The high PPV of this model may renders this tool helpful for the practitioner that considers LuPOR.
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen J, Liu W, Lee KF, Liu K, Wong BPC, Shu-Biu Yeung W. Overexpression of Lin28a induces a primary ovarian insufficiency phenotype via facilitation of primordial follicle activation in mice. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2022; 539:111460. [PMID: 34543700 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2021.111460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Lin28a is an RNA binding protein and increasing evidence has indicated its role in regulating female fertility. Lin28a has been reported to be involved in ovarian follicle activation. However, its role and mechanisms in regulating primordial follicle activation have not yet been explored. To test whether overexpression of Lin28a activates ovarian primordial follicles, studies were conducted in wild type (WT) and Lin28a Tg mice. Female Lin28a Tg mice at 4-month old exhibited significantly smaller litter size and fewer ovulated oocytes when compared with the WT mice. By 6-month of age, these parameters in Lin28a Tg mice were less than 20% of the WT mice. At postnatal day (PD) 14, the number of primordial follicles was significantly decreased but the number of primary follicles was significantly increased in the transgenic mice. The number of primordial follicles, secondary and antral follicles in these mice were drastically reduced at PD21. In the ovary of Lin28a Tg mice, there were activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and its downstream mTOR pathway. Interestingly, overexpression of Lin28a, which can also act as transcriptional activator, activated Wnt signaling through enhancing the transcription of Wnt co-receptor LRP5. In conclusion, overexpression of Lin28a induced a primary ovarian insufficiency phenotype in long term via facilitating Wnt/β-catenin signaling leading to activation of primordial follicles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong, China.
| | - Weimin Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Fertility Regulation, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518053, China.
| | - Kai-Fai Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong, China.
| | - Kui Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Fertility Regulation, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518053, China.
| | - Benancy P C Wong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong, China.
| | - William Shu-Biu Yeung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Fertility Regulation, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518053, China.
| |
Collapse
|