Laparoscopic treatment of ovarian granulosa cells tumor developed in the pelvic anterior preperitoneal space 20 years after laparotomic salpingo-oophorectomy: case report and review of literature

Effects of different surgical extents on prognosis of patients with malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study

Malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors are rare neoplasms that account for approximately 5-7% of all ovarian malignancies, and they are primarily treated with surgery. The prognosis of patients with different surgical extents remains controversial. Therefore, the effects of different surgical extents on the prognosis of patients were explored in this retrospective cohort study. Patients with malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors who underwent surgical treatment from January 2000 to December 2019 were selected. Disease-free survival and overall survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Prognosis factors were identified by Cox regression analysis. P < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference. A total of 278 patients with an average age at onset of 42 (8-78) years old were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 73 months. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival and overall survival rates between patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery and those who underwent Non-fertility-sparing surgery, and between patients underwent staging surgery and those underwent Non-staging surgery. Age < 40 years (P = 0.024), stage II-III (P = 0.038), a high CA125 level (P = 0.035) and WT-1 (+) (P = 0.016) were independent risk factors for recurrence. In conclusion, different surgical extents have no significant influence on recurrence and survival status of patients with malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors.

Left External Iliac Vein Injury During Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer: Our Experience and Review of Literature

Laparoscopic surgical staging is the standard treatment of early-stage ovarian tumors with similar survival outcomes if compared with laparotomic procedures. In this article, we report a case regarding an incidental external iliac vein injury during a pelvic lymphadenectomy for fertility sparing treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer with a video showing the laparoscopic repair without any consequence or side effect. A 36 year-old obese woman with Body Mass Index 30 kg/m² referred at our hospital with an histological diagnosis of high grade ovarian serous carcinoma after a left laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy performed in another hospital. After an hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy, a laparoscopic surgical staging with a pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy with lymph-node dissection until the left renal vein, omentectomy, and appendectomy were performed. A thermal injury to the left external iliac vein occurred using the bipolar forceps during lymphadenectomy and was repaired after an immediate clamping of the site using endoclinch and the suction irrigator probe. The laceration on the iliac vein was successfully repaired using 10 mm laparoscopic titanium clips; after a follow-up of 42 months no recurrence was detected. In conclusion, laparoscopy is a safe and effective therapeutic option for fertility sparing treatment patients with early stage ovarian carcinoma with a significantly low morbidity and postoperative hospitalization, but it should be reserved for oncologic surgeons trained in advanced laparoscopic procedures and repair of vascular injuries potentially associated with high mortality rate.

Eradication of Isolated Para-Aortic Nodal Recurrence in a Patient with an Advanced High Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: Our Experience and Review of Literature

We report a case report regarding the eradication of isolated lymph-nodal para-aortic recurrence in the aortic region down the left renal vein (LRV) in a patient treated two years earlier in another hospital for a FIGO stage IC2 high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with a video showing the para-aortic space after eradication of the metastatic tissue. A 66 year-old woman was admitted 24 months after the initial surgical procedure for an increased Ca 125 level and CT scan that revealed a 3 cm para-aortic infrarenal lymph-nodal recurrence that was confirmed by PET/CT scan. A secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) with a para-aortic lymph-nodal dissection of the tissue down the LRV and radical omentectomy were performed: during the cytoreduction, the right hemicolon was mobilized. The anterior surface of the inferior vena cava (IVC), aorta and LRV were exposed. The metastatic lymph nodes were detected in the para-ortic space down the proximal part of the LRV and eradicated; an en bloc infrarenal lymph-node dissection from the aortocaval region was performed. The operative time during the surgical procedure was 212 min with a blood loss of 120 mL. No intra- and postoperative complications, including ureteral or vascular injury or renal dysfunction, occurred. At histological examination, three dissected lymph nodes were positive for metastasis, and the patient was discharged five days after laparotomy without side effects and underwent chemotherapy 3 weeks later; after a follow-up of 42 months, no recurrence was detected. In conclusion, secondary debulking surgery can be considered a safe and effective therapeutic option for the management of recurrences, although long-term follow-ups are necessary to evaluate the overall oncologic outcomes of this procedure.

Oncological Prognosis and Fertility Outcomes of Different Surgical Extents for Malignant Ovarian Sex-Cord Stromal Tumors: A Narrative Review

Background

Malignant ovarian sex-cord stromal tumors (MOSCSTs) are rare neoplasms that account for approximately 5–7% of all ovarian malignancies. The majority (70%) of patients had an early stage; thus, surgery is the predominant treatment. Patients were relatively young at the onset of the tumor. Moreover, the prognosis of patients with this tumor is better than that of malignant epithelial ovarian tumors and tends to recur late with an indolent clinical course. Thus, patients may be more inclined to conservative surgical procedures. There is, however, no objective criterion for selecting a suitable surgical procedure. Clinically, surgical extent depended on the preoperative evaluations, age, and willingness of patients, and gynecologists were relatively subjective when choosing surgery. The prognosis of patients with different surgical extents is still controversial. The review aimed to summarize the impacts of different surgical extents on oncological prognosis and fertility outcomes.

Methods

The literature search was performed in PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/), and publications between January 2011 and December 2021 in English including clinical cohort studies and case reports were eligible for inclusion.

Results

We finally identified 12 large-sample retrospective studies and 18 cases of MOSCSTs. The primary surgical procedures include fertility-spring surgery (FSS), total hysterectomy with unilateral or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH-USO/BSO), FSS with complete staging procedure, complete staging surgery (CSS), and debulking surgery. FSS includes cystectomy (CYS), unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO) or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) with uterine preservation that allows for potential future assisted reproductive approaches. Complete staging procedure includes peritoneal cytologic examinations, inspections of peritoneal surfaces, random peritoneal biopsies and omentectomy. FSS with complete staging procedure means surgical procedure with uterine preservation and complete staging procedure. And, generally, CSS means TAH-BSO with complete staging procedure.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that USO can be done in young, fertility-desired patients with tumors confined to the ovary but avoid CYS. FSS with complete staging procedure is feasible among stage IC-III patients who have fertility desire. Patients can choose to have a complete surgery once their family is complete or without fertility requirements. CSS is recommended for patients with risk factors such as high stage, poor differentiation, and large tumor size and without fertility desire. A close follow-up is essential.

Laparotomy vs. minimally invasive surgery for ovarian cancer recurrence: a systematic review

The objective of the present review is to thoroughly investigate the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the setting of secondary cytoreduction for ovarian cancer recurrence, comparing this approach to traditional open surgery. PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus and Web of Science databases (between 1st January 1989 and 1st January 2020), have been systematically queried to identify all articles reporting either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted secondary surgical cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer. We also manually searched the reference lists of the identified studies. Only English language papers were considered. Two independent reviewers screened and identified the reports. A sub-analysis was performed including studies comparing MIS vs. open abdominal secondary cytoreduction. A total of 617 articles were considered. Among them, we included 12 retrospective studies on minimally invasive secondary cytoreduction, enrolling 372 patients (260 of whom were submitted to whether robotics or laparosopy). Three studies compared 69 patients who underwent MIS vs. 112 cases of open abdominal secondary cytoreduction. Other 9 articles described a total of 191 patients who had minimally invasive secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer without a comparative arm. The quality of the evidence was low. The decision regarding the use of MIS was left to surgeon's discretion; in general, the candidates to MIS were selected patients with single-site disease or few localizations of relapse. Compared to open surgery, MIS was associated with significantly lower blood loss, shorter hospital stay and less postoperative complications; the rate of complete cytoreduction to residual tumor =0 was 95.5% in MIS cases vs. 87.5% in laparotomy cases. The risk of complications was generally low. Disease-free and overall survival were comparable between groups. There is no consensus on the criteria to select patients for laparoscopic or robotic secondary cytoreduction. Intra-operative ultrasound has been proposed as a possible tool to better identify the site of recurrence and for confirmation of complete resection of disease. In conclusion, MIS is an option in selected patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, provided there is no widespread disease. Selection of patients appears of utmost importance to obtain satisfactory survival outcomes.