Adverse effects of excessive ovarian response on the pregnancy rate of in vitro fertilization treatment

Live birth after letrozole as an adjunct to follicle-stimulating hormone versus follicle-stimulating hormone alone for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilisation cycles-study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

In vitro fertilisation (IVF) is an effective infertility treatment but the live birth rate remains unsatisfactory. Ovarian stimulation by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is routinely used in IVF and the resulting high serum estradiol levels may impair oocyte/embryo quality and endometrial receptivity. Letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, can reduce serum estradiol levels following ovarian stimulation. We aim to test the hypothesis that co-treatment with letrozole reduces supraphysiological serum estradiol levels and improves endometrial receptivity, leading to a higher live birth rate of IVF. We are conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate whether letrozole as an adjunct to FSH in IVF is superior to FSH alone in the live birth rate of fresh embryo transfer.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is an open-label randomised controlled superiority trial being performed in two assisted reproduction centres in China. Infertile women who have antral follicle count (AFC) before ovarian stimulation or on day 5 of ovarian stimulation ≥15 are randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either letrozole and FSH or FSH alone in a GnRH antagonist protocol. Recruited women follow the standard operating procedures of the two centres. The primary outcome is the live birth rate of the fresh embryo transfer. Stimulation parameters, maternal side effects and obstetric and perinatal complications are secondary outcomes. The planned sample size is 900, i.e. 450 per group.

DISCUSSION

The present study is the first multicentre randomised study to compare the live birth rate of the fresh embryo transfer following ovarian stimulation by letrozole and FSH versus FSH alone in women with anticipated high ovarian responses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02912988 . Registered on September 23, 2016. This trial protocol is version 2.0.

Performance of ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) in predicting ovarian response and livebirth in the in-vitro fertilisation cycle using a standard stimulation with corifollitropin alpha in a GnRH antagonist protocol

The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) in predicting ovarian response and livebirth of women undergoing their first in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle. This is a retrospective analysis of 285 women from 2013 to 2016. The outcome measures were area (AUC) under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves for prediction of excessive and poor response, livebirth in the fresh cycle and cumulative livebirth. The ORPI was significantly correlated with the oocyte number. For prediction of excessive response, AUC for ORPI was comparable to AMH and significantly higher than AFC and female age. At a cut-off of 0.42, ORPI has a sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 77% respectively for prediction of excessive response. For prediction of poor response, AUC for ORPI was significantly higher than AFC, AMH and female age. At a cut-off of 0.12, ORPI has a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 89% respectively for prediction of poor response. For prediction of livebirth, AUCs of ORPI were not significantly different from AFC and female age. Therefore, ORPI is not a good predictor of livebirth. Its prediction of excessive and poor ovarian response is comparable to that of serum AMH.

Ovarian sensitivity index is a better measure of ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophin stimulation than the number of oocytes during in-vitro fertilization treatment

PURPOSE

To validate the use of the ovarian sensitivity index (OSI) as a measure of ovarian response during in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study carried out in an assisted reproduction unit in a teaching hospital. We analysed data from 2,556 women undergoing the first IVF cycle between 2002 and 2009. OSI was calculated as the number of retrieved oocytes divided by total dose of FSH administered (per 1,000 IU). Its correlation to other parameters of ovarian response was compared to that of the oocyte number.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficients of OSI with age, AFC, AMH, total dose of gonadotrophin, average daily dose of gonadotrophin and duration of stimulation were significantly higher than that of oocyte number with these respective parameters. OSI demonstrated a higher intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) than the oocyte number when comparing the two parameters across the first and second stimulated IVF cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

OSI is a better measure of ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophin stimulation than the oocyte number, and is particularly useful when different subjects are treated with different stimulation regimens which would have confounding effect on the oocyte number.

Role of baseline antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone in prediction of cumulative live birth in the first in vitro fertilisation cycle: a retrospective cohort analysis

Objective

This retrospective study determined for the first time the role of baseline antral follicle count (AFC) and serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) level in the first in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle in predicting cumulative live birth from one stimulation cycle.

Methods

We studied 1,156 women (median age 35 years) undergoing the first IVF cycle. Baseline AFC and AMH level on the day before ovarian stimulation were analysed. The main outcome measure was cumulative live birth in the fresh plus all the frozen embryo transfers after the same stimulation cycle.

Results

Serum AMH was significantly correlated with AFC. Both AMH and AFC showed significant correlation with age and ovarian response in the stimulated cycle and total number of transferrable embryos. Baseline AFC and serum AMH were significantly higher in subjects attaining a live birth than those who did not in the fresh stimulated cycle, as well as those attaining cumulative live birth. There was a significant trend of higher cumulative live birth rate in women with higher AMH or AFC. However, logistic regression revealed that both AMH and AFC were not significant predictors of cumulative live birth after adjusting for age and number of embryos available for transfer. Considering only one single predictor, the areas under the ROC curves for AMH (0.646, 95% CI 0.616–0.675) and age (0.648, 95% CI 0.618–0.677) were slightly higher than that for AFC (0.617, 95% CI 0.587–0.647) in predicting cumulative live birth. However, a model combining AMH (with or without AFC) and age of the women only classified an addition of less than 2% of subjects correctly compared to the model with age alone.

Conclusion

Baseline AFC and serum AMH have only modest predictive performance on the occurrence of cumulative live birth, and may not give additional value on top of the women's age.