2
|
Aidala AA, Wilson MG, Shubert V, Gogolishvili D, Globerman J, Rueda S, Bozack AK, Caban M, Rourke SB. Housing Status, Medical Care, and Health Outcomes Among People Living With HIV/AIDS: A Systematic Review. Am J Public Health 2015; 106:e1-e23. [PMID: 26562123 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2015.302905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 269] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accumulating evidence suggests responses to HIV that combine individual-level interventions with those that address structural or contextual factors that influence risks and health outcomes of infection. Housing is such a factor. Housing occupies a strategic position as an intermediate structural factor, linking "upstream" economic, social, and cultural determinants to the more immediate physical and social environments in which everyday life is lived. The importance of housing status for HIV prevention and care has been recognized, but much of this attention has focused on homeless individuals as a special risk group. Analyses have less often addressed community housing availability and conditions as factors influencing population health or unstable, inadequate, or unaffordable housing as a situation or temporary state. A focus on individual-level characteristics associated with literal homelessness glosses over social, economic, and policy drivers operating largely outside any specific individual's control that affect housing and residential environments and the health resources or risk exposures such contexts provide. OBJECTIVES We examined the available empirical evidence on the association between housing status (broadly defined), medical care, and health outcomes among people with HIV and analyzed results to inform future research, program development, and policy implementation. SEARCH METHODS We searched 8 electronic health and social science databases from January 1, 1996, through March 31, 2014, using search terms related to housing, dwelling, and living arrangements and HIV and AIDS. We contacted experts for additional literature. SELECTION CRITERIA We selected articles if they were quantitative analyses published in English, French, or Spanish that included at least 1 measure of housing status as an independent variable and at least 1 health status, health care, treatment adherence, or risk behavior outcome among people with HIV in high-income countries. We defined housing status to include consideration of material or social dimensions of housing adequacy, stability, and security of tenure. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality appraisal. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials and a modified version of the Newcastle Ottawa Quality Appraisal Tool for nonintervention studies. In our quality appraisal, we focused on issues of quality for observational studies: appropriate methods for determining exposure and measuring outcomes and methods to control confounding. RESULTS Searches yielded 5528 references from which we included 152 studies, representing 139,757 HIV-positive participants. Most studies were conducted in the United States and Canada. Studies examined access and utilization of HIV medical care, adherence to antiretroviral medications, HIV clinical outcomes, other health outcomes, emergency department and inpatient utilization, and sex and drug risk behaviors. With rare exceptions, across studies in all domains, worse housing status was independently associated with worse outcomes, controlling for a range of individual patient and care system characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Lack of stable, secure, adequate housing is a significant barrier to consistent and appropriate HIV medical care, access and adherence to antiretroviral medications, sustained viral suppression, and risk of forward transmission. Studies that examined the history of homelessness or problematic housing years before outcome assessment were least likely to find negative outcomes, homelessness being a potentially modifiable contextual factor. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies indicate an independent effect of housing assistance on improved outcomes for formerly homeless or inadequately housed people with HIV. Housing challenges result from complex interactions between individual vulnerabilities and broader economic, political, and legal structural determinants of health. The broad structural processes sustaining social exclusion and inequality seem beyond the immediate reach of HIV interventions, but changing housing and residential environments is both possible and promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela A Aidala
- Angela A. Aidala is with the Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Michael G. Wilson is with the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Virginia Shubert is with Shubert Botein Policy Associates, New York, NY. At the time of this study, David Gogolishvili, Jason Globerman, Sergio Rueda, and Sean B. Rourke were with the Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. Anne K. Bozack is with the Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health. Maria Caban is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, BOOM!Health, New York, NY
| | - Michael G Wilson
- Angela A. Aidala is with the Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Michael G. Wilson is with the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Virginia Shubert is with Shubert Botein Policy Associates, New York, NY. At the time of this study, David Gogolishvili, Jason Globerman, Sergio Rueda, and Sean B. Rourke were with the Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. Anne K. Bozack is with the Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health. Maria Caban is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, BOOM!Health, New York, NY
| | - Virginia Shubert
- Angela A. Aidala is with the Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Michael G. Wilson is with the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Virginia Shubert is with Shubert Botein Policy Associates, New York, NY. At the time of this study, David Gogolishvili, Jason Globerman, Sergio Rueda, and Sean B. Rourke were with the Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. Anne K. Bozack is with the Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health. Maria Caban is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, BOOM!Health, New York, NY
| | - David Gogolishvili
- Angela A. Aidala is with the Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Michael G. Wilson is with the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Virginia Shubert is with Shubert Botein Policy Associates, New York, NY. At the time of this study, David Gogolishvili, Jason Globerman, Sergio Rueda, and Sean B. Rourke were with the Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. Anne K. Bozack is with the Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health. Maria Caban is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, BOOM!Health, New York, NY
| | - Jason Globerman
- Angela A. Aidala is with the Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Michael G. Wilson is with the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Virginia Shubert is with Shubert Botein Policy Associates, New York, NY. At the time of this study, David Gogolishvili, Jason Globerman, Sergio Rueda, and Sean B. Rourke were with the Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. Anne K. Bozack is with the Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health. Maria Caban is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, BOOM!Health, New York, NY
| | - Sergio Rueda
- Angela A. Aidala is with the Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Michael G. Wilson is with the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Virginia Shubert is with Shubert Botein Policy Associates, New York, NY. At the time of this study, David Gogolishvili, Jason Globerman, Sergio Rueda, and Sean B. Rourke were with the Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. Anne K. Bozack is with the Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health. Maria Caban is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, BOOM!Health, New York, NY
| | - Anne K Bozack
- Angela A. Aidala is with the Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Michael G. Wilson is with the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Virginia Shubert is with Shubert Botein Policy Associates, New York, NY. At the time of this study, David Gogolishvili, Jason Globerman, Sergio Rueda, and Sean B. Rourke were with the Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. Anne K. Bozack is with the Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health. Maria Caban is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, BOOM!Health, New York, NY
| | - Maria Caban
- Angela A. Aidala is with the Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Michael G. Wilson is with the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Virginia Shubert is with Shubert Botein Policy Associates, New York, NY. At the time of this study, David Gogolishvili, Jason Globerman, Sergio Rueda, and Sean B. Rourke were with the Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. Anne K. Bozack is with the Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health. Maria Caban is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, BOOM!Health, New York, NY
| | - Sean B Rourke
- Angela A. Aidala is with the Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Michael G. Wilson is with the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Virginia Shubert is with Shubert Botein Policy Associates, New York, NY. At the time of this study, David Gogolishvili, Jason Globerman, Sergio Rueda, and Sean B. Rourke were with the Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. Anne K. Bozack is with the Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health. Maria Caban is with the Department of Research and Evaluation, BOOM!Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Food insecurity is associated with greater acute care utilization among HIV-infected homeless and marginally housed individuals in San Francisco. J Gen Intern Med 2013; 28:91-8. [PMID: 22903407 PMCID: PMC3539018 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2176-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2012] [Revised: 06/22/2012] [Accepted: 06/28/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food insecurity, or the uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate, safe foods, has been associated with poor HIV outcomes. There are few data on the extent to which food insecurity impacts patterns of health-care utilization among HIV-infected individuals. OBJECTIVE We examined whether food insecurity was associated with hospitalizations, Emergency Department (ED) visits, and non-ED outpatient visits. METHODS HIV-infected, homeless and marginally housed individuals participating in the San Francisco Research on Access to Care in the Homeless (REACH) cohort underwent quarterly structured interviews and blood draws. We measured food insecurity with the validated Household Food Insecurity Access Scale, and categorized participants as food secure, mild/moderately food insecure, and severely food insecure. Primary outcomes were: (1) any hospitalizations, (2) any ED visits, and (3) any non-ED outpatient visits. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate model parameters, adjusting for socio-demographic (age, sex, ethnicity, education, income, housing status, health insurance) and clinical variables (CD4 nadir, time on antiretroviral therapy, depression, and illicit drug use). RESULTS Beginning in November 2007, 347 persons were followed for a median of 2 years. Fifty-six percent of participants were food insecure at enrollment. Compared with food-secure persons, those with severe food insecurity had increased odds of hospitalizations [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.16, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.50-3.09] and ED visits (AOR = 1.71, 95 % CI = 1.06-2.30). While the odds of an outpatient visit were 41 % higher for severely food insecure individuals, the effect was not statistically significant (AOR = 1.41, 95 % CI = 0.99-2.01). Mild/moderate food insecurity was also associated with increased hospitalizations (AOR = 1.56, 95 % CI = 1.06-2.30), ED visits (AOR = 1.57, 95 % CI = 1.22-2.03), and outpatient visits (AOR = 1.68, 95 % CI = 1.20-2.17). CONCLUSIONS Food insecurity is associated with increased health services utilization among homeless and marginally housed HIV-infected individuals in San Francisco. Increased ED visits and hospitalizations are not related to fewer ambulatory care visits among food-insecure individuals. Addressing food insecurity should be a critical component of HIV treatment programs and may reduce reliance on acute care utilization.
Collapse
|