1
|
Teixeira A, Teixeira M, Almeida V, Gaio R, Torres T, Magina S, Cunha C, Sousa Lobo JM, Almeida IF. Does the Vehicle Matter? Real-World Evidence on Adherence to Topical Treatment in Psoriasis. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:1539. [PMID: 34683831 PMCID: PMC8539972 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13101539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The influence of the vehicle in topical treatment adherence remains to be elucidated. The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of the pharmaceutical dosage form on adherence to topical treatment in psoriasis patients, taking into consideration the mechanical features. The adherence was evaluated in a sample of 102 psoriasis patients, followed for approximately 45 days. Adherence was calculated with a new combined methodology using a log and medication weights. The effect of the group formulation was evaluated using logistic regression models. A complex effect of the vehicle on adherence was found, mediated by the affected area. The adherence was significantly higher for patients applying gels and creams than for those using ointments, whenever the body area affected was extensive. The opposite was found when the affected area was small. Mechanical properties can partially explain the findings since gels and creams may be easier to apply. Patient beliefs and preferences regarding vehicles and their sensory attributes might also explain the results. It is noteworthy that adherence was strikingly low, with more than 75% non-adherent patients. This real-world evidence provides an insight for pharmaceutical industries and guidance for treatment prescription by physicians aiming to address the public health emergency of treatment non-adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Teixeira
- Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada em Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde (IINFACTS), Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde, CESPU, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal; (A.T.); (V.A.)
- Laboratório de Tecnologia Farmacêutica, MedTech, UCIBIO-REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências do Medicamento, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Maribel Teixeira
- Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada em Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde (IINFACTS), Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde, CESPU, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal; (A.T.); (V.A.)
| | - Vera Almeida
- Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada em Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde (IINFACTS), Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde, CESPU, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal; (A.T.); (V.A.)
| | - Rita Gaio
- Centro de Matemática, Departamento de Matemática, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Tiago Torres
- Serviço de Dermatologia, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Sofia Magina
- Serviço de Dermatologia, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Departamento de Farmacologia e Terapêutica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Cátia Cunha
- Serviços Farmacêuticos, Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa, 4564-007 Penafiel, Portugal;
| | - José M. Sousa Lobo
- Laboratório de Tecnologia Farmacêutica, MedTech, UCIBIO-REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências do Medicamento, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Isabel F. Almeida
- Laboratório de Tecnologia Farmacêutica, MedTech, UCIBIO-REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências do Medicamento, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Teixeira A, Oliveira C, Teixeira M, Rita Gaio A, Lobo JMS, de Almeida IFM, Almeida V. Development and Validation of a Novel Questionnaire for Adherence with Topical Treatments in Psoriasis (QATOP). Am J Clin Dermatol 2017; 18:571-81. [PMID: 28321796 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-017-0272-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-report measures are the most used methodologies for the evaluation of adherence to psoriasis topical treatment, although currently there is no standard questionnaire for this purpose. OBJECTIVE The present study aimed at developing a novel questionnaire (Questionnaire for Adherence to TOPical treatment [QATOP]) for the assessment of adherence to topical treatment in psoriasis. METHODS A questionnaire containing nine items organized into two parts (part 1: current patient treatment; part 2: adherence to treatment, amount used, and treatment-associated variables) was developed, supported by a systematic literature review, qualitative patient focus interviews, and expert-group input. Its content validity was determined by a pilot study of six patients. Adherence to topical treatment was then assessed in 35 patients with psoriasis, after 45 days of treatment, using the QATOP and a medication log. Associations between different items of the QATOP and the log were investigated. RESULTS Adherence results were 63.5 ± 29.2% for the log and 60.9 ± 24.4% for the QATOP, and were strongly correlated (R = 0.819, p < 0.001). Distinct posologic regimens were reported by patients, which, in some cases, were not the usual doses. Patients also reported using doses of medicine on each application that were markedly lower than required. CONCLUSION The QATOP is a valid and reliable self-report measure of adherence to topical treatment in patients with psoriasis. The use of this standard questionnaire could improve the methodological quality of adherence studies. Improvement of the clarity of posologic instructions is clearly urgently needed.
Collapse
|
3
|
Svendsen MT, Andersen F, Hansen J, Johannessen H, Andersen KE. Medical adherence to topical corticosteroid preparations prescribed for psoriasis: A systematic review. J DERMATOL TREAT 2016; 28:32-39. [DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2016.1178375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Tiedemann Svendsen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
- Dermatological Investigations Scandinavia, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Flemming Andersen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
- Dermatological Investigations Scandinavia, Odense C, Denmark
| | | | - Helle Johannessen
- Research Unit of User Perspectives, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Klaus Ejner Andersen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
- Dermatological Investigations Scandinavia, Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Teixeira A, Teixeira M, Almeida V, Torres T, Sousa Lobo JM, Almeida IF. Methodologies for medication adherence evaluation: Focus on psoriasis topical treatment. J Dermatol Sci 2016; 82:63-8. [PMID: 26917347 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2016] [Revised: 02/11/2016] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Adherence to topical treatment has been less studied in comparison with systemic therapeutic regimens and is poorly understood. High-quality research on this area is essential to outline a strategy to increase medication adherence and clinical outcomes. For a more comprehensive understanding of this issue, a systematic review of the methodologies for topical treatment adherence evaluation in psoriasis was undertaken. Twenty one studies were selected from the literature which used six different adherence methodologies. Merely three studies used multiple adherence measurement methods. The most used method was questionnaire (44%) which was also associated with higher variability of the adherence results. One possible explanation is the lack of a validated questionnaire designed specifically for the evaluation of adherence to topical treatment. Only one method (medication weight) takes into consideration the applied dose. However, the estimation of the expected weight is complex, which renders this method, as used presently, less effective. The use of a dosing device could improve its accuracy and be helpful to clearly instruct the patients about the correct dose. As there is no single method that allows an accurate and complete assessment of adherence it is recommended to use a combination of methods, including self-report and medicines' weight measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Teixeira
- CESPU, Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada em Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde, Rua Central de Gandra 1317, 4585-116 Gandra PRD, Portugal; Laboratório de Tecnologia Farmacêutica, Departamento de Ciências do Medicamento, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira n° 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Maribel Teixeira
- CESPU, Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada em Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde, Rua Central de Gandra 1317, 4585-116 Gandra PRD, Portugal
| | - Vera Almeida
- CESPU, Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada em Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde, Rua Central de Gandra 1317, 4585-116 Gandra PRD, Portugal
| | - Tiago Torres
- Serviço de Dermatologia, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António, Rua D. Manuel II, Ex. CICAP, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal
| | - José Manuel Sousa Lobo
- Laboratório de Tecnologia Farmacêutica, Departamento de Ciências do Medicamento, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira n° 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Isabel Filipa Almeida
- Laboratório de Tecnologia Farmacêutica, Departamento de Ciências do Medicamento, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira n° 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Psoriasis is a relatively common chronic inflammatory skin disease in children for which there is no cure. Most children have mild disease that can be managed with topical therapy as opposed to phototherapy or systemic therapy. Despite the mild presentation of psoriasis in most children, the disease can have a significant impact on quality of life due to the need for ongoing treatment, the frequently visible nature of the cutaneous manifestations, and the social stigma that is associated with psoriasis. Adherence to treatment, in particular topical therapy, is often poor in adults and compromises response to therapy and medical provider management strategies. Multiple factors that may contribute to nonadherence in adults with psoriasis have been identified, including lack of education on the disease and expectations for management, issues related to ease of use and acceptability of topical medications, and anxiety regarding possible medication side effects. There is currently no published data on adherence in the pediatric psoriasis population; however, poor adherence is often suspected when patients fail to respond to appropriate therapy. General strategies used to assess adherence in other pediatric disease populations can be applied to children with psoriasis, and interventions that reflect experience in other chronic dermatologic disorders such as atopic dermatitis may also be helpful for medical providers caring for children with psoriasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sandra Cortina
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology.,Center for Adherence and Self-Management, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thorneloe RJ, Bundy C, Griffiths CEM, Ashcroft DM, Cordingley L. Adherence to medication in patients with psoriasis: a systematic literature review. Br J Dermatol 2013; 168:20-31. [PMID: 22963128 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Psoriasis is associated with considerable physical and psychological morbidity. Optimal use of psoriasis treatments can limit the physical manifestations of psoriasis and help improve quality of life, but nonadherence is common. Smoking, obesity and excessive alcohol consumption are prevalent in this population. A systematic review of adherence to medication and recommendations for lifestyle change in psoriasis was undertaken, with a critical appraisal of the quality of the selected studies. Electronic searches from inception to March 2012 (PubMed, Web of Science and Embase) were conducted. Twenty-nine studies were included; however, none examined adherence to advice about lifestyle change. Studies using a dichotomous classification of adherence tended to report suboptimal adherence, with 21·6-66·6% of patients classed as adherent. No consistent pattern of results emerged for sociodemographical, disease and lifestyle factors as determinants of adherence. However, some treatment factors were associated with adherence. While mixed findings were reported for quality of life as a determinant of adherence, psychological factors (psychological distress and patient satisfaction with care and therapy) were associated with adherence. Only tentative conclusions can be made for determinants of adherence because the methodological quality of many of the included studies limits conclusions. There is a need for improved quality of research and reporting in this area, and this review provides a platform from which future research within this area should progress, along with suggested research recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Thorneloe
- Dermatology Research Centre, Institute of Inflammation and Repair.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic plaque psoriasis is the most common type of psoriasis, and it is characterised by redness, thickness, and scaling. First-line management of chronic plaque psoriasis is with topical treatments, including vitamin D analogues, topical corticosteroids, tar-based preparations, dithranol, salicylic acid, and topical retinoids. OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis, relative to placebo, and to similarly compare vitamin D analogues (used alone or in combination) with other topical treatments. SEARCH METHODS We updated our searches of the following databases to February 2011: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library (2011, Issue 2), MEDLINE (from 1948), EMBASE (from 1980), Science Citation Index (from 2008), Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (from 2008), BIOSIS (from 1993), Dissertation Abstracts via DialogClassic (all publication years), and Inside Conferences (all publication years).We identified ongoing and unpublished studies from the UK Clinical Research Network Study Portfolio and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials. We checked the bibliographies of published studies and reviews for further references to relevant trials, and we contacted trialists and companies for information about newly published studies.A separate search for adverse effects was undertaken in February 2011 using MEDLINE and EMBASE (from 2005).Final update searches for both RCTs and adverse effects were undertaken in August 2012. Although it has not been possible to incorporate RCTs and adverse effects studies identified through these final searches within this review, we will incorporate these into the next update. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials comparing active topical treatments against placebo or against vitamin D analogues (used alone or in combination) in people with chronic plaque psoriasis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS One author extracted study data and assessed study quality. A second author checked these data. We routinely contacted trialists and companies for missing data. We also extracted data on withdrawals and on local and systemic adverse events. We defined long-term trials as those with a duration of at least 24 weeks. MAIN RESULTS This update added 48 trials and provided evidence on 7 new active treatments. In total, the review included 177 randomised controlled trials, with 34,808 participants, including 26 trials of scalp psoriasis and 6 trials of inverse psoriasis, facial psoriasis, or both. The number of included studies counted by Review Manager (RevMan) is higher than these figures (190) because we entered each study reporting a placebo and an active comparison into the 'Characteristics of included studies' table as 2 studies.When used on the body, most vitamin D analogues were significantly more effective than placebo, with the standardised mean difference (SMD) ranging from -0.67 (95% CI -1.04 to -0.30; 1 study, 119 participants) for twice-daily becocalcidiol to SMD -1.66 (95% CI -2.66 to -0.67; 1 study, 11 participants) for once-daily paricalcitol. On a 6-point global improvement scale, these effects translate into 0.8 and 1.9 points, respectively. Most corticosteroids also performed better than placebo; potent corticosteroids (SMD -0.89; 95% CI -1.06 to -0.72; I² statistic = 65.1%; 14 studies, 2011 participants) had smaller benefits than very potent corticosteroids (SMD -1.56; 95% CI -1.87 to -1.26); I² statistic = 81.7%; 10 studies, 1264 participants). On a 6-point improvement scale, these benefits equate to 1.0 and 1.8 points, respectively. Dithranol, combined treatment with vitamin D/corticosteroid, and tazarotene all performed significantly better than placebo.Head-to-head comparisons of vitamin D for psoriasis of the body against potent or very potent corticosteroids had mixed findings. For both body and scalp psoriasis, combined treatment with vitamin D and corticosteroid performed significantly better than vitamin D alone or corticosteroid alone. Vitamin D generally performed better than coal tar, but findings relative to dithranol were mixed. When applied to psoriasis of the scalp, vitamin D was significantly less effective than both potent corticosteroids and very potent corticosteroids. Indirect evidence from placebo-controlled trials supported these findings.For both body and scalp psoriasis, potent corticosteroids were less likely than vitamin D to cause local adverse events, such as burning or irritation. Combined treatment with vitamin D/corticosteroid on either the body or the scalp was tolerated as well as potent corticosteroids, and significantly better than vitamin D alone. Only 25 trials assessed clinical cutaneous dermal atrophy; few cases were detected, but trials reported insufficient information to determine whether assessment methods were robust. Clinical measurements of dermal atrophy are insensitive and detect only the most severe cases. No comparison of topical agents found a significant difference in systemic adverse effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Corticosteroids perform at least as well as vitamin D analogues, and they are associated with a lower incidence of local adverse events. However, for people with chronic plaque psoriasis receiving long-term treatment with corticosteroids, there remains a lack of evidence about the risk of skin dermal atrophy. Further research is required to inform long-term maintenance treatment and provide appropriate safety data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne R Mason
- Centre for Health Economics, The University of York, York, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Devaux S, Castela A, Archier E, Gallini A, Joly P, Misery L, Aractingi S, Aubin F, Bachelez H, Cribier B, Jullien D, Le Maître M, Richard MA, Ortonne JP, Paul C. Adherence to topical treatment in psoriasis: a systematic literature review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2012; 26 Suppl 3:61-7. [PMID: 22512682 DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04525.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment adherence has been recognized as an important issue in the management of chronic diseases such as psoriasis. OBJECTIVE The aim of this work was to analyse data about topical treatment adherence in psoriasis. METHODS Systematic literature review (62 references) between 1980 and 2011 (database: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane; Mesh keywords: Patient Compliance [Mesh] OR Medication Adherence [Mesh] AND Psoriasis [Mesh]; limits: date of publication >1980, humans subjects, written in French or English, aged ≥ 19 years). Two parameters were evaluated: (i) the ratio of number of product applications performed vs. number of applications expected according to physician recommendations, (ii) the ratio of amount of product used vs. amount of product prescribed. RESULTS A total of 22 studies were selected. Nine studies reported on the frequency of topical treatment application in a real world setting. Five studies showed a frequency of applications varying between 50% and 60% of those expected. Because of the high variability in medication adherence assessment methods, the data could not be combined. Twelve articles reported on the frequency of topical treatment application in randomized controlled trials with adherence varying between 55% and 100%. Concerning the amount of product use, four studies showed patients applied between 35% and 72% of the recommended dose during a treatment period of 14 days to 8 weeks. The most frequently mentioned reasons for non-adherence to topical treatment were low efficacy, time consumption and poor cosmetic characteristics of topical agents. Patients experiencing adherence issues were significant younger, were men, had younger age at onset of psoriasis and had a higher self-assessed severity. To improve adherence, the following strategies were suggested: to give patients information about psoriasis, to recognize social impact, to give written instructions for use such as a care plan, to explain side effects of topical therapies, to choose treatment and its cosmetic properties in agreement with the patient. CONCLUSIONS Literature data about topical treatment adherence are heterogeneous and scarce. They confirm the limited topical treatment adherence in psoriasis in real life, much lower than what is reported in randomized controlled trials. Therapeutic education and clear instructions on the use of topical agents are necessary to improve adherence. Studies are needed to identify predictors of limited adherence and to identify interventions improving adherence to topical medications in psoriasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Devaux
- Dermatology Department, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Saraceno R, Gramiccia T, Frascione P, Chimenti S. Calcipotriene/betamethasone in the treatment of psoriasis: a review article. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2009; 10:2357-65. [PMID: 19663634 DOI: 10.1517/14656560903198960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Plaque-type psoriasis is a chronic and immune-mediated skin disease affecting approximately 1-3% of the Caucasian population. Most cases are of mild or moderate severity and benefit from local treatment that represents the mainstay therapy. Topical corticosteroids and vitamin D(3) analogues remain the option of choice. Optimization of these treatments is made by the combination of calcipotriene and betamethasone dipropionate. This formulation combines the keratinocyte differentiation and antiproliferative action of the vitamin D(3) analogues with the anti-inflammatory effect of steroids enhancing effectiveness while reducing the side-effect profile of the single topical agent. In this article, we highlight the advantages of the association of calcipotriene and betamethasone in the treatment of localized plaque-type, scalp and nail psoriasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosita Saraceno
- Policlinico Tor Vergata-University of Rome Tor Vergata, Department of Dermatology, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Published data are reviewed on the pharmacology, efficacy, tolerability, and pleasantness of the vitamin D(3) analogue calcipotriol in a cream formulation (Daivonex/Dovonex cream; LEO Pharma AS, Denmark) in the treatment of psoriasis. Calcipotriol cream monotherapy is more effective than placebo, and as effective as betamethasone valerate cream and coal tar in psoriasis. A regimen of morning-cream and evening-ointment is equally effective as twice-daily calcipotriol ointment and is preferred by patients. Calcipotriol cream is also a highly efficacious maintenance treatment used alone or in an alternating regimen with calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate ointment. Short- and long-term trials have demonstrated that calcipotriol cream is well tolerated by patients with psoriasis. Irritation is observed less frequently than with calcipotriol ointment, making the cream very suitable for children and thin or sensitive areas, such as flexures or (off-label use) the face. Calcipotriol cream is generally preferred to the ointment formulation, as shown by preference testing, and leads to improved patient compliance. In conclusion, calcipotriol cream is not only an effective treatment for psoriasis but is pleasant to use and well tolerated even in sensitive areas. Therefore, calcipotriol cream is particularly useful for the maintenance treatment of psoriasis, after induction therapy with a fast-acting vitamin D/steroid two-compound product.
Collapse
|
11
|
Saraceno R, Andreassi L, Ayala F, Bongiorno MR, Giannetti A, Lisi P, Martini P, Peris K, Peserico A, Chimenti S. Efficacy, safety and quality of life of calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate (Dovobet®) versus calcipotriol (Daivonex®) in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris: A randomized, multicentre, clinical trial. J DERMATOL TREAT 2009; 18:361-5. [DOI: 10.1080/09546630701646156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
12
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic plaque psoriasis is the most common type of psoriasis and is characterised by redness, thickness and scaling. First line management of chronic plaque psoriasis is with topical treatments, including vitamin D analogues, topical corticosteroids, tar-based preparations, dithranol, salicylic acid and topical retinoids. OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness, tolerability and safety of topical treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis with placebo; to compare vitamin D analogues with other topical treatments. SEARCH STRATEGY The Cochrane Skin Group's Trials Register was searched (2004/12). To update an unpublished 2002 review we also searched CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library (Issue 1,2005); MEDLINE (to 2005/02); EMBASE (to 2005/08); Science Citation Index (to 2005); Biosis (to 2005); Dissertation Abstracts (all publication years); Inside Conferences (all publication years); SIGLE (to 2005); National Research Register (all projects with a start date of 2001 to 2005); metaRegister of Current Controlled Trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials comparing treatments against placebo or against vitamin D analogues in people with chronic plaque psoriasis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS One author extracted study data and assessed study quality. A second author checked these data. We routinely contacted triallists and companies for missing data. We extracted data on withdrawals and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS The review included 131 RCTs with 21,448 participants. Vitamin D was significantly more effective than placebo, although there was a wide variation in effect size with the standardised mean difference (SMD) ranging from -0.82 (95% CI -1.34 to -0.29) to -1.90 (95% CI -2.09 to -1.71). With one exception, all corticosteroids performed better than placebo, with potent corticosteroids (SMD: -0.95 (95% CI: -1.11 to -0.80; I(2): 61.1%; 17 studies; 2386 participants)) having smaller benefits than very potent corticosteroids (SMD: -1.29 (95% CI: -1.45 to -1.13; I(2): 53.2%; 11 studies; 1571 participants)). Dithranol and tazarotene performed better than placebo. Head-to-head comparisons of vitamin D against potent or very potent corticosteroids found no significant differences. However, combined treatment with vitamin D /corticosteroid performed significantly better than either vitamin D alone or corticosteroid alone. Vitamin D performed better than coal tar, but findings relative to dithranol were mixed. Potent corticosteroids were less likely than vitamin D to cause local adverse events. No comparison of topical agents found a significant difference in systemic adverse effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Corticosteroids perform as well as vitamin D analogues and are associated with a lower incidence of local adverse events. Further research is required to inform long-term maintenance treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne R Mason
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Alcuin A Block, Heslington, York, UK, YO10 5DD.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
According to the patients, improvement of efficacy, long-term safety and improvement of compliance are needed. The topical treatment has been innovated during the last decade. Most important are the introduction of two new classes of treatments: topical vitamin D(3) analogues and the retinoid tazarotene. To what extent, however, have we achieved developments which are in line with the needs as expressed by the patients? Improved efficacy has been realized by successful combinations of topical treatments. In particular, the combinations of dithranol, vitamin D(3) and tazarotene with a topical corticosteroid proved to be very effective with a reduced profile of side-effects. The efficacy of vitamin D(3) analogues and tazarotene is such that the efficacy of a potent corticosteroid (betamethasone-17-valerate) is approached; calcipotriol even showed an efficacy which is at least as good as this corticosteroid. The long-term safety of new compounds has been evaluated for at least 12 months in large studies. Remarkably for corticosteroids such information is available for only 12 weeks. However, intermittent applications of a topical corticosteroid in combination with another topical treatment provide an effective and safe long-term control of psoriasis. Compliance is a conditio sine qua non for an effective topical treatment. Important progress has been made to increase compliance. Short-contact dithranol has been popularized as an ambulatory treatment which is a highly effective approach as a care instruction programme. Formulations which are better from a cosmetical point of view have been developed for various topical treatments. Reduction of the frequency of applications proved to be possible for most treatments. Once daily applications for corticosteroids, vitamin D(3) analogues and retinoids have been developed, and intermittent applications, a few times per week, are possible for corticosteroids, which proved to be very effective with a reduced profile of side-effects, and are also developed for dithranol.
Collapse
|