The effect of a 600 MeV neutron beam on mouse bone marrow

Neutrons are forever! Historical perspectives

Purpose: Neutrons were an active field of radiobiology at the time of publication of the first issues of the International Journal of Radiation Biology in 1959. Three back-to-back papers published by Neary and his colleagues contain key elements of interest at the time. The present article aims to put these papers into context with the discovery of the neutron 27 years previously and then give a feel for how the field has progressed to the present day. It does not intend to provide a comprehensive review of this enormous field, but rather to provide selective summaries of main driving forces and developments. Conclusions: Neutron radiobiology has continued as a vigorous field of study throughout the past 84 years. Main driving forces have included concern for protection from the harmful effects of neutrons, exploitation and optimization for cancer therapy (fast beam therapy, brachytherapy and boron capture therapy), and scientific curiosity about the mechanisms of radiation action. Effort has fluctuated as the emphasis has shifted from time to time, but all three areas remain active today. Whatever the future holds for the various types of neutron therapy, the health protection aspects will remain with us permanently because of natural environmental exposure to neutrons as well as increased additional exposures from a variety of human activities.

The RBE of the leakage radiation from the Hiletron neutron therapy unit

The RBE of the leakage radiation from the Hiletron 14.7 MeV neutron therapy unit has been measured using three sensitive biological systems in mice, which differ markedly in their radiobiological characteristics. These systems comprise type A spermatogonia and bone marrow stem cells, which are affected insignificantly by dose rate, and pigment abnormalities in hair follicles which are affected markedly by dose rate. For mice irradiated at 10 cm depth in a water phantom, the leakage radiation up to 40 cm from the beam axis was virtually as effective as the primary beam for the latter two biological systems, and for spermatogonia in mice when irradiated in air. At this distance, the total dose rate was about 0.2 cGy (rad) per minute (3% of that in the primary beam), and the gamma-ray component was about 70%. This equal effectiveness of the total dose for all three systems was considered fortuitous, and it implied high RBE values for equal effect with the small neutron component at far distances. Considering published data on RBE versus neutron energy, the evidence suggested either a positive interaction of neutron and gamma-ray components in killing bone marrow stem cells when the neutron component was less than 40% of the total dose, or an increased efficiency of neutrons when delivered at very low dose rates. However the components were additive in killing spermatogonia.