1
|
Chen B, Jeon YH, Chen TF, Gnjidic D, Thompson J, Sawan M. Perspectives of aged care home staff and health care professionals on the Psychotropic medicines use in Residents And Culture: Influencing clinical Excellence (PRACTICE) tool ©. Res Social Adm Pharm 2025; 21:154-160. [PMID: 39658413 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Revised: 08/16/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High use of psychotropic medications continues to be common in residential aged care homes despite the risk of harm and limited efficacy in people living with dementia. Research has shown that the organizational culture of aged care homes influences psychotropic medication use in residents with dementia. The Psychotropic medicines use in Residents And Culture: Influencing Clinical Excellence (PRACTICE) tool was developed to evaluate the organizational culture of aged care homes specific to the use of psychotropic medications. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the comprehensibility, relevance, and comprehensiveness of the PRACTICE tool among end-users. METHOD Cognitive interviews were conducted with participants representing a broad range of health disciplines across Australia. Interviews were performed using a combination of the think-aloud technique and verbal probing. Interviews were transcribed and content coded for participants' perceptions of the PRACTICE tool. Items were modified based on findings from the cognitive interviews, participants' suggestions for rewording of items and discussions with the research team. RESULTS A total of 20 cognitive interviews were conducted. Based on the cognitive interviews, 48 out of 63 items were modified. Reasons for modification were categorized into three themes: 1) Items changed to align with the aged care home staff's scope of practice; 2) Items adjusted to prevent unintended blame from reading the items; and 3) Items modified to prevent potential misinterpretation of their intended meaning. Three items were added to improve the comprehensiveness of the tool. Most participants reported that they understood the items and considered them as relevant and acceptable for the evaluation of organizational culture and use of psychotropic medication in aged care homes. CONCLUSION This study confirms that the PRACTICE tool is a comprehensive tool appropriate for the assessment of organizational culture specific to psychotropic medication use and is important for aged care home settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boyi Chen
- Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Yun-Hee Jeon
- Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Timothy F Chen
- Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Danijela Gnjidic
- Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Mouna Sawan
- Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Munneke W, Demoulin C, Roussel N, Leysen M, Van Wilgen CP, Pitance L, Reezigt RR, Voogt LP, Dankaerts W, Danneels L, Köke AJA, Cools W, De Kooning M, Nijs J. Comparing physical therapy students' attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic low back pain and knee osteoarthritis: an international multi-institutional comparison between 2013 and 2020 academic years. Braz J Phys Ther 2024; 28:100592. [PMID: 38368840 PMCID: PMC10883834 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.100592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2013, physical therapy students demonstrated low guideline-adherent recommendations regarding chronic low back pain (CLBP) for spinal pathology, activity, and work. OBJECTIVES To assess the differences in physical therapy students' attitudes, beliefs, and adherence to guideline recommendations regarding CLBP and knee osteoarthritis between 2013 and 2020. METHODS In 2013 and 2020, second and fourth-year physical therapy students were recruited from 6 Belgian and 2 Dutch institutions. Attitudes and beliefs regarding CLBP and knee OA were evaluated using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT), the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS), and a questionnaire regarding therapeutic exercise and knee osteoarthritis. A clinical vignette was used to measure guideline-adherent recommendations regarding spinal pathology, activity, and work. RESULTS In 2013, 927 second-year and 695 fourth-year students; in 2020, 695 second-year and 489 fourth-year students; were recruited to participate in the study. Compared to 2013, students had less biomedical and stronger biopsychosocial attitudes and beliefs regarding CLBP, more guideline-adherent recommendations for activity, and more biopsychosocial beliefs regarding the benefits of exercise for patients with knee osteoarthritis in both the second and fourth year. Only fourth-year students in 2020 scored significantly better on HC-PAIRS and guideline-adherent recommendation relating to spinal pathology. No differences were found regarding work recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Between 2013 and 2020, physical therapy students made a positive shift towards a more biopsychosocial approach to CLBP and knee osteoarthritis management. Guideline-adherent recommendations for CLBP concerning activity improved, however, concerning work and spinal pathology, it remained low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter Munneke
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM), Belgium; Department of Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Christophe Demoulin
- Department of Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Nathalie Roussel
- Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences (MOVANT), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marijke Leysen
- Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM), Belgium; Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Paul Van Wilgen
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM), Belgium; Transcare, Transdisciplinary Pain Management Center, the Netherlands
| | - Laurent Pitance
- Neuro-musculoskeletal Lab (NMSK), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Roland R Reezigt
- Department of Physiotherapy, Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Lennard P Voogt
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM), Belgium; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Applied Sciences Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wim Dankaerts
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lieven Danneels
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physical Therapy, Universiteit Gent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Albère J A Köke
- Adelante Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology, Hoensbroek, the Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherland; Department of Physical Therapy Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Wilfried Cools
- Core facility - Support for Quantitative and Qualitative Research (SQUARE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Margot De Kooning
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jo Nijs
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM), Belgium; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hutchinson JM, Williams TE, Westaway AM, Bédard A, Pitre C, Lemieux S, Dodd KW, Lamarche B, Guenther PM, Haines J, Wallace A, Martin A, Louzada MLDC, Jessri M, Olstad DL, Prowse R, Simpson JR, Vena JE, Kirkpatrick SI. Development of the Canadian Food Intake Screener to assess alignment of adults' dietary intake with the 2019 Canada's Food Guide healthy food choices recommendations. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2023; 48:603-619. [PMID: 37094383 DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2023-0019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
NOVELTY The Canadian Food Intake Screener was developed to rapidly assess alignment of adults' dietary intake over the past month with the Food Guide's healthy food choices recommendations. The screener was developed and evaluated through an iterative process that included three rounds of cognitive interviews in each of English and French, along with ongoing feedback from external advisors and face and content validity testing with a separate panel of content experts. The 16-question screener is intended for use with adults, aged 18-65 years, with marginal and higher health literacy in research and surveillance contexts in which comprehensive dietary assessment is not possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy M Hutchinson
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Tabitha E Williams
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Ailish M Westaway
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandra Bédard
- Centre Nutrition, santé et société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Camille Pitre
- Centre Nutrition, santé et société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- École de nutrition, Faculté des sciences de l'agriculture et de l'alimentation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Simone Lemieux
- Centre Nutrition, santé et société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- École de nutrition, Faculté des sciences de l'agriculture et de l'alimentation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Kevin W Dodd
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Benoît Lamarche
- Centre Nutrition, santé et société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- École de nutrition, Faculté des sciences de l'agriculture et de l'alimentation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Patricia M Guenther
- Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jess Haines
- Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Angela Wallace
- Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Alicia Martin
- Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Maria Laura da Costa Louzada
- Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health; Center for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mahsa Jessri
- Food, Nutrition and Health Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Dana Lee Olstad
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Rachel Prowse
- Division of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | | | - Jennifer E Vena
- Alberta's Tomorrow Project, Cancer Research and Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|