The perspectives of allied health clinicians on the working alliance with people with stroke-related communication impairment

Do Treatment Ingredients Targeting Working Alliance Improve Cognitive Rehabilitation Session Performance in Patients With Acquired Brain Injury?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to experimentally evaluate the potential impact of clinician-driven therapy ingredients hypothesized to enhance working alliance (WA) and promote patient engagement during cognitive rehabilitation sessions. It was hypothesized that when the clinician introduced evidence-backed alliance enhancing ingredients, there would be a corresponding improvement in participants' (a) performance on attention drills paired with a metacognitive strategy, (b) learning the steps to use a phone application, and (c) adherence to a home exercise program. It was also hypothesized that patients would show perceptual shifts toward stronger alliance.

METHOD

Four adult participants who sustained moderate to severe acquired brain injuries with chronic cognitive deficits participated in the study. The study used a concurrent multiple-baseline design with randomization. Both visual and quantitative analyses were used to compare potential differences in performance on cognitive rehabilitation tasks when specific alliance enhancing behaviors were integrated into sessions.

RESULTS

Findings showed a strong effect for increased performance on attention span tasks when the clinician added the alliance enhancing treatment ingredients. Participants also learned more steps in the phone application task and either maintained or improved homework adherence in the experimental phase when the treatment ingredients were applied. The findings provided mixed results on participant perceptions of WA, as measured by a modified version of the Working Alliance Inventory.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides some of the first experimental data demonstrating that alliance enhancing treatment ingredients can have a significant influence on patient performance during cognitive rehabilitation sessions. The article offers recommendations for building on this important line of study.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28727006.

Living with stroke during the first year after onset: an instrumental case study exploring the processes that influence adjustment

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to explore the experiences of an individual navigating life in the first year after stroke, with attention to the influence of health professionals on adjustment.

METHOD

In-depth interviews were completed at regular intervals with an individual in rural Australia. This longitudinal approach supported the exploration of views over time. Interview transcripts were coded and analysed using strategies consistent with constructivist grounded theory methods. Findings are presented as an instrumental case study.

RESULTS

The experience of stroke was one of adjustment to a new reality and of an altered and evolving concept of self: captured within the themes of fragmentation, loss, and reconstruction. Self-efficacy emerged as a driver in the adjustment process. Interactions with health professionals influenced adjustment and impacted on conceptualisations of self and self-efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjustment to stroke necessitated a reconceptualization of self. Relationships and interactions with others emerged as potential facilitators. For health professionals working with people after stroke, knowledge of the adjustment process and attention to practices that affirm personhood and enhance self-efficacy have the potential to facilitate long term outcomes. Processes linked to adjustment are represented visually to guide conceptual understandings and facilitative actions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONAll interactions with health professionals, including casual or ad hoc interactions, have the potential to influence adjustment after stroke.Health professionals who interact in ways that recognise personhood may have an especially positive influence on processes linked to adjustment.Giving time to listen to personal narratives and reflections may assist with sense-making and support the process of reconceptualising self after stroke.Through bidirectional sharing of experience and ideas, health professionals can facilitate the experience of self-efficacy.

Humor in rehabilitation professions: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Studying humor in the rehabilitation professions is important given its positive effects on health and well-being. We conducted a scoping review to understand how the use of humor has been explored in the existing literature in four rehabilitation professions. The rehabilitation professions included audiology, speech-language pathology, physical therapy, and occupational therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The five-stage method identified by Arksey and O'Malley was used to conduct this review. Six databases were searched. We included 57 articles in our final review, summarized in a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

We generated seven themes in our analysis: (1) humour as a management strategy in therapy; (2) humour as a power establisher vs. equalizer; (3) humour as a coping mechanism in rehabilitation; (4) conceptualizations of non-verbal humor cues in therapy; (5) Is humour trainable? (6) Humor used to foster group cohesion; and (7) Attitudes and beliefs surrounding humor practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings emphasize the importance of using humor in the rehabilitation professions, and the ways in which humor is conceptualized in a multitude of ways for both clinician and client. Future work is needed to further understand the presence and use of humor in rehabilitation professions.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONIn a scoping review of the literature, this study showed that humor was used mainly positively in rehabilitation by the included professions of audiology, speech-language pathology, physical therapy, and occupational therapy and contributed to a sense of belonging.Humor may be an effective way to improve management of client/clinician relations as well as improving group cohesion in rehabilitation settings.In the rehabilitation professions of audiology, speech-language pathology, physical therapy, and occupational therapy, non-verbal humor cues were used in instances where communication was difficult or impaired for clients.

Person-centered care for musculoskeletal pain: Putting principles into practice

Person-centered care specifically focuses on the whole person and is an important component of contemporary care for people with musculoskeletal pain conditions. Evidence suggests however, that some clinicians experience difficulties with integrating person-centered care principles into their clinical practice. Therefore, the purpose of this masterclass is to provide a framework that enables clinicians to incorporate person-centered principles in their management of people with musculoskeletal pain conditions. To support clinicians in overcoming some of the reported obstacles, we provide practical recommendations aimed at putting principles of person-centered care into practice. The framework supporting clinicians' delivery of person-centered care in practice consists of three key-principles: A) a biopsychosocial understanding of the person's experience; B) person-focused communication; and C) supported self-management. The framework includes three phases: 1) identification and goal setting, 2) coaching to self-management, and 3) evaluation. Building a therapeutic relationship underpins these phases and is an overarching element that weaves through the key-principles and phases of the framework. We use a clinical case to illustrate the practical implementation of these recommendations.

Management of communication disability in the first 90 days after stroke: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

People with communication disability after stroke need interventions to optimise healthcare communication and rehabilitation outcomes. Current evidence syntheses do not adequately inform the management of communication disability during the first 90 days post-stroke.

PURPOSE

To explore the scope of literature for the management of communication disability in the first 90 days after stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A scoping review was conducted using a systematic keyword search of six databases. A descriptive synthesis was generated using communication-related domains related to the biopsychosocial framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).

RESULTS

A total of 129 studies met eligibility criteria. Aphasia was the most frequently addressed communication disability after stroke (76/129 studies) with a paucity of evidence investigating other acquired neurogenic communication impairments. Management predominantly focused on communication-related: body functions and structures (62 studies) (e.g., linguistic-behavioural therapies), followed by environmental factors (39 studies) (e.g., communication partner training/support); activities and participation (15 studies) (e.g., augmentative and alternative communication); and personal factors (13 studies) (e.g., assessment of depression after aphasia).

CONCLUSION

A coordinated, integrated approach to developing and testing acute and subacute interventions for all communication disabilities across all communication-related domains is required.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONInterdisciplinary stroke clinicians need to manage communication disabilities in the first 90 days after stroke to optimise healthcare communication and rehabilitation outcomes.There is some evidence to guide clinicians in aphasia management but less in other disabilities of speech and cognitive functioning.Most interventions to inform clinical practice address communication-related body functions and structures (e.g., linguistic and speech therapies). Clinicians need to address all domains and more evidence is needed to address environmental factors (e.g., communication support); activities and participation (e.g., person-centred goal setting); and personal factors (e.g., psychological care).

Finding Goal Focus With People With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in a Person-Centered Multi-Component Community Connection Program (M-ComConnect)

Background and Objectives: Loss of social connections in the community is a common consequence of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), resulting in reduced well-being and quality of life. M-ComConnect is an individualized multi-component community connection intervention with the key objectives of increasing social activity, developing social relationships, and supporting community participation following severe TBI. As part of the M-ComConnect approach, semi-structured initial interviews were conducted to develop a holistic understanding of each participant and their goal focus for the project. In this paper we describe how clinicians worked with participants to identify a desired community-based social activity in which to participate. Method: Transcripts of initial interviews between participant and clinician were analyzed using the phases of reflexive thematic analysis developed by Braun and Clarke. Participants were ten individuals aged between 24 and 75 with severe TBI. All were living in the community and reported reduced social connections since their TBI. The aim of the analysis was to evaluate the skills and strategies used by clinicians in their interactions with participants to derive goal focus for the program. Results: Thematic analysis of initial interview data revealed three main categories and fourteen sub-categories of clinical strategies. These were: (1) Humanizing (curiosity; demonstrating respect and empathy; providing compliments and affirmations; simple reflections; revealing aspects of self; and humor and laughter), (2) Empowering (emphasizing choice and control; highlighting strengths; identifying roadblocks and reframing to reveal opportunities; and collaborative problem solving), and (3) Focusing (making suggestions; identifying preferences; working with ideas; and negotiating). These strategies aligned with the program's relational approach and supported the core processes of the goal-focussing framework, namely understanding and connecting with you, building a relationship, and working together with you to find focus. Conclusion: The goal-focusing framework and clinical strategies outlined provide guidance for clinicians working with people with TBI in the community and is a promising way to engage clients when focusing on individualized social activity-based goals.