Falls prevention and balance rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a bi-centre randomised controlled trial

Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation with Traditional Rehabilitation Methods in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Systematic Review

Background: The rehabilitation process for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is long and complex, which can lead to reduced rehabilitation outcomes and reduced quality improvement. Thus, there is a need to use new methods to boost traditional rehabilitation. Innovations such as telerehabilitation can be helpful to remove the obstacles to treatment, but evidence for their effectiveness is limited. The objective of this work was to compare the clinical effectiveness of telerehabilitation with traditional interventions in MS patients. Methods: Seven bibliographic databases (PubMed, Cochran Library, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, Embase, and ProQuest) were used in this research. The initial search resulted in the extraction of 8,239 articles; after the review of the title, abstract, and full text, 11 articles were selected. In addition, backward reference list checking of the selected studies was conducted. Studies that were related to our objectives were included. Quality assessment was performed using the CONSORT checklist. Then, data extraction was done using the form set by the researcher in Word 2016 software. Results: Overall, telerehabilitation achieved more positive effects compared to traditional rehabilitation on physical (n = 6), cognitive (n = 3), cognitive, and physical outcomes (n = 2), respectively. Synchronous telerehabilitation was more effective than other modalities (n = 8). In four studies, virtual reality-based telerehabilitation was used. Also, telerehabilitation in home offered better clinical outcomes compared to rehabilitation center (n = 9). Conclusions: This review provides evidence for the potential effectiveness of telerehabilitation for the improvement of clinical outcomes in MS patients. However, more robust randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the observed positive effects.

Fall Assessment and Monitoring in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Practical Evidence-Based Review for Clinicians

Purpose of Review

Falls occur in more than half of all people with multiple sclerosis (MS) but tend to be underdiagnosed and underreported in clinical encounters. This narrative review aims to summarize evidence-based approaches for evaluating fall risk and proven treatment strategies to reduce falling in people with MS to improve care for people with MS and to enhance interprofessional care coordination between treating neurologic and physical therapy (PT) teams.

Recent Findings

Screening not just for falls but for near-falls as well because fear of falling can improve fall assessment and identify patients who may benefit from fall prevention interventions. A number of barriers, including time constraints during visits and the fallacy that falling is inevitable in MS, can limit clinician awareness about patient falls and delay timely referral to PT. Consultation with physical therapists for individualized fall prevention treatment can reduce risk of falling. Interventional studies have also shown that PT-guided exercise programs improve balance confidence in people with MS. However, people with MS are often under-referred to PT by treating clinicians.

Summary

A clinical approach is provided to summarize practical, accessible, evidence-based, low-burden measurements and interventions likely to improve ascertainment of patients at risk of falling and optimize timely PT referral and treatment.

When 'good' is not good enough: a retrospective Rasch analysis study of the Berg Balance Scale for persons with Multiple Sclerosis

Background

The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is one of the most used tools to quantify balance in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis, a population at high risk of falling.

Aim

To evaluate the measurement characteristics of the BBS in Multiple Sclerosis through Rasch analysis.

Design

Retrospective study.

Setting

Outpatients in three Italian Rehabilitation centers.

Population

Eight hundred and fourteen persons with Multiple Sclerosis able to stand independently for more than 3 s.

Methods

The sample (N = 1,220) was split into one validating (B1) and three confirmatory subsamples. Following the Rasch analysis performed on B1, the item estimates were exported and anchored to the three confirmatory subsamples. After obtaining the same final solution across all samples, we studied the convergent and discriminant validity of the final BBS-MS using the EDSS, the ABC scale, and the number of falls.

Results

The base analysis on the B1 subsample failed the monotonicity, local independence, and unidimensionality requirements and did not fit the Rasch model. After grouping locally dependent items, the BBS-MS fitted the model (χ²₈ = 23.8; p = 0.003) and satisfied all requirements for adequate internal construct validity (ICV). However, it was mistargeted to the sample, given the striking prevalence of higher scores (targeting index 1.922) with a distribution-independent Person Separation Index sufficient for individual measurements (0.962). The B1 item estimates were anchored to the confirmatory samples with confirmation of adequate fit (χ² = [19.0, 22.8], value of ps = [0.015, 0.004]) and satisfaction of all ICV requirements for all subsamples. The final BBS-MS directly correlated with the ABC scale (rho = 0.523) and inversely with EDSS (rho = -0.573). The BBS-MS estimates significantly differed across groups according to the pre-specified hypotheses (between the three EDSS groups, between the ABC cut-offs, distinguishing 'fallers' vs. 'non-fallers', and between the 'low' vs. 'moderate' vs. 'high' levels of physical functioning; and, finally, between 'no falls' vs. 'one or more falls').

Conclusion

This study supports the internal construct validity and reliability of the BBS-MS in an Italian multicentre sample of persons with Multiple Sclerosis. However, as the scale is slightly mistargeted to the sample, it represents a candidate tool to assess balance, mainly in more disabled people with an advanced walking disability.

Unwrapping the "black box" of balance training in people with multiple sclerosis - A descriptive systematic review of intervention components, progression, and intensity

BACKGROUND

Delineating the specific components of the existing balance training interventions in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) may contribute to a framework for future design and reporting of such interventions. Thus, we aimed to systematically synthesize how balance training frequency, intensity, time, type, duration, and progression are reported in balance training interventions for PwMS.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cinahl. Search terms were MS, postural balance, walking, gait, and randomized/quasi-randomized controlled or clinical trials. Articles including ambulatory PwMS and interventions designed to challenge the balance control system were eligible. Two investigators screened, selected, and extracted data independently. Data on study characteristics such as design, population, and balance training content were extracted. Categorization of balance training based on balance control components was performed.

RESULTS

We included 40 studies grouped under five balance training categories. Balance interventions were well described regarding frequency, session time, and duration, but only two interventions described training intensity, and no systematic, gradual progression approach was reported for balance training adaptation over time. However, the balance training interventions included many sensory and motor components of the balance control system. Still, little focus was on reactive motor strategies, vestibular sense, and cognitive dual-tasking.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing balance training interventions in PwMS primarily consist of practicing sensory and motor strategies. Future balance training interventions are encouraged to systematically monitor individual advancements in balance training adaptations and to apply the progressive overload principle (i.e. continuous increase in balance exercise stimulus over time). Furthermore, we suggest that balance training in PwMS is performed with high intensity near an individual's balance capacity limits. Finally, individualized balance training is recommended to cover all relevant components of balance control using the proposed framework.

The bidirectional relationship between homebound status and falls among older adults: a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Previous research has shown an association between homebound status and falls among older adults. However, this association was primarily drawn from cross-sectional studies. This study aimed to determine the bidirectional relationship between homebound status and falls among older adults in the community.

METHODS

We used data of the community-dwelling older adults from 2011 to 2015 of the National Health and Aging Trends Study, a nationally representative survey of Medicare Beneficiaries in the United States (Sample 1 [No falls at baseline]: N = 2,512; Sample 2 [Non-homebound at baseline]: N = 2,916). Homebound status was determined by the frequency, difficulty, and needing help for outdoor mobility. Falls were ascertained by asking participants whether they had a fall in the last year. Generalized estimation equation models were used to examine the bidirectional association between homebound status and falls longitudinally.

RESULTS

Participants with no falls at baseline (n = 2,512) were on average, 76.8 years old, non-Hispanic whites (70.1%), and female (57.1%). After adjusting for demographics and health-related variables, prior year homebound status significantly contributed to falls in the following year (Odds ratio [OR], 1.28, 95% CI: 1.09-1.51). Participants who were non-homebound at baseline (n = 2,916) were on average, 75.7 years old, non-Hispanic white (74.8%), and female (55.8%). Previous falls significantly predicted later homebound status (OR, 1.26, 95% CI: 1.10-1.45) in the full adjusted model.

CONCLUSION

This is the first longitudinal study to determine the bidirectional association between homebound status and falls. Homebound status and falls form a vicious circle and mutually reinforce each other over time. Our findings suggest the importance of developing programs and community activities that reduce falls and improve homebound status among older adults.

Benefits of Equine-Assisted Therapies in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

This systematic review aimed to provide an up-to-date analysis of the effects of equine-assisted therapies (EAT) in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to conduct this systematic review. PubMed and Web of Science databases were employed in the search, which ended in February 2022. The risk of bias analysis was performed using the Evidence Project tool. After removing duplicates, thirty-nine studies were identified. However, only ten fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Therefore, a total of 195 PwMS, aged between 40.3 and 51.3, were included in this systematic review. EAT-based interventions had a mean length of 13.6 weeks with a session´s frequency ranging from ten to once a week. All sessions involved real horses and lasted a mean of 34.4 min. Among the included articles, four were randomized controlled trials (RCT), four did not perform randomization, and two employed a prepost design without a control group. RCTs showed positive effects on quality of life, fatigue, balance, spasticity, and gait speed. Furthermore, non-RCT showed improvements in balance, spasticity, and postural control (postural control was not assessed in RCT studies). Importantly, significant effects were only observed when the comparison group was inactive or followed usual care. Therefore, EAT is a promising and effective therapy to improve quality of life, fatigue, balance, spasticity, and gait speed in PwMS. However, since comparison groups are heterogeneous, results could vary depending on the research design. Moreover, the inclusion of noncontrolled studies (in order to have a wide perspective of the state of art) could increase the risk of bias and make the results be taken with caution.

Identification of modified dynamic gait index cutoff scores for assessing fall risk in people with Parkinson disease, stroke and multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Balance and gait impairments increase fall rate and injury in people with neurological disorders(PwND). The modified Dynamic Gait Index(mDGI) is a scale assessing dynamic balance during walking, however its ability in identifying Fallers and Recurrent Fallers has not been studied.

RESEARCH QUESTION

To evaluate mDGI's ability in identifying retrospective Fallers and Recurrent Fallers establishing cut-off scores for its use in clinical practice.

METHOD

In this cross-sectional study, the number of retrospective falls and mDGI scores were collected. PwND were categorised as Non-Fallers or Fallers (falls≥1) and as Recurrent Fallers(falls≥2) or Non-Recurrent/Non-Fallers(falls<2) according to their number of retrospective falls over two months. Two generalised linear logistic models were developed using a machine learning method to detect Fallers (Model 1) and Recurrent Fallers (Model 2) based on mDGI scores. ROC curves were used to identify mDGI cut-off scores to distinguish between different fall categories.

RESULTS

58 PwND (mean ± standard deviation age: 63.4 ± 12 years) including 28 people with Multiple Sclerosis, 15 people with Parkinson's disease and 15 people with Stroke were analysed. The mDGI score(median (IQR)) for Non-Fallers, Fallers, Recurrent Fallers and Non-Recurrent/Non-Fallers was respectively 50(22), 37(22), 26.5(20.25) and 46.5(20.5)points. The cut-off to identify Fallers from Non-Fallers was 49 points(sensitivity:100 %, specificity:50 %, post-test probability with mDGI ≤ cut-off: 53.2 %, post-test probability with mDGI > cut-off: 0%, AUC:0.68), while 29 points(sensitivity:60 %, specificity:79 %, post-test probability with mDGI ≤ cut-off:52.1 %, post-test probability with mDGI > cut-off:16.1 %, AUC:0.70) was the best cut-off to identify Recurrent Fallers.

SIGNIFICANCE

People with mDGI score>49 points have low or minimal fall risk, while people with mDGI score≤49 points should be further investigated with other scales before starting a balance-focused rehabilitation intervention. People scoring ≤29 points on the mDGI scale may need a fall prevention intervention, regardless of the results of other balance clinical measures.

Higher Disease and Pain Severity and Fatigue and Lower Balance Skills Are Associated with Higher Prevalence of Falling among Individuals with the Inflammatory Disease of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)

Background: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a chronic inflammatory and autoimmune disorder that is associated with impaired vision, sensory loss, pain, fatigue, and spasms in the upper and lower limbs. Typically, persons with this disorder are also at higher risks of falls. Given this, the aims of the study were to compare the prevalence rates of falling for NMOSD cases and healthy controls (HCs), and to predict falling in the former group based on sociodemographic, psychological, and illness-related factors. Method: A total of 95 adults with NMOSD (Mean age = 34.89 years; 70.5% females) and 100 matched HCs took part in the study. All participants completed a series of questionnaires covering sociodemographic information and falling rates. The NMOSD individuals also reported on disease duration, pain, fatigue, and fear of falling, while their balance performance was objectively assessed. Results: Compared to healthy controls, the NMOSD cases had a 2.5-fold higher risk of falling. In this latter group, higher scores for pain, fatigue, fear of falling, and higher EDSS scores were distinguished between fallers and non-fallers, and objective balance skills had no predictive value. Conclusions: Compared to healthy controls, NMOSD sufferers had a 2.5-fold higher risk of experiencing falls. In this group, disease impairments (EDSS, fatigue, pain) predicted falling. Specific interventions such as regular resistance training might reduce the risk of falling.

Fall definitions, faller classifications and outcomes used in falls research among people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

Purpose: To identify the definitions of a fall, faller classifications and outcomes used in prospectively-recorded falls research among people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS).Methods: A systematic review of peer-reviewed journal articles was conducted using electronic databases. Relevant data were extracted by one reviewer and verified by a second independent reviewer.Results: Twenty-six papers met the inclusion criteria. A relative degree of heterogeneity existed amongst studies for the outcomes of interest to this review. Thirteen different fall definitions were identified. Fourteen different falls outcomes were used across the included studies, with six of these reported by only one study each. Data regarding injurious falls were presented by only eight papers. The majority (n = 17) of papers classified individuals as a faller if they fell at least once.Conclusions: This review highlights the large variation in fall definitions, faller classifications and outcomes used in this research field. This hinders cross-comparison and pooling of data, thereby preventing researchers and clinicians from drawing conclusive findings from existing literature. The creation of an international standard for the definition of a fall, faller classification and falls outcomes would allow for transparent and coordinated falls research for people with MS, facilitating progression in this research field.Implications for rehabilitationFalls are a common occurrence among people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) resulting in numerous negative consequences.There is large heterogeneity in the definitions, methods and outcomes used in falls research for people with MS.This lack of standardisation prevents the accurate cross-comparison and pooling of data, impeding the identification of falls risk factors and effective falls prevention interventions for people with MS.Consequently, clinicians should interpret the outcomes of falls research for people with MS with caution, particularly when comparing studies regarding falls risk assessments and falls prevention interventions for use in clinical practice.

Beyond current research practice: Methodological considerations in MS rehabilitation research (is designing the perfect rehabilitation trial the Holy Grail or a Gordian knot?)

Rehabilitation is an essential aspect of symptomatic and supportive treatment for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for rehabilitation interventions in MS has increased over the last two decades. The design, conduct and reporting quality of some of these trials could be improved. There are, however, some specific challenges that researchers face in conducting RCTs of rehabilitation interventions, which are often 'complex interventions'. This paper explores some of the challenges of undertaking robust clinical trials in rehabilitation. We focus on issues related to (1) participant selection and sample size, (2) interventions - the 'dose', content, active ingredients, targeting, fidelity of delivery and treatment adherence, (3) control groups and (4) outcomes - choosing the right type, number, timing of outcomes, and the importance of defining a primary outcome and clinically important difference between groups. We believe that by following internationally accepted RCT guidelines, by developing a critical mass of MS rehabilitation 'trialists' through international collaboration and by continuing to critique, challenge, and develop RCT designs, we can exploit the potential of RCTs to answer important questions related to the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions.

The impact of balance specific physiotherapy, intensity of therapy and disability on static and dynamic balance in people with multiple sclerosis: A multi-center prospective study

BACKGROUND

A high-quality research identifying the best physiotherapeutic approach for the improvement of balance in people with multiple sclerosis is missing. This study compared aspects of balance improvement such as therapy specificity to balance, therapy method and category, country, intensity and medical conditions.

METHODS

A multicentric randomised rater-blinded controlled trial comprised three different physiotherapy programs (Czech and Italian outpatient or inpatient programs). All patients received 20 therapy sessions. Experimental group underwent balance specific physiotherapy (it was Motor Program Activating Therapy in the Czech cohort and Sensory-motor Integration Training in the Italian cohort), control group underwent non-balance specific physiotherapy (it was Vojta reflex locomotion in the Czech cohort and conventional dynamic strengthening exercises in the Italian cohort, respectively). Static balance was evaluated by Berg Balance Scale and dynamic balance was assessed by Timed Up-and-Go Test.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients entered the study. Physiotherapy significantly improved static balance (p < 0.0001, increase by mean 2.6 points (95% confidence interval 2.0-3.5) in BBS score). Balance specific approach had a higher effect than non-specific balance approach (increase in BBS by 1.9 points, 95% confidence interval 0.9-3.7 points). The intensity of the physiotherapy significantly influenced static balance (BBS by 2.7 points higher in the inpatient setting, p= 0.007). Dynamic balance was also improved (TUG decrease by -0.8 s (95% CI -1.4 - -0.1s, p = 0.011)); the balance specificity had no impact. The level of disability played the most important role (p= 0.022).

CONCLUSION

Although the overall changes in static and dynamic balance were statistically significant, they were quite small in a clinical sense. A small statistically significant difference between balance specific and non-specific treatment was found. It seems that a high intensity of the therapy is critical to maximize the effectiveness.

Interventions for preventing falls in people with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most prevalent diseases of the central nervous system with recent prevalence estimates indicating that MS directly affects 2.3 million people worldwide. Fall rates of 56% have been reported among people with MS in a recent meta-analysis. Clinical guidelines do not outline an evidence-based approach to falls interventions in MS. There is a need for synthesised information regarding the effectiveness of falls prevention interventions in MS.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce falls in people with MS. Specific objectives included comparing: (1) falls prevention interventions to controls and; (2) different types of falls prevention interventions.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Trials Register of the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS Group, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2018 Issue 9); MEDLINE (PubMed) (1966 to 12 September 2018); Embase (EMBASE.com) (1974 to 12 September 2018); Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (EBSCOhost) (1981 to 12 September 2018); Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information Database (Bireme) (1982 to 12 September 2018); ClinicalTrials.gov; and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; PsycINFO (1806 to 12 September 2018; and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (1999 to 12 September 2018).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised trials of interventions to reduce falls in people with MS. We included trials that examined falls prevention interventions compared to controls or different types of falls prevention interventions. Primary outcomes included: falls rate, risk of falling, number of falls per person and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors screened studies for selection, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We used a rate ratio (RaR) and 95% confidence interval to compare falls rate between groups. For risk of falling, we used a risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI based on the number of fallers in each group.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 839 people with MS (12 to 177 individuals) were randomised in the 13 included trials. The mean age of the participants was 52 years (36 to 62 years). The percentage of women participants ranged from 59% to 85%. Studies included people with all types of MS. Most trials compared an exercise intervention with no intervention or different types of falls prevention interventions. We included two comparisons: (1) Falls prevention intervention versus control and (2) Falls prevention intervention versus another falls prevention intervention. The most common interventions tested were exercise as a single intervention, education as a single intervention, functional electrical stimulation and exercise plus education. The risk of bias of the included studies mixed, with nine studies demonstrating high risk of bias related to one or more aspects of their methodology. The evidence was uncertain regarding the effects of exercise versus control on falls rate (RaR of 0.68; 95% CI 0.43 to 1.06; very low-quality evidence), number of fallers (RR of 0.85; 95% CI 0.51 to 1.43; low-quality evidence) and adverse events (RR of 1.25; 95% CI 0.26 to 6.03; low-quality evidence). Data were not available on quality of life outcomes comparing exercise to control. The majority of other comparisons between falls interventions and controls demonstrated no evidence of effect in favour of either group for all primary outcomes. For the comparison of different falls prevention interventions, the heterogeneity of intervention types across studies prohibited the pooling of data. In relation to secondary outcomes, there was evidence of an effect in favour of exercise interventions compared to controls for balance function with a SMD of 0.50 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.92), self-reported mobility with a SMD of 16.30 (95% CI 9.34 to 23.26) and objective mobility with a SMD of 0.28 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.50). Secondary outcomes were not assessed under the GRADE criteria and results must be interpreted with caution.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence regarding the effects of interventions for preventing falls in MS is sparse and uncertain. The evidence base demonstrates mixed risk of bias, with very low to low certainty of the evidence. There is some evidence in favour of exercise interventions for the improvement of balance function and mobility. However, this must be interpreted with caution as these secondary outcomes were not assessed under the GRADE criteria and as the results represent data from a small number of studies. Robust RCTs examining the effectiveness of multifactorial falls interventions on falls outcomes are needed.

Educational and Exercise Intervention to Prevent Falls and Improve Participation in Subjects With Neurological Conditions: The NEUROFALL Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Falls, mobility impairments and lack of social support lead to participation restrictions in people with neurological conditions. The aim of this multicenter, single blinded randomized controlled trial was to test whether an educational program focusing on fall prevention and safe mobility reduces falls and increases social participation among people with neurological conditions. Methods: Ninety people with Stroke (n = 25), multiple sclerosis (n = 33) and Parkinson disease (n = 32), median age 63 (31-89), were randomized. A permuted block algorithm stratified by field center was used to allocate participants to an education group (EG, n = 42) consisting of an educational program focused on fall prevention and tailored balance exercises and a control group (CG, n = 48) receiving usual treatments. After baseline assessment, each participants was followed for 6 months with telephone contacts by blinded interviewers. Being fallers (>1 fall) and time to become a faller were used as primary outcomes. Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scales assessed treatment effects on social integration and daily living activities. Results: Over a median (Interquartile Range) follow-up of 189 (182-205) days, [EG = 188 (182-202), CG = 189 (182-209)] fallers were 10 in the CG and 11 in the EG (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 2.5; P = 0.94). At follow-up the EG scored significantly better than CG on the CIQ (+1.7 points, CI: 0.1 to 3.3) and IADL (+2.2 points, CI: 0.4 to 4.0). Conclusions: This educational program did not reduce the risk of falls but it improved the ability to carry out activities of daily living and decreased participation restrictions in people with neurological conditions.

Factors influencing balance improvement in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: A pragmatic multicentric trial

OBJECTIVES

Treatment for progressive multiple sclerosis (pMS) is a key area of research. To date, whether MS type and the rehabilitation setting are associated with worse or better response to rehabilitation is unclear. We aimed to understand the association between balance and MS type, in/outpatient treatment and specificity of the intervention.

METHODS

We assessed 150 people with MS before and after in/outpatient rehabilitation. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was used to discriminate between responders (≥+3-point improvement in BBS score; a clinically meaningful improvement) and non-responders to specific or non-specific balance rehabilitation. Factors associated with balance were analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Balance improved after rehabilitation: median (quartile 1 [Q1]-Q3) BBS score pre- and post-rehabilitation of 49 (45-53) and 52 (47-55) (P<0.001). Univariate logistic analysis revealed a clinically meaningful improvement in balance associated with pMS (OR 2.21 [95% CI 1.09-4.05]), inpatient therapy (0.41 [0.19-0.84]), using a walking aid (1.68 [1.06-2.69]), and low baseline BBS score (0.86 [0.81-0.92]). On multivariable analysis, probability of improvement was similar for participants with pMS and the relapsing-remitting form but was associated with low baseline BBS score and specific treatment (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.74-0.89] and 5.66 [1.79-21.5]).

CONCLUSION

A clinically meaningful improvement in balance was more likely when MS individuals with moderate to high disability had specific exercises targeting balance, but MS type did not influence the outcome.

The ability of clinical balance measures to identify falls risk in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective:

To determine the ability of clinical measures of balance to distinguish fallers from non-fallers and to determine their predictive validity in identifying those at risk of falls.

Data sources:

AMED, CINAHL, Medline, Scopus, PubMed Central and Google Scholar. First search: July 2015. Final search: October 2017.

Review methods:

Inclusion criteria were studies of adults with a definite multiple sclerosis diagnosis, a clinical balance assessment and method of falls recording. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 scale and the modified Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Statistical analysis was conducted for the cross-sectional studies using Review Manager 5. The mean difference with 95% confidence interval in balance outcomes between fallers and non-fallers was used as the mode of analysis.

Results:

We included 33 studies (19 cross-sectional, 5 randomised controlled trials, 9 prospective) with a total of 3901 participants, of which 1917 (49%) were classified as fallers. The balance measures most commonly reported were the Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go and Falls Efficacy Scale International. Meta-analysis demonstrated fallers perform significantly worse than non-fallers on all measures analysed except the Timed Up and Go Cognitive ( p < 0.05), but discriminative ability of the measures is commonly not reported. Of those reported, the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value (0.92), but without reporting corresponding measures of clinical utility.

Conclusion:

Clinical measures of balance differ significantly between fallers and non-fallers but have poor predictive ability for falls risk in people with multiple sclerosis.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of a novel gait trainer in increasing the functionality of individuals with motor impairment: A case series

Regaining the ability to independently ambulate following a physical disability can increase functional ability and participation of patients in daily life. Gait trainers are assistive devices that enable body support and provide safety during gait. However, most conventional gait trainers are pre-configured to a constant position, therefore not suitable for practicing sit-to-stand function, and require assistance from a caregiver in order to mount the device from a sitting position. We therefore evaluated the effectiveness of a dynamically-adjusting gait trainer, designed to provide independence and safety during gait and various activities, in both lab setting and at home in four subjects (one female, three males, ages 32-79 years) with limited ambulation. Spatiotemporal parameters and gait symmetry were recorded, as well as activity levels, actual use of device, and satisfaction. Although gait parameters and physical activity levels were not notably improved, and in one case were worsened, three subjects reported positive experience with the gait trainer. The new gait trainer may have advantages in supporting users with limited mobility during walking and various functions and decrease the risk for falls. A longer practice time and individual fitting process are recommended for better accommodation to the new possibilities.