1
|
Shadowen N, Meehan Z, Webb C, Fowles T, Beveridge R. Early intervention in youth psychosis: Novel approaches to understanding change. Psychiatry Res 2023; 326:115269. [PMID: 37331067 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
Untreated psychosis in adolescents and young adults is associated with significant and progressive impairment. Early intervention to provide support and treatment for those at risk of psychosis is essential. Several early intervention models have been developed for those at-risk and those who are victims of a recent episode - including the Portland Identification and Early Referral model (PIER; McFarlane, 2001). This study extends previous work demonstrating a variety of positive treatment outcomes achieved by PIER in the context of a large-scale implementation across the state of Delaware. The sample included 108 youth and young adults who were either at risk for psychosis or had already experienced a first episode within the past two years. Participants received the PIER treatment model and were followed from baseline to six months after they were discharged from treatment. Researchers predicted that PIER participants would experience an increase in functioning and a decrease in positive psychosis symptoms. Change over time was examined through the lens of two analytic techniques: the Reliable Change Index (RCI) analyses and Growth Curve Modeling (GCM). Results show improvement on a number of outcomes over the course of the intervention as expected. Clinical implications, limitations, and suggestions for further research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noel Shadowen
- University of Delaware, Center for Training Evaluation and Community Collaboration, 210 South College Avenue, Newark, DE 19716; Skyline Psychotherapy & Assessment Services, PLLC, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Zachary Meehan
- University of Delaware, Center for Training Evaluation and Community Collaboration, 210 South College Avenue, Newark, DE 19716
| | - Charles Webb
- Office of Evidence-Based Practices, Division of Prevention and Behavioral Health Services, 1825 Faulkland Road, Wilmington, DE 19805
| | - Timothy Fowles
- University of Delaware, Center for Training Evaluation and Community Collaboration, 210 South College Avenue, Newark, DE 19716
| | - Ryan Beveridge
- University of Delaware, Center for Training Evaluation and Community Collaboration, 210 South College Avenue, Newark, DE 19716
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parker S, Arnautovska U, Korman N, Harris M, Dark F. Comparative Effectiveness of Integrated Peer Support and Clinical Staffing Models for Community-Based Residential Mental Health Rehabilitation: A Prospective Observational Study. Community Ment Health J 2023; 59:459-470. [PMID: 36057000 PMCID: PMC9981709 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-022-01023-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
This observational study compared the outcomes of consumers receiving community-based residential mental health rehabilitation support in Australia under a clinical staffing model and an integrated staffing model where Peer Support Workers are the majority component of the staffing profile. Reliable and clinically significant (RCS) change between admission and discharge in functional and clinical assessment measures were compared for consumers receiving care under the clinical (n = 52) and integrated (n = 93) staffing models. Covariate analyses examined the impact of known confounders on the outcomes of the staffing model groups. No statistically significant differences in RCS improvement were identified between the staffing models. However, logistic regression modelling showed that consumers admitted under the integrated staffing model were more likely to experience reliable improvement in general psychiatric symptoms and social functioning. The findings support the clinical and integrated staffing models achieving at least equivalent outcomes for community-based residential rehabilitation services consumers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Parker
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. .,Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Woolloongabba, Australia. .,Metro North Addiction and Mental Health Service, Chermside, Australia. .,The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia.
| | - U Arnautovska
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - N Korman
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - M Harris
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - F Dark
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Woolloongabba, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Occupational evaluation of community-based psychiatric rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with severe mental illnesses: A ten-year retrospective study. Asian J Psychiatr 2023; 81:103450. [PMID: 36630832 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a lack of research on the effect of community-based psychiatric rehabilitation programs (CBPRs) in individuals with severe mental illness. This research used data from a retrospective study to examine the effect of a CBPR in a community rehabilitation center. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical outcomes measures from a retrospective study were collected. Outcome measures were the Allen Cognitive Level Screen assessment, Purdue Pegboard Test, Chu's Attention Test, and Activities of Daily Living Rating Scale-III (ADLRS-III) before and immediately after 12 months of intervention. RESULTS The 141 participants with mental illness were an average age of 35.29 years (SD = 8.75). The retrospective review of medical records showed 46 people dropped out within 12 months, and 95 people continued to participate in the rehabilitation program for 1 year. After 1 year of community rehabilitation, there was a trend for the participants who completed the intervention to improve on the ADLRS-III, Purdue Pegboard Test, and Chu's Attention Test. Participants who performed better on the occupational assessment were more likely to transit to the employment status. CONCLUSION This study found the benefits of CBPR in work-related intervention for people with mental illness. Occupational assessments are relevant for studying changes in functional outcomes in people with mental illness receiving community-based rehabilitation.
Collapse
|
4
|
Tully S, Bucci S, Alkotob Y, Penn G, Berry K. Sex differences in functional outcome after hospitalisation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res 2023; 323:115095. [PMID: 36889159 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
The aims of this review were to determine: i) how many studies have examined global functioning outcomes from a psychiatric inpatient stay disaggregated by sex; and ii) if women have worse global functioning outcomes than men following an admission. A systematic review following PRISMA guidance and meta-analysis were conducted. Thirty-six studies met eligibility criteria for inclusion in the review. Of these, eleven papers provided sufficient data to conduct a meta-analysis of global functioning outcomes comparing men and women. Overall, differences between men and women were small. The meta-analysis revealed either no difference or a small significant difference in global functioning outcomes in favour of women, contrary to expectations. As many as 93% of otherwise eligible studies had to be excluded for not disaggregating data by sex. Women may have slightly superior functioning outcomes than men suggesting that inpatient services should be more heavily focused on applying principles of gender-informed care for men as well as women. The finding that so many potential studies had to be excluded for not reporting sex differences is consistent with other mental health literature and highlights a need for better reporting practices in relation to sex differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Tully
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - S Bucci
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Y Alkotob
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - G Penn
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - K Berry
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Community-care unit model of residential mental health rehabilitation services in Queensland, Australia: predicting outcomes of consumers 1-year post discharge. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2020; 29:e109. [PMID: 32157987 PMCID: PMC7214525 DOI: 10.1017/s2045796020000207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Community care units (CCUs) are a model of residential psychiatric rehabilitation aiming to improve the independence and community functioning of people with severe and persistent mental illness. This study examined factors predicting improvement in outcomes among CCU consumers. METHODS Hierarchical regression using data from a retrospective cohort (N = 501) of all consumers admitted to five CCUs in Queensland, Australia between 2005 and 2014. The primary outcome was changed in mental health and social functioning (Health of the Nation Outcome Scale). Secondary outcomes were disability (Life Skills Profile-16), service use, accommodation instability, and involuntary treatment. Potential predictors covered service, consumer, and treatment characteristics. Group-level and individualised change were assessed between the year pre-admission and post-discharge. Where relevant and available, the reliable and clinically significant (RCS) change was assessed by comparison with a normative sample. RESULTS Group-level analyses showed statistically significant improvements in mental health and social functioning, and reductions in psychiatry-related bed-days, emergency department (ED) presentations and involuntary treatment. There were no significant changes in disability or accommodation instability. A total of 54.7% of consumers demonstrated reliable improvement in mental health and social functioning, and 43.0% showed RCS improvement. The majority (60.6%) showed a reliable improvement in psychiatry-related bed-use; a minority demonstrated reliable improvement in ED presentations (12.5%). Significant predictors of improvement included variables related to the CCU care (e.g. episode duration), consumer characteristics (e.g. primary diagnosis) and treatment variables (e.g. psychiatry-related bed-days pre-admission). Higher baseline impairment in mental health and social functioning (β = 1.12) and longer episodes of CCU care (β = 1.03) increased the likelihood of RCS improvement in mental health and social functioning. CONCLUSIONS CCU care was followed by reliable improvements in relevant outcomes for many consumers. Consumers with poorer mental health and social functioning, and a longer episode of CCU care were more likely to make RCS improvements in mental health and social functioning.
Collapse
|
6
|
Parker S, Siskind D, Hermens DF, Dark F, McKeon G, Korman N, Arnautovska U, Harris M, Whiteford H. A Comprehensive Cohort Description and Statistical Grouping of Community-Based Residential Rehabilitation Service Users in Australia. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:798. [PMID: 31780965 PMCID: PMC6857698 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Community Care Units (CCUs) are a model of community-based residential rehabilitation support available in Australia that assists people affected by severe and persistent mental illness to enhance their independent living skills and community involvement. These services have been subject to limited evaluation, and available descriptions of consumer cohorts lack relevance to the understanding of their rehabilitation needs. Method: A clinical assessment battery covering a broad range of relevant domains was completed with consumers commencing at three CCUs in Queensland, Australia, between December 2014 and December 2017 (N = 145). The cohort was described based on demographic, diagnostic, treatment-related variables, and the assessment battery. The comparability of included sites was assessed. This contemporary cohort was also compared to the pooled cohort of Australian community-based residential rehabilitation services emerging from a previous systematic review. Additionally, cluster analysis (CA) was completed in two stages based on the clinician-rated assessments: hierarchical CA (Wards method) to identify the optimal number of clusters, followed by K-means clustering. Results: Dominant features of the cohort were male sex and the primary diagnoses of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The average consumer age was 31.4 years. Most consumers were referred from the community, had been living with family, and were not subject to involuntary treatment orders. No site-based differences were observed on demographic, diagnostic and treatment-related variables. However, some site-based variation in levels of symptoms and functional impairment emerged. Overall, the cohort was comparable with the Transitional Residential Rehabilitation (TRR) cohort defined in a previous systematic review. Through CA, a three-cluster solution emerged: Cluster 1 (15%) was characterised by higher levels of substance use comorbidity; Cluster 2 (39%) was characterised by higher levels of disability and symptoms; and Cluster 3 (46%) was distinguished by lower levels of general psychiatric symptoms. Conclusions: The cohort was generally comparable to the TRR cohort. Site-based variability in the characteristics of admitted consumers was minimal. The CA solution suggested that three different sub-groups of consumers are admitted to CCUs, which have implications for adapting the approach to rehabilitation. Recommendations include ensuring early availability of interventions to address co-morbidities and pacing rehabilitation expectations to consumers stage of recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Parker
- Rehabilitation Academic Clinical Unit, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Services (MSAMHS), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Dan Siskind
- Rehabilitation Academic Clinical Unit, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Services (MSAMHS), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Daniel F Hermens
- Sunshine Coast Mind and Neuroscience-Thompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, QLD, Australia
| | - Frances Dark
- Rehabilitation Academic Clinical Unit, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Services (MSAMHS), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Gemma McKeon
- Psychosis Academic Clinical Unit, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Services (MSAMHS), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nicole Korman
- Rehabilitation Academic Clinical Unit, Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Services (MSAMHS), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Urska Arnautovska
- PA Foundation, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Meredith Harris
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Harvey Whiteford
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|