1
|
Kumar P, Christodoulou A, Loizou M. Assessment approaches for hemiplegic shoulder pain in people living with stroke - A scoping review. Disabil Rehabil 2025; 47:1677-1687. [PMID: 39105542 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2385736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is reported in up to 40% of people with stroke. Causes of HSP are often multifactorial. To inform appropriate treatment, reliable/valid assessments are critical. The aim of this scoping review was to collate assessment approaches used in studies where the primary outcome was HSP, and to identify how frequently each assessment approach was used. METHODS A systematic search, including studies from 2000-2023 was conducted of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Biomed Central, and Cochrane Library databases, with four key terms used: "assess", "stroke", "pain" and "shoulder". All primary studies published in English language fulfilling the reviews inclusion criteria were included. Six reviewers extracted the data. RESULTS A total of 29 assessment methods for HSP were identified from 124 studies. The common assessments were: Visual Analogue Scale (n = 75, 60%), Passive Range of Movement (n = 65, 52%), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (n = 32, 26%), glenohumeral subluxation (n = 30, 24%) and Numerical Rating Scale (n = 27, 22%). CONCLUSION A wide range of assessment approaches was identified for HSP, and some are used more than others. A fully comprehensive assessment that considers different aspects of pain including severity and timing, functioning, and the psychological burden, is needed in this area of practice to be able to guide appropriate treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praveen Kumar
- College of Health, Science and Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Avgi Christodoulou
- College of Health, Science and Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael Loizou
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Raghavan P. Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mechanisms of Motor Recovery Poststroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2024; 35:235-257. [PMID: 38514216 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2023.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Stroke remains a leading cause of disability. Motor recovery requires the interaction of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms, which reinforce each other. Injury to the brain initiates a biphasic neuroimmune process, which opens a window for spontaneous recovery during which the brain is particularly sensitive to activity. Physical activity during this sensitive period can lead to rapid recovery by potentiating anti-inflammatory and neuroplastic processes. On the other hand, lack of physical activity can lead to early closure of the sensitive period and downstream changes in muscles, such as sarcopenia, muscle stiffness, and reduced cardiovascular capacity, and blood flow that impede recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Preeti Raghavan
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Glize B, Cook A, Benard A, Sagnier S, Olindo S, Poli M, Debruxelles S, Renou P, Rouanet F, Bader C, Dehail P, Sibon I. Early multidisciplinary prevention program of post-stroke shoulder pain: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Rehabil 2022; 36:1042-1051. [PMID: 35505589 DOI: 10.1177/02692155221098733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate if positioning the upper-limb promoting abduction, external rotation and flexion of the shoulder reduces the intensity of post-stroke shoulder pain at day-7 compared to usual clinical practice. DESIGN & SETTING Prospective single-center randomized clinical trial using a superiority design comparing two preventive strategies of post-stroke shoulder pain in a stroke unit. SUBJECTS Patients were included within 2 days from a first symptomatic ischemic stroke affecting shoulder motor function. INTERVENTIONS Intervention group included specific positioning of the shoulder in abduction, external rotation and flexion in bed, chair and during mobilization. Control group referred to usual practice i.e. positioning using a standard support scarf. MAIN MEASURES Primary outcome was the intensity of shoulder pain assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) (0-100) at day-7 post-stroke. Other outcomes measured at day-7 and 2 months post-stroke were the VAS, motor function, spasticity, depression, functional independence and rates of complex regional Pain syndrome (CRPS). RESULTS 76 patients (49 males; mean age = 68.3) were randomized. The shoulder pain at day-7 was not different between the control group (16.1, SD = 27.4) and the intervention group (10.3, SD = 21.5, p = 0.18) as well as at 2 months (p = 0.12). A lower rate of depression was observed in the intervention group at 2 months 36.7% (CI95% 19.9;56.1) vs 52.9% (CI95% 35.1;70.2). No between-group difference in other outcomes was observed at 2 months. CONCLUSIONS This study failed to demonstrate the benefit of a specific positioning tool in reducing the intensity of post-stroke shoulder pain which was lower than previously reported in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Glize
- Service de MPR, 36836CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,HACS team, BPH INSERM 1219, 158435Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Amandine Cook
- Centre de rééducation de la Tour de Gassies, Bruges, France.,Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, 36836CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Antoine Benard
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit (USMR), 36836CHU Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Bordeaux, France
| | - Sharmila Sagnier
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, 36836CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Clinical Epidemiology Unit (USMR), 36836CHU Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Bordeaux, France
| | - Stéphane Olindo
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, 36836CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mathilde Poli
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, 36836CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Pauline Renou
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, 36836CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - François Rouanet
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, 36836CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Clément Bader
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit (USMR), 36836CHU Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Bordeaux, France
| | - Patrick Dehail
- Service de MPR, 36836CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,HACS team, BPH INSERM 1219, 158435Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Igor Sibon
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, 36836CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, EPHE, INCIA, UMR 5287, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Bladel A, Cools A, Michielsen M, Oostra K, Cambier D. Passive mobilisation of the shoulder in subacute stroke patients with persistent arm paresis: A randomised multiple treatment trial. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY 2022; 78:1589. [PMID: 35281779 PMCID: PMC8905406 DOI: 10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anke van Bladel
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ann Cools
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Kristine Oostra
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dirk Cambier
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|