A systematic review and meta-analysis of Patient-Rated Wrist (and Hand) Evaluation (PRWE/PRWHE) measurement properties, translation, and/ or cross-cultural adaptation

Proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Four-corner arthrodesis with scaphoid excision (FCA) and proximal row carpal resection (PRC) are frequently performed in wrists with post-traumatic Scaphoid Non- Union Advanced Collapse (SNAC)/Scapho-Lunate Advanced Collapse (SLAC) osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of these two procedures.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective cohort study included all patients who had PRC or FCA between January 1st, 2009 and January 1st, 2019 and who were followed up. Follow-up included: mobility (radial deviation, ulnar deviation, flexion, extension), strength (grip test, pinch test), function (QuickDash, patient-rated wrist evaluation [PRWE]), subjective mobility, and global satisfaction scores.

RESULTS

Among 25 patients included, 11 had PRC and 14 had FCA with a mean follow-up of 69.5 months [12-132]. Radial deviation was 18° versus 14° (p = 0.7), ulnar deviation was 21° versus 22° (p = 0.15), flexion was 39° versus 30° (p = 0.32), extension was 32.5° versus 29.5° (p = 0.09), grip test compared to the controlateral side was 72% versus 62% (p = 0.53), Quick Dash score was 12.5 versus 17.6 (p = 0.84), PRWE was 18.7 versus 17.6 (p = 0.38), subjective mobility was 7.8 versus 7.5 (p = 0.23), and satisfaction score was 8.7 versus 9 (p = 0.76), respectively, in the FCA group and the PRC group. Re-operation rates were 14% patients in the FCA group and 0% in the PRC group.

CONCLUSION

This study found no significant difference between FCA and PRC on strength, mobility, and function in patients with post-traumatic SLAC or SNAC stage II wrist arthritis. Both FCA and PRC seem to be reliable surgical techniques with good outcomes with more revision in the FCA group.

Surgical treatment of distal radius fractures: impact on forearm rotation in non-elderly patients

Forearm rotation restriction (FRR) is common after surgery for distal radius fractures (DRFs). The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of DRFs on forearm rotation. This retrospective study reviewed patients with DRFs who underwent surgical treatment from January 2019 to December 2021. The patients' basic data and radiographic parameters were analyzed. Forearm rotation, including pronation and supination, was assessed using a standard goniometer. The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score was evaluated, and the incidence of FRR at the 6-month follow-up was recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors correlated with FRR. A total of 127 patients with DRFs were included in this study. After surgery, 46 cases were considered to have FRR, with a rate of 36.2%, while the remaining 81 cases (63.8%) did not have FRR. The PRWE scores were 22.8 ± 5.2 and 17.9 ± 4.2 in the FRR group and non-FRR group, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the involvement of the sigmoid notch (OR, 2.88; 95% CI 1.49-5.56), post-operative volar tilt < 0° (OR, 2.16; 95% CI 1.34-3.50), and post-operative ulnar variance > 0 mm (OR, 1.37; 95% CI 1.06-1.78) were independently associated with the incidence of FRR. The FRR is associated with an increased PRWE score and may have had some impact on the patient's daily life. Fractures involving the sigmoid notch, dorsal angulation, and radial shortening deformity were found to be correlated with the incidence of FRR. Preoperative risk notification and intraoperative preventive measures are necessary for these patients.

Measurement properties of the Dutch versions of QuickDASH and PRWHE in patients with complaints of hand, wrist, forearm and elbow

BACKGROUND

The shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) are commonly used questionnaires to assess patient-reported hand function. Information about the measurement properties of the Dutch versions is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To gain insight into the measurement properties of the Dutch language versions of the QuickDASH and the PRWHE in patients with (non)specific complaints of the hand, wrist, forearm and elbow.

METHODS

Internal consistency, construct validity, test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and floor and ceiling effects were assessed according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) recommendations.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were filled out by 132 patients. Internal consistency of QuickDASH (Cronbach's α= 0.92) and PRWHE (Cronbach's α= 0.97) was high. Predefined hypotheses for construct validity were not confirmed for 75% for both QuickDASH and PRWHE (accordance with 62% of predefined hypotheses for both questionnaires). Test-retest reliability of QuickDASH (ICC = 0.90) and PRWHE (ICC = 0.87) was good. Both QuickDASH (AUC = 0.84) and PRWHE (AUC = 0.80) showed good responsiveness. No floor or ceiling effects were present.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement properties of the Dutch language versions of the QuickDASH and the PRWHE, applied to patients with (non)specific complaints of the hand, wrist, forearm and elbow, were very similar. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness were good for both QuickDASH and PRWHE. Construct validity could not be demonstrated sufficiently.

BFR Training Improves Patients' Reported Outcomes, Strength, and Range of Motion After Casting for Colles' Fracture

PURPOSE

This study compared traditional rehabilitation as a treatment modality after plaster cast treatment of Colles' fracture with a combination of individualized blood flow restriction (BFR) and traditional rehabilitation.

METHODS

Twenty-eight participants were randomized into a BFR group and a non-BFR group after plaster cast treatment of Colles' fracture. The BFR group completed traditional rehabilitation with a medical grade tourniquet applied to the upper arm, and the non-BFR group underwent traditional rehabilitation only. Patients were followed up with radiographic outcomes (palmar tilt and radial inclination) to ensure the stability of the fracture. Clinical assessment of patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score, grip strength, pinch strength, wrist range of motion (ROM), and muscle stiffness was conducted at cast removal and 6 wk after cast removal. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA determined significant interactions between time and group in the aforementioned variables. An independent-sample t -test assessed the differences in baseline variables and radiographic outcomes.

RESULTS

Significant interactions between time and group were noted for PRWE score ( F = 11.796, P = 0.002, η2p = 0.339), grip strength ( F = 5.445, P = 0.029, η2p = 0.191), and wrist ROM (ulnar deviation; F = 7.856, P = 0.010, η2p = 0.255). No significant interactions between time and group were found in measurements of pinch strength or wrist ROM (flexion, extension, radial deviation, pronation, supination). An independent-sample t -test showed no significant difference in baseline variables and radiographic outcomes between the groups before or after intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that combining individualized BFR with traditional rehabilitation resulted in greater increases in PRWE score, grip strength, and wrist ROM (ulnar deviation) than traditional rehabilitation alone. Therefore, adding individualized BFR to traditional rehabilitation might be a better option for treatment for similar patients.

The association between pain self-efficacy and patient-reported outcome measures for hand disorders: a cross-sectional study

Introduction

Multiple psychological factors influence the functioning of patients with hand disorders. Pain self-efficacy is a positive psychological factor, which concerns an individual's confidence to function despite experiencing pain. This study aimed to analyse the association between pain self-efficacy and a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for hand and wrist disorders.

Methods

Cross-sectional data from patient records were collected prior to hand therapy to analyse the correlation between pain self-efficacy and a PROM for hand and wrist disorders. The assessment tools consisted of the Dutch translations of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire Short Form (PSEQ-2) and the Patient Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation (PRWHE).

Results

The findings were reported for the entire sample of 185 respondents (61% women). The PSEQ-2 and the PRWHE were strongly and significantly correlated, which signifies that a higher pain self-efficacy was associated with less pain and disability as measured by the PRWHE. Within a multivariable regression model which accounted for confounding variables, pain self-efficacy independently predicted 28% of the PRWHE scores.

Conclusions

A strong association between the Dutch PSEQ-2 and the PRWHE was found in this sample of hand therapy patients. This study was limited by the use of retrospective data and by the lack of validation of the Dutch PSEQ-2. The findings were consistent with existing research which reported similar correlations between upper extremity PROM scores and pain self-efficacy. The positively worded PSEQ presents a chance to routinely assess pain self-efficacy as a key psychological factor while also affirming a positive coping strategy.

Occupational Performance 1 Year After a Distal Radius Fracture From the Perspective of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

IMPORTANCE

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) frequently compromise independent functioning.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze occupational performance post-DRF using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and related interviews, guided by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). COPM score was compared with standard metrics: Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Participation Behavior Questionnaire (PBQ).

METHOD

Through a semistructured COPM interview, participants highlighted self-care, productivity, and leisure. They completed the PRWE and PBQ, linking results to ICF sets.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING

Outpatient hand surgery clinic at a trauma center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N = 120), 1 yr post-DRF.

OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Incorporated COPM, PRWE, and PBQ, linked to ICF.

RESULTS

Analysis identified 73 codes, aligning with 30 ICF Hand Conditions codes. Main concerns related to self-care (15.21%), leisure (12.16%), and productivity (16.22%). Major challenges pertained to domestic (67.00%) and civic life (64.53%) within ICF. Occupational performance was positively correlated with participation (r = .62) and inversely with disability (r = -.62).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

DRFs result in varied occupational challenges that are not always reflected in standard measures. The COPM offers a comprehensive insight into post-DRF patient challenges, emphasizing the value of diverse clinical assessment approaches. What This Article Adds: This study highlights the importance of a holistic approach in occupational therapy for DRF patients, revealing that standard measurements might overlook key challenges that they face. By adopting broader evaluative methods, occupational therapists can better address patient-specific needs and enhance their rehabilitation outcomes.

Psychometric qualities of the patient rated Wrist/Hand evaluation (PRWHE) in dutch primary care patients with wrist complaints

Background

Knowledge on the course, disability and functionality of wrist complaints is still compendious in primary care guidelines, despite the high prevalence in primary care. Valid questionnaires can facilitate the monitoring of patients in primary care and research initiatives. In this study, we aimed to study the psychometric qualities of the Dutch version of the Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE-DLV) among adults with (sub)acute wrist complaints in primary care.

Methods

An observational cohort of 35 adults with (sub)acute wrist complaints in Dutch primary care was established. The content validity of the PRWHE-DLV was validated by assessing the floor and ceiling effects at baseline (T0). Reproducibility was assessed by the test-retest reliability between T0 and T1 (2–5 days after T0), using the Intra-class Correlation Coefficient. The construct validity was assessed based on the correlation between the PRWHE-DLV and the Quick-DASH, Physical Component Score (SF-12), VAS-function, Physical Functioning (SF-12), VAS-pain and Bodily Pain (SF-12) at T0. Responsiveness was defined as the ability of the PRWHE-DLV to measure change 3 weeks after T0 (internal) and the relation of these changes to clinically important outcomes (external).

Results

Psychometric qualities of the PRWHE-DLV demonstrated high content validity with no floor or ceiling effects, excellent reliability (Intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.90; 95% CI 0.80–0.95), high construct validity with the validated Quick-DASH and VAS score (r = 0.85 with Quick-DASH, r = 0.75 with VAS-function and r = 0.78 with VAS-pain) and high responsiveness.

Conclusion

The PRWHE-DLV provided reliable and adequate information for primary care clinical practice.

Bringing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Into Practice: A Review of the Latest Developments in PROM Use in the Evaluation and Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

As health care systems globally shift toward optimizing value, defined as health outcomes achieved per dollar spent across a full cycle of care, there has been increasing focus on using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to gauge success. Patient-reported outcome measures are validated questionnaires that allow patients to share their health status across several domains (eg, pain or physical function). This trend has been particularly notable in hand surgery, with PROM use investigated for many common hand conditions, including carpal tunnel syndrome, Dupuytren contracture, trigger finger, osteoarthritis, and wrist ganglion. The purpose of this article is to review recent developments in the use of PROM instruments, including the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire; Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, for the evaluation and treatment of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. The considerable progress in establishing PROMs for use in carpal tunnel syndrome is reviewed, and future improvements are proposed to standardize PROM use and bring PROMs into day-to-day clinical practice for individualized patient treatment decision-making and counseling.

Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in wrist osteoarthritis: test-retest reliability and construct validity

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are frequently used to assess the effects of treatments in patients with wrist osteoarthritis (OA), but their psychometric properties have not been evaluated in this group of patients. Our aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS pain at rest, pain on motion without load, and pain on load), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaires in patients with wrist OA regarding test-retest reliability and construct validity.

METHODS

The NRS, DASH and PRWE were self-administered by 50 patients (40 men and 10 women, mean age 66 years) in a postal survey on two occasions, two weeks apart. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by Kappa statistics and the Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rho) were calculated to evaluate construct validity.

RESULTS

The Kappa coefficients for DASH, PRWE and NRS pain on motion without load and NRS pain on load were > 0.90, 95% CI ranging from 0.84 to 0.98, while NRS pain at rest was 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.92. The construct validity of the PROMs was confirmed by three formulated hypotheses: a higher correlation between PRWE and NRS (rho 0.80-0.91, p < 0.001) was found, compared to DASH and NRS (rho 0.68-0.80, p < 0.001); the NRS pain on motion without load and NRS pain on load correlated more strongly to PRWE and DASH (rho 0.71-0.91, p < 0.001) compared to NRS pain at rest (rho 0.68-0.80) and a high correlation between PRWE and DASH was found (rho 0.86, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The NRS, DASH and PRWE demonstrate excellent test-retest reliability and moderate to high construct validity in patients with wrist OA. These PROMs are highly related, but they also differ. Therefore, they complement each other in ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of perceived disability in wrist OA. As PRWE showed the highest test-retest reliability and the highest relation to the other PROMs, the sole use of the PRWE can be recommended in clinical practice.