Fluorescence (FISH) and chromogenic (CISH) in situ hybridisation in prostate carcinoma cell lines: comparison and use of virtual microscopy

HER2 gene amplification in patients with prostate cancer: Evaluating a CISH-based method

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most widespread malignancies in the world. The role of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in the pathogenesis and progression of human PCa remains poorly understood. In contradiction with breast cancer, studies on HER2 overexpression and gene amplification in PCa have produced varying results, although the HER2 oncogene has been implicated in the biology of numerous tumor types, and serves as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target in breast cancer. Technical challenges are considered the main reasons for data discrepancies. Amplification of the HER2 gene has previously been reported in PCa, in which it was associated with tumor progression. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of HER2 amplification in PCa. A total of 32 biopsy samples obtained from human prostate adenocarcinomas were evaluated by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) to determine the frequency of patients with HER2 gene amplifications. High copy numbers of HER2 were detected in 19 of the prostate tumors analyzed. The results of the present study suggested that, in patients without amplification of HER2, high levels of prostate-specific antigen or a high Gleason score were not significantly correlated with a high pathologic stage. Furthermore, amplification levels of the HER2 gene were directly associated with pathologic stage in patients with PCa. Therefore, the potential use of HER2 as a prognostic factor or therapeutic target for PCa warrants further study.

Molecular diagnostics: techniques and recommendations for 1p/19q assessment

Several morphology- and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods for chromosome 1p 19q deletion status assessment are available. Important prerequisites for all molecular techniques concern tissue quality and selection of regions of interest. The most common methods for diagnostic 1p 19q assessment are fluorescence in situ hybridization and PCR-based microsatellite analysis. While the latter requires the use of autologous blood samples, more advanced techniques such as array comparative genomic hybridization, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification or real-time PCR are independent from autologous DNA samples. However, due to high technical demand and experience required their applicability as diagnostic tests remains to be shown. On the other hand, chromogenic in situ hybridization evolves as attractive alternative to FISH. Herein, the available test methods are reviewed and outlined, their advantages and drawbacks being discussed in detail.

Molecular diagnostic testing of cytology specimens: current applications and future considerations

Molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis continue to be discovered, accelerating significant expansion of the spectrum of clinically useful molecular diagnostic tests and their incorporation into patient care algorithms. Currently, molecular assays facilitate identification of infectious processes, detection of specific constitutional and somatically acquired pathogenic mutations, guidance of therapy selection, and monitoring of treatment response and disease progression. The correlation of genomic test results with clinical, morphologic, and immunophenotypic findings has defined the practice of "precision medicine" with wide-reaching implications for health care. As novel promising techniques such as microarrays and next-generation sequencing are adopted by health care providers, new practice standards are being developed for incorporation into practice. Cytology specimens are good sources of high-quality nucleic acids. Although sometimes limited in quantity, in many cases such specimens are well suited for molecular diagnostic testing, which is capable of maximizing the number of tests from small amounts of sample. The pathologist continues to serve as a central resource for diagnostic testing and consultation regarding appropriate use of molecular tests. Understanding current methodologies, clinical utility of currently available nucleic acid tests, validation requirements for test implementation, quality assurance metrics, and future technology trends is essential to the practice of contemporary molecular pathology.

Chromogenic in situ hybridization is a reliable alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for diagnostic testing of 1p and 19q loss in paraffin-embedded gliomas

Recent studies imply the importance of rapid and reliable diagnostic assessment of 1p/19q status in oligodendroglial tumors. To date, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the most commonly applied technique. FISH, however, has several technical shortcomings that are suboptimal for diagnostic applications: results must be viewed in a fluorescence microscope, results are usually evaluated by a single investigator only, and signal fading excludes physical archiving. Also, in gliomas, the distinction of diffusely infiltrating tumor cells from reactively altered normal tissue may be challenging in fluorescence microscopy. Dual-color chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) has started to replace FISH in some diagnostic tests performed in pathology. Here, we present the first single institute experience with a side-by-side analysis of 1p/19q FISH and CISH in a series of 42 consecutive gliomas. FISH and CISH produced identical results for 1p and 19q in 93% of cases (n = 39/42). Discrepant results were reevaluated by repeated FISH and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based microsatellite marker analysis for loss of heterozygosity. Reevaluation confirmed CISH data in all three cases. We conclude that CISH is a reliable alternative in 1p/19q testing in paraffin-embedded tissues likely to be more sensitive to detect 1p/19q status than FISH analysis.