Thalidomide Effects in the Post-transplantation Setting in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Thalidomide maintenance following high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma: a UK myeloma forum phase 2 study

Thalidomide maintenance has unresolved issues regarding dosage and toxicity. We evaluated this in five dose cohorts in 100 patients. At a median follow-up of 32.3 months, 23 patients had stopped thalidomide for disease progression, 54 for side effects. 3-year overall and progression-free survival was 76% and 41% respectively. Dosage did not influence disease outcome but greatly affected toxicity. Fifteen patients converted from partial remission to complete remission on thalidomide at a median of 13.5 months. Maintenance doses >200 mg were largely unachievable and peripheral neuropathy was the main toxicity. Lower doses enabled more patients to stay on the drug for a useful period of time.

Low tolerance and high toxicity of thalidomide as maintenance therapy after double autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma patients

Although a double autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (APBSCT) is an effective therapy for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma and extends progression-free survival and overall survival, pts show a continued pattern of recurrent disease. The feasibility and tolerability of thalidomide (Thal) administered in the post-transplantation period as maintenance therapy was tested in 17 pts at a dose of 100 mg/d starting between 3 and 5 months after the second transplantation and continuing either until toxicity precluded further therapy or until pts had disease progression. After a median administration of 13 months (range: 3-26), 76.5% (13 pts) failed to tolerate Thal because of: transiet ischemic attack (three pts), severe fatigue (two), neutropenia (one), piastrinopenia (one), severe opportunistic infectious (two), erectile impotence (one), gastrointestinal toxicity (anorexia with weight loss one), peripheral neuropathy (two). After a median follow-up of 36 months (range: 10-59) from the second transplant, 13 patients attained a CR + near CR (with a conversion rate from 47.1% to 76.5%). In conclusion, Thal as maintenance therapy after double ASCT is associated with low feasibility and high toxicity and could prevent a lengthy use of this antineoplastic agent.

Maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma with particular emphasis on thalidomide

Treatment standards are changing as a result of new findings in the therapy of multiple myeloma. So far, prednisone, dexamethasone and interferon-a have mainly been used as maintenance therapy after achieving remission or stable disease. At present, thalidomide is being considered as a new therapeutic option in several studies investigating maintenance therapy. As a result of the dose dependence of adverse effects such as neuropathy, constipation, sedation/vertigo and bradycardia, individual adjustment of the thalidomide dose is recommended. Only isolated cases of thrombosis occurred in the maintenance phase of therapy, and discontinuation of therapy is generally not necessary. While important study results on the efficacy of thalidomide following conventional chemotherapy are still awaited, it is the best documented drug so far for maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation. An upgrade of the response was seen in 22-73% of patients, as well as a significant prolongation of progression-free survival. For the first time, maintenance therapy with thalidomide showed a significant improvement in overall survival in a phase III study published recently. The tolerability of thalidomide could be further improved by including the option of intermittent administration of the drug.

Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves overall survival after autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation improves survival for patients with multiple myeloma (MM); however, most patients develop recurrent disease after undergoing transplantation, and new treatment approaches are needed. The objective of this retrospective review of autologous HPC transplantation for patients with MM was to evaluate the impact of conditioning regimens and posttransplantation therapy on survival.

METHODS

The authors reviewed 112 patients with MM who received autologous HPC grafts at their institution. Between June 1992 and August 2001, 54 patients received busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (Bu/Cy/VP-16), and 58 patients received high-dose melphalan (MEL-200) followed by autologous HPC transplantation. After transplantation, 36 patients received thalidomide for maintenance or salvage therapy, and 76 patients received no posttransplantation thalidomide.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 58 months, the median survival was 54 months. There was no statistically significant difference noted with regard to response to conditioning regimen, progression-free survival, or overall survival between the Bu/Cy/VP-16 and MEL-200 cohorts. Patients who received thalidomide after transplantation had improved median survival (65.5 months) compared with patients who did not receive thalidomide (44.5 months; P = .09). When they were separated according to reasons for thalidomide use, patients who received thalidomide as maintenance had improved overall survival compared with patients who received thalidomide as salvage (65 months vs. 54 months; P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy provided no advantage over high-dose melphalan in patients with MM who underwent autologous HPC transplantation. The posttransplantation use of thalidomide seemed to improve the survival of patients compared with historical controls from the prethalidomide era. Further prospective trials are underway to confirm the benefit of thalidomide in the posttransplantation setting.

Thalidomide in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma is an incurable bone marrow cancer, the treatment of which is notoriously difficult. Only modest advances have been achieved using complex polychemotherapeutic regimens, transplant strategies and supportive therapy. In 1999, when new drugs for myeloma were urgently needed, thalidomide was introduced and opened up a completely new line of therapy for the disease. Although the mechanism of action is not yet completely understood, thalidomide has demonstrated efficacy in patients with refractory, relapsed myeloma, even in late-stage cases. This article reviews the current knowledge of thalidomide in myeloma treatment, focusing especially on the possible mechanisms of action, clinical results and adverse events of this drug.

Treatment and prevention of cerebrovascular disorders in children

Cerebrovascular disorders are an important cause of mortality and chronic morbidity in children. Ischemic stroke is more common than cerebral venous thrombosis and hemorrhagic stroke in children. Several medical disorders have been associated with stroke in children, and a thorough evaluation of underlying causes is needed to determine the best treatment and prevention strategy. The treatment and prevention of stroke in children is not well studied, and current recommendations are based on adult studies, nonrandomized trials, or expert opinion. Children with stroke require immediate, special attention and if possible should be stabilized and transferred to an institution that can offer pediatric neurovascular expertise and care. All children with stroke should be referred to or have their care managed by a pediatric neurologist. The treatment of stroke in adults is well studied, and when applicable this evidence should be considered in the treatment of children with stroke. Data from animal and adult stroke studies have demonstrated a benefit for the aggressive treatment of infection, fever, blood pressure, hypo/hyperglycemia, intracranial pressure, and seizures, and should be applied to children with stroke. The use of thrombolytic, antithrombotic, and antiplatelet therapies is based on adult studies, cohort studies, and/or expert opinion. Two consensus guidelines regarding the treatment of arterial ischemic stroke and cerebral venous thrombosis were recently published and recommend the use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents in the acute setting, depending on the underlying cause of stroke. The evidence for the primary prevention of stroke in children is restricted to sickle cell disease (SCD) and derived from the Stroke Prevention in Sickle Cell Study Project studies. Long-term chronic transfusion therapy to maintain hemoglobin S levels below 30% is indicated in children with SCD and intracranial stenosis. It has also been recently determined that chronic transfusion therapy should not be stopped in children with SCD and an increased risk for stroke. The recurrence rate of arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) in children ranges from 6% to 30% and is highest among children with recurrent transient ischemic attack, cardiac disease, arteriopathies, and metabolic and coagulation abnormalities. Recommendations for secondary prevention are based on adult studies and the underlying pathophysiology of the stroke. Antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 1-5 mg/kg/day) is recommended in most children with a history of AIS. Although there is minimal evidence to support its use in children, anticoagulation may be indicated in AIS associated with extracranial arterial dissection, prothrombotic disorders, cardiac disease, severe intracranial stenosis, and recurrent AIS while on antiplatelet therapy.