A single dose of ketamine cannot prevent protracted stress-induced anhedonia and neuroinflammation in rats

Increased dopamine D2/D3 receptor and serotonin transporter availability in male rats after spontaneous remission from repeated social defeat-induced depression; a PET study in rats

Most pharmacological treatments for depression target monoamine transporters and about 50 % of treated patients attain symptomatic remission. Once remission is attained, it is hard to distinguish the changes on brain monoaminergic transmission induced by the antidepressants, from those associated to remission per se. In this study, we aimed at studying the brain of spontaneously remitted rats from repeated social defeat (RSD)-induced depression in terms of dopamine D2/D3 receptor and serotonin transporter (SERT) availability, showing absence of depressive symptoms 2 weeks after RSD. We combined behavioral tests and positron emission tomography (PET) with [11C]raclopride and [11C]DASB to explore the changes in dopamine D2/D3 receptor and serotonin transporter (SERT) availability, respectively. Male rats submitted to RSD showed increased peripheral corticosterone levels, decreased body weight and anhedonia, as measured with the sucrose preference test, 1 day after RSD, confirming depressive-like symptoms. These depressive-like symptoms were no longer present 2 weeks after RSD. Rats that recovered from depressive-like symptoms showed decreased D2/D3 receptor binding in the caudate putamen and increased SERT availability in the brainstem, insular cortex, midbrain and thalamus, compared to control non-stressed animals. Our study shows that remission of depressive-like symptoms does not just "normalize" monoaminergic transmission, as changes in dopaminergic and serotonergic neurotransmission linger in several brain regions even after depressive-like symptoms have already resolved. These results provide new insights into the brain changes associated to remission in the RSD-induced depression model in rats.

Recent advances in the crosstalk between the brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glucocorticoids

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a key neurotrophin within the brain, by selectively activating the TrkB receptor, exerts multimodal effects on neurodevelopment, synaptic plasticity, cellular integrity and neural network dynamics. In parallel, glucocorticoids (GCs), vital steroid hormones, which are secreted by adrenal glands and rapidly diffused across the mammalian body (including the brain), activate two different groups of intracellular receptors, the mineralocorticoid and the glucocorticoid receptors, modulating a wide range of genomic, epigenomic and postgenomic events, also expressed in the neural tissue and implicated in neurodevelopment, synaptic plasticity, cellular homeostasis, cognitive and emotional processing. Recent research evidences indicate that these two major regulatory systems interact at various levels: they share common intracellular downstream pathways, GCs differentially regulate BDNF expression, under certain conditions BDNF antagonises the GC-induced effects on long-term potentiation, neuritic outgrowth and cellular death, while GCs regulate the intraneuronal transportation and the lysosomal degradation of BDNF. Currently, the BDNF-GC crosstalk features have been mainly studied in neurons, although initial findings show that this crosstalk could be equally important for other brain cell types, such as astrocytes. Elucidating the precise neurobiological significance of BDNF-GC interactions in a tempospatial manner, is crucial for understanding the subtleties of brain function and dysfunction, with implications for neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases, mood disorders and cognitive enhancement strategies.

Social adversity during juvenile age but not adulthood increases susceptibility to an immune challenge later in life

Adverse experiences in early life can increase mental vulnerability to immune challenges experienced later in life, which may induce the development of stress-related psychopathologies. Here, we investigated whether the combined effect of both events is higher if the first adverse experience occurs when the brain is still in development. Therefore, male Wistar rats were exposed to repeated social defeat (RSD, first hit) during juvenile age or adulthood and to an immune challenge consisting of a single injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS, second hit) in adulthood. Control animals were not exposed to RSD, but only to the LPS challenge. Translocator protein density, a marker for reactive microglia, microglia cell density and plasma corticosterone levels were measured using in vivo [¹¹C]PBR28 positron emission tomography, iba1 immunostaining, and corticosterone ELISA, respectively. Anhedonia, social behavior and anxiety were measured with the sucrose preference, social interaction, and open field tests, respectively. Rats exposed to RSD during juvenile age exhibited enhanced anhedonia and social interaction dysfunction after an immune challenge in adulthood. This enhanced susceptibility was not observed in rats exposed to RSD during adulthood. In addition, exposure to RSD synergistically increased microglia cell density and glial reactivity to the LPS challenge. This increase in microglia cell density and reactivity to the LPS challenge was more pronounced in rats exposed to RSD during juvenile age than in adulthood. Exposure to RSD alone in juvenile age or adulthood induced similar short-term anhedonia, a long-lasting increase in plasma corticosterone and microglial activity, but no change in anxiety and social behavior. Our findings indicate that exposure to social stress during juvenile age, but not adulthood, primes the immune system and increases the sensitivity to an immune challenge experienced later in life. This suggests that juvenile social stress can have more deleterious effects in the long term than similar stress in adulthood.

Impact of stress on inhibitory neuronal circuits, our tribute to Bruce McEwen

This manuscript is dedicated to the memory of Bruce S. McEwen, to commemorate the impact he had on how we understand stress and neuronal plasticity, and the profound influence he exerted on our scientific careers. The focus of this review is the impact of stressors on inhibitory circuits, particularly those of the limbic system, but we also consider other regions affected by these adverse experiences. We revise the effects of acute and chronic stress during different stages of development and lifespan, taking into account the influence of the sex of the animals. We review first the influence of stress on the physiology of inhibitory neurons and on the expression of molecules related directly to GABAergic neurotransmission, and then focus on specific interneuron subpopulations, particularly on parvalbumin and somatostatin expressing cells. Then we analyze the effects of stress on molecules and structures related to the plasticity of inhibitory neurons: the polysialylated form of the neural cell adhesion molecule and perineuronal nets. Finally, we review the potential of antidepressants or environmental manipulations to revert the effects of stress on inhibitory circuits.