Trofosfamide as salvage therapy for anaplastic large cell lymphoma relapsing after high-dose chemotherapy

All-oral low-dose chemotherapy TEPIP is effective and well-tolerated in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma

Purpose

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a rare and heterogenous hematologic malignancy with poor prognosis especially in elderly and frail patients who are not eligible for intensive treatment. The resulting palliative setting necessitates tolerable but effective schedules for outpatient treatment. TEPIP is a locally developed, all-oral low-dose regimen comprising trofosfamide, etoposide, procarbazine, idarubicin, and prednisolone.

Methods

In this observational retrospective, single-center study, the safety and efficacy of TEPIP was evaluated in 12 patients (pts.) with PTCL treated at the University Medical Center Regensburg between 2010 and 2022. The endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS), and adverse events were individually reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria.

Results

The enrolled cohort was characterized by advanced age (median 70 years), extensive disease (100% Ann Arbor ≥stage 3), and poor prognosis (75% high/high-intermediate international prognostic index). The most common subtype was angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (8/12), and 11/12 patients had relapsed or refractory disease at TEPIP onset with a median of 1.5 prior treatment regimens. After a median of 2.5 TEPIP cycles (total of 83 cycles), the ORR was 42% (complete remission 25%), and the OS reached a median of 185 days. Any grade of adverse event (AE) occurred in 8/12 patients, with four patients showing AE ≥CTCAE grade 3 (33%), and the AEs were mainly non-hematological.

Conclusion

TEPIP demonstrated competitive efficacy with a tolerable safety profile in a highly palliative cohort of patients with difficult-to-treat PTCL. The all-oral application, which makes outpatient treatment possible, is particularly noteworthy.

Low-dose trofosfamide plus rituximab is an effective and safe treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the elderly: a single center experience

Background

Rituximab plus combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is broadly accepted as standard for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Nevertheless, there is sparsely data concerning the management of elderly patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of treatment with rituximab and low-dose trofosfamide in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) with DLBCL who were not suitable for R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens or who did not consent to aggressive treatment. The choice regarding the qualification for R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimen was left to the estimation of the treating physicians.

Results

Eleven patients with a median age of 83 years (range, 75–90 years) were included. The age-adjusted international prognostic index was low risk in one patient, low-intermediate in four patients, high-intermediate in three patients, and high risk in 3 patients. All patients were evaluable for response. Five patients (45%) achieved a complete response, three (27%) a partial response, one (9%) stable disease, and two (18%) progressive disease. The estimated 1-yr overall survival was 54.5%, and the estimated 1-yr progression-free survival 45.5%, however, three patients (27%) were alive without evidence of disease at 16–20 months from start of treatment. Main toxicity was leukopenia (36% grade III or IV), whereas grade III/IV non-hematological adverse events did not occur.

Conclusions

Due to its potency and low toxicity, trofosfamide/rituximab might represent an alternative therapy for DLBCL of elderly patients not suitable for R-CHOP. This observation, however, should be confirmed in a larger patient population within a prospective clinical trial.

The unique characteristics and management of patients over 60 years of age with classic Hodgkin lymphoma

In recent decades, the prognosis of Hodgkin lymphoma has been substantially improved, but these successes have been restricted to younger patients and could not be translated into a major benefit for older patients, especially those with advanced-stage disease. Major problems in treating older patients include a different biology, frailty, comorbidities, and poorer tolerance of therapy. Additionally, these patients are often excluded from randomized trials, so an evidence-based standard of care is lacking. Importantly, the proportion of older patients with HL will increase over the next 50 years. Currently, ABVD (Adriamycin [doxorubicin], bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) is considered to be the gold standard, even though it has some toxicity in older patients and prospective data are not available. Thus, further studies are required, including the assessment of comorbidities and the incorporation of new drugs such as immunomodulatory agents, antibody-drug conjugates, mTOR inhibitors, or histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors.

Metabolism and transport of oxazaphosphorines and the clinical implications

The oxazaphosphorines including cyclophosphamide (CPA), ifosfamide (IFO), and trofosfamide represent an important group of therapeutic agents due to their substantial antitumor and immuno-modulating activity. CPA is widely used as an anticancer drug, an immunosuppressant, and for the mobilization of hematopoetic progenitor cells from the bone marrow into peripheral blood prior to bone marrow transplantation for aplastic anemia, leukemia, and other malignancies. New oxazaphosphorines derivatives have been developed in an attempt to improve selectivity and response with reduced toxicity. These derivatives include mafosfamide (NSC 345842), glufosfamide (D19575, beta-D-glucosylisophosphoramide mustard), NSC 612567 (aldophosphamide perhydrothiazine), and NSC 613060 (aldophosphamide thiazolidine). This review highlights the metabolism and transport of these oxazaphosphorines (mainly CPA and IFO, as these two oxazaphosphorine drugs are the most widely used alkylating agents) and the clinical implications. Both CPA and IFO are prodrugs that require activation by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP)-catalyzed 4-hydroxylation, yielding cytotoxic nitrogen mustards capable of reacting with DNA molecules to form crosslinks and lead to cell apoptosis and/or necrosis. Such prodrug activation can be enhanced within tumor cells by the CYP-based gene directed-enzyme prodrug therapy (GDEPT) approach. However, those newly synthesized oxazaphosphorine derivatives such as glufosfamide, NSC 612567 and NSC 613060, do not need hepatic activation. They are activated through other enzymatic and/or non-enzymatic pathways. For example, both NSC 612567 and NSC 613060 can be activated by plain phosphodiesterase (PDEs) in plasma and other tissues or by the high-affinity nuclear 3'-5' exonucleases associated with DNA polymerases, such as DNA polymerases and epsilon. The alternative CYP-catalyzed inactivation pathway by N-dechloroethylation generates the neurotoxic and nephrotoxic byproduct chloroacetaldehyde (CAA). Various aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) and glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are involved in the detoxification of oxazaphosphorine metabolites. The metabolism of oxazaphosphorines is auto-inducible, with the activation of the orphan nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) being the major mechanism. Oxazaphosphorine metabolism is affected by a number of factors associated with the drugs (e.g., dosage, route of administration, chirality, and drug combination) and patients (e.g., age, gender, renal and hepatic function). Several drug transporters, such as breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), multidrug resistance associated proteins (MRP1, MRP2, and MRP4) are involved in the active uptake and efflux of parental oxazaphosphorines, their cytotoxic mustards and conjugates in hepatocytes and tumor cells. Oxazaphosphorine metabolism and transport have a major impact on pharmacokinetic variability, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship, toxicity, resistance, and drug interactions since the drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters involved are key determinants of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxazaphosphorines. A better understanding of the factors that affect the metabolism and transport of oxazaphosphorines is important for their optional use in cancer chemotherapy.

Leukotriene B4 receptor inhibitor LY293111 induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human anaplastic large-cell lymphoma cells via JNK phosphorylation

Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a heterogeneous lymphoma category in which a subset of cases carry the t(2;5)(p23;q35) or variant translocations resulting in overexpression of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). LY293111 (2-[2-propyl-3-[3-[2-ethyl-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-hydroxyphenoxy]-propoxy]-phenoxy] benzoic acid sodium salt) is a leukotriene B4 receptor antagonist, which was found to be safe and tolerable in Phase I clinical trials. In this study, we investigated the potential therapeutic effects and mechanisms of action of LY293111 in ALCL cell lines. LY293111 inhibited proliferation of both ALK(+) and ALK(-) ALCL cell in a dose-dependent fashion and induced complete G(1)-S cell cycle arrest, which was accompanied by upregulation of p27 and downregulation of cyclin E. Pretreatment with LY293111 for 4 h resulted in profound inhibition of serum-induced phosphorylation of extracellular-regulated kinases-1 and 2 and Akt and a concomitant increase in the phosphorylation of the stress-activated kinase c-jun N-terminal kinases (JNK). Simultaneously, LY293111 induced caspase-dependent apoptosis via activation of the intrinsic pathway, including early loss of mitochondrial inner transmembrane potential and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), cleavage of caspases-9, -3, poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis. The phospho-JNK inhibitor SP600125 partially protected Sup-M2 cells from LY293111-induced apoptosis, PARP cleavage and ROS generation, suggesting a role for JNK in LY293111-induced cell death. These results warrant further studies of LY293111 in ALCL.

Treatment of primary intraocular lymphoma with oral trofosfamide: report of two cases and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL) is poor. Due to frequent ocular and/or CNS relapses, the optimal treatment for PIOL has not yet been defined. This is the first report of PIOL treatment with trofosfamide.

METHODS

The first patient with a newly diagnosed PIOL was not considered eligible for high-dose methotrexate-based systemic chemotherapy due to comorbidities. The second patient had a primary central nervous system lymphoma, which was resistant to three chemotherapy regimens and responded to whole-brain irradiation. A tumor relapse in the eye was treated with local radiotherapy with initial success; however, the tumor subsequently recurred. The first patient received oral trofosfamide 150 mg daily, the second 400 mg daily (reduced after 5 months of therapy to 300 mg daily) over 5 consecutive days, followed by a 5-day drug-free interval.

RESULTS

In both patients, complete remission was achieved, which lasted for 8+ and 18 months, respectively. Except for a temporary asymptomatic decrease in hemoglobin in the first patient, no toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Trofosfamide may offer an alternative treatment option for PIOL with a very favorable side effect profile. The exact role of trofosfamide in the treatment of PIOL remains to be defined.

Dose escalation study for defining the maximum tolerated dose of continuous oral trofosfamide in pretreated patients with metastatic lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Trofosfamide is increasingly used in the treatment of patients with several types of malignancies. However, the optimal dose of trofosfamide for patients with advanced cancer has not been systematically investigated yet. The aim of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of continuous oral trofosfamide.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

16 patients with advanced lung cancer (14 nonsmall cell lung cancer, 2 small cell lung cancer; 10 male, 6 female; median age 64 years (range 46-82); median Karnofsky status 70%; median number of organs involved 3 (range 1-6)) were enrolled. All patients were previously treated with chemotherapy (median 2x, range 1-6) and 8/16 (50%) with radiotherapy. Patients received trofosfamide p.o. administered in 3 doses per day for 3 weeks (1 cycle) using a 3-patient-cohort dose-escalation strategy. Toxicities were graded according to the WHO Criteria.

RESULTS

Patients received a median of 2 cycles of trofosfamide (range 1-4) at 3 dose levels (90, 125, and 175 mg/m2). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 20, 13.3, and 6.6%, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicities during the first cycle were grade 3 muscle weakness and anorexia observed in 1/6 patients in cohort 1 (trofosfamide 90 mg/m2), grade 3 neutropenia in 1/6, and encephalopathy in 1/6 patients in cohort 3 (trofosfamide 175 mg/m2). Therefore, the dose level of 125 mg/m2 was defined as the MTD.

CONCLUSION

Trofosfamide at 125 mg/m2 administered in 3 doses per day was well tolerated. This dose level is recommended for further clinical studies.

Trofosfamide in the Palliative Treatment of Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Trofosfamide is an alkylating agent that is derived from the oxazaphoshorines. It has found application in a broad spectrum of malignancies in the last three decades. The main indications for application were in the palliative situation and as maintenance therapy. Good results were reported from the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and soft tissue sarcomas. A lot of small studies and casuistic contributions are available giving treatment results of several solid carcinomas (malignant gliomas, ovarian, lung and prostate cancer, and others). Due to its oral formulation and good tolerability trofosfamide is an attractive candidate for the palliative situation because treatment on an outpatient basis is possible. However, there is still a lack of randomized clinical studies with trofosfamide. Thus, evidence-based conclusions on the therapeutic value of the drug cannot be drawn. In the future, phase III trials should be undertaken.