Poor graft function after T cell-depleted allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant

Definitions, incidence and outcome of poor graft function after hematopoietic cell transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Poor graft function (PGF) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a serious complication with high morbidity and mortality. The reported incidence of PGF, its risk factors and outcome vary substantially between studies. This variability may be explained by heterogeneity in patient cohorts and HCT strategies, differences in the underlying causes of cytopenia, as well as by differences in PGF definition. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we provide an overview of the various PGF definitions used and determined the impact of this variability on the reported incidence and outcome. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science up to July 2022, for any study on PGF in HCT recipients. We performed random-effect meta-analyses for incidence and outcome and subgroup analyses based on different PGF criteria. Among 69 included studies (14.265 HCT recipients), we found 63 different PGF definitions, using various combinations of 11 common criteria. The median incidence of PGF was 7% (IQR: 5-11%, 22 cohorts). The pooled survival of PGF patients was 53% (95% CI: 45-61%, 23 cohorts). The most commonly reported risk factors associated with PGF were history of cytomegalovirus infection and prior graft-versus-host disease. Incidence was lower in studies with strict cytopenic cutoffs, while survival was lower for primary compared to secondary PGF. This work indicates that a standardized, quantitative definition of PGF is needed to facilitate clinical guideline development and to advance scientific progress.

Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells as treatment for poor graft function after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A multicenter prospective analysis

Introduction

Poor graft function (PGF) is a rare but serious complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Due to their hematopoietic supporting properties and immune regulatory effects, multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) could be considered a good candidate to help to restore bone marrow (BM) niches homeostasis and facilitate hematopoiesis after alloHCT.

Methods

We prospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of ex-vivo expanded BM-derived MSC from third-party donor in a series of 30 patients with prolonged severe cytopenia and PGF after alloHCT. This multicenter trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NTC00603330).

Results

Within 90 days post-MSC infusion, 53% (95% CI, 35 - 71%) of patients improved at least one cytopenia (overall response, OR) and 37% (95% CI, 19 - 54%) achieved a complete hematological response (CR: absolute neutrophil count, ANC >0.5 x 10⁹/L, Hb > 80g/L and platelet count > 20 x 10⁹/L with transfusion independence). Corresponding response rates increased to 67% (95% CI, 50 - 84%) OR and 53% (95% CI, 35 - 71%) CR within 180 days after MSC infusion. A significant decrease in red blood cells and platelets transfusion requirement was observed after MSC (median of 30-days transfusion requirement of 0.5 and 0 from d90-120 post-MSC versus 5 and 6.5 before MSC, respectively, p ≤0.001). An increase in ANC was also noted by day +90 and +180, with 3/5 patients with severe neutropenia having recovered an ANC > 1 x 10⁹/L within the 90-120 days after MSC infusion. Overall survival at 1 year post-MSC was 70% (95% CI, 55.4 - 88.5), with all but one of the patients who achieved CR being alive. A single infusion of third-party MSC appeared to be safe, with the exception of one deep vein thrombotic event possibly related to the intervention.

Discussion

In conclusion, a single i.v. infusion of BM-derived MSC from third party donor seemed to improve hematological function after alloHCT, although spontaneous amelioration cannot be excluded. Comparative studies are warranted to confirm these encouraging results.

The Incidence, Outcomes, and Risk Factors of Secondary Poor Graft Function in Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acquired Aplastic Anemia

Secondary poor graft function (sPGF) increases the risk of life-threatening complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The incidence, clinical outcomes, and risk factors of sPGF have not been elucidated in haploidentical (haplo-) HSCT for acquired aplastic anemia (AA) patients. We retrospectively reviewed 423 consecutive AA patients who underwent haplo-HSCT between January 2006 and December 2020 and report a 3-year cumulative incidence of 4.62% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.92%-10.23%) of sPGF. While no primary PGF occurred. The median time to sPGF was 121 days (range 30-626 days) after transplantation. To clarify the risk factors for sPGF, 17 sPGF cases and 382 without PGF were further analyzed. Compared to patients without PGF, the 2-year overall survival was significantly poorer for sPGF patients (67.7% vs 90.8%, p =.002). Twelve sPGF patients were alive until the last follow-up, and 7 achieved transfusion independency. The multivariable analyses revealed that later neutrophil engraftment (OR 2.819, p=.049) and a history of refractory cytomegalovirus viremia (OR=7.038, p=.002) post-transplantation were associated with sPGF. There was weak evidence that a history of grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease increased the risk of sPGF (p=.063). We advocated better post-transplantation strategies to balance the risk of immunosuppression and viral reactivation for haplo-HSCT in AA patients.

Clinical features, pathophysiology, and therapy of poor graft function post-allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Poor graft function (PGF), defined by the presence of multilineage cytopenias in the presence of 100% donor chimerism, is a serious complication of allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). Inducers or potentiators of alloimmunity such as cytomegalovirus reactivation and graft-versus-host disease are associated with the development of PGF, however, more clinical studies are required to establish further risk factors and describe outcomes of PGF. The pathophysiology of PGF can be conceptualized as dysfunction related to the number or productivity of the stem cell compartment, defects in bone marrow microenvironment components such as mesenchymal stromal cells and endothelial cells, or immunological suppression of post-alloSCT hematopoiesis. Treatment strategies focused on improving stem cell number and function and microenvironment support of hematopoiesis have been attempted with variable success. There has been limited use of immune manipulation as a therapeutic strategy, but emerging therapies hold promise. This review details the current understanding of the causes of PGF and methods of treatment to provide a framework for clinicians managing this complex problem.