Impact of dermal absorption factors in occupational exposure assessment: comparison of two models for agricultural reentry workers exposed to azinphosmethyl

Dislodgeable Foliar Residue Measurements and Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Captan for Workers in Apple Orchards

Captan dislodgeable foliar residues (DFRs) were determined by following the applications of this fungicide in an apple orchard. The study comprised an investigation of the variability of captan DFR values and 14 days of DFR monitoring to assess kinetic modeling. A method combining solid-phase microextraction (SPME) gas chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-QTOF-MS) was developed for the quantification of captan residues from DFR aqueous extracts. The results evidenced that (1) sampling parameters such as the position of the tree in a row and the height of foliar significantly influenced captan DFR levels (247-1450 ng·cm-2), highlighting the need to implement a comprehensive sampling strategy; (2) the DFR captan dissipation kinetic model best matched with a biphasic one, with half-lives of DFRcaptan of 3.4 and 12.8 days, respectively, for the initial rapid phase 1 decline (day 0-5) and the slower phase 2 decline phase (day 6-14). Furthermore, through DFR measurements, the potential dermal exposure (PDE) of workers was assessed using transfer coefficients (TCs) from the literature. Compared to the acceptable operator exposure levels (AOELs), the results showed that the re-entry interval for captan may not sufficiently protect workers whose arms, hands, and legs are not covered.

Pesticide regulations: exposure-dose modeling from FIFRA to FQPA

The federal laws and regulations governing the registration and use of pesticides in the United States under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act are published in the Federal Register, while state laws such as California are published in the California Food and Agricultural Code, Divisions 6, 7, and 13. Up until the passage of the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA of 1996), federal and state regulations pertaining to the registration and use of pesticides were in most cases identical except for the fact that food tolerances were enforced but not set at the state level. The California Department of Pesticide Regulation's Worker Health and Safety Program continues to monitor worker exposure to pesticides and report illnesses among workers associated with pesticide exposure. Under FQPA, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has taken a leadership role in the development of probabilistic pesticide exposure models (i.e., DEEM, SHEDS, etc.) using pesticide application, human activity, and exposure databases (i.e., CPPAES, CHAD, CSFII, FCID, NHANES, and NHEXAS). A physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) modeling framework has been established by EPA to assess cumulative risk of dose and injury to infants and children to organophosphorus, carbamate (NMC), and pyrethroid insecticides from aggregate sources and routes. Probabilistic models are being linked to PBPK/PD models to improve risk assessments.

The effect of the 14-day agricultural restricted entry interval on azinphosmethyl exposures in a group of apple thinners in Washington state

We examined the effect of the 14-day agricultural restricted entry period on absorbed pesticide doses in a group of twenty experienced apple thinners. Thinners entered orchards 1-49 days following azinphosmethyl applications. Urine samples (n=296) collected throughout the thinning season were analyzed for the three dialkylphosphate metabolites of azinphosmethyl to estimate absorbed daily doses. Separate dose distributions were created for samples collected when the interval was <14 days, or 14 days or more; geometric mean doses for these two categories differed by a factor of two (42 and 19 microg/kg/day, respectively; p<0.0001). Dose estimates were compared to US Environmental Protection Agency and California EPA regulatory guidance values for occupational azinphosmethyl risk. None of the doses exceeded the U.S. EPA NOAEL (560 microg/kg/day), but nearly all had a margin of exposure of less than 100. Addition of a 10-fold uncertainty factor to California EPAs NOAEL produced a guidance value of 75 microg/kg/day. Only 2.4% of the doses exceeded this value for re-entry intervals 14 days or more, while 27% exceeded the value for re-entry intervals <14 days. We conclude that the 14-day restricted entry interval provides an appropriate level of worker health protection under the field conditions studied.