Narrative flexibility in brief psychotherapy for depression

A Review of Empirical Studies Investigating Narrative, Emotion and Meaning-Making Modes and Client Process Markers in Psychotherapy

Despite the importance of narrative, emotional and meaning-making processes in psychotherapy, there has been no review of studies using the main instruments developed to address these processes. The objective is to review the studies about client narrative and narrative-emotional processes in psychotherapy that used the Narrative Process Coding System or the Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System (1.0 and 2.0). To identify the studies, we searched The Book Collection, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PsycBOOKS, PEP Archive, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Academic Search Complete and the Web of Knowledge databases. We found 27 empirical studies using one of the three coding systems. The studies applied the Narrative Process Coding System and the Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System to different therapeutic modalities and patients with various clinical disorders. In some studies, early, middle and late phases of therapy were compared, while other studies conducted intensive case analyses of Narrative Process Coding System and Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System patterns comparing recovered vs unchanged clients. The review supports the importance to look for the contribution of narrative, emotion, meaning-making patterns or narrative-emotion markers, to treatment outcomes and encourages the application of these instruments in process-outcome research in psychotherapy.

A close look at therapist contributions to narrative-emotion shifting in a case illustration of brief dynamic therapy

Objective: In a secondary analysis of Friedlander et al.'s [(2018). "If those tears could talk, what would they say?" multi-method analysis of a corrective experience in brief dynamic therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 28, 217-234. doi:10.1080/10503307.2016.1184350] case study of Hanna Levenson's Brief Dynamic Therapy over Time (from APA's Psychotherapy in Six Sessions DVD series), we re-visited the Narrative-Emotion Process Coding (Angus, L. E., Boritz, T., Bryntwick, E., Carpenter, N., Macaulay, C., & Khattra, J. (2017). The Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System 2.0: A multi-methodological approach to identifying and assessing narrative-emotion process markers in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 27, 253-269. doi:10.1080/10503307.2016.1238525) to identify specific therapist behaviors that may have facilitated the client's movement from expressing mostly Problem markers in early sessions to expressing considerably more Transition and Change markers in later sessions. Method: Using open coding and constant comparison qualitative methods, we identified Levenson's behaviors immediately preceding the client's "change shifts" (Problem → Transition/Change and Transition → Change) and "problem shifts" (Transition/Change → Problem). Results: Compared to problem shifts, change shifts were preceded by more therapist behavior reflecting Attaching New Meaning (e.g., linking the client's self-deprecation to her avoidant behavior) and Exploring/Expanding emotions (e.g., inviting the client to give voice to her tears), cognitions (e.g., pointing out the client's self-talk) and motivation (e.g., reflecting on the client's dissatisfaction with her defenses). Conclusions: In this successful case, facilitative therapist behavior reflected common therapeutic responses (e.g., validating the client's perspective) as well as responses characteristic of brief dynamic therapy (e.g., interpreting the client's defenses) and the therapist's personal style (e.g., repeating the client's words for emphasis).

Client Accounts of Corrective Experiences in Psychotherapy: Implications for Clinical Practice

The Patient Perceptions of Corrective Experiences in Individual Therapy (PPCEIT; Constantino, Angus, Friedlander, Messer, & Moertl, 2011) posttreatment interview guide was developed to provide clinical researchers with an effective mode of inquiry to identify and further explore clients' firsthand accounts of corrective and transformative therapy experiences and their determinants. Not only do findings from the analysis of client corrective experience (CE) accounts help identify what and how CEs happen in or as a result of psychotherapy, but the measure itself may also provide therapists with an effective tool to further enhance clients' awareness, understanding, and integration of transformative change experiences. Accordingly, we discuss in this afterword to the series the implications for clinical practice arising from (a) the thematic analysis of client CE accounts, drawn from a range of clinical samples and international research programs and (b) the clinical effect of completing the PPCEIT posttreatment interview inquiry. We also identify directions for future clinical training and research.

The Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System 2.0: A multi-methodological approach to identifying and assessing narrative-emotion process markers in psychotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies suggest that it is not simply the expression of emotion or emotional arousal in session that is important, but rather it is the reflective processing of emergent, adaptive emotions, arising in the context of personal storytelling and/or Emotion-Focused Therapy (EFT) interventions, that is associated with change.

METHOD

To enhance narrative-emotion integration specifically in EFT, Angus and Greenberg originally identified a set of eight clinically derived narrative-emotion integration markers were originally identified for the implementation of process-guiding therapeutic responses. Further evaluation and testing by the Angus Narrative-Emotion Marker Lab resulted in the identification of 10 empirically validated Narrative-Emotion Process (N-EP) markers that are included in the Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System Version 2.0 (NEPCS 2.0).

RESULTS

Based on empirical research findings, individual markers are clustered into Problem (e.g., stuckness in repetitive story patterns, over-controlled or dysregulated emotion, lack of reflectivity), Transition (e.g., reflective, access to adaptive emotions and new emotional plotlines, heightened narrative and emotion integration), and Change (e.g., new story outcomes and self-narrative discovery, and co-construction and re-conceptualization) subgroups. To date, research using the NEPCS 2.0 has investigated the proportion and pattern of narrative-emotion markers in Emotion-Focused, Client-Centered, and Cognitive Therapy for Major Depression, Motivational Interviewing plus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and EFT for Complex Trauma. Results have consistently identified significantly higher proportions of N-EP Transition and Change markers, and productive shifts, in mid- and late phase sessions, for clients who achieved recovery by treatment termination.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery is consistently associated with client storytelling that is emotionally engaged, reflective, and evidencing new story outcomes and self-narrative change. Implications for future research, practice and training are discussed.