Improving psychotherapy effectiveness by addressing the problem of premature termination: Introduction to a special section

Walk-in mental health: Bridging barriers in a pandemic

'Single Session Therapy' (SST) is a service delivery model that seeks to provide an evidence-based, solution-focused, brief intervention within a single therapy session. The stand-alone session affords the opportunity to provide brief psychological interventions while clients await access to longer-term services. The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted individuals' mental health. However, the majority of research has investigated patient mental health within hospital settings and community organizations that offer long-term services, whereas minimal research has focused on mental health concerns during COVID-19 within an SST model. The primary aim of the study was to measure client experiences of a brief mental health service. The nature of client mental health concerns who access such services at various points during a pandemic was also investigated. The current study utilized client feedback forms and the Computerized Adaptive Testing-Mental Health (CAT-MH) to measure client experiences and mental health concerns. Qualitative analysis of client feedback forms revealed themes of emotional (e.g., safe space) and informational support (e.g., referrals). Clients also reported reduced barriers to accessing services (e.g., no appointment necessary, no cost), as well as limitations (e.g., not enough sessions) of the Walk-in clinic. Profile analysis of the CAT-MH data indicated that clients had higher rates of depression before COVID-19 (M = 64.2, SD = 13.07) as compared to during the pandemic (M = 59.78, SD = 16.87). In contrast, higher rates of positive suicidality flags were reported during the pandemic (n = 54) as compared to before (n = 29). The lower reported rates of depression but higher rate of suicidality during the pandemic was an unanticipated finding that contradicted prior research, to which possible explanations are explored. Taken together, the results demonstrate the positive experiences of clients who access a single session therapy.

Premature termination of the unified protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: The role of ambivalence towards change

Ambivalence towards change is an expected, recurrent process in psychological change. However, the prolonged experience of ambivalence in psychotherapy contributes to client disengagement, which could result in treatment dropout. Considering the negative effects of premature termination of therapy and the convenience of the identification of clients who are at risk of dropping out before achieving good-outcome, the current study explored the predictive power of ambivalence for premature therapy termination using a multilevel time-backwards model (i.e., considering the session of the dropout as session zero and then modelling what occurred from the dropout until session 1). Participants included a total of 96 psychotherapy clients (38 dropouts) treated in a university-based clinic following the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders. Multilevel modelling using a time-backwards model to analyse dropout data provided evidence of the predictive power of ambivalence evolution throughout treatment on the decision to prematurely discontinue treatment (p < .0001; R² _adj  = .29). Specifically, good-outcome dropouts presented a decreasing ambivalence trend throughout treatment, whereas poor-outcome dropouts tended to experience the same levels of ambivalence before deciding to drop out (time × dropout; β₁₁  = .64, p = .014). Additionally, poor-outcome dropouts presented higher levels of ambivalence (β₀₁  = 9.92, p < .0001) in the last session. The results suggest that the pattern of client ambivalence towards change is a predictor of premature termination of therapy. Implications for clinical and research contexts are discussed.

Dropout from mentalization-based group treatment for adolescents with borderline personality features: A qualitative study

Objective: Premature termination, or dropout, is a major concern in psychotherapy in general and an issue of particular importance in treatments for borderline personality disorder (BPD). Yet few studies investigating dropout from therapy in adolescent BPD populations exist. This study investigates reasons for dropping out from group-based mentalization-based treatment (MBT-G) for BPD or borderline features in an adolescent population.Method: Ten semi-structured interviews were performed with female adolescents who had dropped out from group-based MBT for BPD. The data were analyzed qualitatively using Systematic Text Condensation.Results: The results point to the existence of a subgroup of adolescent BPD patients who do not perceive the treatment sufficiently helpful or worthwhile, who experienced treatment as emotionally demanding, time-consuming and connected with unpleasant experiences. Positive reasons for early termination were reported in the form of experienced improvement in condition. Dropping out became understood as a process of weighing perceived benefits against perceived costs of staying in treatment. This understanding of dropout as a process implies the existence of a window of time where intervention to prevent dropout is possible, presupposing the detection of at-risk patients.

Dropout and narcissism: an exploratory research about situational factors and personality variables of the psychotherapist

The premature interruption of psychotherapeutic treatments is a significant phenomenon, with rates that can be above 50%, although differences emerge among studies. In general, the variables related to the psychotherapists have a significant effect on the treatment and a greater extent than the situational variables. In this study a multi-method research has been conducted to test the situations of impasse ending in dropout and the relationship between these situations and the covert narcissistic dimension of the therapist. Each participant was administrated the Impasse Interview, asking the therapist to focus on a salient or recent dropout case, and the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale. The linguistic analysis of the interviews carried out with T-Lab produced 4 thematic clusters. Furthermore, as for the covert narcissistic dimension, 11 therapists reported a score below the average (Group A) and 9 scoring in the average (Group B). Finally, the association between the four clusters and the two groups of therapists was investigated. The therapeutic alliance and the emotional reaction of the therapist, influenced by his narcissistic dimension, represent key variables for the outcome of the therapy.