Selection of the optimal personalized treatment from multiple treatments with multivariate outcome measures

Improving Individualized Treatment Decisions: A Bayesian Multivariate Hierarchical Model for Developing a Treatment Benefit Index using Mixed Types of Outcomes

Background

Precision medicine has led to the development of targeted treatment strategies tailored to individual patients based on their characteristics and disease manifestations. Although precision medicine often focuses on a single health outcome for individualized treatment decision rules (ITRs), relying only on a single outcome rather than all available outcomes information leads to suboptimal data usage when developing optimal ITRs.

Methods

To address this limitation, we propose a Bayesian multivariate hierarchical model that leverages the wealth of correlated health outcomes collected in clinical trials. The approach jointly models mixed types of correlated outcomes, facilitating the "borrowing of information" across the multivariate outcomes, and results in a more accurate estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects compared to using single regression models for each outcome. We develop a treatment benefit index, which quantifies the relative treatment benefit of the experimental treatment over the control treatment, based on the proposed multivariate outcome model.

Results

We demonstrate the strengths of the proposed approach through extensive simulations and an application to an international Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment trial. Simulation results indicate that the proposed method reduces the occurrence of erroneous treatment decisions compared to a single regression model for a single health outcome. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis demonstrates the robustness of the model across various study scenarios. Application of the method to the COVID-19 trial exhibits improvements in estimating the individual-level treatment efficacy (indicated by narrower credible intervals for odds ratios) and optimal ITRs.

Conclusion

The study jointly models mixed types of outcomes in the context of developing ITRs. By considering multiple health outcomes, the proposed approach can advance the development of more effective and reliable personalized treatment.

Selection of the optimal personalized treatment from multiple treatments with right-censored multivariate outcome measures

We propose a novel personalized concept for the optimal treatment selection for a situation where the response is a multivariate vector that could contain right-censored variables such as survival time. The proposed method can be applied with any number of treatments and outcome variables, under a broad set of models. Following a working semiparametric Single Index Model that relates covariates and responses, we first define a patient-specific composite score, constructed from individual covariates. We then estimate conditional means of each response, given the patient score, correspond to each treatment, using a nonparametric smooth estimator. Next, a rank aggregation technique is applied to estimate an ordering of treatments based on ranked lists of treatment performance measures given by conditional means. We handle the right-censored data by incorporating the inverse probability of censoring weighting to the corresponding estimators. An empirical study illustrates the performance of the proposed method in finite sample problems. To show the applicability of the proposed procedure for real data, we also present a data analysis using HIV clinical trial data, that contained a right-censored survival event as one of the endpoints.

Quantiles based personalized treatment selection for multivariate outcomes and multiple treatments

In this work, we propose a method for individualized treatment selection when there are correlated multiple responses for the K treatment ( K ≥ 2 ) scenario. Here we use ranks of quantiles of outcome variables for each treatment conditional on patient-specific scores constructed from collected covariate measurements. Our method covers any number of treatments and outcome variables using any number of quantiles and it can be applied for a broad set of models. We propose a rank aggregation technique for combining several lists of ranks where both these lists and elements within each list can be correlated. The method has the flexibility to incorporate patient and clinician preferences into the optimal treatment decision on an individual case basis. A simulation study demonstrates the performance of the proposed method in finite samples. We also present illustrations using two different datasets from diabetes and HIV-1 clinical trials to show the applicability of the proposed procedure for real data.

Model-free screening for variables with treatment interaction

Precision medicine is a medical paradigm that focuses on making effective treatment decision based on individual patient characteristics. When there are a large amount of patient information, such as patient’s genetic information, medical records and clinical measurements, available, it is of interest to select the covariates which have interactions with the treatment, for example, in determining the individualized treatment regime where only a subset of covariates with treatment interactions involves in decision making. We propose a marginal feature ranking and screening procedure for measuring interactions between the treatment and covariates. The method does not require imposing a specific model structure on the regression model and is applicable in a high dimensional setting. Theoretical properties in terms of consistency in ranking and selection are established. We demonstrate the finite sample performance of the proposed method by simulation and illustrate the applications with two real data examples from clinical trials.

Optimal Personalized Treatment Selection with Multivariate Outcome Measures in a Multiple Treatment Case

In this work we propose a novel method for individualized treatment selection when there are correlated multiple treatment responses. For the K treatment (K ≥ 2) scenario, we compare quantities that are suitable indexes based on outcome variables for each treatment conditional on patient-specific scores constructed from collected covariate measurements. Our method covers any number of treatments and outcome variables, and it can be applied for a broad set of models. The proposed method uses a rank aggregation technique that takes into account possible correlations among ranked lists to estimate an ordering of treatments based on treatment performance measures such as the smooth conditional mean. The method has the flexibility to incorporate patient and clinician preferences into the optimal treatment decision on an individual case basis. A simulation study demonstrates the performance of the proposed method in finite samples. We also present data analyses using HIV clinical trial data to show the applicability of the proposed procedure for real data.

Personalized treatment plans with multivariate outcomes

In this work, we propose a novel method for individualized treatment selection when the treatment response is multivariate. Our method covers any number of treatments and it can be applied for a broad set of models. The proposed method uses a Mahalanobis-type distance measure to establish an ordering of treatments based on treatment performance measures. Our investigation in this work deals with means of responses conditional on lower dimensional composite scores based on covariates where these scores are built using single index models to approximate mean responses against patient covariates. Smoothed estimates of such conditional means are combined to construct an estimate of the aforementioned distance measure, which is then used to estimate the optimal treatment. An empirical study demonstrates the performance of the proposed method in finite samples. We also present a data analysis using an HIV clinical trial data to show the applicability of the proposed procedure for real data.