1
|
Meinhardt MW, Skorodumov I, Jeanblanc J, Benvenuti F, Hilal FF, Domi E, André C, Bodeau S, Jeanblanc V, Domanegg K, Ciccocioppo R, Naassila M, Spanagel R. A new module in the drug development process: preclinical multi-center randomized controlled trial of R-ketamine on alcohol relapse. Neuropsychopharmacology 2025; 50:886-894. [PMID: 40021941 PMCID: PMC12032358 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-025-02071-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2024] [Revised: 02/08/2025] [Accepted: 02/11/2025] [Indexed: 03/03/2025]
Abstract
The drug development process in psychiatry faces significant challenges due to low reproducibility rates in animal testing, which often leads to translation failures. To address this issue, we introduce a new approach in psychiatric drug development: a preclinical randomized controlled trial (preRCT). To demonstrate its potential utility, we conducted a multi-center preRCT using the alcohol deprivation effect (ADE) model to assess the impact of ketamine and R-ketamine on alcohol relapse across three European research centers. Ketamine (20 mg/kg) significantly reduced relapse, while R-ketamine showed efficacy only in females. A higher dose of R-ketamine (40 mg/kg) was also effective in males. These sex-dependent effects were linked to plasma R-ketamine levels, which were two-fold higher in female compared to male rats. Notably, R-ketamine demonstrated a lasting reduction in alcohol consumption without adverse effects. In conclusion, our preRCT demonstrates R-ketamine's effectiveness in reducing alcohol relapse and supports translation to a clinical RCT that accounts for sex-dependent effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus W Meinhardt
- Institute of Psychopharmacology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Molecular Neuroimaging, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ivan Skorodumov
- Institute of Psychopharmacology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jérôme Jeanblanc
- University of Picardy Jules Verne, INSERM UMR1247 research unit, Amiens, France
| | - Federica Benvenuti
- School of Pharmacy, Center for Neuroscience, Pharmacology Unit, University of Camerino, Camerino, 62032, Italy
| | - Fahd François Hilal
- University of Picardy Jules Verne, INSERM UMR1247 research unit, Amiens, France
| | - Esi Domi
- School of Pharmacy, Center for Neuroscience, Pharmacology Unit, University of Camerino, Camerino, 62032, Italy
| | - Camille André
- University of Picardy Jules Verne, INSERM UMR1247 research unit, Amiens, France
- Laboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - Sandra Bodeau
- Laboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, Amiens, France
- MP3CV Laboratory, UR UPJV 7517, University of Picardy Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Virginie Jeanblanc
- University of Picardy Jules Verne, INSERM UMR1247 research unit, Amiens, France
| | - Kevin Domanegg
- Institute of Psychopharmacology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roberto Ciccocioppo
- School of Pharmacy, Center for Neuroscience, Pharmacology Unit, University of Camerino, Camerino, 62032, Italy
| | - Mickael Naassila
- University of Picardy Jules Verne, INSERM UMR1247 research unit, Amiens, France
| | - Rainer Spanagel
- Institute of Psychopharmacology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), partner site Mannheim/Heidelberg/Ulm, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Quelch D, Lingford-Hughes A, John B, Nutt D, Bradberry S, Roderique-Davies G. Promising strategies for the prevention of alcohol-related brain damage through optimised management of acute alcohol withdrawal: A focussed literature review. J Psychopharmacol 2024:2698811241294005. [PMID: 39529219 DOI: 10.1177/02698811241294005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
There is an increasing awareness of the link between chronic alcohol consumption and the development of cognitive, behavioural and functional deficits. Currently, preventative strategies are limited and require engagement in dedicated long-term rehabilitation and sobriety services, the availability of which is low. The acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome is an episode of neurochemical imbalance leading to autonomic dysregulation, increased seizure risk and cognitive disorientation. In addition to harm from symptoms of alcohol withdrawal (e.g. seizures), the underpinning neurochemical changes may also lead to cytotoxicity through various cellular mechanisms, which long-term, may translate to some of the cognitive impairments observed in Alcohol-Related Brain Damage (ARBD). Here we review some of the pharmacological and neurochemical mechanisms underpinning alcohol withdrawal. We discuss the cellular and pharmacological basis of various potential neuroprotective strategies that warrant further exploration in clinical populations with a view to preventing the development of ARBD. Such strategies, when integrated into the clinical management of acute alcohol withdrawal, may impact large populations of individuals, who currently face limited dedicated service delivery and healthcare resource.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren Quelch
- Addictions Research Group, Applied Psychology Research and Innovation Group, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
- Alcohol Care Team and Clinical Toxicology Service, Sandwell and West-Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anne Lingford-Hughes
- Centre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bev John
- Addictions Research Group, Applied Psychology Research and Innovation Group, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
| | - David Nutt
- Centre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sally Bradberry
- Addictions Research Group, Applied Psychology Research and Innovation Group, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
- Alcohol Care Team and Clinical Toxicology Service, Sandwell and West-Birmingham NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gareth Roderique-Davies
- Addictions Research Group, Applied Psychology Research and Innovation Group, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guiraud J, Spanagel R, van den Brink W. Substitution therapy for patients with alcohol dependence: Mechanisms of action and efficacy. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF NEUROBIOLOGY 2024; 175:187-239. [PMID: 38555116 DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2024.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
New approaches for the treatment of alcohol dependence (AD) may improve patient outcomes. Substitution maintenance therapy is one of the most effective treatment options for opioid and nicotine use disorders. So far, there has been little attention to substitution therapy for the treatment of AD. Here, we explain the mechanistic foundations of alcohol substitution maintenance therapy. Alcohol has many primary targets in the brain (and other organs) and the physical interaction of ethanol molecules with these specific ethanol-sensitive sites on a variety of ionotropic receptors (e.g. GABA-A, NMDA, and nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptors) and ion channels provides the rationale for substitution. As such, a variety of compounds can interact with those ethanol-sensitive sites and can thus substitute for some of the effects of alcohol. For some of these compounds, alcohol discrimination studies have shown their substitution potential. Accordingly, potential substitution treatments include agonists acting at GABA receptors such as sodium oxybate, baclofen and benzodiazepines, NMDA receptor antagonists such as ketamine and memantine, or nAChRs agonists such as varenicline. All these compounds are already approved for other indications and we present clinical evidence for these drugs in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) and in the long-term treatment of AD, and outline future steps for their acceptance as substitution treatment in AD. Finally, we discuss the substitution approach of managed alcohol programs for the most severely affected homeless populations. Results showed that sodium oxybate is probably the closest to a substitution therapy for AD and is already approved for the treatment of AWS and in the long-term treatment of AD in some countries. In conclusion, we argue that better AD treatment can be provided if substitution maintenance treatments for alcohol are implemented at a similar scale as for opioid and nicotine use disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Guiraud
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Vergio, Clichy, France.
| | - Rainer Spanagel
- Institute of Psychopharmacology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Wim van den Brink
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) commonly is associated with compromise in neurobiological and/or neurobehavioral processes. The severity of this compromise varies across individuals and outcomes, as does the degree to which recovery of function is achieved. This narrative review first summarizes neurobehavioral, neurophysiological, structural, and neurochemical aberrations/deficits that are frequently observed in people with AUD after detoxification. Subsequent sections review improvements across these domains during recovery, taking into account modulators of recovery to the extent permitted. Where appropriate, the discussion includes work integrating outcomes across domains, leveraging the strengths of diverse experimental methods. Interventions to ameliorate neurobiological or neurobehavioral deficits do not constitute a primary objective of this review. However, their consideration is a logical inclusion. Therefore, a limited introduction to existing methods is also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Jo Nixon
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
- Center for Addiction Research & Education, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ben Lewis
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
- Center for Addiction Research & Education, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|