Maternal Hemodynamic Changes Associated with Furosemide Treatment

Furosemide to lower antenatal severe hypertension: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a leading cause of perinatal morbidity, and timely treatment of severely elevated blood pressure is recommended to prevent serious sequelae. In acute hypertension marked by increased blood volume, it is unknown whether diuretics used as an adjunct to antihypertensive medications lead to more effective blood pressure control.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether the addition of intravenous furosemide to first-line antihypertensive agents reduces systolic blood pressure in acute-onset, severe antenatal hypertension with wide (≥60 mm Hg) pulse pressure.

STUDY DESIGN

In this double-blinded randomized trial, participants received 40 mg of intravenous furosemide or placebo in addition to a first-line antihypertensive agent. The primary outcome was mean systolic blood pressure during the first hour after intervention. Secondary outcomes included corresponding diastolic blood pressure; systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse pressure at 2 hours after intervention; total reduction from qualifying blood pressure; duration of blood pressure control; need for additional antihypertensive doses within 1 hour; and electrolytes and urine output. A sample size of 35 participants per group was planned to detect a 15-mm Hg difference in blood pressure.

RESULTS

Between January 2021 and March 2022, 65 individuals were randomized: 33 to furosemide and 32 to placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. There was no difference in the primary outcome of mean 1-hour systolic blood pressure (147 [14.8] vs 152 [13.8] mm Hg; P=.200). We found a reduction in 2-hour systolic blood pressure (139 [18.5] vs 154 [18.4] mm Hg; P=.007) and a decrease in 2-hour pulse pressure (55 [12.5] vs 67 [15.1]; P=.003) in the furosemide group. Subgroup analysis according to hypertension type showed a significant reduction in 2-hour systolic blood pressure and 2-hour pulse pressure among patients with new-onset hypertension, but not among those with preexisting hypertension. Urine output was greater in the furosemide group, with no difference in electrolytes and creatinine before and after intervention.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous furosemide in conjunction with a first-line antihypertensive agent did not significantly reduce systolic blood pressure in the first hour after administration. However, both systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure at 2 hours were decreased in the furosemide group. These findings suggest that a 1-time dose of intravenous furosemide is a reasonable adjunct to achieve blood pressure control, particularly in patients in whom increased volume is suspected.

The use of loop diuretics in the context of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Addressing volume expansion may improve the management of hypertension across the pregnancy continuum. We conducted a systematic review to summarize the evidence on the use of loop diuretics in the context of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and the postpartum period.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar were searched for original research articles published up to 29 June 2021. Of the 2801 results screened, 15 studies were included: eight randomized controlled trials, six before-after studies, and one cohort study. Based on random effects meta-analysis of before-after studies, antepartum use of loop diuretics was associated with lower DBP [mean difference -17.73 mmHg, (95% confidence intervals -34.50 to -0.96); I2 = 94%] and lower cardiac output [mean difference -0.75 l/min, (-1.11 to -0.39); I2 = 0%], with no difference in SBP, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, or total peripheral resistance. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials revealed that postpartum use of loop diuretics was associated with decreased need for additional antihypertensive patients [relative risk 0.69, (0.50-0.97); I2 = 14%], and an increased duration of hospitalization [mean difference 8.80 h, (4.46-13.14); I2 = 83%], with no difference in the need for antihypertensive therapy at hospital discharge, or persistent postpartum hypertension.

CONCLUSION

Antepartum use of loop diuretics lowered DBP and cardiac output, while their postpartum use reduced the need for additional antihypertensive medications. There was insufficient evidence to suggest a clear benefit. Future studies focusing on women with hypertensive pregnancy disorders who may most likely benefit from loop diuretics are required.

Preeclampsia subtypes: Clinical aspects regarding pathogenesis, signs, and management with special attention to diuretic administration

During normal pregnancy, blood volume increases by nearly two liters. Distinctively, the absence coupled with the extreme extent regarding the volume expansion, are likely accompanied with pathological conditions. Undoubtedly, preeclampsia, defined as the appearance of hypertension and organ deficiency, such as proteinuria during the second half of pregnancy, is not a homogenous disease. Clinically speaking, two main types of preeclampsia can be distinguished, in which a marked difference between them is vascular condition, and consequently, the blood volume. The "classic" preeclampsia, as a two-phase disease, described in the first, latent phase, in which, placenta development is diminished. Agents from this malperfused placenta generate a maternal disease, the second phase, in which endothelial damage leads to hypertension and organ damage due to vasoconstriction and thrombotic microangiopathy. In this hypovolemia-associated condition, decreasing platelet count, signs of hemolysis, renal and liver involvement are characteristic findings; proteinuria is marked and increasing. In the terminal phase, visible edema develops due to increasing capillary transparency, augmenting end-organ damages. "Classic" preeclampsia is a severe and quickly progressing condition with placental insufficiency and consequent fetal growth restriction and oligohydramnios. The outcome of this condition often leads to fetal hypoxia, eclampsia or placental abruption. The management is limited to a diligent prolongation of pregnancy to accomplish improved neonatal pulmonary function, careful diminishing high blood pressure, and delivery induction in due time. The other subtype, associated with relaxed vasculature and high cardiac output, is a maternal disease, in which obesity is an important risk factor since predisposes to enhanced water retention, hypertension, and a weakened endothelial dysfunction. Initially, enhanced water retention leads to lowered extremity edema, which oftentimes progresses to a generalized form and hypertension. In several cases, proteinuria appears most likely due to tissue edema. This condition already fully meets preeclampsia criteria. Laboratory alterations, including proteinuria, are modest and platelet count remains within the normal range. Fetal weight is also normal or frequently over average due to enhanced placental blood supply. It is very likely, further water retention leads to venous congestion, a parenchyma stasis, responsible for ascites, eclampsia, or placental abruption. During the management of this hypervolemia-associated preeclampsia, the administration of diuretic furosemide treatment seemingly offers promise.

Phenotype‐Directed Management of Hypertension in Pregnancy

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are among the most serious conditions that pregnancy care providers face; however, little attention has been paid to the concept of tailoring clinical care to reduce associated adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes based on the underlying disease pathogenesis. This narrative review discusses the integration of phenotype‐based clinical strategies in the management of high‐risk pregnant patients that are currently not common clinical practice: real‐time placental growth factor testing at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto and noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring to guide antihypertensive therapy at the University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle. Future work should focus on promoting more widespread integration of these novel strategies into obstetric care to improve outcomes of pregnancies at high risk of adverse maternal‐fetal outcomes from these complications of pregnancy.

Hemodynamic pathways of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia

Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia are the 2 main types of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Noninvasive maternal cardiovascular function assessment, which helps obtain information from all the components of circulation, has shown that venous hemodynamic dysfunction is a feature of preeclampsia but not of gestational hypertension. Venous congestion is a known cause of organ dysfunction, but its potential role in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia is currently poorly investigated. Body water volume expansion occurs in both gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, and this is associated with the common feature of new-onset hypertension after 20 weeks of gestation. Blood pressure, by definition, is the product of intravascular volume load and vascular resistance (Ohm's law). Fundamentally, hypertension may present as a spectrum of cardiovascular states varying between 2 extremes: one with a predominance of raised cardiac output and the other with a predominance of increased total peripheral resistance. In clinical practice, however, this bipolar nature of hypertension is rarely considered, despite the important implications for screening, prevention, management, and monitoring of disease. This review summarizes the evidence of type-specific hemodynamic profiles in the latent and clinical stages of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Gestational volume expansion superimposed on an early gestational closed circulatory circuit in a pressure- or volume-overloaded condition predisposes a patient to the gradual deterioration of overall circulatory function, finally presenting as gestational hypertension or preeclampsia-the latter when venous dysfunction is involved. The eventual phenotype of hypertensive disorder is already predictable from early gestation onward, on the condition of including information from all the major components of circulation into the maternal cardiovascular assessment: the heart, central and peripheral arteries, conductive and capacitance veins, and body water content. The relevance of this approach, outlined in this review, openly invites for more in-depth research into the fundamental hemodynamics of gestational hypertensive disorders, not only from the perspective of the physiologist or the scientist, but also in assistance of clinicians toward understanding and managing effectively these severe complications of pregnancy.

Immediate postpartum management of patients with severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pathophysiology guiding practice

Developing clinically-focused evidence and experience-based approaches to improve maternity care is a national priority. Safety and quality collaborative initiatives related to management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are vital in the implementation of improved care. We reviewed the obstetric literature to construct a concise summary of the core pathophysiologic issues, practice principles and clinical interventions which are foundational for physicians providing immediate postpartum care for patients with severe pregnancy-related hypertension (including those with eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, and superimposed preeclampsia inclusive of those with gestational hypertension that develop severe range blood pressures). While based largely upon the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) Hypertension Task Force Guidelines released in 2013 as well as updated 2018 guidelines set forth by ACOG for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, this summary goes beyond the basic safety bundles for hypertension management and lays a pathophysiologic foundation for the immediate postpartum care of patients with severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Preeclampsia: a gestational cardiorenal syndrome

It is generally accepted today that there are two different types of preeclampsia: an early-onset or placental type and a late-onset or maternal type. In the latent phase, the first one presents with a low output/high resistance circulation eventually leading in the late second or early third trimester to an intense and acutely aggravating systemic disorder with an important impact on maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity; the other type presents initially as a high volume/low resistance circulation, gradually evolving to a state of circulatory decompensation usually in the later stages of pregnancy, with a less severe impact on maternal and neonatal outcome. For both processes, numerous dysfunctions of the heart, kidneys, arteries, veins and interconnecting systems are reported, most of them presenting earlier and more severely in early- than in late-onset preeclampsia; however, some very specific dysfunctions exist for either type. Experimental, clinical and epidemiological observations before, during and after pregnancy are consistent with gestation-induced worsening of subclinical pre-existing chronic cardiovascular dysfunction in early-onset preeclampsia, and thus sharing the pathophysiology of cardiorenal syndrome type II, and with acute volume overload decompensation of the maternal circulation in late-onset preeclampsia, thus sharing the pathophysiology of cardiorenal syndrome type 1. Cardiorenal syndrome type V is consistent with the process of preeclampsia superimposed upon clinical cardiovascular and/or renal disease, alone or as part of a systemic disorder. This review focuses on the specific differences in haemodynamic dysfunctions between the two types of preeclampsia, with special emphasis on the interorgan interactions between heart and kidneys, introducing the theoretical concept that the pathophysiological processes of preeclampsia can be regarded as the gestational manifestations of cardiorenal syndromes.

Maternal Venous Hemodynamic Dysfunction in Proteinuric Gestational Hypertension: Evidence and Implications

This review summarizes current knowledge from experimental and clinical studies on renal function and venous hemodynamics in normal pregnancy, in gestational hypertension (GH) and in two types of preeclampsia: placental or early-onset preeclampsia (EPE) and maternal or late-onset (LPE) preeclampsia, presenting at <34 weeks and ≥34 weeks respectively. In addition, data from maternal venous Doppler studies are summarized, showing evidence for (1) the maternal circulation functioning closer to the upper limits of capacitance than in non-pregnant conditions, with intrinsic risks for volume overload, (2) abnormal venous Doppler measurements obtainable in preeclampsia, more pronounced in EPE than LPE, however not observed in GH, and (3) abnormal venous hemodynamic function installing gradually from first to third trimester within unique pathways of general circulatory deterioration in GH, EPE and LPE. These associations have important clinical implications in terms of screening, diagnosis, prevention and management of gestational hypertensive diseases. They invite for further hypothesis-driven research on the role of retrograde venous congestion in the etiology of preeclampsia-related organ dysfunctions and their absence in GH, and also challenge the generally accepted view of abnormal placentation as the primary cause of preeclampsia. The striking similarity between abnormal maternal venous Doppler flow patterns and those observed at the ductus venosus and other abdominal veins of the intra-uterine growth restricted fetus, also invites to explore the role of venous congestion in the intra-uterine programming of some adult diseases.

Preliminary study of the effects of furosemide on blood pressure during late-onset pre-eclampsia in patients with high cardiac output

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of furosemide on hypertension and edema in patients with pre-eclampsia experiencing high cardiac output.

METHODS

The present cohort study enrolled patients with pre-eclampsia who were admitted to the pregnancy pathology unit of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pécs, Hungary, between January 1 and December 31, 2015. Eligible patients had singleton pregnancies with no fetal anomalies, high blood volume, visible edema, and a hematocrit concentration below 37 L/L. Blood pressure was measured and impedance cardiography was used to determine cardiac output for all patients before they received a 40-mg dose of furosemide; after 60 minutes blood pressure and cardiac output were measured again.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 14 patients. Lower cardiac output (P=0.002), systolic blood pressure (P=0.002), and diastolic blood pressure (P=0.002) were recorded after furosemide administration, with patient heart rates remaining stable.

CONCLUSION

The heart-rate stability suggests that the change of cardiac output was due to a decrease in blood volume. These data suggest that diuretics could be useful in the management of late-onset pre-eclampsia, indicating that an increase in water retention could play a role in the development of late-onset pre-eclampsia.

[Management of arterial hypertension before 20weeks gestation in pregnant women]

In the first 6 months of pregnancy, the primary goal of antihypertensive treatment is to prevent the complications of severe hypertension. Initiation of antihypertensive drug treatment is recommended in pregnant women with severe hypertension (blood pressure>160/110mmHg). Initiation of antihypertensive drug treatment should also be considered in pregnant women at high cardiovascular risk (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, personal history of cardiovascular disease) with moderate hypertension (blood pressure between 140-159/90-109mmHg). A systolic blood pressure goal<160 and a diastolic blood pressure goal between 85 and 100mmHg is recommended in pregnancy. Labetalol, nifedipine, nicardipine and alphamethyldopa should be considered preferential antihypertensive drugs in pregnancy. Salt restriction, physical exercise and weight loss have not demonstrated any effect in the prevention of preeclampsia and serious maternal complications of hypertension.

Pharmacological management of hypertension in pregnancy

Hypertension in pregnancy remains a significant public health problem. Pharmacological management of blood pressure in pregnancy is impacted by changes in maternal drug disposition and by the pharmacodynamic effects of specific agents. This article will review the impact of pregnancy on pathways of drug elimination and the associated clinical implications, the pharmacodynamic effects of specific drugs and classes of drugs in pregnancy, and the data to date on the impact of antihypertensive therapy on mothers and their fetuses.

Management of chronic hypertension during pregnancy with furosemide, amlodipine or aspirin: a pilot clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the maternal and neonatal efficacy and safety with furosemide, amlodipine or aspirin in women with mild/moderate chronic hypertension during pregnancy.

METHODS

A pilot clinical trial was performed in a tertiary teaching hospital in Panama. Pregnant patients with mild/moderate chronic hypertension at ≤20 weeks of gestation were invited to take part in the study. Mild/moderate chronic hypertension was defined as a pregnancy with systolic blood pressure of 140-159 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of 90-109 mmHg. Women in the furosemide group received 20 mg of furosemide oral each day, those in the amlodipine group received 5 mg of amlodipine oral each day and those in the aspirin group received 75 mg of orally-administered acetylsalicylic acid each day.

RESULTS

We enrolled 63 patients during the study period, 21 women were randomised to each group (aspirin, amlodipine and furosemide). We found no difference in maternal complications, pre-term births, mean birth weight or in the proportion of small for gestational age infants among treatment groups. Severe hypertension and aggregate pre-eclampsia were similar among treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

This pilot trial demonstrates that both furosemide and amlodipine might have the same effect during pregnancy. However, a large clinical trial is necessary to prove this.

Pharmacodynamics of clonidine therapy in pregnancy: a heterogeneous maternal response impacts fetal growth

BACKGROUND

Clonidine, a centrally acting antihypertensive agent, has been used successfully in pregnancy. We sought to describe the pharmacodynamic effects of clonidine in pregnancy and the associated impact on fetal growth.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed. Maternal hemodynamics were measured before and after treatment. Responses to clonidine were categorized by the predominant hemodynamic effect: decreased vascular resistance, decreased cardiac output (CO), or mixed. Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of hemodynamic response to clonidine and association between response group and birth weight.

RESULTS

Sixty-six pregnant women were studied. Treatment was associated with a reduction of mean arterial pressure (MAP) (-9.2 mm Hg, P < 0.001), a reduction in total peripheral resistance (TPR) (-194 dyne·cm·sec⁻⁵, P < 0.001), and an increase in CO (+0.5 l/min, P < 0.001). The hemodynamic response was characterized by decreased resistance in 34 women; decreased CO in 22; and mixed effect in 10. No maternal demographic characteristics were associated with a reduction in CO. Mean birth weight percentile was lower in the group that experienced a reduction in CO compared to the group with a reduction in vascular resistance (26.1 vs. 43.6, P = 0.02). The rate of birth weight <10th percentile was also higher in the group experiencing decreased CO (41 vs. 8.8%, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The hemodynamic effect of clonidine in pregnancy is heterogeneous. The category of effect, reduction in vascular resistance vs. reduction in CO, significantly impacts fetal growth. A reduction in heart rate (HR) after therapy identifies pregnancies at risk for reduced fetal growth.

Cardio-renal effects of the A1 adenosine receptor antagonist SLV320 in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Blocking the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism with adenosine A1 receptor antagonists seems to improve diuresis and sodium excretion without compromising the glomerular filtration rate in patients with heart failure. However, the direct cardiac effects of this compound class have not been investigated to date.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In total, 111 patients (109 men and 2 women) received a 1-hour infusion of 5, 10, and 15 mg SLV320, an adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, placebo, or 40 mg furosemide. Mean age was 57.9 years, mean ejection fraction was 28.1%, 82 patients were of New York Heart Association class II, and 29 patients were of New York Heart Association class III. Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance, right atrial pressure, and cardiac output) were determined. Kidney function was assessed by cystatin C measurements and by analysis of urine output and urine electrolytes. In addition, pharmacokinetics of SLV320 and ex vivo inhibition of adenosine A1 receptor activity were performed. SLV320 was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were observed. Heart rate, blood pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, right atrial pressure, and cardiac output were not altered by any dose of SLV320. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was significantly (P=0.04) decreased by furosemide (-6.2+/-5.9 mm Hg). Systemic vascular resistance was significantly (P=0.04) increased in the furosemide group (+166.70+/-261.87 dynes . s(-1) . cm(-5)), whereas all SLV320 groups showed no significant alterations of systemic vascular resistance. Changes from baseline cystatin C plasma concentrations decreased after 10 mg SLV320 (-0.093+/-0.137 mg/L, P=0.046), whereas furosemide resulted in a significant (P=0.03) increase of cystatin C (+0.052+/-0.065 mg/L) versus baseline. All values represent mean changes+/-SD from baseline at 3 hours postdosing: SLV320 (10 and 15 mg) increased significantly sodium excretion and diuresis compared with placebo during the 0- to 6-hour collection period postdosing.

CONCLUSIONS

SLV320 infusion shows no immediate effects on cardiac hemodynamics. SLV320 might improve glomerular filtration rate while simultaneously promoting natriuresis and diuresis. Clinical Trial Registration- clinicaltrials.gov Indentifier: NCT00160134.