Association between incongruence about survivor function and outcomes among stroke survivors and family caregivers

Care dependence and caregiver fatigue in ischemic stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Care dependence among ischemic stroke survivors may be related to caregiver fatigue, but the current status and relationship between these factors have not been well studied. This study aimed to investigate the current status of care dependence and caregiver fatigue in ischemic stroke survivors and to analyze their influencing factors and relationship.

METHODS

A total of 380 pairs of inpatient ischemic stroke survivors and caregivers were included from July 2019 to April 2020 by convenience sample. Survivors demographic data and clinical variables were collected. The Chinese Care Dependency Scale and Fatigue Scale-14 were used to assess survivors' care dependence and caregiver fatigue.

RESULTS

The largest number of ischemic stroke survivors were mild care dependence (62.89%), followed by those who were severe dependence (19.47%). Caregiver fatigue was moderate (42.9%) or severe (40.5%). Survivors' care dependence was influenced by the age of survivors (P = 0.005), total score of NIHSS (P < 0.001), and number of comorbidities (P = 0.006). Caregiver fatigue was positively correlated with survivors' care dependence (P < 0.001), and was affected by total score of NIHSS (P = 0.032), conscious health (P = 0.024) or sleep status (P < 0.001) of caregivers, and number of survivors cared for at the same time (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The current status of ischemic stroke survivors' care dependence and caregiver fatigue was not optimistic. This study identified three influencing factors for IS survivors' care dependence and four influencing factors for caregiver fatigue, and identified the positive relationship between them. This provided new evidence and direction for future research to explore effective measures to reduce survivors' care dependence and caregiver fatigue. In clinical practice, we should focus on and actively help survivors and caregivers with these influencing factors to reduce their burden.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was not registered prospectively and we would conduct retrospectively registered.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Examining the Efficacy of the Telehealth Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK III) Intervention for Stroke Caregivers: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a leading cause of serious, long-term disability and has a sudden onset. Upon discharge to the home setting, families are thrust into providing care, often without sufficient training from health care providers. Aligned with current patient and caregiver guidelines, the Telehealth Assessment and Skill-Building Kit (TASK III) is a nurse-led intervention designed to empower caregivers to address their own needs and those of the survivor using innovative skill-building strategies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to test the short-term (immediately after the intervention at 8 wk) and long-term (12, 24, and 52 wk) efficacy of the TASK III intervention, compared with an information, support, and referral (ISR) group, to improve caregiver life changes (ie, changes in physical health, physical functioning, emotional well-being, and general health) as a result of providing care.

METHODS

A randomized controlled clinical trial design will be used with baseline data collection from 296 family caregivers by telephone after the stroke survivor is discharged home. Caregivers randomly assigned to the ISR group (n=148, 50%) will receive information from the American Heart Association about stroke family caregiving. Caregivers randomly assigned to the TASK III group (n=148, 50%) will receive a TASK III resource guide and information from the American Heart Association. Both groups will receive 8 weekly calls from a nurse, with a booster call a month later. Outcomes will be assessed by blinded data collectors at 8, 12, 24, and 52 weeks. The primary outcome (at 8 wk) is caregiver life changes measured by the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale. Secondary outcomes are depressive symptoms; other symptoms (eg, stress, fatigue, sleep, pain, and shortness of breath); unhealthy days; diet; exercise; and self-reported health care use. Mediators are task difficulty, threat appraisal, and self-efficacy. Program evaluation outcomes (satisfaction and technology ratings) will also be analyzed.

RESULTS

The trial was registered on March 10, 2022. Enrollment and random assignment of the first participant was on November 30, 2022, with an anticipated completion of recruitment by November 30, 2025. Completion of the primary end point data analysis is anticipated by August 31, 2026, with results expected to be reported on ClinicalTrials.gov by April 1, 2027. As of October 9, 2024, a total of 198 (66.9% of the proposed total sample of 296) family caregivers have been enrolled and randomly assigned to the TASK III group (n=98, 49.5%) or the ISR group (n=100, 50.5%). The last update was performed on January 25, 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

If the TASK III intervention is shown to be efficacious in the proposed randomized controlled clinical trial, our next goal will be to translate TASK III into ongoing stroke systems of care, providing a tremendous public health impact.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05304078; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05304078.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/67219.

Disagreement about perceptions of patient disability between the stroke patient and caregiver: a cross sectional study exploring the association to patient and caregiver quality of life

OBJECTIVES

This study explored the association of disagreement in the perception of patient disability between patients and family caregivers with physical and psychological quality of life (QOL) in both parties.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of data collected from male stroke patients and family caregivers was conducted. Physical and psychological QOL in patients and caregivers were measured using the WHOQOL BREF. Perceptions of patient disability were measured using the 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (DAS). Using DAS scores reported independently by patients and caregivers, dyads were categorized into one of four groups representing agreement or disagreement about patient disability. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the associations between WHOQOL scores in patients and caregivers and these four groups.

RESULTS

Among 56 dyads enrolled, approximately 52% were categorized into 'agreement' groups and 48% were categorized into 'disagreement' groups. The disagreement in perception about patient disability were significantly associated with poor patient physical QOL. However, the disagreement in perception were not significantly associated with caregiver QOL.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest the association of disagreement with QOL differs between patients and caregivers. Further research is needed to carefully appraise the relationship and interaction between patient and caregiver.

Association of patient quality of life with the degree of agreement in the perceptions of patient disability within the stroke patient-rehabilitation therapist dyad: a cross-sectional study in postdischarge rehabilitation setting

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of study was to explore the association between patient physical and psychological quality of life (QOL) with the degree of agreement in perceptions of patient disability within the stroke patient-rehabilitation therapist dyad.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional dyadic study with a tablet-based structured questionnaire.

SETTING

Rehabilitation, nursing and long-term care facilities that provide rehabilitation services in the Kanagawa prefecture, Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

The 81 dyads of a male patient with stroke living at home and the rehabilitation therapist in charge of the eligible patient were recruited from March 2019 to February 2020.

METHOD

Patient physical and psychological QOL was measured using the WHOQOL BREF. Perceptions of patient disability were measured using the 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule V.2.0 (DAS). DAS scores of patients and therapists were classified into two (high and low) and three (high, medium, low) categories, respectively, and six patterns of agreement about patient function were created and used in the analysis. Generalised estimating equations were used to examine multivariable associations between WHOQOL scores in patients and the degree of agreement within dyads adjusting for other covariates and clustering effects.

RESULTS

Among 81 enrolled dyads, 48 (59.3%) were classified into one of four disagreement groups (low medium, low high, high medium, high low). When the patient appraised himself as having mild disability, the degree of patient-therapist disagreement was negatively associated with patient's physical and psychological QOL. When the patient appraised himself as having severe disability, his physical and/or psychological QOL was poorer, regardless of the degree of agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Disagreement in the perception of disability within patient-rehabilitation therapist dyad could be associated with patient's poor QOL, especially when the patient perceives himself as having mild disability. Reaching an agreement about patient disability is needed in the delivery of rehabilitation care for patients with stroke living at home to improve their QOL.

Dyadic appraisals, dyadic coping, and mental health among couples coping with stroke: A longitudinal study protocol

AIM

The aim of this study is to describe a longitudinal research protocol for exploring the relationship of dyadic appraisal, dyadic coping (DC), and dyadic mental health among stroke survivors and their spouses and its action path.

BACKGROUND

Stroke can be considered as a dyad phenomenon which affects the mental health of both the survivors and their spouse caregivers. Studies based on dyadic theories are needed to examine the roles of dyadic appraisal and DC on the mental health of stroke dyads.

DESIGN

Longitudinal study.

METHODS

Stroke survivors and their spouse caregivers will be recruited from hospital, when the survivors are stable and about to discharge. Follow-up assessments will take place in 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after participants discharge. The structural equation modelling will be used for statistic analysing.

DISCUSSION

Our study seeks to expand the theory of Developmental-Contextual Model to examine the association among variables including dyadic appraisal, DC, and mental health for the couples coping with stroke.

Interpersonal relationship challenges among stroke survivors and family caregivers

A strong interpersonal relationship after stroke is important for the well-being of survivors and family caregivers. However, as many as 54% of families experience relationship problems after stroke and as many as 38% of couples experience overt conflict. The purpose of this study is to enhance understanding about relationship challenges among stroke dyads and to identify implications for direct practice in social work. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with N = 19 care dyads. Qualitative data were analyzed through an interpretive description lens. Seven themes about relationship challenges were identified. Findings highlight areas to consider in promoting strong relationships between survivors and family caregivers. Social workers may have the opportunity to assist dyads with disrupting negative communication cycles, strengthening empathy and collaboration, and achieving a balance so that each person's needs are met.

Association of formal and informal care with health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms: findings from the Caring for Adults Recovering from the Effects of Stroke study

AIM

To investigate the association between informal and formal care and stroke participants' self-reported health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms one year after the stroke event.

METHODS

We examined a national population-based sample of 123 stroke participants. Care received was defined as formal (outpatient therapy, care from home health aides, nurses, or therapists), informal (family caregiver), or shared (formal and informal). Hours of care were extracted from Medicare claims and caregiver self-report. A general linear model was used to compare health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms one year after the stroke for those who received shared care, only informal care or only formal care to those with no post-stroke care.

RESULTS

Among stroke participants, 12.2% received only formal care, 35.0% only informal care, 38.2% shared care, and 14.6% no care. Those with only informal care had greater self-reported depressive symptoms than those who received no care at all.

CONCLUSIONS

Shared care was the most common care configuration for stroke participants, but no significant associations were found between shared care and self-reported outcomes after adjusting for stroke participant characteristics. Further research is needed on the dose of informal and formal care and their coordination to better understand relationships with recovery.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONStroke is one of the leading causes of disability for adults in the USA and ongoing care is needed for survivors.Informal caregivers such as family members play an important role in recovery in addition to formal care provided by home health aides, nurses and therapists.This study showed that survivors with informal care had more severe depressive symptoms, while shared care provided by formal and informal caregivers may prevent further decline in patients with worse baseline health.