The Spinal Cord Injury Spasticity Evaluation Tool: A Persian adaptation and validation study

Safety and Potential Efficacy of Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury-Induced Spasticity: An Open-Label, Non-Randomized, Single-Arm Trial

BACKGROUND

Despite the abundant literature on the use of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) in spastic cerebral palsy, no investigation has evaluated its use in adult patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI)-induced spasticity. The present investigation aimed to evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of SDR in chronic SCI-induced spasticity for the first time.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm, non-randomized clinical trial, all patients were assigned to the single study intervention arm and underwent SDR. The primary outcome measure was the safety profile of SDR. Secondary outcome measures were Modified Ashworth Scale, Penn Spasm Frequency Scale, visual analog scale for spasticity, Spinal Cord Injury Spasticity Tool, Spinal Cord Independence measure version III, and Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Six patients with cervical SCI and 4 with thoracic SCI were allocated to the single study intervention arm. No adverse event attributable to the SDR was found. Moreover, all secondary outcome measures of the study improved significantly over the study period (P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis also found a significant association between level of injury and changes in average Modified Ashworth Scale scores (P = 0.041), Spinal Cord Injury Spasticity Tool score (P = 0.013), and Spinal Cord Independence measure version III total (P = 0.002) and mobility domain scores (P = 0.004) at 12-month postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical trial indicated that SDR is a safe and potentially effective procedure in patients with severe and intractable SCI-induced spasticity. However, future clinical trials with larger sample sizes and adequate power are required to validate our findings regarding efficacy.

Glottal Function Index: Validity and Reliability of the Persian Language Version in Patients With Voice Disorders

OBJECTIVE

To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Glottal Function Index into the Persian language (GFIp) and validate it in patients with voice disorders.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional and prospective validation design was adopted.

METHOD

The GFI was translated and culturally adapted into Persian language according to the methodology of standard forward-backward translations to obtain semantic, idiomatic, and conceptual equivalence. One hundred patients with voice disorders (53 men; mean age: 41.4 ± 13.6 years) and 40 healthy volunteers (21 women; mean age: 36.7 ± 10.0 years) completed the GFIp. Patients with voice disorders also completed the Persian Voice Handicap Index (VHIp) to assess the construct validity.

RESULTS

There were no floor and ceiling effects. Evidence for construct validity was found with a significant very good correlation between the GFIp and the VHIp total scores (r = 0.70; P < 0.001). Differences of GFIp scores between the patients and healthy participants were statistically significant (P < 0.001) confirming discriminant validity. The internal consistency reliability was acceptable for GFIp (Cronbach's α = 0.74). Absolute reliability measures of Standard Error of Measurement and the Smallest Detectable Change for GFIp were 2.5 (confidence interval 95% = ±4.9) and 6.93, respectively. Factor analysis revealed the GFIp as a single factor instrument.

CONCLUSION

The GFIp is a valid and reliable self-administered instrument for use in Persian-speaking patients with voice disorders.

The MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care: A validation of the Persian-language version

Background: Valid and reliable tools are required to measure patient satisfaction with physical therapy care. The aim of this study was to translate the MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care (MRPS) into Persian language and to evaluate its measurement properties.Methods: A cross-sectional and prospective validation study design was adopted. The development of the Persian MRPS (MRPSp) followed the standard guidelines with "forward"-"backward" translation, consensus agreement of expert panel, and pilot testing. The final MRPSp was evaluated for reliability and validity.Results: A total of 114 patients (mean age 52.14 years, 72 females) participated in this study. The patients' satisfaction was high as reflected in the ceiling effect (25.4%). The overall Cronbach's α was 0.91. Corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.22 to 0.88. Principal component analysis suggested a 7-item "internal" factor (alpha = 0.95) and a 3-item "external" factor (alpha = 0.74). The correlations of factors with two global measures of satisfaction were significant ranging from 0.247 to 0.789. Individual items of MRPSp had significant positive correlations with two global measures (r = 0.233-0.736). The standard error of measurement was between 0.97 and 2.14. The smallest detectable change was between 2.7 and 5.93.Conclusion: The Persian version of the MRPS is a two-factor reliable and valid instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care.

Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the brief illness questionnaire in Iranian with non-specific chronic neck pain

INTRODUCTION

The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) is an instrument for assessing the illness perception. Illness perception varies between individuals based on their health status. There is no study that assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of BIPQ in neck pain patients. The goal of this study was to evaluate the reliability, construct validity, and exploratory factor analysis of the Persian BIPQ in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study in which 123 individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain participated. 60 participants examined after 7 days for testing reliability. Reliability was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change. For assessing construct validity and item-total correlation, correlation tests were used. Also, exploratory factor analysis was done to assess the factor structure of the BIPQ.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis' results showed that there were 2 factors with Eigenvalues >1. Factor 1 included "identity", "consequence", "timeline", and "emotional response". Factor 2 consisted of "coherence" and "treatment control". The intra-class correlation coefficient and the cronbach's alpha for the total score was 0.8 and 0.86 respectively. Results of correlation tests showed an acceptable construct validity except with SF-12 mental component. Item-total correlation tests demonstrated that the correlations were above 0.3 for all subscales except for "treatment control" and "coherence".

CONCLUSION

BIPQ has an acceptable properties to assess illness perception in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain. The results of exploratory factor analysis and item-total correlation confirmed that 2-subscale version is more acceptable.

The Persian Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire: Validation in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

BACKGROUND

Illness perceptions may influence coping behaviors as well as treatment and recovery among patients with chronic pain including low back pain (LBP). These perceptions may vary across different conditions. The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) is used as an instrument to assess the patients' perception of illness. Although the BIPQ has been previously translated into Persian, its psychometric properties have not been evaluated among patients with chronic nonspecific LBP. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Persian BIPQ in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP.

METHODS

116 patients with chronic nonspecific LBP with a mean (standard deviation) age of 36.4 years (10.7) participated in this cross-sectional study. Fifty patients were reexamined after 10 to 12 days for test-retest reliability. Internal consistency reliability, construct validity, concurrent criterion validity, and structural validity were evaluated. The concurrent validity was examined by using the Short Form-36 Health Survey.

RESULTS

There were no floor and ceiling effects. Cronbach's alpha for the total score was 0.90. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability was 0.90. The standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change was found to be 3.26 and 9.04, respectively. The convergent correlations confirmed the construct validity. The concurrent criterion validity was demonstrated by significant negative correlations with the SF-36. The Exploratory Factor Analysis produced the 2 factors (emotional illness representations and cognitive illness representations) with an eigenvalue >1.0 that jointly accounted for 58.86% of the total variance.

CONCLUSION

The Persian BIPQ is a reliable and 2-factor instrument and can be used for assessing illness perception in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP.

A review and evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures for spasticity in persons with spinal cord damage: Recommendations from the Ability Network - an international initiative

Context: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable for capturing the impact of spasticity on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in persons with spinal cord damage (SCD) and evaluating the efficacy of interventions. Objective: To provide practical guidance for measuring HRQoL in persons with spasticity following SCD. Methods: Literature reviews identified measures of HRQoL and caregiver burden, utilized in studies addressing spasticity in SCD. Identified measures were evaluated for clinical relevance and practicality for use in clinical practice and research. The PRISM, SCI-SET, EQ-5D and SF-36 instruments were mapped to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The PRISM and SCI-SET were evaluated using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Results: Two spasticity-specific, five generic, and four preference-based measures were identified. ICF mapping and the COSMIN checklist supported the use of the PRISM and SCI-SET in SCD. The SF-36 is considered the most useful generic measure; disability-adapted versions may be more acceptable but further studies on psychometric properties are required. The SF-36 can be converted to a preference-based measure (SF-6D), or alternatively the EQ-5D can be used. While no measures specific to caregivers of people with SCD were identified, the Caregiver Burden Scale and the Zarit Burden Interview are considered suitable. Conclusion: Recommended measures include the PRISM and SCI-SET (condition-specific), SF-36 (generic), and Caregiver Burden Scale and Zarit Burden Interview (caregiver burden). Consideration should be given to using condition-specific and generic measures in combination; the PRISM or SCI-SET combined with SF-36 is recommended.

Single item presenteeism question: Reliability and validity of Persian version in participants with low back pain

BACKGROUND

Single item presenteeism question (SIPQ) is a rating scale to assess the impact of low back pain (LBP) on presenteeism.

OBJECTIVE

To translate the SIPQ into Persian language (SIPQ-P) and evaluate the reliability and validity of the SIPQ-P in participants with LBP.

METHODS

In the first stage, the English SIPQ was translated into Persian language in a cross-sectional design following standard forward-backward approach with expert panel review and pilot testing. In the second stage with a prospective cohort design, 100 participants with LBP (84 male and 16 female, mean age±SD: 33.9±11.2 years) participated. Participants were asked to answer the SIPQ-P and rate their LBP from 0 to 10 according to the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) for concurrent criterion validity. To evaluate the convergent construct validity of SIPQ, participants completed Persian Functional Rating Index (PFRI). For the divergent validity, the Spearman's correlation test was used to evaluate the association between the SIPQ-P and education. For the test-retest reliability, 50 participants answered the SIPQ-P after 7 days. Fifty healthy participants (mean age±SD: 24.24±8.07 years) answered the SIPQ-P for evaluating discriminant validity.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the SIPQ-P score of participants and the healthy participants (p <  0.001). The concurrent criterion validity was demonstrated by a significant correlation between the SIPQ-P and pain NPRS (Spearman's rho = 0.46, p <  0.001). The Spearman correlation coefficient showed a significant correlation between the SIPQ-P scores and the Persian FRI (r = 0.56, p <  0.001). There was no correlation between the SIPQ-P score and the education level (r = -0.001, p = 0.99). The ICCagreement was 0.77 indicating a very good test-retest reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the Persian version of SIPQ is a reliable and valid scale to assess the effect of LBP on presenteeism in Persian speakers with LBP.