Clinical and radiological outcome of non-surgical management of thoracic and lumbar spinal fracture-dislocations - a historical analysis in the era of modern spinal surgery

Systematic Nursing Interventions Combined with Continuity of Care in Patients with a Spinal Fracture Complicated with a Spinal Cord Injury and Its Effect on Recovery and Satisfaction

Objective. The aim of this study is to examine the application value of systematic nursing interventions combined with continuity of care in cases with a spinal fracture complicated with a spinal cord injury and its effect on recovery and satisfaction. Methods. We identified ninety cases with a spinal fracture complicated with a spinal cord injury who were admitted to local hospital from May 2019 to May 2021 as research subjects and assigned them into an experimental group (systematic nursing combined with continuity of care, n = 45) and a control group (conventional nursing, n = 45) according to their admission order. The level of life of all groups between intervention was evaluated with reference to the Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74) Rating Scale. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale was used to assess the emotional status of patients before and after intervention. The complication rates, nursing outcomes, nursing satisfaction, and rehabilitation outcomes of all cases were calculated. Results. The GQOLI-74 score of the experimental group was higher than that of another group ( $P<0.05$ ). Lower HAD scores of experimental group were observed than that of another group ( $P<0.05$ ). The experimental group obtained remarkably higher nursing effective rates and higher nursing satisfaction than another group ( $P<0.05$ ). Rehabilitation outcome of the experimental group outperformed that another group ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. The use of systematic nursing intervention combined with continuity of care for cases with spinal fracture complicated with a spinal cord injury can enhance the nursing effect, effectively relieve cases’ psychological pressure, improve patients’ level of life and nursing satisfaction, and contribute to the maintenance of a good nurse-patient relationship, which merits clinical promotion.

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for the Treatment of Types B and C Thoracolumbar Injuries: A PRISMA Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Thoracic and lumbar spine injuries may require surgical management, particularly AO Spine types B and C injuries. Open reduction and fixation using pedicle screws, with or without fusion and/or decompression, is the gold standard surgical treatment for unstable injuries. Recent advances in instrumentation design have resulted in less-invasive surgeries. However, the literature is sparse about the effectiveness of these procedures for types B and C injuries. The objective is to compare the outcomes of conventional open surgery versus minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) for the treatment of AO Spine types B and C thoracolumbar injuries.

METHODS

A systematic review of published literature in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed to identify studies comparing outcomes achieved with open versus minimally invasive surgery in AO Spine types B and C thoracolumbar injury patients. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used.

RESULTS

Five retrospective case-control studies and 3 prospective studies met selection criteria. In general, most of the studies demonstrated that minimally invasive spine surgery is feasible for types B and C injuries, and associated with potential advantages like reduced blood loss, postoperative pain, and muscle injury, and shorter hospital stays. However, no differences were detected in major outcomes, like neurological status or disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Published literature currently suggests that minimally invasive spine surgery is a valid alternative for treating types B and C thoracolumbar injuries. However, further comparative prospective randomized clinical trials are necessary to establish the superiority of one approach over the other.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Management of thoracic spine dislocation by total vertebrectomy and spine shortening: case report

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of thoracic spine fracture-dislocations is now well established with the recent progress in spine surgery. Although most affected individuals have a degree of spinal cord injury (SCI), early surgical reduction, and stabilization of the unstable deformity allow an immediate program of rehabilitation. Vertebrectomy is considered as the last surgical technique reserved for the most persistent spinal deformities that cannot be brought to an acceptable correction with less invasive methods.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of a 19-year-old male with a sub-acute thoracic spine fracture-dislocation at the level of T7-T8 who underwent a posterior T8 vertebrectomy with reduction and instrumentation from T4 down to T1. The individual had excellent results during follow-ups regarding alignment, fusion, and rehab program.

DISCUSSION

In this case, we present the good outcome of vertebrectomy and spine shortening in an individual with thoracic spine fracture-dislocation, and the advantages of posterior approach.

Clinical application and cases examples of a new treatment algorithm for treating thoracic and lumbar spine trauma

Study design

Review of illustrative cases of a new algorithm to help in the treatment decision of thoracolumbar spine trauma.

Objectives

To illustrate the use of the new algorithm for managing thoracic and lumbar spine trauma.

Settings

Recently, a new algorithm for helping in the decision of the best treatment modality for thoracolumbar spine trauma (TLST) was published. The algorithm considers injury morphology, neurological status, clinical status (pain and disability), and also multimodal radiological evaluation (MMRE) in the decision for non-operative versus operative treatment for TLST. Injuries were classified in three groups: (1) stable injuries, (2) potentially unstable injuries/ delayed instability, or (3) clearly unstable injuries.

Methods

Cases examples of the algorithm application were presented and discussed.

Results

Stable injuries (minor fractures without instability) are non-surgically treated; potentially unstable injuries or associated with delayed instability may be initially managed non-surgically and operative treatment is an option, especially in the setting of important pain, deformity or a new neurological deficit. Clearly unstable injuries are treated surgically as soon as possible to avoid neurological worsening, severe pain, and/ or progressive spinal deformity.

Conclusions

Clinical examples of TLST were presented, discussed and classified as stable, potentially unstable and clearly unstable injuries. Further studies addressing the reliability and safety of this algorithm are necessary.