Current state of balance assessment during transferring, sitting, standing and walking activities for the spinal cord injured population: A systematic review

A scoping review on the current state of sex- and gender-based analysis (SGBA) in standing balance research

BACKGROUND

Understanding sex and gender differences in standing balance is challenged by varied use of terminology and definitions. In addition, the use of sex- and gender-based analyses (SGBA) in standing balance research is unknown. This scoping review examined the frequency and type of SGBA, and the use of sex- and gender-based terminology in standing balance research published in the year 2020.

METHODS

Eight databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles that quantitatively measured standing balance in adult humans using a biomechanical construct and were published in 2020. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and extracted data with a third reviewer resolving conflicts. In accordance with sex and gender equity in research (SAGER) guidelines, data extraction focused on participant demographics, inclusion and type of SGBA, consistency of sex and gender terminology, alignment with operational definitions (e.g., female used to describe sex), and sex and gender data collection methods. Absolute and relative values across all articles and within collaboratively created categories of participant groups were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 366 articles in the analysis, 20 % included sex and/or gender in the statistical analyses of which 50 % conducted SGBA. Consistent terminology aligned with this study's definitions of sex and gender was found in 12 % of all articles, whereas 40 % used labels consistently without assigning them to sex or gender, ∼20 % used inconsistent or unaligned terminology, and 7 % did not report sex or gender. No articles included more than two options for sex or gender, and very few included self-reporting by participants (3 % for sex, 1 % for gender) or clearly described how sex (3 %) or gender (1 %) data were collected.

CONCLUSIONS

Small changes to the collection and reporting of sex and gender, and more SGBA in standing balance research could drastically improve the inclusivity and accuracy of standing balance assessment in research and clinical settings.

Outcome measures in rodent models for spinal cord injury and their human correlates

Pre-clinical research is intended to inform clinical research, however, communication between these researchers is lacking. A better understanding of what can be learned from animal and human models and what cannot, is essential. This includes a better understanding of where underlying constructs in outcome measures in rodents and humans align and where they diverge to improve dialogue between human and animal researchers. The goal of this review is to promote an understanding of similarities and differences in outcome measures and encourage consideration of these differences when planning, interpreting, and communicating findings from animal or human experiments. Seven individuals with a range of expertise in human and animal research and outcome measures reviewed rat and human measures focused on sensorimotor and functional outcomes. They then discussed where measures corresponded and where they did not, based on the underlying construct the assessment is intended to measure. Key findings are that measures of impairment (such as strength) often used in clinical trials are not commonly used in rodents. Measures such as speed and distance of locomotion are commonly assessed in humans and, while not commonly assessed in rodents, can be collected through existing outcome measures. Additional findings are that animal and human outcome measures are often developed and evaluated differently, with more standardized processes applied to human outcome measures. A deeper understanding and communication of similarities and differences in outcome measures, and where differences are necessary due to interspecies differences, may improve translation from animals to humans and humans to animals.

Exercise therapy can effectively improve trunk performance and sitting balance in spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of exercise on trunk performance and balance in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).

METHODS

We searched the databases MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from inception to June 2020. Our search targeted studies such as randomized or non-randomized controlled trials and randomized crossover trials that evaluated the effects of exercise on trunk performance and balance in patients with SCI.

RESULTS

Seventeen eligible studies with 432 patients with SCI were included in the meta-analysis. The exercise significantly improved several measures: Berg Balance Scale (mean differences [MD] = 4.58; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.35, 8.8; p = 0.03), Modified Functional Reach Test (MD = 5.29; 95% CI, 4.16, 6.42; p < 0.01), T-shirt test (MD = 5.62; 95% CI, - 3.82, - 7.42; p < 0.01), Timed Up and Go (MD = - 1.70; 95% CI, - 0.23, - 3.16; p = 0.02). Improvements were also noted in total static sitting balance (standardized mean differences [SMD] = 1.21; 95% CI, 0.79, 1.63; p < 0.01), and total dynamic sitting balance (SMD = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.30, 1.73; p < 0.01). In the subgroup analysis, exercise with sensory input enhancement significantly improved total static (SMD = 1.37; 95% CI, 0.64, 2.11; p < 0.01) and total dynamic sitting balance (SMD = 1.78; 95% CI, 0.28, 3.29; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise may improve sitting balance in patients with SCI. Moreover, enhancement of sensory input had an add-on effect in improving sitting balance.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42020185904).

Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the Mini- and Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Tests in People with Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC) are key metrics that vary across conditions and should be determined for specific populations. However, these metrics have not yet been established for the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) and Brief-BESTest in people with subacute traumatic incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (iCSCI). In this study, we aimed to determine the responsiveness and MIC of the Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest in people with subacute iCSCI.

METHODS

This study included people with iCSCI who could maintain the standing position for 30 s without assistance within 7 days of injury at the university hospital's advanced critical care center. Responsiveness was assessed by correlating Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest change scores with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). MIC values were determined using the global rating of change scale as an anchor, employing receiver operating characteristic curve methods (MICROC) and predictive modeling methods adjusted for the proportion of improved participants (MICadjusted).

RESULTS

Fifty people with iCSCI were included in the analysis. Changes in BBS scores were moderately positively correlated with changes in Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest scores. MICadjusted values were 3.7 for the Mini-BESTest and 2.2 for the Brief-BESTest. The MICROC, based on an improvement rate of 64%, was deemed less appropriate for interpreting meaningful changes due to the high proportion of improved participants.

CONCLUSIONS

MICadjusted benchmarks can help clinicians measure significant improvements in dynamic balance, design effective interventions, and evaluate rehabilitation outcomes in people with iCSCI.

Balance Interventions to Improve Upright Balance Control and Balance Confidence in People With Motor-Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury or Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assist with clinical decision making, evidence syntheses are needed to demonstrate the efficacy of available interventions and examine the intervention components and dosage parameters. This systematic review and meta-analysis described the efficacy, components and dosage of interventions targeting upright balance control, balance confidence, and/or falls in adults with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D).

DATA SOURCES

A search strategy following the population, intervention, control, outcome framework was developed. Six databases were searched: APA PsychInfo, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, Emcare Nursing, Web of Science CC, and Medline.

STUDY SELECTION

Title, abstract, and full-text screening were conducted by 2 researchers independently. Inclusion criteria included the following: (1) adults with chronic, motor-incomplete SCI/D; (2) physical intervention targeting upright postural control; and (3) clinical and/or biomechanical measures of upright balance control and/or balance confidence and/or documentation of falls.

DATA EXTRACTION

Participant characteristics, balance intervention details, adverse events, and study results were extracted. The Downs and Black Checklist was used to assess methodological quality. Meta-analyses on pre-post intervention outcomes and a meta-regression of dosage were completed. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach was used to evaluate the quality of the evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The search returned 1664 unique studies; 26 were included. Methodological quality was moderate to good. Participants were 500 individuals with SCI/D, aged 18-74 years (males: females = 2.4:1). Minor adverse events were reported in 8 studies (eg, muscle soreness and fatigue). Walking interventions and upright balance training with visual feedback had clinically meaningful and significant pooled effects on improving standing balance control. Only walking interventions had a significant pooled effect on improving balance confidence. There were no significant findings on dosage response. Few studies evaluated the effects of balance interventions on the occurrence of falls.

CONCLUSIONS

Walking interventions and upright balance training with visual feedback had greater effects on upright balance control than conventional physiotherapy; however, the quality of the evidence was very low.

Reliability of the Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest for assessing patients with incomplete spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Single institution observational study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the ceiling and floor effects of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), and Brief-BESTest, as well as to determine the intra- and inter-rater reliabilities and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest in patients with acute and subacute incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) classified as AIS D.

SETTING

Advanced critical care center of our university hospital.

METHODS

Twenty patients with incomplete cervical SCI who could stand without assistance were recruited. The floor and ceiling effects were evaluated by plotting histograms from the distribution of scores on the BBS, Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest, and calculating skewness. The Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest were evaluated and videotaped simultaneously, and intra- and inter-rater reliabilities were assessed. The MDC was also calculated.

RESULTS

The skewness of the BBS was -1.57, and the full score was 35%, indicating a ceiling effect. However, no ceiling or floor effect was observed for the Mini-BESTest and the Brief-BESTest. Intraclass correlation coefficients for intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities were 0.98 and 0.97 for the Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest, respectively. Individual item reliability was moderate or better for the Mini-BESTest and excellent or better for the Brief-BESTest. The MDC of total scores ranged 3.14-3.84 and 2.92-3.60 for the Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest are reliable assessment tools for patients with acute and subacute incomplete SCI classified as AIS D. Clarified error ranges aid in estimating the treatment effect on balance abilities.

A systematic review of validity and reliability assessment of measuring balance and walking at the level of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in people with spinal cord injury

Context: A spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with a wide range of impairments in functioning, many limitations in activity, and restrictions for patients.Objectives: The present study aimed to systematically review the psychometric properties (reliability and validity) of outcome measures used to assess walking and balance in people with spinal cord injury.Methods: Databases such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Sciences were searched for relevant articles using various terms (title and abstract). Articles including the outcome measures of spinal cord injury patients and published in English from 2010 until 2021 were selected, and the quality of the selected studies was determined by applying the COSMIN checklist. Reliability and validity values were extracted, and conclusions were drawn about the psychometric quality of each measure.Results: A total of 1253 records were retrieved, and among them 22 potentially eligible articles were identified, 15 of which were included in the present study. The COSMIN tool (Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) was used to evaluate the quality level of imported articles based on the inclusion criteria.Conclusions: One consideration for testing people with disabilities is to observe the reliability and validity of the instrument, which was addressed in this study in various fields. In our study, seven tools for assessing SCI were evaluated, and it was found that the 10-meter walk (10MWT) tool performs better and more easily than other tools. The Mini-BESTest tool was suggested as a reliable tool for assessing standing balance in SCI subjects.

The reliability and validity of the Lie‑To‑Sit‑To‑Stand‑To‑Walk transfer test in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the standard procedure for treating end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, some residual issues can persist, leading to various problems, including pain, compromised strength, impaired proprioception, postural instability, dynamic balance issues, and gait deficiencies. The Lie-to-Sit-to-Stand-to-Walk Transfer Test (LSSWT) implements a multi-faceted methodology to evaluate basic transfer abilities. The purpose of this study is to investigate the validity, reliability, and minimal clinically important difference of the LSSWT in TKA patients.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with TKA were enrolled in this study. The patients were administered the LSSWT, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score. Patients rested between the tests for an hour to prevent fatigue.

RESULTS

The mean age was 68.1 ± 2.59 years and the mean HSS Knee Score was 85.43 ± 3.47 of the patients. The relative (ICC coefficient) and absolute (SEM and SRD95) reliability values were 0.88, 1.21, and 3.33 respectively. The Spearman correlation coefficient of the LSSWT with the TUG was 0.63.

CONCLUSIONS

The LSSWT displays excellent reliability and high validity in assessing fall risk, complex dynamic balance, and mobility required for daily activities in patients post-TKA. The low MCID value (3.33) indicates its sensitivity and ability to identify minor changes in a patient's status over time or in response to rehabilitation applications. Therefore, it is recommended to use the LSSWT when evaluating fall risk, dynamic balance, and mobility for community living, discharge planning, or facility admission.

Feasibility of using a depth camera or pressure mat for visual feedback balance training with functional electrical stimulation

Individuals with incomplete spinal-cord injury/disease are at an increased risk of falling due to their impaired ability to maintain balance. Our research group has developed a closed-loop visual-feedback balance training (VFBT) system coupled with functional electrical stimulation (FES) for rehabilitation of standing balance (FES + VFBT system); however, clinical usage of this system is limited by the use of force plates, which are expensive and not easily accessible. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a more affordable and accessible sensor such as a depth camera or pressure mat in place of the force plate. Ten able-bodied participants (7 males, 3 females) performed three sets of four different standing balance exercises using the FES + VFBT system with the force plate. A depth camera and pressure mat collected centre of mass and centre of pressure data passively, respectively. The depth camera showed higher Pearson's correlation (r > 98) and lower root mean squared error (RMSE < 10 mm) than the pressure mat (r > 0.82; RMSE < 4.5 mm) when compared with the force plate overall. Stimulation based on the depth camera showed lower RMSE than that based on the pressure mat relative to the FES + VFBT system. The depth camera shows potential as a replacement sensor to the force plate for providing feedback to the FES + VFBT system.

A new balance assessment tool for quantifying balance impairment in patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury: Pilot study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to quantitatively and objectively evaluate the balance impairment in patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) using a new evaluation tool for balance and to assess its role in comprehensive balance assessment.

DESIGN

Retrospective pilot study.

SETTING

Rehabilitation hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

14 patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

OUTCOME MEASURES

We retrospectively compared and analyzed the results of 14 patients with motor incomplete SCI who underwent various balance assessments, including the FRA510S test, using correlation.

RESULTS

The agreement between the FRA510S and existing balance assessment was confirmed through Bland-Altman plots; moreover, high degree of agreement was observed in Berg Balance Scale in the eye closed state and in Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test in the eye open state.

CONCLUSIONS

It was confirmed that the FRA510S equipment provides quantitative values for balance function. Balance assessment using the FRA510S, along with neurological, electrophysiological, and clinical tests, may provide comprehensive additional information related to falls and gait rehabilitation in patients with SCI.

Clinical Static Balance Assessment: A Narrative Review of Traditional and IMU-Based Posturography in Older Adults and Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

Maintaining a stable upright posture is essential for performing activities of daily living, and impaired standing balance may impact an individual's quality of life. Therefore, accurate and sensitive methods for assessing static balance are crucial for identifying balance impairments, understanding the underlying mechanisms of the balance deficiencies, and developing targeted interventions to improve standing balance and prevent falls. This review paper first explores the methods to quantify standing balance. Then, it reviews traditional posturography and recent advancements in using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) to assess static balance in two populations: older adults and those with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). The inclusion of these two groups is supported by their large representation among individuals with balance impairments. Also, each group exhibits distinct aspects in balance assessment due to diverse underlying causes associated with aging and neurological impairment. Given the high vulnerability of both demographics to balance impairments and falls, the significance of targeted interventions to improve standing balance and mitigate fall risk becomes apparent. Overall, this review highlights the importance of static balance assessment and the potential of emerging methods and technologies to improve our understanding of postural control in different populations.

Interrater reliability of the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool for spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Psychometric study.

OBJECTIVES

The Standing and Walking Assessment Tool (SWAT) is a standardized approach to the evaluation of standing and walking capacity following traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) in Canada. The SWAT classifies individuals with a tSCI into 12 stages of standing and walking capacity that are paired with well-established outcome measures, such as the Berg Balance Scale and 10-m Walk Test. Prior research has demonstrated the validity and responsiveness of the SWAT stages; however, the reliability remains unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the interrater reliability of the SWAT stages.

SETTING

Inpatient units of two Canadian rehabilitation hospitals.

METHODS

Adults with sub-acute tSCI were recruited. SWAT stage was evaluated for each participant by two physical therapists separately. The two therapists aimed to complete the evaluations within one day of each other. To evaluate interrater reliability, the percentage agreement between the SWAT stages rated by the two physical therapists was calculated, along with a linear weighted kappa statistic with a 95% CI.

RESULTS

Forty-five individuals with sub-acute tSCI (36 males, 9 females, mean (SD) age of 54.8 (17.9) years) participated. The percentage agreement in SWAT stages between the two physical therapists was 75.6%. A kappa statistic of 0.93 with a 95% CI, 0.81-1.05 was obtained. In cases where therapists disagreed (18% of participants), therapists differed by 1-2 stages only.

CONCLUSIONS

The SWAT stages have high interrater reliability, providing further support for the use of the SWAT in rehabilitation practice in Canada.

Inspiratory Muscle Performance Is Related to Seated Balance Function in People With Spinal Cord Injury: An Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between inspiratory muscle performance (IMP) and functional sitting balance (FSB) in persons with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). We hypothesized that a moderate correlation would be found between IMP and FSB and that individuals with better balance would have better IMP.

DESIGN

The SCI-specific modification of the Function in Sitting Test (FIST-SCI) measured FSB. The IMP measures included (1) maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), (2) sustained MIP (SMIP), and (3) inspiratory duration. Upper extremity motor score (UEMS) and level of injury (LOI) were taken from International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury examinations. Spearman correlational analyses assessed relationships among these factors in the sample (N=37). Mann-Whitney U tests explored differences between 2 comparison group pairs (tetraplegia group [TG] vs paraplegia group [PG]; independent transfer group [ITG] vs assisted transfer group [ATG]). Regression analysis examined variables predictive of FSB in the TG.

SETTING

Research facility.

PARTICIPANTS

Volunteers with tetraplegia (n=21, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A=8, B=7, C=6) and paraplegia (n=16, AIS A=9, B=4, C=3) (N=37).

INTERVENTION

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

IMP, LOI, UEMS, FIST-SCI.

RESULTS

UEMS, MIP, SMIP, and LOI had moderate to high correlations with FIST-SCI scores (ρ=0.720 (P<.001), 0.480 (P=.003), 0.467 (P=.004), 0.527 (P=.001), respectively). UEMS, MIP, and FIST-SCI scores were higher in the PG and ITG than the TG and ATG, respectively (PG vs. TG P values=<.001, .008, .002, respectively, and ITG vs. ATG P values=<.001, .032, <.001, respectively). Further, SMIP and UEMS predicted FIST-SCI balance scores in the TG, accounting for 55% of total variance (P<.001) (FIST-SCI=11.88+0.03 [SMIP]+0.425 [UEMS]).

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between IMP and balance appears preserved after SCI. FSB was predicted, in part, via UEMS and SMIP in the TG. Future research should focus on the effect of SCI-based breathing interventions on FSB.

Test-retest reliability and validity of the Sitting Balance Measure-Korean in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-cultural reliability and validity.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate the Korean version of the Sitting Balance Measure (SBM-K) in Korean persons with incomplete spinal cord injury (ISCI).

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

METHODS

Twenty-nine persons with ISCI were evaluated using SBM-K, which was validated using the kappa coefficient and intraclass coefficient (ICC). The correlation between SBM-K individual items and total score was analyzed using Spearman's correlation, and the internal consistency of test items was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Additionally, the standard error measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) were measured. For the clinical validity of SBM-K, the correlation of SBM-K with the modified Sitting Balance Scale (mSBS) and the Korean-Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III (KSCIM-III) was determined via Spearman's correlation. Linear regression was performed to determine whether SBM-K could predict KSCIM-III.

RESULTS

The weighted kappa score of the SBM-K individual items and ICC of SBM-K total score were 0.76-0.83 (good-very good) and 0.98 (0.95-0.99), respectively. The correlation between the SBM-K total score and individual items was notable (r = 0.78-0.98). Cronbach's alpha, SEM, and MDC of SBM-K were 0.98, 0.59, and 1.64, respectively. The clinical validity of SBM-K correlated with mSBS (r = 0.88) and KSCIM-III (r = 0.65-0.89). SBM-K accounted for 17-72% of the variance in predicting KSCIM-III.

CONCLUSIONS

SBM-K showed sufficient test-retest reliability, validity, and marginal measurement errors. SBM-K can serve as an optimal clinical assessment tool for Korean ISCI patients and may provide clinicians with reliable sitting balance assessment in Korean clinical settings.

Multimodal Exercise Effects in Older Adults Depend on Sleep, Movement Biography, and Habitual Physical Activity: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: The promotion of healthy aging is one of the major challenges for healthcare systems in current times. The present study investigates the effects of a standardized physical activity intervention for older adults on cognitive capacity, self-reported health, fear of falls, balance, leg strength and gait under consideration of movement biography, sleep duration, and current activity behavior. Methods: This single-blinded, randomized controlled trial included 49 community-dwelling older adults (36 women; 82.9 ± 4.5 years of age (Mean [M] ± SD); intervention group = 25; control group = 24). Movement biography, sleep duration, cognitive capacity, self-reported health status, and fear of falls were assessed by means of questionnaires. Leg strength, gait, and current activity levels were captured using a pressure plate, accelerometers, and conducting the functional-reach and chair-rising-test. The multicomponent intervention took place twice a week for 45 min and lasted 16 weeks. Sub-cohorts of different sleep duration were formed to distinguish between intervention effects and benefits of healthy sleep durations. Change scores were evaluated in univariate analyses of covariances (ANCOVAs) between groups and sub-cohorts of different sleep duration in both groups. Changes in cognitive capacity, self-reported health, fear of falls, balance, leg strength, and gait were investigated using the respective baseline values, movement biography, and current activity levels as covariates. Analysis was by intention-to-treat (ITT). Results: We found sub-cohort differences in cognitive capacity change scores [F _(3,48) = 5.498, p = 0.003, ηp ² = 0.287]. Effects on fear of falls [F _(1,48) = 12.961, p = 0.001, ηp ² = 0.240] and balance change scores F _(1,48) = 4.521, p = 0.040, ηp ² = (0.099) were modified by the level of current activity. Effects on gait cadence were modified by the movement biography [F _(1,48) = 4.545; p = 0.039, ηp ² = 0.100]. Conclusions: Unlike for functional outcomes, our multicomponent intervention in combination with adequate sleep duration appears to provide combinable beneficial effects for cognitive capacity in older adults. Trainability of gait, fear of falls, and flexibility seems to be affected by movement biography and current physical activity levels. Trial registration: This study was registered at the DRKS (German Clinical Trials Register) on November 11, 2020 with the corresponding trial number: DRKS00020472.

Diagnostic tests to assess balance in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review of their validity and reliability

Background

Sophisticated biomechanical instruments can assess balance in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) with accuracy and precision; however, they are costly and time consuming to use. Clinical diagnostic tests to assess balance in patients with SCI are less costly and easier to use, but there is limited literature available regarding their reliability and validity.

Objectives

To review systematically articles reporting the validity and reliability of diagnostic tests used to assess balance function in patients with SCI.

Methods

We searched for articles in the English language from the earliest record to December 15, 2020, which reported validity or reliability of any clinical instrument or diagnostic test used to assess balance in patients with SCI. Articles assessing balance in paraplegic patients with causes other than SCI were excluded. Databases included MEDLINE, AMED, EMBASE, HMIC, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist was used to assess the studies included and PRISMA-DTA guidelines were applied.

Results

We included 16 articles that assessed the validity or reliability of 10 diagnostic tests. The Functional Reach Test (FRT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) were assessed by more than 1 study, while the remaining 7 diagnostic tests including the Function in Sitting Test, T-Shirt Test, Motor Assessment Scale item 3, Sitting Balance Score, 5 Times Sit-to-Stand Test, Tinetti scale, and Sitting Balance Measure were assessed by 1 study each. The FRT has good-to-excellent test-retest reliability, excellent inter-rater reliability, and good construct, concurrent, and convergent validity. The BBS has excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, high internal consistency, and good concurrent and construct validity. The Mini-BESTest has excellent test-retest reliability, excellent inter-rater reliability, high internal consistency, and good concurrent, convergent, and construct validity.

Conclusions

The FRT, BBS, and Mini-BESTest appear to be valid and reliable clinical instruments to assess balance function in patients with SCI.

Interjoint coordination between the ankle and hip joints during quiet standing in individuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injury

Individuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injuries (iSCI) often have impaired abilities to maintain upright balance. For able-bodied (AB) individuals, the ankle and hip joint accelerations are in antiphase to minimize the postural sway during quiet standing. Here we investigated how interjoint coordination between the ankle and hip joints was affected in individuals with iSCI, leading to their larger postural sway during quiet standing. Data from 16 individuals with iSCI, 14 age- and sex-matched AB individuals, and 13 young AB individuals were analyzed. The participants performed quiet standing during which kinematic and kinetic data were recorded. Postural sway was quantified using center-of-pressure velocity and center-of-mass acceleration. Individual ankle and hip joint kinematics were quantified, and the interjoint coordination was assessed using the cancellation index (CI), goal-equivalent variance (GEV), nongoal-equivalent variance (NGEV), and uncontrolled manifold (UCM) ratio. Individuals with iSCI displayed greater postural sway compared with AB individuals. The contribution of ankle angular acceleration toward one's sway was significantly greater for those with iSCI compared with AB groups. CI and the UCM ratios were not statistically different between the groups, while GEV and NGEV were significantly greater for the iSCI group compared with the AB groups. We demonstrated that individuals with iSCI show larger postural sway compared with the AB individuals during quiet standing, primarily due to larger ankle joint acceleration. We also demonstrated that the interjoint coordination between ankle and hip joint is not affected in individuals with iSCI, which is not successfully able to reduce the large COM acceleration.NEW & NOTEWORTHY There are limited studies investigating the biomechanics of standing balance for individuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). Through our study, we found that these individuals with iSCI demonstrated increased postural sway primarily due to increased ankle joint accelerations. In addition, the ankle-hip coordination was equivalent between able-bodied individuals and those with motor incomplete spinal cord injury, which was not able to reduce the large body acceleration.

Falls After Dysvascular Transtibial Amputation: A Secondary Analysis of Falling Characteristics and Reduced Physical Performance

INTRODUCTION

Over half of all people with lower limb amputation (LLA) experience at least one fall annually. Furthermore, the majority of LLAs result from dysvascular health complications, contributing to balance deficits. However, fall-related research specific to dysvascular LLA remains limited.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize falls among adults with dysvascular LLA, using an existing Fall-Type Classification Framework and to describe the functional characteristics of participants across the framework categories.

DESIGN

Secondary data analysis from two randomized controlled trials.

SETTING

Outpatient setting.

PARTICIPANTS

People (n = 69) 6 months to 5 years from dysvascular lower extremity amputation, who were ≥50 years of age and independently ambulatory using a prosthesis.

INTERVENTION

None.

OUTCOME

Descriptions of self-reported falls were collected on a weekly basis for 12 weeks, and analyzed using an existing Fall-Type Classification Framework. Fall frequencies, estimated count, and estimated proportions were compared across all framework categories, with 95% confidence intervals. Functional measures (Timed Up and Go, Two Minute Walk, Five Meter Walk, and average step count) were collected, and averages for each participant who experienced a fall were calculated.

RESULTS

Thirty participants (43.5%) reported 42 falls within 12 weeks. A variety of fall types were described. Incidence of falls was highest for intrinsic destabilization sources, from incorrect weight shift patterns during transfer activities.

CONCLUSION

Patients with dysvascular LLAs experience a variety of fall types. The high frequency of intrinsically sourced, incorrect weight-shift falls during transfer activities emphasizes the need to focus rehabilitation efforts on improving postural control in patients with dysvascular LLAs during activities such as reaching, turning, and transferring.

Postural control strategy after incomplete spinal cord injury: effect of sensory inputs on trunk-leg movement coordination

BACKGROUND

Postural control is affected after incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) due to sensory and motor impairments. Any alteration in the availability of sensory information can challenge postural stability in this population and may lead to a variety of adaptive movement coordination patterns. Hence, identifying the underlying impairments and changes to movement coordination patterns is necessary for effective rehabilitation post-iSCI. This study aims to compare the postural control strategy between iSCI and able-bodied populations by quantifying the trunk-leg movement coordination under conditions that affects sensory information.

METHODS

13 individuals with iSCI and 14 aged-matched able-bodied individuals performed quiet standing on hard and foam surfaces with eyes open and closed. We used mean Magnitude-Squared Coherence between trunk-leg accelerations measured by accelerometers placed over the sacrum and tibia.

RESULTS

We observed a similar ankle strategy at lower frequencies (f ≤ 1.0 Hz) between populations. However, we observed a decreased ability post-iSCI in adapting inter-segment coordination changing from ankle strategy to ankle-hip strategy at higher frequencies (f > 1.0 Hz). Moreover, utilizing the ankle-hip strategy at higher frequencies was challenged when somatosensory input was distorted, whereas depriving visual information did not affect balance strategy.

CONCLUSION

Trunk-leg movement coordination assessment showed sensitivity, discriminatory ability, and excellent test-retest reliability to identify changes in balance control strategy post-iSCI and due to altered sensory inputs. Trunk-leg movement coordination assessment using wearable sensors can be used for objective outcome evaluation of rehabilitative interventions on postural control post-iSCI.

Using wearable sensors to characterize gait after spinal cord injury: evaluation of test-retest reliability and construct validity

STUDY DESIGN

Quantitative cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the test-retest reliability and the construct validity of inertial measurement units (IMU) to characterize spatiotemporal gait parameters in individuals with SCI.

SETTING

Two SCI rehabilitation centers in Canada.

METHODS

Eighteen individuals with SCI participated in two evaluation sessions spaced 2 weeks apart. Fifteen able-bodied individuals were also recruited. Participants walked 20 m overground under five conditions that challenged balance to varying degrees. Five IMU were attached to the lower-extremities and the sacrum to collect the mean and the coefficient of variation of five gait parameters (gait cycle time, double-support percentage, cadence, stride length, stride velocity). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to evaluate the test-retest reliability. Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare the five walking conditions to evaluate known-group validity while Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to characterize the level of association between gait parameters and the Mini BESTest (MBT).

RESULTS

Cadence was reliable across all walking conditions. Reliability was higher for the mean (ICC = 0.55-0.98) of the parameters compared to their coefficient of variation (ICC = 0.16-0.97). Cadence collected with IMU had construct validity as their values differed across walking conditions and groups of participants. The coefficient of variation was generally better than the mean to show differences across the five walking conditions. The MBT was moderately to strongly associated with mean cadence (ρ ≥ 0.498) and its coefficient of variation (ρ ≤ -0.49) during most walking conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

IMU provide reliable and valid measurements of gait parameters in ambulatory individuals with SCI.

Development and validation of the Standing Balance Assessment for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury (SBASCI) - A new outcome measure

BACKGROUND

Injury to the spinal cord results in standing balance impairment following variable sensorimotor loss. Standing balance training is a realistic goal for the majority of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) for which therapists need valid measures to assess standing ability in people with SCI that are relevant to functionality.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to develop an all inclusive Standing Balance Assessment for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury (SBASCI) measure and to establish its initial psychometric properties.

METHODS

The study was carried out in three phases: Item development, scale development and scale evaluation. Literature review, focus group discussions and evaluation by experts resulted in the development of a 22-item SBASCI scale. The scale was administered on 120 participants with SCI. Exploratory factor analysis and item analysis were used to determine construct validity and internal consistency of the scale.

RESULTS

Content validity was established qualitatively and quantitatively. The scale shows high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.96). The results of the exploratory factor analysis suggested a four factor structure retaining all the 22 items.

CONCLUSION

SBASCI is a valid and reliable scale to measure the standing balance of individuals with SCI. Further studies are required to establish other psychometric properties.

Psychometric Testing and Clinical Utility of a Modified Version of the Function in Sitting Test for Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVES

Seated balance (SB) is substantially compromised and greatly impacts the function of individuals living with a spinal cord injury (SCI). A clinically applicable criterion standard measure for SB does not exist for this population. Initial validation and reliability analysis of the Function in Sitting Test (FIST) in SCI has been published, but the authors of this study report that modifications to the tool may be necessary. This study aimed to explore the psychometrics and clinical utility of a modified version of the FIST to better measure SCI-specific functional tasks in sitting.

DESIGN

The FIST was modified (FIST-SCI) by an expert panel and used by 2 graders to evaluate the SB of individuals with chronic SCI (cSCI) on 2 separate days. The Motor Assessment Scale item 3 (MAS-SCI) was included as a comparison measure.

SETTING

Research facility.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals with cSCI longer than 1 year (N=38) participated in the study. Injury levels of individuals participating in this study spanned C1 to T10 (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A, 17 subjects; B, 12 subjects; and C, 9 subjects). Thirteen individuals required assistance to transfer.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Validity, reliability, internal consistency, sensitivity, specificity, and responsiveness.

RESULTS

Validity testing found a moderate relationship between the MAS-SCI and the FIST-SCI (ρ, .522; P<.05). FIST-SCI scores distinguished individuals requiring assistance to transfer from those who were independent (t=4.51; P<.05). Inter- and intra-rater reliability were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient (2,k)=.985 and .983, respectively) and internal consistency was excellent (α=.94). A FIST-SCI cutoff score of 45 or greater was 92% sensitive and specific in characterizing transfer ability. Standard error of the measure (1.3) and minimal detectable change (3.5) were similar to previous work.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial validity of the FIST-SCI is reported, but further assessment is required. Reliability is excellent in the cSCI population. FIST-SCI scores provide clinical insight into the seated functional ability of individuals with cSCI.

Quantifying balance control after spinal cord injury: Reliability and validity of the mini-BESTest

Context/Objective: Incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) causes deficits in balance control. The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (mini-BESTest) is a comprehensive measure; however, further testing of its psychometric properties among the iSCI population is needed. We evaluated the mini-BESTest's test-retest reliability, and concurrent and convergent validity among individuals living with iSCI for more than one year. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Twenty-one individuals with chronic motor iSCI (14 females, mean age 56.8 ± 14.0 years). Interventions: None. Outcome Measures: Participants completed the mini-BESTest at two sessions spaced two weeks apart. At the second session, participants performed tests of lower extremity muscle strength and quiet standing on a force platform with eyes opened (EO) and eyes closed (EC). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) evaluated test-retest reliability. To evaluate concurrent and convergent validity, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) quantified relationships between mini-BESTest scores and measures of center of pressure (COP) velocity during EO and EC standing, and lower extremity muscle strength, respectively. Results: Test-retest reliability of the mini-BESTest total score and sub-scale scores were high (ICC = 0.94-0.98). Mini-BESTest scores were inversely correlated with COP velocity when standing with EO (r = 0.54-0.71, P < 0.05), but not with EC. Lower extremity strength correlated strongly with mini-BESTest total scores (r = 0.73, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The mini-BESTest has high test-retest reliability, and concurrent and convergent validity in individuals with chronic iSCI.

Falls after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence proportion and contributing factors

INTRODUCTION

Falls are detrimental to the well-being of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). To establish effective fall prevention initiatives, a comprehensive understanding of falls after SCI is needed.

OBJECTIVES

To report the incidence proportion of falls and summarize the factors contributing to falls in individuals with SCI.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Eight databases were searched. Abstracts/full articles were screened by two researchers independently. Data concerning study design, participant characteristics, and the incidence proportion, factors, and consequences of falls were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using a domain-based approach that considered sampling and measurement bias. The incidence proportions of falls were pooled for ambulators and wheelchair users separately using random-effects meta-analyses, and compared descriptively for inpatients and community-dwelling individuals. Fall-related factors were organized according to the Biological, Behavioral, Social & Economic and Environmental Model of fall risk.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 1706 articles; 24 unique studies were included. The risk of sampling bias was high. All but one study focused on community-dwelling individuals; 78% (95% confidence interval 73-83%, I² = 0%) of ambulators and 69% (95% confidence interval 60-76%, I² = 59%) of wheelchair users fell ≥1 over 12 months. In contrast, only 13% of inpatients fell. Most fall-related factors were categorized as biological (e.g., muscle weakness), behavioral (e.g., inattentiveness) or environmental (e.g., uneven surfaces).

CONCLUSIONS

Falls are frequent among community-dwelling individuals with SCI. A variety of biological, behavioral, and environmental factors contribute to falls, some of which are modifiable and may be addressed through SCI-specific fall prevention initiatives.

Intensive Balance Training for Adults With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injuries: Protocol for an Assessor-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Impaired reactive balance control can lead to increased falls in people with neurological impairments. Perturbation-based balance training (PBT), which involves repetitive exposure to destabilizing external perturbations, improves the ability to take reactive steps in older adults and individuals who have had a stroke.

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to investigate whether PBT or conventional intensive balance training (CIBT) results in greater improvements in reactive stepping ability in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI).

DESIGN

The design consists of an assessor-blind randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 2 balance training programs (PBT and CIBT) matched for training duration (thrice weekly for 8 weeks).

SETTING

A tertiary spinal cord injury rehabilitation center is used as the setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants include 24 adults with iSCI classified as a C or D on the American Spinal Association Impairment Scale, who are able to stand independently and exhibit moderate trunk control.

INTERVENTION

Both PBT and CIBT involve 24 sessions, each 1 hour long, of individualized static and dynamic balance tasks. However, PBT includes external, unexpected balance perturbations provided manually by the trainer at a frequency of roughly 1 per training minute.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome is the ability to recover balance using a single step during the Lean-and-Release test, a novel method of assessing reactive balance. Secondary outcomes include a number of clinical balance and gait assessments, and the number of falls experienced in a 6-month follow-up period. Semi-structured interviews are conducted 3 months after training completion to gain insight into the participants' perceptions of the impact of the interventions.

LIMITATIONS

A control group receiving "standard care" for balance training is not included.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial will provide physical therapists with insight into the efficacy of 2 forms of balance training for individuals with iSCI.