Parental Cancer-related Information Seeking, Health Communication and Satisfaction with Medical Providers of Childhood Cancer Survivors: Differences by Race/Ethnicity and Language Preference

A systematic scoping review of patient and caregiver self-report measures of satisfaction with clinicians' communication

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic scoping review of self-report tools used to measure patient and/or caregiver satisfaction with clinician communication. Aims included identifying: 1) instruments that have been used to measure communication satisfaction, and 2) content of the communication items on measures.

METHODS

Two databases (PubMed and CINAHL) were searched for relevant studies. Eligibility included patient or caregiver self-report tools assessing satisfaction with clinicians' communication in a biomedical healthcare setting; and the stated purpose for using the measurement involved evaluating communication satisfaction and measures included more than one question about this. All data were charted in a form created by the authors.

RESULTS

Our search yielded a total of 4531 results screened as title and abstracts; 228 studies were screened in full text and 85 studies were included in the review. We found 53 different tools used to measure communication satisfaction among those 85 studies, including 29 previously used measures (e.g., FS-ICU-24, CAHPS), and 24 original measures developed by authors. Content of communication satisfaction items included satisfaction with content-specific communication, interpersonal communication skills of clinicians, communicating to set the right environment, and global communication satisfaction items.

CONCLUSION

There was high variability in the number of items and types of content on measures. Communication satisfaction should be better conceptualized to improve measurement, and more robust measures should be created to capture complex factors of communication satisfaction.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Creating a rigorous evaluation of satisfaction with clinician communication may help strengthen communication research and the assessment of communication interventions.

Preferences for survivorship education and delivery among Latino and non-Latino childhood cancer survivors and caregivers

PURPOSE

To assess survivor and parent perceptions of the long-term survivor visit and preferences regarding accessing health information, survivorship education, and support networks in rural and metropolitan regions of Texas.

METHODS

Leveraging the multi-institutional Survivorship and Access to Care for Latinos to Understand Disparities (SALUD) cohort, we administered a 26-item bilingual survey to adult survivors of childhood cancer and parents of younger survivors. Characteristics and responses were compared between survivors vs. parents and Latinos vs. non-Latinos using a t test or Fisher exact test. Odds ratios for the outcomes of interest were calculated with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

We received 138 responses from 59 survivors and 79 parents of survivors treated at three Texas pediatric cancer hospitals/clinics. Parents were more likely than survivors to seek survivorship information from other survivors or parents of survivors (OR=6.32, 95% CI 1.78, 22.47), and non-Latinos preferred social media as an educational resource (OR=3.70, CI 1.58, 8.68). Survivors, particularly Latino survivors, preferred short videos as a mode of survivorship education delivery. Highest topic priorities for survivorship education were 'risk for second cancers' and 'diet, nutrition, and exercise.' All parents and survivors who rated survivor physical and mental health as 'fair' or 'poor' identified as Latino.

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight differences in perceived health status between Latino and non-Latino survivors and support the development of adapted survivorship education content to address the specific needs of Latino survivors. Implications for Cancer Survivors Results of this study suggest a need for survivorship educational materials in multiple formats and that are tailored to the style, content, language preferences, and health literacy status of the target population.

Disparities in pediatric cancer survivorship care: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) experience many long-term health problems that can be mitigated with recommended survivorship care. However, many CCS do not have access to survivorship care nor receive recommended survivorship care. We reviewed the empirical evidence of disparities in survivorship care for CCS.

METHODS

This systematic review searched PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for studies on survivorship care for CCS (PROSPERO: CRD42021227965) and abstracted the reported presence or absence of disparities in care. We screened 7945 citations, and of those, we reviewed 2760 publications at full text.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies reported in 61 publications met inclusion criteria. Potential disparities by cancer treatment (N = 14), diagnosis (N = 13), sex (N = 13), and current age (N = 13) were frequently studied. There was high quality of evidence (QOE) of survivorship care disparities associated with non-White race, Hispanic ethnicity, and being uninsured. Moderate QOE demonstrated disparities among CCS who were unemployed and older. Lower QOE was found for disparities based on cancer diagnosis, cancer treatment, age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, sex, insurance type, income, educational attainment, and geographic area.

CONCLUSIONS

We found strong empirical evidence of disparities in survivorship care for CCS associated with race, ethnicity, and insurance status. Multiple other disparate groups, such as those by employment, income, insurance type, education, cancer diagnosis, age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, cancer treatment, geographic area, sex, and self-identified gender warrant further investigation. Prospective, multilevel research is needed to examine the role of other patient characteristics as potential disparities hindering adequate survivorship care in CCS.

Barriers and facilitators of Hispanic/Latino parents caregiving for a childhood cancer survivor: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

This qualitative study aimed to explore Hispanic parents of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) perceptions of facilitators and barriers to their caregiving experience.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured phone interviews with 15 Hispanic/Latino parents (English and Spanish). Parents were recruited using a purposive sampling method in a safety-net hospital in Los Angeles County from July-September 2020. Interviews were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed in the language they were conducted. Two coders independently coded interviews following reflexive thematic analysis and elements of grounded theory methodology.

RESULTS

Most caregivers were mothers caring for leukemia CCS who had finished treatment more than 2 years prior. Caregivers expressed gratitude to social workers for introducing and aiding with the application process for safety-net programs that enabled caregivers to focus on their child's care and well-being. Caregivers revealed the importance of supportive communication with the medical team, particularly after their child's treatment was considered complete. All caregivers found caring for a child with cancer overwhelming, and many described deteriorations in their health and well-being. Financial instability, transportation difficulties, and work disruptions were identified as barriers, resulting in caregiver distress. Caregivers also shared the challenges they experienced navigating the healthcare system, seeking care despite lack of legal residency, and staying afloat despite limited employment opportunities.

CONCLUSION

Improving navigation to resources and improving relationships with the medical team may reduce the perceived caregiving burden among Hispanic/Latino caregivers throughout their family's cancer journey.

The Impact of Hispanic Ethnicity and Language on Communication Among Young Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors, Parents, and Medical Providers and Cancer-Related Follow-Up Care

PURPOSE

The triad of communication between young adult childhood cancer survivors (YACCSs), their parents, and their medical providers is an important process in managing health care engagement. This study sought to identify communication patterns among this triad, factors associated with communication, and engagement of survivorship care.

METHODS

We analyzed data from Project Forward, a population-based study that surveyed YACCSs and their parents. YACCSs were on average age 20 years, 7 years from diagnosis, 50% female, and 57% identified as Hispanic/Latino (N = 160 dyads). Latent class analysis of nine communication indicators from parent and YACCS surveys identified distinct classes of communication between YACCSs, parents, and medical providers. Associations between resulting classes and YACCS/parent characteristics were examined using multinomial logistic regression. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between communication classes and cancer-related follow-up care.

RESULTS

Latent class analysis identified three classes of triad communication: (1) high health care-focused communication (37.5%), (2) high comprehensive communication (15.6%), and (3) overall low communication (46.9%). After adjusting for covariates, greater time since diagnosis was associated with reduced odds of membership in class 2 while dyads with Spanish-speaking Hispanic parents were more likely to be in class 2 (v class 3). Additionally, YACCSs who were in either of the high communication groups were more likely to have received recent follow-up care.

CONCLUSION

Examining language preference provides an important contextual understanding as we found Spanish-speaking Hispanic parents engaged in high communication, which was associated with cancer-related follow-up care. Yet, our results also support the need to enhance communication between this triad to improve outcomes.