ANALYSIS OF URINARY PORPHYRINS BY HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY-ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION MASS SPECTROMETRY

Comparison of 2-Aminobenzamide, Procainamide and RapiFluor-MS as Derivatizing Agents for High-Throughput HILIC-UPLC-FLR-MS N-glycan Analysis

Rising awareness of the universal importance of protein N-glycosylation governs the development of further advances in N-glycan analysis. Nowadays it is well known that correct glycosylation is essential for proper protein function, which emanates from its important role in many physiological processes. Furthermore, glycosylation is involved in pathophysiology of multiple common complex diseases. In the vast majority of cases, N-glycosylation profiles are analyzed from enzymatically released glycans, which can be further derivatized in order to enhance the sensitivity of the analysis. Techniques wherein derivatized N-glycans are profiled using hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) with fluorescence (FLR) and mass spectrometry (MS) detection are now routinely performed in a high-throughput manner. Therefore, we aimed to examine the performance of frequently used labeling compounds -2-aminiobenzamide (2-AB) and procainamide (ProA), and the recently introduced RapiFluor-MS (RF-MS) fluorescent tag. In all experiments N-glycans were released by PNGase F, fluorescently derivatized, purified by HILIC solid phase extraction and profiled using HILIC-UPLC-FLR-MS. We assessed sensitivity, linear range, limit of quantification (LOQ), repeatability and labeling efficiency for all three labels. For this purpose, we employed in-house prepared IgG and a commercially available IgG as a model glycoprotein. All samples were analyzed in triplicates using different amounts of starting material. We also tested the performance of all three labels in a high-throughput setting on 68 different IgG samples, all in duplicates and 22 identical IgG standards. In general, ProA labeled glycans had the highest FLR sensitivity (15-fold and 4-fold higher signal intensities compared to 2-AB and RF-MS respectively) and RF-MS had the highest MS sensitivity (68-fold and 2-fold higher signal intensities compared to 2-AB and ProA, respectively). ProA and RF-MS showed comparable limits of quantification with both FLR and MS detection, whilst 2-AB exhibited the lowest sensitivity. All labeling procedures showed good and comparable repeatability. Furthermore, the results indicated that labeling efficiency was very similar for all three labels. In conclusion, all three labels are a good choice for N-glycan derivatization in high-throughput HILIC-UPLC-FLR-MS N-glycan analysis, although ProA and RF-MS are a better option when higher sensitivity is needed.

A Simple Method for Quantification of Five Urinary Porphyrins, Porphobilinogen and 5-Aminolevulinic Acid, Using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Analysis of porphyrins and 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA), porphobilinogen (PBG) in physiological liquids is required for diagnosis and follow-up of porphyrias. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods with higher specificity and sensitivity have been developed. The major disadvantage of those methods is that they require longer extraction times due to their matrix effects. The present study suggests a simple, fast, sensitive, and specific assay for determination of Coproporphyrin, 5-carboxylporphyrin, 6-carboxylporphyrin, 7-carboxylporphyrin, Uroporphyrin I and ALA, PBG in urine sample by direct injection without sample pre-treatment using LC-MS. For the purposes of the present study LC-MS device was set to multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) and positive ion mode. Porphyrins and ALA, porphobilinogen were characterized by their MS/MS product ion, spectra. ALA, PBG and 5 porphyrins were detected simultaneously. Limit of detection for Coproporphyrin, 5-carboxylporphyrin, 6-carboxylporphyrin, 7-carboxylporphyrin, Uroporphyrin I were 2 nmol/L, where it was 5 μmol/L for ALA and 2 μmol/L for porphobilinogen. The present study suggests that the present method is very effective compared to many other available methods for it does not require pre-treatment, provides simultaneous results of ALA, PBG and 5 porphyrins quantitatively in a shorter span of time, and has suitable sensitivity and selectivity. LC-MS technique was used clinically for the determination of urine porphyrin levels.

Determination of porphyrins in oral bacteria by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

Biofilms in the oral cavity can be visualized by fluorescence and a common assumption is that the endogenously produced porphyrins in certain bacteria give rise to this fluorescence. Porphyrin content in oral bacteria has been sparingly investigated, and non-selective detection techniques such as utilizing the Soret fluorescence band of porphyrins are often used. In the present study, a quantitative and selective method for the determination of porphyrins in oral bacteria has been developed and validated using high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Lysis of bacteria using Tris-EDTA buffer together with ultrasonication showed high microbial killing efficiency ≥99.98 %, and sample clean-up using C₁₈-solid phase extraction resulted in low matrix effects ≤14 % for all analytes. Using this method, the porphyrin content was determined in the two oral pathogens Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis, as well as for baker’s yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Uroporphyrin, 7-carboxylporphyrin, 6-carboxylporphyrin, coproporphyrin, and protoporphyrin IX were identified in the investigated microorganisms, and it was shown that the porphyrin profile differs between the two bacteria, as well as for S. cerevisiae. To our knowledge, this is the first time the porphyrin profile has been determined for the bacterium A. actinomycetemcomitans.

Graphical Abstract