The Influence of Engagement and Satisfaction on Smoking Cessation Interventions: A Qualitative Study

Barriers to smoking interventions in community healthcare settings: a scoping review

Smoking is one of the major causes of preventable death and is considered the greatest threat to global public health. While the prevalence of smoking has decreased, population growth has led to an increase in the absolute number of smokers. There are many proven smoking cessation interventions available to support smokers in their quit attempts. Most people who smoke, however, underutilize the treatments available to them. This scoping review aimed to identify the current barriers experienced by all stakeholders (smokers, service providers and policymakers) to existing evidence-based smoking cessation interventions in community healthcare settings. Five electronic databases (CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched for relevant literature. A total of 40 eligible articles from different countries published between 2015 and 2022 were included in the review and content analysis carried out to identify the key barriers to smoking cessation interventions. Seven key themes were found to be common to all stakeholders: (i) literacy, (ii) competing demands and priorities, (iii) time, (iv) access to product, (v) access to service, (vi) workforce and (vii) motivation/readiness. These themes were mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model. This study presents the effect the barriers within these themes have on current smoking cessation services and highlights priorities for future interventions.

A qualitative study of smokers' assessments of four smoking cessation interventions delivered in a hospital emergency department

BACKGROUND

A recent clinical trial of 1056 adults who smoke tested the efficacy of four components of a treatment intervention initiated in a hospital emergency department (ED) and found two of them to be clinically effective. This paper explores study participants' attitudes towards the four components, whether they identified important interactions, and suggestions for further tailoring.

METHODS

Telephone interviews were conducted with participants at the end of the three-month study period. Each participant had received at least one intervention component: nicotine replacement therapy, referral to a smokers' telephone quitline, a brief negotiation interview, or the smartphone-enabled SmokefreeTXT program. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using an iterative approach, grounded in the data, using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Between March 2017 and September 2018, 63 interviews were conducted with participants who received at least one intervention component. The sample was diverse with respect to race, ethnicity, gender, and sociodemographic status. Intervention components were generally well-received by participants. Four themes were identified: Intervention Context, Intervention Content, Communications, and Recommendations. Provision of smoking cessation interventions to ED patients led to reduced self-reported smoking for most. Nicotine replacement therapy diminished cravings, while behavioral interventions provided social support that helped motivate and sustain behavior change.

CONCLUSIONS

Intervention components were feasible and acceptable. The data suggest that pharmacological and behavioral interventions be offered simultaneously, that communication skills training be provided to those who deliver the interventions, and that interventions should respect participants' autonomy and preferences concerning intervention timing, frequency, and termination.

Conceptualizing patient-centered care for substance use disorder treatment: findings from a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Despite ongoing efforts aimed to improve treatment engagement for people with substance-related disorders, evidence shows modest rates of utilization as well as client-perceived barriers to care. Patient-centered care (PCC) is one widely recognized approach that has been recommended as an evidence-based practice to improve the quality of substance use disorder treatment. PCC includes four core principles: a holistic and individualized focus to care, shared decision-making and enhanced therapeutic alliance.

AIMS

This scoping review aimed to explore which PCC principles have been described and how they have defined and measured among people with substance-related disorders.

METHODS

Following the iterative stages of the Arksey and O'Malley scoping review methodology, empirical (from Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and ISI Web of Science) and grey literature references were eligible if they focused on people accessing treatment for substance-related disorders and described PCC. Two reviewers independently screened the title/abstract and full-texts of references. Descriptive analyses and a directed content analysis were performed on extracted data.

FINDINGS

One-hundred and forty-nine references met inclusion from the 2951 de-duplicated references screened. Therapeutic alliance was the most frequent principle of PCC described by references (72%); this was consistently defined by characteristics of empathy and non-judgment. Shared decision-making was identified in 36% of references and was primarily defined by client and provider strategies of negotiation in the treatment planning process. Individualized care was described by 30% of references and included individualized assessment and treatment delivery efforts. Holistic care was identified in 23% of references; it included an integrated delivery of substance use, health and psychosocial services via comprehensive care settings or coordination. Substance use and treatment engagement outcomes were most frequently described, regardless of PCC principle.

CONCLUSIONS

This review represents a necessary first step to explore how PCC has been defined and measured for people accessing substance use disorder treatment. The directed content analysis revealed population and context-specific evidence regarding the defining characteristics of PCC-principles that can be used to further support the implementation of PCC.

Igniting activation: Using unannounced standardized patients to measure patient activation in smoking cessation

Introduction

Despite a decline, smoking rates have remained high, especially in communities with lower income, education, and limited insurance options. Evidence shows that physician-initiated counseling on smoking cessation is effective and saves lives, and that specific skills are needed to appropriately lead this type of patient-physician communication. Residency is a critical moment for future physicians and may be the optimal time to learn, practice, and refine this skillset. Unannounced Standardized Patients (USPs) have been found to be effective, incognito evaluators of resident practices.

Methods

This study introduced rigorously trained actors (USPs) into two urban, safety-net clinics to assess resident ability to engage, activate, and counsel a pre-contemplative smoker. A complementary chart review assessed appropriate documentation in the patient's electronic health record (EHR) and its relationship to counseling style and prescribing practices.

Results

Resident scores (% well done) on patient education and engagement were low (33% and 23%, respectively). Residents who coupled cessation advice with an open discussion style activated their patients more than those who solely advised cessation across all comparable measures. On EHR documentation, residents who accurately documented smoking history were more likely to directly advise their patient to quit smoking when compared to residents who did not document (t(97) = 2.828, p = .006, Cohen's D = 0.56).

Conclusions

Results highlight the need to reinforce training in patient-centered approaches including motivational interviewing, counseling, and shared decision-making. Future research should focus on the effects of smokers in pre-contemplation on physician counseling style and examine the relationship between medical training and provider communication to guide interventions.

•

Counseling, documentation, and prescribing all vary when residents meet an Unannounced Standardized Patient (USP) smoker.

•

Patients are activated to quit smoking when a provider couples cessation advice with an open discussion of pros and cons.

•

Training in motivational interviewing and shared decision-making can enhance patient-provider cessation communication.