Associations of Personality Traits and Emotional Intelligence: Comparing Individuals in Rehabilitation from Drug Misuse, Occasional Users and Non-Users

A prospective study of the impact of an emotional intelligence program on opioid relapse and its determinants in upper Egypt

BACKGROUND

Opioid use is a growing concern worldwide with high relapse rates and psychiatric comorbidities. Emotional intelligence (EI) has been associated with positive health outcomes, yet limited research exists on EI-based interventions for opioid use disorders. The study aimed to assess EI levels among individuals with opioid addiction and implement an EI program to reduce addiction severity and relapse rates, as well as examine potential factors that contribute to enhancing EI.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study assigned 40 males with opioid use disorder into an intervention group receiving a 2-week EI program (n = 20) and a control group (n = 20). Healthy comparison group (without opioid use disorder) (n = 20) was also included. Measures including the Emotional Intelligence Scale, Personality Inventory for DSM-5, Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), Addiction Severity Index, and Advance Warning of Relapse (AWARE) questionnaire were used to assess the groups at baseline,2 weeks and 3-month follow-up in patients with opioid use disorder.

RESULTS

The healthy group exhibited lower scores on disinhibited personality subscales, maladaptive personality traits, and SCL-90-R subscales than the opioid addiction groups at baseline. The EI intervention group displayed substantial increases in EI subscale scores at the second and third follow-up assessments compared to the control group. At AWARE scale follow-up, all control group patients had relapsed, versus only one patient in the EI intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants with opioid addiction demonstrated lower baseline EI and higher rates of psychiatric symptoms and maladaptive personality traits than healthy group. A brief EI intervention led to significant EI increases and lower relapse rate versus standard treatment alone.

Substance Addiction in Adolescents: Influence of Parenting and Personality Traits

BACKGROUND

Substance use in adolescents has been separately related to personality traits and parental socialization styles; in this study, our objective was to study these variables in an integrated way.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in five institutes in a final sample of 331 students, excluding those with gaming disorder. The sample was stratified into three subgroups: 'no addiction', 'low risk', and 'high risk' of Substance Use Disorders (SUD).

RESULTS

12.9% of the adolescents presented a low risk of SUD, while 18.3% showed a high risk, with both being older (F = 9.16; p < 0.001) than the no addiction group. Adolescents with high risk scored lower in control and structure variables and higher in maternal and paternal indifference factors. Non-addicted subjects presented higher scores in conscientiousness, extraversion, and agreeableness and lower scores in neuroticism. The probability of SUD increased with age (OR = 2.187; p = 0.022), sensation seeking (OR = 1.084; p < 0.001), and neuroticism (OR = 1.049; p = 0.042), while conscientiousness was a protective factor (OR = 0.930; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

These results reflect that personality traits are directly related to the development of substance abuse in adolescents.

Emotion regulation in substance use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The ability to regulate emotions effectively has been associated with resilience to psychopathology. Individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) have been shown to have higher levels of negative emotionality, with some evidence suggesting impairment in emotion regulation compared with individuals without SUDs. However, no previous attempt has been made to systematically review the literature to assess the magnitude of this difference. We aimed to assess the association between SUD diagnosis and emotion regulation as measured by the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) through a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing findings.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO and Embase. We examined cross-sectional studies that compared a SUD group with a control group and measured emotion regulation using the DERS or the ERQ. The primary analysis focused on papers using the DERS, as this was the predominant instrument in the literature.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met our primary analysis criteria, representing 1936 individuals with a SUD and 1567 controls. Individuals with SUDs relative to controls had significantly greater DERS scores, with a mean difference of 21.44 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 16.49-26.40, P < 0.001] and Hedges' g = 1.05 (95% CI = 0.86-1.24, P < 0.001). The difference was robust, remaining significant after removing outliers and studies with high risk of bias. Individuals with SUDs demonstrated poorer emotion regulation on each subscale of the DERS, with the largest deficits in the Strategies and Impulse subscales. The ERQ analysis revealed greater use of expressive suppression in those with SUDs relative to controls (Hedges' g = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.25-1.28, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

People with substance use disorders appear to have greater difficulties in emotion regulation than people without substance use disorders.

An Integrated Model of Nature and Nurture Factors that Contribute to Addiction and Recovery

BACKGROUND

In the context of the opioid epidemic and growing awareness of addiction as a public health concern, there are efforts to inform the public, patients, families, and policy makers about the factors that contribute to addiction and facilitate recovery. Several theoretical models provide useful frameworks for this discussion, but each of them has limitations.

OBJECTIVES

This paper presents an accessible yet comprehensive theoretical model that integrates empirical evidence about addiction etiology and recovery using the nature-nurture paradigm.

RESULTS

The model presents substance use along a continuum, and identifies risk and protective factors in multiple domains that have been identified by research. The domains on the nature side of the model include genetic and biological factors, comorbid psychiatric and medical disorders, physiological reinforcement of substance use, and changes to neural mechanisms. The domains on the nurture side of the model include sociocultural factors, environmental factors, personality, emotions, cognitions, psychological reinforcement of substance use, and cognitive and behavioral changes. The progression from increased or decreased substance use to addiction or recovery is mediated by changes in neural mechanisms and cognitive and behavioral changes, which have feedback loops with the physiological and psychological reinforcement.Conclusions/Importance: This model is a useful heuristic, consistent with a public health framework, for discussing addiction and recovery with patients, their families, and the public. This integrated model of nature and nurture factors has the potential to inform clinical practice, consultation, research, prevention programs, educational programs, and public policy.