Minding the (Information) Gap: What do Emerging Adult Adoptees Want to Know about their Birth Parents?

Does the amount of family history matter? Perspectives of adult adoptees

Family history is considered the gold standard for risk assessment of inherited conditions and is often used to inform preventative care. There are currently no provider guidelines that address caring for patients with a lack of family history, and adoptees report inconsistent care because of this. Through this qualitative study, we explored (1) how the amount of family history impacts adoptees' perceptions of healthcare and (2) adoptees' suggestions for improvement of their healthcare. Fourteen adult adoptees participated in semi-structured interviews via telephone or Zoom audio. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis and interpretive phenomenology. Results revealed five themes: adoptees should have access to their family health history; several factors influence the importance of family history (reproduction, identity formation, age, and health concerns); many adoptees use direct-to-consumer testing to gain information about health risks or to find family members; completing history forms or being asked about family health history invokes negative emotions in adoptees; experiences with healthcare providers are variable for adoptees. These results show that unknown family health history can contribute to a negative perception of healthcare. Adoptees perceive family health history as important to know, and not having this information brings up complex emotions in the healthcare setting. To help mitigate the disparities and the negative emotions that adoptees feel, genetic counselors should consider acknowledging the complex emotions, reassuring adoptees with available preventative care, and revising preclinical paperwork, such as family health history questionnaires, to be more inclusive of those who lack this information. These changes have the potential to significantly improve healthcare experiences for adoptees. Healthcare providers, especially genetic counselors, need to continue to learn about and advocate for this population.

Psychological wellbeing in adult adoptees: current age and developmental tasks

Introduction

Studies about adult adoptees are normally focused on the differences in adjustment difficulties between them and non-adoptees. However, there has been less research about adoptees' positive and developmental adjustment in adulthood. The aim of this study is to test a model of the mediating role of adoptees' achievement of adulthood tasks in the relationship between current age and psychological wellbeing.

Materials and methods

The sample consisted of 117 adults who were adopted as children by Spanish families. Their current mean age is 28.3 years. Participants underwent an interview and completed Ryff's Psychological WellBeing Scales.

Results

Findings show that current age is directly and negatively related to psychological wellbeing [c' = -0.039, 95% CI (-0.078, -0.001)], and the relationship between these variables is mediated by adoptees' achievement of adulthood tasks [indirect effect = 0.035, 95% CI (.014, 0.059)].

Discussion

The findings support traditional theories about transitioning to adulthood, and adds relevant information about this transition in adoptees. Moreover, this work indicates a new way of assessing adoption success, based on long-term measures and normative variables. Services providers should account for the importance of supporting young people on their life transitions and promoting their wellbeing, especially among those who started from disadvantaged contexts.

Profiles of Adoptee Adjustment in Young Adulthood

The developmental stage of young adulthood, the period from one's late twenties through thirties, has grown in attention and research focus among general populations. However, little is known about the adjustment of adopted individuals during this phase. The present study sought to expand our understanding of the various patterns of adoptee adjustment in young adulthood. Latent profile analysis was used to identify profiles across eight domains of functioning spanning physical and mental health to relationships, achievement, and engagement. Three profiles were identified, demonstrating varying levels of adult functioning. Adoption related and non-adoption related variables were explored using a series of multinomial logistic regressions to determine which factors differentiated between profiles. It appears that, although some adoption related variables remain significant in young adulthood, non-adoption related variables are more strongly linked to adoptee adjustment at this developmental stage. Implications and future directions for clinical care and research are discussed.

Anonymous birth: Biographical knowledge and dyadic coping in adoptive mothers and fathers

Research on adoptive parents of anonymously born children is still scarce. Open issues are (1) examining how much biographical information is available to adoptive parents, (2) considering differences between adoptive mothers and fathers, and (3) understanding what affects their dyadic coping. Hence, this study set out to compare adoptive mothers’ and fathers’ mental health, attachment styles, dyadic coping, and biographical knowledge, and to identify predictors of dyadic coping. 62 mothers and 40 fathers (mean age: 46 years) raising an anonymously born adoptee answered online or paper-pencil versions of the Brief Symptom Inventory, Vulnerable Attachment Style Questionnaire, Dyadic Coping Inventory, Child Behavior Checklist, and a checklist of biographical data. Descriptive analyses showed that biographical knowledge was generally low in adoptive parents. More information was available on the birth mother than the birth father, with letters being the most common memorial. Furthermore, student t-tests revealed few differences: adoptive mothers reported to be more anxious and rated their ability to communicate stress and common dyadic coping as higher than did adoptive fathers. Finally, a hierarchical linear regression identified knowledge of more biographical data, parents’ older age as well as child’s younger age and higher psychopathology scores as predictors of better adoptive parents’ dyadic coping. These findings highlight the difficult task of gathering biographical information whilst maintaining the birth mother’s anonymity. They also stress the need of further research which may inform policies tailored to the specific needs of adoptive parents in the context of anonymous birth.