Conventional running suture and continuous double loop closure: an experimental study of wound strength

National survey of colorectal surgery units on abdominal wall closure

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to assess the current status and knowledge of the Spanish colorectal surgeons on the wall closure.

METHODS

A single answer questionnaire of 25 closed questions was conducted using specific software for online surveys that was distributed to a cohort of colorectal surgeons.

RESULTS

53 surgeons replied to the survey. The vast majority prefer a closure of the midlaparotomy with a very slow absorbing monofilament (67.92%) continuous suture (96.23%) in a single plane (81.13%). Mass stitches, retention systems, and loop sutures continue to be used. The most commonly used suture gauge was USP 1 (United States Pharmacopeia) (58.49%). The most commonly used needle is with a cylindrical body and a trocar tip. Only 50%, routinely perform wall closure after placement of a trocar equal to or greater than 10 mm. Almost everyone knows the 4:1 rule and thinks it should be applied, but the small bites technique is not performed. 50% would never place a prophylactic prosthesis. The closure is usually performed by the same surgeon who has performed the entire procedure. One out of five confesses not knowing the rate of incisional hernias in his unit.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of consensus and basic knowledge regarding the technical aspects of closure and the prevention of the appearance of incisional hernias. The use of slow absorbing monofilament continuous suture in a single plane seems well accepted.

New suture materials for midline laparotomy closure: an experimental study

Background

Midline laparotomy closure carries a significant risk of incisional hernia. This study examines the behavior of two new suture materials, an elastic material, polyurethane (PUe), and a barbed polydioxanone (PDXb) suture thread in a rabbit model of midline incision closure.

Methods

Three 2-cm midline incisions were made in 68 New Zealand White rabbits. The incisions were closed by running suture using four 3/0 threads: polypropylene (PP) (Surgipro®, Covidien), PUe (Assuplus®, Assut Europe), PDX (Assufil®, Assut Europe) or PDXb (Filbloc®, Assut Europe). Animals in each suture group were euthanized 3 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Histological sections of the tissue-embedded sutures were subjected to morphological, collagen expression, macrophage response and uniaxial tensiometry studies.

Results

No signs of wound dehiscence or complications were observed. At 3 weeks, all sutures were surrounded by connective tissue composed mainly of collagen III. PUe showed greater collagen I expression than the other sutures. All sutures elicited a macrophage response that diminished from 3 weeks to 6 months (p < 0.001). This response was similar for the non-reabsorbable sutures (PP and PUe) yet PDXb showed a significantly greater response than the other reabsorbable suture (PDX) at 3 weeks (p < 0.01). At this early time point, the tensile strength of PUe was similar to that of control intact tissue (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Three weeks after surgery, PUe revealed more collagen I deposition than the remaining materials and this translated to a similar biomechanical behavior to linea alba, that could avoid the appearance of short term dehiscences and thus reduce the incidence of incisional hernia. PDXb provides no additional advantages in their behavior regarding PDX suture.

Long-term outcome study in patients with abdominal wound dehiscence: a comparative study on quality of life, body image, and incisional hernia

OBJECTIVE

Long-term quality of life and body image of patients with abdominal wound dehiscence were assessed.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with abdominal wound dehiscence from a prospectively followed cohort of 967 patients (2007-2009) were reviewed. Patients completed the Short Form 36 quality of life questionnaire and Body Image Questionnaire and participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. For each patient, four controls were matched by age and gender. Analyses were adjusted for age, gender, comorbidity, and follow-up length.

RESULTS

Of the 37 patients with abdominal wound dehiscence, 23 were alive after a mean follow-up of 40 months (range 33-49 months). Nineteen patients developed incisional hernias (83 %). Patients with abdominal wound dehiscence reported significantly lower scores for physical and mental component summaries (p = 0.038, p = 0.013), general health (p = 0.003), mental health (p = 0.011), social functioning (p = 0.002), and change (p = 0.034). No differences were found for physical functioning (p = 0.072), role physical (p = 0.361), bodily pain (p = 0.133), vitality (p = 0.150), and role emotional (p = 0.138). Patients with abdominal wound dehiscence reported lower body image scores (median 16.5 vs. 18, p = 0.087), cosmetic scores (median 13 vs. 16, p = 0.047), and total body image scores (median 30 vs. 34, p = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

At long-term follow-up, patients with abdominal wound dehiscence demonstrated a high incidence of incisional hernia, low body image, and low quality of life.

Re-laparotomy after cesarean section

OBJECTIVE

To assess the rate, indications, and outcome of re-laparotomy after cesarean section in the early postoperative period.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study during a 121-month period.

SETTING

A tertiary care university center.

POPULATION

A cohort of 3380 women who underwent cesarean section out of 18,609 parturients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of re-laparotomy after cesarean section in the early postoperative period.

RESULTS

The incidence of re-laparotomy after cesarean section was 0.53% (18/3380). Of these 18 women, 12 (66%) were operated for hemorrhage, 3 (17%) for eventration, and 3 (17%) for formation of intra-abdominal abscess. Hysterectomy was required in one case (5.5%). We had no maternal mortalities.

CONCLUSION

Although the incidence of re-laparotomy after cesarean in the early postoperative period is low and the outcome is favorable, several measures must be undertaken to reduce the need for re-laparotomy.

Polipropileno frente a polidioxanona: igual eficacia biomecánica en cierres de la línea media

INTRODUCTION

After laparotomy, the incidence of incisional hernia is high, especially when the abdomen in opened along the linea alba, a weak structure of the abdominal wall. This study was designed to evaluate the biomechanical resistance of midline closure using the same surgical technique but two different types of suture material, a long-lasting absorbable material and a non-absorbable material.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 7.5 cm midline laparotomy was performed in 48 New Zealand White rabbits. The surgical wound was then repaired with an en masse running suture using polypropylene 4/0 or polydioxanone 4/0. Animals not subjected to surgery were used as controls. Morphological, immunohistochemical and biomechanical tests were undertaken 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Both types of suture gave rise to scar tissue composed of collagen fibers concentrically arranged around the suture filaments. Six months after surgery, the polydioxanone suture had almost completely degraded. The macrophage response steadily diminished over time, although it was significantly greater in wounds closed by polydioxanone suture. No significant differences were found in the biomechanical strength provided by the two types of suture.

CONCLUSIONS

After laparotomy closure at the linea alba, both suture materials showed optimal biological behavior. The composition of the suture material did not affect the tensile strength of the repair zone.

El cierre de laparotomía en la línea alba

The midline laparotomy is among the most common ways of accessing the peritoneal cavity. This approach is not only used for surgery of the digestive tract but is also extensively applied in vascular, gynecology and urological surgery. When this surgical procedure is conducted in an emergency setting, and depending on the type of surgery (clean and /or contaminated), the incidence of complications may be particularly high, especially when acute dehiscence of the wall occurs (evisceration). Furthermore, the rate of herniation related to midline laparotomy is still high at approximately 16% of cases. Despite efforts to evaluate different suture techniques, suture threads (reabsorbable or non-reabsorbable) and general factors that may interfere with the repair process, the incidence of complications associated with this approach has not been reduced. After multiple studies including meta-analyses, the outcome of laparotomy closure has not essentially improved. We should therefore consider the use of new ways of closing the abdomen in selected patients that might somehow reinforce the surgical wound and notably reduce the incidence of short- and medium-term complications. One such method could perhaps be the use of a biomaterial to support and strengthen conventional sutures.