One-stage lengthening and derotational osteotomy of the femur stabilised with a gamma nail

Leg Length Discrepancy- Treatment Indications and Strategies

BACKGROUND

Many people have leg-length discrepancies of greater or lesser severity. No evidence-based studies on the need for treatment are currently available.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed database, as well as on published recommendations from Germany and abroad and on the authors' own clinical experience.

RESULTS

If the two legs are of different lengths, this is generally because one leg is too short. It is debated whether leg-length discrepancy causes pain or long-term musculoskeletal disturbances. A direct connection to back pain is questionable, but a mildly elevated incidence of knee arthritis seems likely. The evidence base on the indications for treatment of leg-length discrepancy is poor; only informal consensus recommendations are available. There are a wide variety of conservative and surgical treatment options. The final extent of a leg-length discrepancy first noted during the growing years can be estimated with predictive algorithms to within 2 cm. The treatments that can be considered include a shoe insert, a high shoe, or an orthosis, surgically induced slowing of growth by blockade of the epiphyseal plates around the knee joint, or leg lengthening with osteotomy and subsequent distraction of the bone callus with fully implanted or external apparatus. Changes in leg length exert marked mechanical stress on the soft tissues. If the predicted leg-length discrepancy exceeds 5 cm, initial leg-lengthening treatment can already be considered during the patient's growing years.

CONCLUSION

It must be discussed with each patient individually whether the treatment should be conservative or surgical. The extent of the discrepancy is not the sole determining factor for the mode of treatment. The decision to treat is always elective.

Decortication and osteotomy for the correction of multiplanar deformity in the treatment of malunion in adult diaphyseal femoral deformity: a case series and technique description

AIM

To review patients that have undergone correction of a symptomatic femoral malunion using osteotomy combined with decortication.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who have undergone decortication and multiplanar osteotomy, looking at the pre-operative deformity, correction achieved, time to union and complications.

RESULTS

Seven patients underwent correction under the senior author from 2003 to 2012. Average age was 46 years (range 32-60 years). All had femoral shortening deformity (average 2.7 cm, range 2-4 cm). Each also had at least one other plane of deformity with rotation being the next most commonly encountered in 5 out of the 7 (average 33°, range 0°-45°). Two had tri-planar deformity with the five having bi-planar deformity. Average time to union was 16.3 months (range 7-39 months) with an average of 1.5 operations (range 1-3 operations) to union. One patient has a non-union after five corrective operations.

CONCLUSION

Correction of multiplanar deformity of the femur is challenging. Osteotomy with decortication provides a technique to achieve significant femoral multiplanar deformity correction in a single operation. This publication provides technical description of the operative technique, guidance and results.

Neglected femoral diaphyseal fracture

Femoral diaphyseal fractures usually result after trauma of high magnitude and because of this, can be life-threatening injuries or may result in considerable physical disability if not treated with care and caution. Nonoperative treatment of these fractures continues to be popular among the patient population in the Indian subcontinent, which in majority of cases, leads to healing in malalignment, shortening of the limb, chondromalacia patellae, and loss of knee motion. Although the majority of these fractures are being treated by operative methods today, success of the treatment depends largely on the surgeon's familiarity with the procedure or the type of fracture pattern (comminuted or segmental) particularly in a polytraumatized patient. Delayed union and nonunion of femoral-diaphyseal fractures and implant failures usually result after these procedures or the type of injury. The purpose of this study is to discuss various types of neglected femoral diaphyseal fractures and to review the literature on their treatment.