Laparoscopic intragastric resection of gastric leiomyoma close to the cardia using a flexible endocutter intraluminally

Laparoscopic intraluminal surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Intraluminal surgery began with the advent of endoscopy. Endoscopic endoluminal surgery has limitations; and its failure results in conventional open or laparoscopic interventions with increased morbidity. Laparoscopy-assisted intraluminal surgery is a novel alternative to open or laparoscopic surgery for a failed endoscopic endoluminal technique, minimizing the associated complications. Endoscopic resection of early gastric and duodenal cancers is restricted by the limited view of the endoscope, insufficient number of instrument channels, and inability to have adequate margins of resection without risking perforation. These cancers potentially can be treated by laparoscopy-assisted intraluminal surgery without resorting to major gastric or duodenal resection. This procedure is relatively easy to perform and oncologically effective. We present the experience of the Texas Endosurgery Institute (TEI) in treating early gastric and duodenal cancers, including large malignant polyps and carcinoid tumors, with laparoscopy-assisted endoluminal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data for all patients with early gastric and duodenal cancers who underwent laparoscopy-assisted endoluminal surgery at TEI between 1996 and 2007 were prospectively recorded. All of the patients had been referred by the endoscopist as noncandidates for endoscopic resection. We prospectively collected data on preoperative diagnosis, operating time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, histopathology, and recurrence rate. All patients underwent endoluminal port placement under direct visualization after a pneumoperitoneum was established. Operations were performed in conjunction with upper endoscopy for assistance with port placement under endoluminal visualization, insufflation, and specimen retrieval. After the intraluminal portion of the operation was completed, the endoluminal port sites were closed with laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing.

RESULTS

From 1996 to 2007, a total of 12 patients underwent laparoscopic endoluminal surgery. All cases were completed successfully, including 5 resections of early gastric cancer (stage I), 3 wedge resections of carcinoid tumor, 2 resections of duodenal adenocarcinoma, and 2 resections of a malignant polyp at the gastroesophagic junction; all the cases were completed with disease-free margins. No recurrence of the original pathology have been reported, and the complications were minimal.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic intraluminal surgery for early gastric and duodenal cancer is a feasible alternative to open conventional therapies; and it is associated with a lower incidence of incisional hernia formation and a lower infection rate.

Laparoscopic resection of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors located in the upper stomach

BACKGROUND

The treatment strategy for a gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor located close to the esophagogastric junction remains controversial. The authors evaluate the criteria indicating that a gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor is suitable for laparoscopic resection and assess the surgical techniques on the basis of clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The criteria specified a tumor more than 2 cm in diameter or a tendency for it to increase in size during the follow-up period. For eight patients in whom the tumor was located within 3 cm of the esophagogastric junction, an intragastric laparoscopic approach was used, whereas for seven patients in whom the tumor was further from the esophagogastric junction, an exogastric approach was used.

RESULTS

In all 15 cases, the laparoscopic resection was successful, with no complications. The intragastric group had a mean maximal tumor size of 2.9 cm, a mean operation time of 168 min, and a mean postoperative hospital stay of 8.8 days, whereas these values in the exogastric group, were respectively, 3.9 cm, 121 min (p = 0.0442), and 9.6 days. There were no recurrences in either group during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The good clinical outcomes suggest hat the criteria used as an indication for laparoscopic resection and the surgical techniques applied were appropriate for the resection of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors.

Technical considerations in laparoscopic resection of gastric neoplasms

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the use of different laparoscopic approaches in the management of gastric neoplasms based on tumor type and location.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of seven patients (3 men and 4 women) with 11 gastric lesions who were referred to our facility between March 2000 and October 2001 for laparoscopic excision of gastric neoplasms.

RESULTS

Two patients had gastrointestinal stromal lesions (3 lesions); two patients had hyperplastic polyps (3 lesions); one patient had carcinoid tumor (2 lesions); one patient had a carcinoma in situ and an adenoma; and one patient had an ectopic pancreas. Extraluminal laparoscopic wedge resection was used in four patients with lesions at the anterior gastric wall or along the lesser or greater curvature. Intragastric excision was used in two patients with small posterior wall lesions, and a transgastrotomy approach was used in one patient with a posterior wall lesion that could not be removed by the intragastric approach. All the lesions were completely excised with clear margins. The median hospital stay was 3 days. Complications developed in two patients. One patient presented with a perforated ulcer 2 weeks after surgery, and a second patient had postoperative pyloric edema that resolved with conservative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of different laparoscopic approaches based on gastric neoplasm type and location facilitates tumor access and resection.