Instrumental support to facilitate hepatitis C treatment adherence: working around shortfalls in shared-care

Qualitative analysis of the barriers and facilitators influencing uptake of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in a primary healthcare environment

Historical interferon and ribavirin therapies for hepatitis C virus have been replaced by modern treatments with improved efficacy and tolerability. Despite the availability of direct-acting antiviral therapy, evidence demonstrates poor uptake in Australia. Presently, the barriers and facilitators influencing uptake of direct-acting antiviral therapy are not fully understood, especially in a primary healthcare environment. Our study aimed to discover methods of improving uptake of treatment in the community. We conducted 15 semi-structured, face-to-face interviews in a metropolitan, primary healthcare clinic in Australia. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and subsequently analysed using thematic content analysis. We identified patient-related and healthcare system-related barriers and facilitators to commencing treatment. This included established themes from current literature, and novel themes unique to direct-acting antiviral therapy and primary care. Overall, our study reinforces the importance of public health campaigns to promote community awareness and emphasises the concomitant role of mental health in fostering treatment uptake. Informed by our findings, we suggest further research on an integrated model of care, focused on the domains of disease awareness, patient engagement and treatment adherence. Hence, a community-oriented approach, driven by primary healthcare, ultimately underpins a successful public strategy to improve outcomes for patients affected by hepatitis C.

Impact of Nursing Interventions on Medication Adherence During Hepatitis C Treatment: State of the Science

This article is a literature review to determine the state of the science regarding the impact of nursing interventions in the treatment of hepatitis C. Hepatitis C is a chronic disease impacting millions of people globally. Treatment is currently available that has the potential to cure the disease. Medication adherence is vital to the eradication of the disease. Nursing interventions could possibly assist in the improvement in medication adherence. By reviewing the literature, the factors influencing patient outcomes were identified. Four themes identified in the literature are influence of comorbidities, self-motivation, psychological factors, and provider support. The research studies are compared and contrasted within and across the themes. Identification of what is known and what is not known about nursing interventions in the treatment of hepatitis C is illustrated in the conclusion of the article. Finally, suggestions for future research are presented. Specific areas of study are identified for focus in the future research.

Building a Hepatitis C Clinical Program: Strategies to Optimize Outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

An increasing number of specialists and non-specialists are developing clinical programs to treat and cure hepatitis C virus (HCV). The goal of this paper is to evaluate and describe optimal strategies to improve outcomes related to HCV care delivery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Screening and diagnosis of HCV should be guided by established recommendations. Given the recognized disparity in HCV diagnosis and linkage to care, a multi-modal approach involving care coordination and technology resources should be used to improve patient engagement. Access to HCV treatment may be optimized through systematic documentation, prior authorization, and appeal processes. Treatment monitoring should emphasize medication adherence, side effect and drug interaction management, as well as elimination of practical barriers. Finally, post-treatment engagement to promote liver health and reduce the risk of complications or reinfection maximizes the benefit of HCV treatment.

SUMMARY

The landscape of HCV treatment has evolved from a specialist-driven model with few patients qualifying for treatment to an opportunity for non-specialists and other providers to provide curative therapies in most patients. Innovative practice models that employ a multidisciplinary approach will likely improve screening, diagnosis, engagement, and treatment outcomes.

Caring and curing: Considering the effects of hepatitis C pharmaceuticalisation in relation to non-clinical treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND

The development of simplified and effective hepatitis C (HCV) pharmaceuticals enables treatment scale up among the most marginalised. This potentiates a promise of viral elimination at the population level but also individual level clinical and non-clinical benefits. Reports of transformative non-clinical outcomes, such as changes in self-worth and substance use, are primarily associated with arduous interferon-based treatments that necessitate intensive care relationships. We consider the implications of simplified treatment provision in the era of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) for the realisation of non-clinical benefits.

METHODS

We draw on qualitative data from ethnographic observations and longitudinal interviews with people receiving (n = 22) and providing (n = 10) HCV treatment in London during a transition in HCV biomedicine. First generation DAAs in conjunction with interferon were standard of care for most of this time, with the promise of simplified treatment provision on the horizon.

FINDINGS

Patient accounts of care accentuate the transformative value of interferon-based HCV treatment derived through non-clinical benefits linked to identity and lifestyle change. Such care is constituted as extending beyond the virus and its biomedical effects, with nurse specialists positioned as vital to this care being realised. Provider accounts emphasise the increased pharmaceuticalisation of HCV treatment; whereby care shifts from the facilitation of therapeutic relationships to pharmaceutical access.

CONCLUSION

HCV care in the interferon-era affords identity transformations for those receiving and providing treatment. Biomedical promise linked to the increasing pharmaceuticalisation of HCV treatment has disruptive potential, shifting how care is practised and potentially the realisation of non-clinical treatment outcomes.

Listening to both sides: A qualitative comparison between patients with hepatitis C and their healthcare professionals' perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to hepatitis C treatment adherence and completion

This qualitative study compares and contrasts the perspectives of healthcare professionals who treat hepatitis C with those of patients in treatment. Comparative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 20 healthcare professionals and 20 patients undergoing treatment for hepatitis C concluded that patients and healthcare professionals disagreed on the source of communication breakdowns, but both felt that individualised clinical information improved adherence. Stigma was recognised as a barrier to treatment adherence by both patients and healthcare professionals. Limitations of the healthcare system, such as patients receiving inconsistent information and long wait times, negatively impacted both patients and providers.

Adherence to treatment of chronic hepatitis C: from interferon containing regimens to interferon and ribavirin free regimens

Patients' experience during treatment may affect treatment adherence. Our aim was to assess the impact of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) on adherence to different anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) regimens.Clinical, demographic, and PRO data (short form-36 [SF-36], chronic liver disease questionnaire-hepatitis C version [CLDQ-HCV], functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue [FACIT-F], work productivity and activity impairment: specific health problem [WPAI:SHP]) from 13 multinational clinical trials of anti-HCV treatment were available. Treatment adherence was defined as >80% of prescribed doses taken.Included were 4825 HCV patients. Regimens were grouped into: interferon- and ribavirin (RBV)-containing (±sofosbuvir [SOF]), interferon-free RBV-containing (RBV + SOF ± ledipasvir [LDV]), and interferon-free RBV-free (LDV/SOF). The adherence to these regimens were 77.6%, 84.3%, and 96.2%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Nonadherent patients were more likely to be unemployed and to have a greater PRO impairment at baseline (up to -5.3% lower PRO scores, P < 0.0001). During treatment with interferon- or RBV-based regimens, nonadherent patients experienced lower PROs and had larger decrements from their baseline PRO scores. In contrast, there were no significant declines in PRO scores (all P > 0.05) for the small number of patients who were nonadherent to LDV/SOF. In multivariate analysis, being treatment-naive, longer treatment duration, and receiving an interferon- or RBV-containing regimen were associated with a lower likelihood of adherence (all P < 0.003). Better baseline and on-treatment PRO scores were associated with a higher likelihood of adherence to interferon and RBV.The use of interferon and/or RBV, longer duration of treatment, and lower baseline and on-treatment PRO scores were linked to a decreased likelihood of being adherent to interferon + RBV-containing or interferon-free RBV-containing antiviral regimens. Interferon- and RBV-free regimens were associated with excellent adherence.

Listening to both sides: A qualitative comparison between patients with hepatitis C and their healthcare professionals' perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to hepatitis C treatment adherence and completion

This qualitative study compares and contrasts the perspectives of healthcare professionals who treat hepatitis C with those of patients in treatment. Comparative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 20 healthcare professionals and 20 patients undergoing treatment for hepatitis C concluded that patients and healthcare professionals disagreed on the source of communication breakdowns, but both felt that individualised clinical information improved adherence. Stigma was recognised as a barrier to treatment adherence by both patients and healthcare professionals. Limitations of the healthcare system, such as patients receiving inconsistent information and long wait times, negatively impacted both patients and providers.