Spatial neglect in a patient with logopenic progressive aphasia

Atypical Alzheimer's disease: new insights into an overlapping spectrum between the language and visual variants

Overlap between language and visual variants of atypical Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been reported. However, the extent, frequency of overlap, and its neuroanatomical underpinnings remain unclear. Eighty-two biomarker-confirmed AD patients who presented with either predominant language (n = 34) or visuospatial/perceptual (n = 48) deficits underwent detailed clinical examinations, MRI, and [18F]flortaucipir-PET. Subgroups were defined based on language/visual testing and patterns of volume loss and tau uptake were assessed. 28% of the language group had visual dysfunction (marked in 8%), and 47% of the visual group had language impairment (marked in 26%). Progressive involvement of the parieto-occipital and frontal lobes was noted with greater visual impairment in the language group, and greater left parieto-temporal and frontal involvement with worsening language impairment in the visual group. Only 25% of our cohort showed a pure language or visual presentation, highlighting the high frequency of syndromic overlap in atypical AD and the diagnostic challenge of categorical phenotyping.

Understanding the multidimensional cognitive deficits of logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia

The logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia is characterized by early deficits in language production and phonological short-term memory, attributed to left-lateralized temporoparietal, inferior parietal and posterior temporal neurodegeneration. Despite patients primarily complaining of language difficulties, emerging evidence points to performance deficits in non-linguistic domains. Temporoparietal cortex, and functional brain networks anchored to this region, are implicated as putative neural substrates of non-linguistic cognitive deficits in logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia, suggesting that degeneration of a shared set of brain regions may result in co-occurring linguistic and non-linguistic dysfunction early in the disease course. Here, we provide a Review aimed at broadening the understanding of logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia beyond the lens of an exclusive language disorder. By considering behavioural and neuroimaging research on non-linguistic dysfunction in logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia, we propose that a significant portion of multidimensional cognitive features can be explained by degeneration of temporal/inferior parietal cortices and connected regions. Drawing on insights from normative cognitive neuroscience, we propose that these regions underpin a combination of domain-general and domain-selective cognitive processes, whose disruption results in multifaceted cognitive deficits including aphasia. This account explains the common emergence of linguistic and non-linguistic cognitive difficulties in logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia, and predicts phenotypic diversification associated with progression of pathology in posterior neocortex.

Establishing two principal dimensions of cognitive variation in logopenic progressive aphasia

Logopenic progressive aphasia is a neurodegenerative syndrome characterized by sentence repetition and naming difficulties arising from left-lateralized temporoparietal atrophy. Clinical descriptions of logopenic progressive aphasia largely concentrate on profiling language deficits, however, accumulating evidence points to the presence of cognitive deficits even on tasks with minimal language demands. Although non-linguistic cognitive deficits in logopenic progressive aphasia are thought to scale with disease severity, patients at discrete stages of language dysfunction display overlapping cognitive profiles, suggesting individual-level variation in cognitive performance, independent of primary language dysfunction. To address this issue, we used principal component analysis to decompose the individual-level variation in cognitive performance in 43 well-characterized logopenic progressive aphasia patients who underwent multi-domain neuropsychological assessments and structural neuroimaging. The principal component analysis solution revealed the presence of two, statistically independent factors, providing stable and clinically intuitive explanations for the majority of variance in cognitive performance in the syndrome. Factor 1 reflected 'speech production and verbal memory' deficits which typify logopenic progressive aphasia. Systematic variations were also confirmed on a second, orthogonal factor mainly comprising visuospatial and executive processes. Adopting a case-comparison approach, we further demonstrate that pairs of patients with comparable Factor 1 scores, regardless of their severity, diverge considerably on visuo-executive test performance, underscoring the inter-individual variability in cognitive profiles in comparably 'logopenic' patients. Whole-brain voxel-based morphometry analyses revealed that speech production and verbal memory factor scores correlated with left middle frontal gyrus, while visuospatial and executive factor scores were associated with grey matter intensity of right-lateralized temporoparietal, middle frontal regions and their underlying white matter connectivity. Importantly, logopenic progressive aphasia patients with poorer visuospatial and executive factor scores demonstrated greater right-lateralized temporoparietal and frontal atrophy. Our findings demonstrate the inherent variation in cognitive performance at an individual- and group-level in logopenic progressive aphasia, suggesting the presence of a genuine co-occurring cognitive impairment that is statistically independent of language function and disease severity.

Setting the midpoint of sentences: The role of the left hemisphere

The human brain has a remarkable capacity to focus processing resources based on the features and the relevance of the task at hand. The two cerebral hemispheres contribute differentially to this capacity, with the left hemisphere linguistic and right hemisphere visuo-spatial abilities each offering unique contributions. For example, previous research has established that healthy participants set the subjective mid-point of written sentences more leftwards of center, compared to unpronounceable letter strings or simple lines. Remarkably, patients with right hemisphere damage exhibiting unilateral spatial neglect also show this pattern, even though, as well known in the literature, they tend toward a rightward- bias for non-linguistic stimuli. This evidence suggests that the leftward bias for sentential material is due to linguistic, mainly left-hemisphere mediated processes, which are largely unimpaired in right brain-damaged patients, and intact in heathy participants. To test this hypothesis, we compared sentence bisection performance to that of letter strings and simple lines in left brain-damaged patients (with and without aphasia). If the larger leftward bias in the bisection of sentential material is based on linguistic processes, then the left brain-damaged patients should show a reduction or absence of a leftward bias in sentence bisection. We tested twenty-four left brain-damaged patients (12 with aphasia and 12 without aphasia), and 24 age-matched elderly participants (patients and controls were all right-handed). Participants were asked to bisect 240 stimuli, comprising: (i) affirmative and interrogative clauses, (ii) sentences with lexical and syntactic violations, (iii) letter strings and (iv) simple lines. As predicted, neurologically intact participants showed larger leftward biases in bisecting written readable sentences compared to strings of letters. In contrast, the left hemispheredamaged patients (both with and without aphasia) showed no differences in bisecting sentences and letter strings or lines. These findings indicate that the larger leftward bias exhibited by healthy participants in the bisection of sentences is likely due to ortho-phonological coding taking place implicitly during the bisection task. This ortho-phonological coding is impaired with left brain damage - also in absence of apparent aphasia - leading to the left hemispheredamaged patients showing a reduced leftward bias in sentence bisection. These findings support the hypothesis that the leftward bias in the bisection of written sentences is the result of ortho-phonological influences rather than visual-spatial biases.

Patterns of Neuropsychological Dysfunction and Cortical Volume Changes in Logopenic Aphasia

BACKGROUND

Neuropsychological assessment can add essential information to the characterization of individuals presenting with the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA).

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the neuropsychological characteristics of lvPPA patients. We also examined differences in regional and whole brain atrophy based on neuropsychological profiles.

METHODS

We conducted a hierarchical cluster analysis on memory, executive functioning, and visuospatial neuropsychological test data for 56 individuals with lvPPA. We then compared resultant clusters to left middle temporal, inferior parietal, and superior parietal regions-of-interest using multivariate analysis of covariance. We also performed voxel-level analyses.

RESULTS

We identified three clusters characterized as lvPPA with no neurocognitive impairment (n = 5), lvPPA with mild neurocognitive deficits (n = 23), and lvPPA with marked cognitive deficits (n = 28). WAB-AQ was associated with left middle temporal volume. Superior parietal volumes were smaller for the lvPPA group with marked cognitive symptoms compared to the less severe groups. Voxel-level analyses showed greater atrophy in temporal, parietal, lateral occipital, and frontal regions, left worse than right. Age, disease duration, gender, WAB-AQ, and PiB-PET did not account for differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LvPPA patients without cognitive deficits in other domains were relatively uncommon while 50% of our sample exhibited pronounced neurocognitive deficits outside the language domain. Pronounced cognitive deficits in lvPPA are associated with widespread atrophy, left worse than right. Our study underscores the importance of examining neuropsychological function in addition to language in patients with lvPPA.

Varying Degrees of Temporoparietal Hypometabolism on FDG-PET Reveal Amyloid-Positive Logopenic Primary Progressive Aphasia is not a Homogeneous Clinical Entity

BACKGROUND

The logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) manifests due to a breakdown of the language network with prominent hypometabolism of the left temporoparietal region. LvPPA is strongly associated with amyloid deposition, yet there is question as to whether it is a homogeneous clinical entity.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether differences in temporoparietal metabolic patterns on 18F fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) could elucidate brain regions preferentially affected in lvPPA.

METHOD

We used differences in FDG-PET metabolic z-scores relative to controls for means of left lateral temporal, left inferior parietal, and left superior parietal regions to classify 53 amyloid-positive lvPPA patients into temporal, parietal, or temporoparietal predominate groups. Clinical features and FDG-PET regions of hypometabolism outside of the temporoparietal region were then compared across the three groups; the latter using statistical parametric mapping.

RESULTS

Of the 53 lvPPA patients, 15 were classified as temporal, 14 as temporoparietal, and 22 as parietal predominate. There were no significant differences between the groups on demographic measures, language evaluation, or apolipoprotein E genotype. Compared to the other two groups, individuals with the parietal predominate pattern had extensive hypometabolism in left frontal lobe and the precuneus. Furthermore, this group had greater behavioral dyscontrol and deficits in executive function, visuospatial skills, visual memory retention, working memory, and cognitive flexibility (Bonferronip < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that there is clinical heterogeneity within amyloid-positive lvPPA. Patients with lvPPA with predominant parietal hypometabolism, unlike those with temporal or temporoparietal predominant hypometabolism, demonstrated widespread cognitive and behavioral changes.