Increasing condom usage for African-American and hispanic young fathers in a community based intervention

[Effectiveness of structural interventions to promote condom use in adolescents and young people: Systematic Review]

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the effectiveness of structural or multicomponent interventions aimed at increasing the use of condoms in adolescents and young adults, identifying the strategies that form the interventions evaluated, and recognizing the theoretical models that support these interventions.

METHODOLOGY

Design: Systematic review of literature. Data source: MEDLINE databases were consulted via OVID, Embase, and CENTRAL in order to search for studies on interventions aimed at increasing the use of condoms in adolescents and young adults. Selection of studies: A total of 7 primary investigations were selected, in which the effect of a structured or multicomponent intervention to increase the use of condoms in adolescents and young adults was evaluated. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane bias risk assessment.

RESULTS

Five investigations show changes in the percentages of condom use with values between 53% and 68%. The interventions targeted guided their actions more at individual level with strategies such as sexual health education, reproductive health counseling, knowledge about the condom, knowledge about STIs / HIV, than at organizational and environ-mental levels, which were aimed at the provision of condoms. The theoretical models proposed in the studies are focused on human behavior, individual behavior, and social learning.

CONCLUSION

Structural interventions that aim to increase the use of condoms in adolescents and young adults seem to show significant changes at individual level, but possible changes generated at both organization and environment levels are unknown.

African-American, Puerto-Rican, and Other Hispanic Fathers' Differential Responses to a Parenting Intervention

Despite the recognized importance of fathers to children's well-being, there is a lack of research exploring the impact of parenting interventions on young fathers. Further, little work has been done to identify whether fatherhood interventions differentially benefit specific subgroups of fathers, including Hispanic subgroups.This research examines a 15-week fatherhood intervention for African American, Puerto Rican, and non-Puerto Rican Hispanic young fathers. Data were collected from 312 fathers ages 15-24 at baseline, post-intervention (15 weeks), and at 8 months, 12 months, and 16 months post-baseline follow-up. Latent growth models were used to examine differential shapes of change for the three groups. Results suggest different intervention responses across the three groups on risky parenting attitudes, African American fathers in the study indicated more risky parenting attitudes than Hispanic and Puerto Rican fathers. The practice and research implications of disaggregating data for minority fathers, particularly for Latino subgroups, are discussed.